The Germans expressed their attitude to the Nord Stream-2

30

In Germany, a public opinion poll was conducted, the purpose of which was to find out the attitude of the Germans towards Russia and its policy in Europe in general and to Nord Stream-2 in particular. The survey was conducted by the Forsa Sociological Institute.

According to the study, 77 percent of respondents voted for Nord Stream-2, and 86 percent voted against Washington’s unilateral sanctions. For the intensification of relations with the Russian Federation, 55 percent of the inhabitants of the Federal Republic of Germany spoke out, 28 - against, and 17 percent found it difficult to answer.



The survey was conducted from March 16 to March 19, and about a thousand residents of Germany participated in it.

On December 20 last year, the US president signed a decree on the defense budget, which explicitly spoke about imposing sanctions on countries and companies participating in Nord Stream-2, after which the Swiss company Allseas was forced to terminate its cooperation with Russia. The Russian Federation will have to carry out the necessary work itself, for which the Akademik Chersky vessel, which is approaching Europe, is involved.

Many residents of Germany consider the sanctions against the Nord Stream to be incorrect and have nothing to do with logic, since this project is beneficial both for Europe in general and for Germany in particular.
  • gazprom.com
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Arkharov
    Arkharov
    -10
    April 8 2020 18: 08
    In 2003, forsa was charged with data manipulation in a survey on tuition fees for higher education authorized by the College Development Center (für Hochschulentwicklung Center) co-founded by the Bertelsmann Foundation. According to the statement of results, the majority of students (59%) and the population (67%) stated in November 2003 that they would accept tuition fees if they directly benefited educational institutions and could be financed through loans. The College Development Center announced these results in a December 2003 press release, and they were reported in the press. But later that month, a spokesperson for the Center indirectly admitted that the defendants were only given the choice of a solution between the three models of tuition fees, rather than rejecting them completely.
    In 2007, forsa was accused on the NachDenkSeiten political website of being implicated through the manipulation of a survey in the campaign by the organizational organization Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft (Initiative for the New Social Market Economy) for introducing private health insurance.
    Forsa was a market research firm involved in the 2009 public relations scandal regarding the German Bahn. Surveys with leading questions that led to the results, showing a disapproval of the 2007 strike of drivers and approval of the privatization of the railway, were secretly funded by German Bahn.

    http://ru.knowledgr.com/07033104/ИнститутForsa
    1. Astronaut
      Astronaut
      +5
      April 8 2020 18: 13
      Arkharov has long been accused of manipulating data, and he scribbles everything and scribbled wink
      1. Arkharov
        Arkharov
        -9
        April 8 2020 19: 03
        Who is blaming? Are you just really not happy?
      2. Fourth Horseman
        Fourth Horseman
        +1
        April 9 2020 15: 07
        He has such a job.
    2. Dear sofa expert.
      Dear sofa expert.
      -1
      April 9 2020 15: 51
      AND? Prove the guilt?)
    3. Dear sofa expert.
      Dear sofa expert.
      0
      April 9 2020 16: 01
      Minus set, because you do not know the answer?)
  2. Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev
    +2
    April 9 2020 00: 53
    And not tired of the Germans? Everybody expresses every week, according to the media. And they look into their mouths: what has now been said ...
    1. Dear sofa expert.
      Dear sofa expert.
      +1
      April 9 2020 16: 01
      What would you understand?)
  3. dubovitskiy.1947
    dubovitskiy.1947
    +1
    April 9 2020 01: 22
    Quote: Arkharov
    In 2003, forsa was charged with data manipulation in a survey on tuition fees for higher education authorized by the College Development Center (für Hochschulentwicklung Center), co-founded by the Bertelsmann Foundation. According to the statement of results, the majority of students (59%) and the population (67%) stated in November 2003 that they would accept tuition fees if they directly benefited educational institutions and could be financed through loans. The College Development Center announced these results in a December 2003 press release, and they were reported in the press. But later that month, a spokesperson for the Center indirectly admitted that defendants were only given the choice of a solution between the three models of tuition fees, rather than rejecting them completely.
    In 2007, forsa was accused on the NachDenkSeiten political website of being implicated through the manipulation of a survey in the campaign by the organizational organization Neue Soziale Marktwirtschaft (Initiative for the New Social Market Economy) for introducing private health insurance.
    Forsa was a market research firm involved in the 2009 public relations scandal regarding the German Bahn. Surveys with leading questions that led to the results, showing a disapproval of the 2007 strike of drivers and approval of the privatization of the railway, were secretly funded by German Bahn.

    http://ru.knowledgr.com/07033104/ИнститутForsa

    This ...... can not provide other data that refute the survey, but it can.
    In other words - without arguing with the author, citing facts, figures, and other documents, but accusing him of ..... That’s what outright bastards do.
    1. Arkharov
      Arkharov
      -8
      April 9 2020 08: 27
      Just bring for information and reflection publicly available information.
      1. Dear sofa expert.
        Dear sofa expert.
        +1
        April 9 2020 16: 02
        Information is not talking about anything. You bring the results of the charges.
  4. dubovitskiy.1947
    dubovitskiy.1947
    +4
    April 9 2020 01: 24
    Quote: Arkharov
    Who is blaming? Are you just really not happy?

    Where is the truth, argali? Give me the numbers. disproving survey data, do not blame the author.
    Will I be right, instead of proving otherwise, by reasoning, I will call you a prostitute? And, because you are doing just that, calling the author a liar. Prove it.
    1. Arkharov
      Arkharov
      -9
      April 9 2020 08: 29
      Once again, no one in this particular survey didn’t call anyone a liar. These are your fantasies. But the above data are available for public use, the link is given, so that everyone draws conclusions for himself, if there is, what to do?
  5. Martial Artist
    Martial Artist
    +4
    April 9 2020 02: 21
    The Russian SP-2 is beneficial for Germany and Europe, but disadvantageous for the United States due to the fact that they need to sell their shale gas to equalize their trade balance because it has a negative value and therefore the United States is forced to borrow money from the Fed and already owe him $ 24 trillion, that is, Americans live on credit, like all Europeans in Europe, who boast that they have a high per capita income ...
    If we take away their debts, then Americans and Europeans have negative per capita income, while Russians have positive per capita, but Americans and Europeans do not consider their debts in this indicator to make it appear that they earn and work well, therefore they live so prosperously and comfortably , but in fact, Americans and Europeans are ordinary dependents (parasites) on the neck of Russians, Chinese, and other producer nations.
    1. T. Hanks
      T. Hanks
      -2
      April 9 2020 08: 29
      Warrior, all the gyruses have wandered! This is about am. debt. Everyone is talking about him, but no one has seen. And $ buy and buy. Where is the truth, friend? In my understanding, if you took a loan from a wife for cognac, then anyway you won’t give it back, no matter how much you say that with bestowal. And then repeat again. Maybe with amer debt as well?
      1. Dear sofa expert.
        Dear sofa expert.
        +1
        April 10 2020 13: 07
        But the truth, “friend”, is that you don’t even know that dollars are really different. There are dollars for domestic consumption. They are provided with a “product”, but there is one for the outside .. that they print by turning on the machine. Accordingly, there are two debts. External and internal. Yes, the US domestic debt is less than external, but it is.
        US public debt structure as of January 2019: Total public debt: 21 billion; Debt to various persons: 959 billion; Domestic debt: 16 billion. And this is a monstrous amount.
        If Americans by virtue of their strength (tautology))) can "forgive" the external debt, then everything is much more complicated with the internal. If you have a desire to participate here on the same level as other participants, engage in self-education. Sometimes it helps)
        1. T. Hanks
          T. Hanks
          0
          April 10 2020 17: 29
          No need to be rude. Kohl discussion, then the arguments lead. About Fin and the Finance Ministry a little, but I know. And about where it comes from and where it goes too. Better culturally debate. And Brother-2 watch.
    2. mor7d
      mor7d
      -7
      April 9 2020 09: 31
      Americans live in debt, like all Europeans

      they have a high per capita income

      If we take away their debts, then the Americans and Europeans have a negative per capita income, and the Russians have a positive

      I did not read further, laughter turning into a homeric laughter.
      1. Martial Artist
        Martial Artist
        +1
        April 9 2020 22: 33
        Laughing for no reason is a sign of fooling around.

        - Russian proverb for Russian liberals (Jews).
        1. Arkharov
          Arkharov
          -2
          April 10 2020 07: 58
          Is it necessary to add about the Jews (in parentheses)? Does this also apply to other liberals, or Jews - not liberals? With whom you, "warrior", are fighting, it seems, with your already not very healthy brain.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Martial Artist
            Martial Artist
            0
            April 11 2020 00: 43
            Because in Russia all liberals are Jews, that's why I am adding this Russian feature .... But in other countries ... I don’t know about it.
            1. Arkharov
              Arkharov
              -1
              April 11 2020 07: 33
              In general, do you know anything else, from any areas? And who do you think are liberals?
              And do you think being a liberal is bad?
  6. mor7d
    mor7d
    -7
    April 9 2020 09: 24
    The Germans expressed their attitude to the Nord Stream-2

    The Germans do not care, through Ukraine or not through Ukraine, Russians pump gas to them. But if they are told that this flow was done in spite of the Ukrainians, the Germans will not understand this at all, from their point of view, this is such nonsense.
    1. Dear sofa expert.
      Dear sofa expert.
      +2
      April 9 2020 15: 56
      What makes you think that they did it to spite someone? SP-2 was made in addition to SP-1, as Dutch gas ends. SP-1 alone will not cope. In addition, not only Russian but also Scandinavian gas will go along SP-2 ... do the Scandinavians also sell their gas to Ukraine in spite of them?
    2. Dear sofa expert.
      Dear sofa expert.
      +3
      April 9 2020 15: 57
      You straight put Ukraine in the center of the world. Nafig nobody needs her, and even more so the Germans. The Germans have enough of their national interests.
    3. Dear sofa expert.
      Dear sofa expert.
      0
      April 9 2020 18: 26
      Except, how to put a minus sign, there is nothing to answer?)
  7. dubovitskiy.1947
    dubovitskiy.1947
    0
    April 10 2020 00: 47
    Quote: Arkharov
    Once again, no one in this particular survey didn’t call anyone a liar. These are your fantasies. But the above data are available for public use, the link is given, so that everyone draws conclusions for himself, if there is, what to do?

    Read your words. There, in every line about this.
    1. Arkharov
      Arkharov
      -3
      April 10 2020 08: 00
      Listen there my word is not a single. How did it seem that he left the poultry farm with nothing more to do?
      1. The comment was deleted.
  8. Anatoly Gritsenko
    Anatoly Gritsenko
    +1
    April 10 2020 14: 51
    1000 people the respondents - yes it does not mean anything!
  9. dubovitskiy.1947
    dubovitskiy.1947
    +1
    April 16 2020 14: 19
    Quote: Arkharov
    Listen there my word is not a single. How did it seem that he left the poultry farm with nothing more to do?

    How to climb a mountain, you can’t get down, and you shine? Like Father Fedor, in a famous story.