The Telegraph: Russia could take advantage of UK vulnerability

12

The UK, like many other countries, has been confronted with the COVID-19 pandemic, and the severity of the country's situation is compounded by the fact that even Prime Minister Boris Johnson went to the hospital with coronavirus. British The Telegraph is concerned that some unfriendly countries may take advantage of the UK vulnerability.

In light of this, a number of British media raise the question of how reliably the shores of the "Foggy Albion" are protected from potential enemies, and whether the state’s security systems are defenseless against possible attacks from countries such as Russia, China or Iran.



As soon as Johnson became aware of the transfer to St. Thomas’s intensive care unit on Monday, emergency protocols were put in place to guarantee Her Majesty’s government’s responsibility for the possible use of nuclear forces of some 200 warheads.

Nuclear deterrence, according to British experts, is an effective measure of convincing Russia that Britain is able to take care of its security. In addition, the Royal Navy stands guard over the interests of the country, which last month was forced to monitor seven Russian warships that were suspiciously active in the English Channel and the North Sea.

Great Britain is also trying hard to resist the attempts of the "rogue countries", and Russia in particular, to destabilize the world situation with the help of fake News and inaccurate information about the coronavirus, as well as about the situation with the disease within the Russian Federation itself, which prevents British scientists from receiving true information about this disease and creating an effective medicine.
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    April 9 2020 09: 19
    Russia may take advantage of UK vulnerability

    After the case of the Skripals, when a dangerous OM was brought into the territory of England, I would doubt it for a second.
    1. +1
      April 9 2020 09: 35
      I’m not very strong in history, but as far as I remember, all the last clashes were exactly the opposite ... The Crimean War, the intervention in the Civil ... are there opposite examples?
      1. -4
        April 9 2020 09: 39
        Crimean War

        These events were more than a hundred years ago, better let's remember, and who and where invaded in the last twenty years.
        1. GRF
          +3
          April 9 2020 09: 49
          Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria, Iraq?
          Or is it not us, is it - NATO ...

          If one NATO country, stingy, accidentally bites, then you need to destroy everyone (according to Article 5). (Infectious rabies, like, is treated like that).
          1. -8
            April 9 2020 10: 08
            Afghanistan

            The USSR started this whole booth that cannot end so far

            Югославия

            NATO stopped the war, which lasted 10 years. You would like more, but ... did not burn out.

            Libya

            The people rebelled against the cruel dictator.

            Syria

            This is generally for you and Iran. Americans fought against the British with the British, yes, it was.

            Iraq

            Iraq began aggression in Kuwait, they did not forget, and then Saddam poisoned the OB of the Kurds. Do you remember? Not? Well, they probably didn’t tell you this on TV.
            1. GRF
              +2
              April 9 2020 11: 09
              Of course, it’s convenient, but they themselves (Libya)

              - "Excuse me, but I also destroyed the chapel?
              - No, it was before you "(Afghanistan)

              Did you stop the war? Then where is Yugoslavia? And why then Serbia is afraid of "neighbors"?
              FIGHT - what are they still doing there? (Syria)

              Yes, they still showed the remains in a test tube and showed phosphorus hell to Iraqis. (Iraq)

              British overseas territory - with such a formulation, the Anglo-Saxons have all wars of liberation ... from the natives.
              It’s good that I didn’t announce the whole list, I’d be tired of unsubscribing ...
            2. 0
              April 9 2020 11: 17
              Afghanistan
              - How are the USSR connected and September 11

              Югославия
              - What did you want after the collapse of the USSR, in all the former republics of Yugoslavia, nationalists ....

              Libya, Syria, Iraq
              - It's even scary to think how many people died in the name of "democracy", this is about the "revolted peoples" ... and, by the way, about the altruism of the coalition ... the seizure, namely, the seizure of the oil coast in Syria, what is that?
  2. GRF
    +1
    April 9 2020 09: 42
    Well, our oligarchs can only marry the queen, maybe then other instructions will reach the telegraph. (Do not miss the moment! Otherwise, you will have to marry the king, although then you will certainly not be called outcasts ...)

    Coronavirus shows that you are poorly protected, and your telegraph that madness is incurable ...
  3. +2
    April 9 2020 10: 04
    The British were involved in the assassination of Emperor Paul 1, the assassination of Gregory Rasputin, who was trying to stop the war with Germany and the collapse of the Russian Empire, the Opium Wars in China and much more. Now they, like naughty children, are trying to transfer all their misconduct to others, fearing punishment.
  4. +1
    April 9 2020 17: 40
    Can someone here explain to me why Russia suddenly needed Britain? For what? And are those sober who write such a heresy?
  5. +1
    April 9 2020 22: 12
    As early as the 60s of the 20th century, the UK explained that if she would vomit strongly, then 2 times 50 Megatons on the western coast of the English Channel would make Ireland ... Then they penetrated, now, apparently, they began to forget ...
  6. 0
    April 12 2020 19: 50
    We will drown the little shirts in the sea with a pair of Poseidons!