Presidential address: what did Putin offer Russians against the background of coronavirus


On March 25, 2020, Russian President Vladimir Putin addressed his fellow citizens. The head of state announced a number of measures to support citizens of the country and enterprises.


Putin noted that in many countries of the world the number of patients with coronavirus infection COVID-19 continues to grow and the whole economy the planet. Thanks to the measures taken, Russia has so far been able to restrain the spread of the disease.

But you and I must understand that Russia, simply because of its geographical location, cannot fence itself off from the rest of the world. Near our borders are states that are already seriously affected by the epidemic. And completely block its penetration into our country, objectively impossible

- Putin said.

The President proposed to work “ahead of schedule”. At the same time, he called the life and health of Russians the main priority. He specified that all resources are connected to the deployment of a timely medical care and prevention system. The head of state thanked the doctors for their dedicated work. He asked fellow citizens to be very attentive to the recommendations of doctors.

Putin said voting on amendments to the Russian Constitution needs to be postponed to a later date. He announced that the week from March 30, 2020 to April 5, 2020 will be non-working with the preservation of wages, except for those enterprises that are necessary for life support. Families with the right to maternity capital will be paid an additional 5 thousand rubles a month until the child is three years old.

The President emphasized that previously announced payments, from the second half of 2020, for children from 3 to 7 years old should reach people already in this half-year. At the same time, payments to veterans of the Great Patriotic War and home front workers (75 and 50 thousand rubles, respectively) should receive money already in April 2020.

The Russian leader added that social benefits and benefits will be automatically renewed over the next six months. And small and medium-sized businesses will receive a deferment in all taxes except VAT, insurance premiums will be halved. Withdrawal of funds to offshore companies will be taxed at 15%, and deposits in foreign banks and securities worth more than 1 million rubles - at 13%. At the same time, banks will have to meet customers who find themselves in a difficult situation due to coronavirus.

Moreover, enterprises affected by the consequences of the epidemic cannot be declared bankrupt in the next six months (moratorium). Payments on sick leave of citizens now can not be less than the minimum wage. Unemployment benefits will also increase to the minimum wage.

Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

20 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 25 March 2020 20: 38
    +1
    • 5
    • 4
    We must do everything to support the incomes of citizens.

    - Putin said and introduced a tax on bank deposits ...
    1. Igor Aviator Offline
      Igor Aviator (Igor Aviator) 25 March 2020 20: 57
      -1
      • 5
      • 6
      Change your training manual, or learn to read! I quote LITERALLY:

      deposits in foreign banks and in securities worth more than 1 million rubles.

      Both that, and another assumes the SPECULATION! Say thank you, they used to give for such a "tower". That is OK. it’s not yet evening ... In general. for example, a citizen of the “city on a hill” - USA, would try to deposit, or transfer money to a foreign bank! Would have stayed with nothing for a tax crime! Even having notified of the transfer to the federal tax system, he will have to pay tax for lost profits by the US bank within a few years! So "don’t crumble the bun" on Putin, and pray. He will be replaced either by Beria or Stalin! It really hurts the people’s request for it!
      1. Ivan Ivanov_18 Offline
        Ivan Ivanov_18 (Troll trolls) 25 March 2020 21: 10
        -2
        • 1
        • 3
        He follows the principle of sacredly - Do not reflect, spread!
      2. Arkharov Offline
        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 26 March 2020 06: 46
        +2
        • 3
        • 1
        Manuals, say? You are not reading local illiterate fakes, which people like you invent and post, but in serious publications:

        "I suggest for citizens, whose total amount of bank deposits or investments in debt securities exceeds 1 million rubles, establish a tax on interest income in the amount of 13 percent. That is, I repeat, not the contribution itself, but only the interest received from such investments will be taxed on the income of individuals, "the Kremlin press service quotes the transcript.

        https://quote.rbc.ru/news/article/5e7b74439a79470230fba6d3

        I understand that if we have a middle class from 17000 a month (a similar "middle class" in the states lives in cardboard boxes on the street), then whoever has more than a million is financial bigwigs of an international level !! You are funny uncle.
      3. Nikolaevich I Offline
        Nikolaevich I (Vladimir) 26 March 2020 10: 44
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        What, nafik, "foreign banks", mister with a misunderstanding in the head!? All the media are "buzzing" just ... about banks! (Understand that the RF!) Pray for Putin? belay Mdaaa ... make "do ... tank" pray to God, so he will break his forehead! What is it that Stalin is not for you? Under Stalin, there was no "unjustified" deficit! Along with state-owned enterprises, cooperatives, cooperatives, artisans, single handicraftsmen worked .... collective farmers could sell agricultural products on collective farm markets! The deficit, which finally destroyed the "Soviet-socialist" formation, began under Khrushchev, who closed all these "cooperative cooperatives", sharply limited the rights of the remaining and "single handicraftsmen" ... limited the rights of collective farmers on collective farm markets , ruined reviving agriculture, as a result of which this economy was never able to rise to the end! Aren't you ashamed to show your inner foulbrood?
    2. Kristallovich Offline
      Kristallovich (Ruslan) 25 March 2020 21: 06
      +3
      • 6
      • 3
      If the contribution is more than a million. This is already a category of more or less wealthy citizens who can pay interest tax.
      1. Arkharov Offline
        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 26 March 2020 06: 48
        -1
        • 1
        • 2
        Of course, from the series "middle class with an income of 17000 rubles" .... That is do you approve
    3. Ivan Ivanov_18 Offline
      Ivan Ivanov_18 (Troll trolls) 25 March 2020 21: 11
      0
      • 2
      • 2
      Congratulations, I managed to pollute the puddle. The cookie honestly earned.
  2. Alexzn Offline
    Alexzn (Alexander) 25 March 2020 21: 36
    -2
    • 2
    • 4
    Quite reasonable suggestions. including pumping demand for money. In principle, the States are planning something similar. The introduction of an income tax on interest on deposits is more than common world practice, it is surprising that it has not yet been.
  3. savage1976 Offline
    savage1976 26 March 2020 04: 48
    +2
    • 3
    • 1
    It's funny to read how those who shouted about the need to impose a tax on the rich now shout that they are being robbed.
    1. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 26 March 2020 06: 50
      -2
      • 1
      • 3
      Who specifically shouted here?
      1. savage1976 Offline
        savage1976 26 March 2020 08: 03
        +1
        • 2
        • 1
        Is it really impossible not to touch the middle class, there is nothing left of it anymore, for small businesses without these 3% kirdyk, especially from the age of 21. Add the really rich, but leave the workers alone and at least earn something with their labor. Can't you think of other ways to support the poor, not at the expense of surviving thanks to their cause?

        And these are not your words? And it's not about the middle class with an income of 17000, but about account holders with a million rubles.
        1. Arkharov Offline
          Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 26 March 2020 08: 35
          -3
          • 0
          • 3
          And it's not about the middle class with an income of 17000, but about account holders with a million rubles.

          - and you do not live on Mars? And really believe that 17000 is the middle class, even here? I am ready to subscribe to every word of mine now. But I wrote about a really middle class, and not a fake "for 17000". Of course, I don’t quite understand with a person from which property, professional, etc. I’m trying to communicate on Wednesday, but do you really consider 1 million rubles some really huge means for a really middle class? !!! Is this "really rich" for you? By the way, to the mythical middle class, now you don’t understand who you can classify, well, probably, first of all, a significant part of the officials, starting with not quite small ones, you probably won’t be surprised with a million? Perhaps, there still remains a certain number of “unfinished” small and medium-sized entrepreneurs? I will not be surprised at any number of security officials? Well, and who can be attributed to “Add really rich”, you probably can guess for yourself, if only you really live on another planet?
          1. savage1976 Offline
            savage1976 26 March 2020 08: 43
            +1
            • 2
            • 1
            Yes, of course, it is everywhere visible that all "patriots" are for a progressive tax, but for each "patriot" the tax should start with an amount greater than the income of the "patriot".
            1. Arkharov Offline
              Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 26 March 2020 08: 59
              -3
              • 0
              • 3
              A patriot, not a patriot, well, not from a contribution to the million rubles that a person probably saved all his life, or sold an inherited apartment? No, if you personally live in a box on the street, of course, I am discussing with you in vain, then write, how can I help you?
              1. savage1976 Offline
                savage1976 26 March 2020 09: 08
                +1
                • 3
                • 2
                Do not worry, your family and I do not need your help. And the point is not in incomes or savings, but in banal human dishonesty even before oneself. Since I really wanted progressive taxation, they should be so happy, not screaming "but for what!"
                1. Arkharov Offline
                  Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 26 March 2020 10: 49
                  -2
                  • 0
                  • 2
                  In general, all this was about VAT and not a word specifically about progressive personal income tax. By the way, in principle, I am against this. And they’ll do it, as with this million. There are many other ways to redistribute. Once again I am convinced that you are hanging somewhere in space.
              2. gorenina91 Offline
                gorenina91 (Irina) 26 March 2020 09: 35
                +1
                • 3
                • 2
                - Here, personally, I have deposits in excess of 1 rubles (I think that there are quite a few of them on the site) ... - And personally, I give our banks (although today who generally own these "our banks" in Russia) use my money for the prosperity of the fatherland ... - And it seemed to my state not only that I personally provide him with my deposits for a rather long period ...- and the state decided to take another 000% from the interest on my money ...
                - Well, what’s the point to me then transferring my money to banks in general ... - if at any moment some other “tricks” can come up with the withdrawal of 13% percent of the margin from my money; and from the deposit amount itself (and this could very well happen) ... - Anything can be expected ...
                - Our state in this way will try to remove two "fur coats" from one sheep; and she herself teaches her own investors that don’t be sheep ...- don’t invest in banks ... - What the state is seeking with such a “surplus-appraisal" is hard to understand ...- probably it wants to undermine its own banking system .. .
                - And as for the "real rich" .., then all of this "surplus appraisal" is absolutely not threatened, because all capital in offshore, in import banks, in imported real estate, in imported securities, etc ...
                - In short ...- again and ... as always ...- beat your own, so that strangers are afraid ...
  4. gorenina91 Offline
    gorenina91 (Irina) 26 March 2020 11: 38
    +1
    • 3
    • 2
    - Thus, our guarantor twice violated the promise himself ..:
    1. The amount of 1 rubles, which must be guaranteed to be returned ... to the depositor ...
    - Suppose that citizens invested more than 1, given that by the end of the deposit term a little less than 000 rubles will come in and let's say that this amount has become - 000 rubles (taking into account the accrued interest) ... and ... and a person can get his money, but ... with a deduction of 1% of the profit ...
    - But ... because the whole amount does not exceed 1 rubles ...
    2. Our guarantor fits into the terms of the bank agreement ... - Suppose the interest rate specified in the agreement was one (and the agreement indicated that the bank itself did not have the right to already lower the depositor interest rate before the end of the deposit term.) .. .-This already new contribution will contain already new terms of the contract ... - And our guarantor simply cancels the terms of the concluded contract, i.e. he actually lowers the interest rate on profit ... by subtracting the amount of 13% from profit ... - Simply put, it violates and terminates the terms of a bank agreement ...
    - But what about the fact that he himself is the guarantor of the constitution, the law, the established social system ??? - After all, he himself must guarantee all this ... - And what is he doing ???
    - After all, then it was necessary for the guarantor to notify the citizens of his state and let all old banking agreements that were concluded on the previous terms expire ... - These agreements are only for a period of several months (today the population carries out bank deposits - for a year or six months). .. - And it is already possible to conclude "new agreements" on "new conditions" ... - Only in this way ...- otherwise, it turns out that our state cannot be trusted at all ...
    - The guarantor promises that such and such sums will be paid to the poor and large families ... - Well ... - this should be done by withdrawing funds from some and transferring these funds to others .. . -Also among those whose deposits may exceed -1 rubles ... - there may also be poor and large families ... - And it turns out ...- that they also take away, and what they to transfer the amount from the withdrawn from them ...
    - It is unlikely that our guarantor will achieve anything good with the next election ... - At least 1% of the electorate (according to the guarantor, today in Russia there are so many “rich depositors” ... that they can put on a bank account of more than 1 rubles) .... - our guarantor has lost ...- The guarantor has lost 000% of the population ... - And this 000% of the population belongs to the most stable and independently providing their material condition categories of citizens of the Russian Federation ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. Bakht Offline
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 26 March 2020 22: 44
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    I understand that only dividend tax aroused interest? Everything else passed by my ears ....
    The fact that there are NEGATIVE rates in Europe does not surprise anyone. In 2019, the volume of government and corporate bonds with negative yield reached $ 17 trillion.
    ----
    What about other statements by the president?