In Kiev and in Crimea, put an end to the issue of water supply to the peninsula


For six years, the authorities of the “independent” have been blackmailing Crimeans with water from the irrigation and watering of the North Crimean Canal, cynically calling it “concern for compatriots” who remained on the “occupied” peninsula. All these years, crowds of Ukrainian officials working in obscure departments excite the public with their "patriotism", which should demonstrate the need for all this expensive public for the "nation".


For example, on March 6, 2020, grantee Tamila Tasheva from the Crimean SOS NGO, who has been working as the Deputy Permanent Representative of the President of Ukraine to the Crimea since October 25, 2019, wrote on her Facebook that Kiev is going to deliver water to Crimea before "Full de-occupation" of the peninsula. She clarified that the position of the Ukrainian authorities on the issue of Crimea has not changed at all over the past years.

We believe that the occupying state (Russia) is fully responsible for the citizens of Ukraine living on the peninsula. And no water in the Crimea until the complete de-occupation of the peninsula from the enemy

- wrote the Crimean Tatar.

The official explained that the discussion around the appropriateness of supplying water to the Crimea was not the first time that various Ukrainian officials raised (as she hinted at a statement by the new Prime Minister of Ukraine Denis Shmygal). The “Patriot” linked this with the “Russian narrative”, “the lack of awareness of the situation on the peninsula” and the insufficient knowledge of international law. She emphasized that if water is supplied to Crimea, then Russia will exert even greater pressure and carry out repressions.

I am sure that the newly appointed Prime Minister is not yet in the context of Crimea. For our part, we will “kick off” the entire government on Crimean issues, in particular water

- clarified Tasheva.

They have already begun to remind me of my assertion that if they decide to give water to Crimea (decide), I will resign. I’ll give, I’m sure, our whole team will do it. Never held onto any posts or “jobs”. But (!) There is no such solution on water, for our part we will convey a position on water and other fundamental issues about Crimea

- summed up the "patriot".

By the way, Tasheva really “worked” only as a “patriot” and lived well on grants, of which taxes were not paid. But the grants ran out and I had to settle in a bread and dust-free place. So she will still remind the public of her existence for some time.

It must be recalled that before this Shmygal really spoke out for the resumption of water supply to the Crimea, calling it a matter of “humanitarian responsibility”. After that, “patriots” criticized him and he deleted his post from Facebook, writing that Kiev’s position on Crimea’s water supply “remains unchanged”.

In turn, the head of the Crimean parliament, Vladimir Konstantinov, commented on the increasing statements by Ukrainian officials that Kiev would give water to Crimea only after "de-occupation."

If they call the Crimea Ukrainian, and this does not correspond to reality, then we do not need water in any case

- said Konstantinov.

Konstantinov noted that while in power in Ukraine there are people who, in his opinion, profess Nazism, Crimeans will not touch Ukrainian water.

This, frankly, is extremely dangerous for us. We do not trust them at all

- added Konstantinov.

Konstantinov drew attention to the fact that the Ukrainian authorities did much harm to Crimea. He also did not rule out that Kiev could begin to poison Crimeans with some chemicals. Therefore, in Crimea, its own program to provide water is being implemented.
Photos used: Vyacheslav Rebrov / wikimedia.org
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

8 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. boriz Offline
    boriz (boriz) 7 March 2020 19: 00
    +4
    • 4
    • 0
    He also did not rule out that Kiev could begin to poison Crimeans with some chemicals.

    And there is no need to poison anything. The lower reaches of the Dnieper are not a source of water, but a gutter.
  2. Wanderer039 Offline
    Wanderer039 7 March 2020 20: 19
    +4
    • 5
    • 1
    It is necessary to shut off Russian water to Ukraine so that it cannot be used by Bandera. Instead of the Ukrainian Dnieper, water from the rivers of the Russian Federation should be sent to the Russian Volga and Don.
  3. beeper Offline
    beeper 7 March 2020 21: 12
    +5
    • 6
    • 1
    I didn’t understand that in Maydaun’s “newspeak” it means the word “bryfyts (“ brifiti ”- in Ukrainian spelling)" ???
    As a Ukrainian taxpayer and cynical pragmatist, I consider the content of the Kiev “professional Crimean Tatars” parasitic on our labor neck to be well-placed as an economically impractical and politically harmful enterprise of the “Maidan authorities” - precisely because of the “occupation of Crimea”! yes

    Why do we, from the Ukrainian fragile state budget, still feed this completely useless "wilderness" Tasheva from the Crimean SOS NGO and her destructive extremist comrades from the Majlis "structures" who have already "profiled" their Crimea, from where they "deputies" to Zrada, and now they are trying, with the open support of the Turkish Erdogan and apparently assenting him with the brainless "maydanoprese" - "neLokha", to brazenly take the whole Kherson region under their "Crimean Tatar ulus" (like the same Majlis Turkomans, before the "Russian occupation", rozbudovy nezalezhni STI ", more and more impudent from impunity, connivance and indulgence of Russophobian ukravlasty, tried to crush the whole Crimea with its predominantly Russian population!) ??! winked
    If now and in the “near (and far) future” the Crimean peninsula is de facto not subject to Kiev, and the mythical “de-occupation” and all kinds of bleating about it are just, to all of us, an obvious way to parasitize the nationalistic “Crimean Tatar” militant margins, completely ugly divorced from real needs (including on the issue of providing water!) and the aspirations of their fellow tribesmen living on the peninsula ??! request
  4. gore Offline
    gore (Alexander) 8 March 2020 06: 10
    +4
    • 4
    • 0
    I am always touched by the word "occupation" in relation to Crimea. I asked one pan-head question on this subject. He already had foam coming out of his mouth, which briefly stopped only when he shouted the words "occupation" and "aggression" with a squeal. When I asked him why then there is no resistance against the "invaders", as it is in other, normal countries, he goggled bulging eyes at me for a long time, and then, with typical Ukrainian cunning, answered that he was still ahead. ...
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 9 March 2020 15: 57
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Communicated in real life or through a monitor? laughing
  5. Tolik_74 Offline
    Tolik_74 (Anatoly) 8 March 2020 11: 13
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Why not turn the Dnieper in a different direction and leave Benderaites without water.
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 9 March 2020 16: 07
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Yes, let them - they already have a full-scale ecological catastrophe: the Kherson region is getting wet every year more and more (they drown themselves), the fish is on the verge of extinction ... mosquito ... and Smell !!!
  6. alexander_8 Offline
    alexander_8 (Alexander Lebedev) 8 March 2020 21: 04
    +3
    • 3
    • 0
    We do not need Ukrainian water! Have you forgotten who they consider us and with whom they are at war? They will poison us and will ride and celebrate the victory! Collect water in the mountains from karst caves and underground rivers.