MFA: The Netherlands is trying to hide the fraud of facts on the case of flight MH17

35

The media campaign launched by the Netherlands on the eve of the trial of the Malaysian Boeing crash over Donbass has an accusatory bias against Russia and is designed to put pressure on the court.

This was stated at a briefing by the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, the words of which are quoted by the Russian media:

The media campaign is gaining momentum just unprecedented. <…> And in the last days before the hearings, all this was launched in order to compensate for the existing gaps in the evidence base and hide the manipulation of facts under the pre-selected version. Perhaps, including in order to inspire the idea of ​​the impeccability of the investigation, to predetermine the verdict and to prevent any deviation from the course set six years ago.

The diplomat noted that the statements of the Joint Investigative Group (CVG) about the presence of certain witnesses whose names are classified made within the framework of the same campaign, and became a clear example of how the formula that has nothing to do with an objective investigation began to be applied: “We are sure we know that you did this because we were informed about this by secret sources whose data we cannot tell you. ”

Recall that the Malaysia Airlines passenger Boeing, flying from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, crashed on July 17, 2014 in the sky over the Donetsk region of Ukraine. The victims were 298 people - citizens of 10 states.
  • http://council.gov.ru/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    6 March 2020 18: 06
    So let's look at this "court", and what facts and evidence they will have and operate. The Netherlands did not interrogate real eyewitnesses and witnesses of this barbaric murder, and the militias were the first to take testimony from them immediately after the tragedy, and those "witnesses" still need to be identified at their place of residence, at the place of registration, and a confrontation with those who lived there and lives permanently, otherwise there, in Ukraine, there are plenty of people willing to give "testimony" while living in Lviv. Well, it cannot be that our special services did not have something "in reserve", knowing the meanness and trickyness of our "partners", because there are a lot of our satellites who monitor all the movements of Ukrainian equipment, and if the pictures, indicating that Russia was guilty of this crime on them was obvious, then the United States would not have applied them to put them on public display, which means they have them,
    but not those that are needed to accuse Russia of this crime, but to stand up on May 9 - the Court is coming, and there we will see.
    1. +1
      6 March 2020 18: 54
      Sorry, I was mistaken, not on May 9, but on March 9.
  2. +1
    6 March 2020 23: 08
    “We know for sure that you did this because we were informed about it by secret sources whose data we cannot tell you.”

    The meaning of something like this:

    We know for sure that you did this, but we don’t know how we know this.
  3. +3
    6 March 2020 23: 55
    So where to go to the poor Dutch, if the State Department presses on them? They can’t tell the truth - Ukraine was shot down by order of the State Department, well DO NOT, DO NOT HAVE RIGHTS !!
    1. -2
      7 March 2020 09: 07
      Do not confuse with our telephone justice. In Europe, this does not exist and cannot exist for one country to dictate its demands to a court of another country. You either do not know, or the troll.
      1. +3
        7 March 2020 10: 47
        Naivety is the same STUPIDITY! Well, or you "serve" for American "cookies"!
        1. -1
          8 March 2020 08: 06
          Yes, I’m traveling from the Rostov Region to the American Embassy for tea and cookies.
          1. +1
            8 March 2020 08: 44
            Well, not everyone can be like you - blindly believing in the objectivity of European justice. bully
          2. +2
            8 March 2020 11: 38
            And why go to the Rostov region?))
            1. 0
              8 March 2020 20: 40
              Don't be stupid, expert.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +1
        7 March 2020 12: 40
        vladimir emx (vladimir emx)
        You either do not know, or the troll.

        But I am aware that you are not in the know and you are a troll. crying
      4. Your naivety surprises me.
        1. 0
          8 March 2020 08: 15
          Nothing surprises me after the pilot Voloshin, the Spanish dispatcher, an airplane the size of two football fields.
      5. +1
        8 March 2020 08: 43
        Quote: vladimir emx
        Do not confuse with our telephone justice. In Europe, this does not exist and cannot exist for one country to dictate its demands to a court of another country. You either do not know, or the troll.

        Don't even try to tell your stories after the decision of this type of "arbitration" - about the initial and purely objectivity laughing justice in Europe - "... and we kind of believe you."
      6. 0
        8 March 2020 11: 26
        How can you know what is in Europe and what is not?)
        1. +1
          8 March 2020 20: 03
          I do not watch talk shows, look for information in other sources, listen to smart people.
  4. -3
    7 March 2020 09: 03
    I look forward to trial. I want to see how our propaganda will spit saliva. How many times have they changed shoes - what versions will they put forward now? And how the king will comment on it. The court will be the same, which rejected the lawsuit by 50 lard in favor of Yukos shareholders. In one case, the court is right; in the other, biased. Decide, gentlemen!
    1. +1
      7 March 2020 10: 50
      And your propaganda is KIEV !? And the "verdict" has already been printed in Washington! And in The Hague it will be announced! Well, the Kremlin will naturally agree! Not the first time!
      1. -2
        8 March 2020 08: 10
        Do not listen to the Skabeyevs, this is harmful to the fragile psyche.
        1. 0
          8 March 2020 08: 49
          Quote: vladimir emx
          Do not listen to the Skabeyevs, this is harmful to the fragile psyche.

          You wrote about your psyche? Well, it happens, do not worry so ... laughing
          1. 0
            8 March 2020 20: 37
            About your cotton head.
            1. 0
              8 March 2020 21: 40
              First, pay attention to your ...
        2. +1
          8 March 2020 11: 27
          In your psyche, you can immediately see that you have already heard enough of them))
          1. +1
            8 March 2020 20: 33
            You, I see, agree that talk shows are pure propaganda.
            1. 0
              8 March 2020 21: 42
              You know better, I only watch TV with basketball volleyball, for some reason such shows do not show such channels. bully
    2. 0
      7 March 2020 12: 42
      I want to see how our propaganda will spit saliva.

      Your propaganda in your face is already drooling. Look in the mirror. crying
      1. -1
        8 March 2020 08: 18
        Until March 9, not long, be patient.
    3. 0
      8 March 2020 08: 47
      There will be a court - then we will see whether this or that ...

      Quote: vladimir emx
      I look forward to trial. I want to see how our propaganda will spit saliva. How many times have they changed shoes - what versions will they put forward now? And how the king will comment on it. The court will be the same, which rejected the lawsuit by 50 lard in favor of Yukos shareholders. In one case, the court is right; in the other, biased. Decide, gentlemen!
    4. +2
      8 March 2020 11: 34
      And what do you care about Yukos? Are you one of the shareholders?)
      1. 0
        8 March 2020 20: 30
        I showed the position of Russia.
        1. 0
          8 March 2020 21: 43
          Write correctly - the position of Russia in my presentation, or interpretation hi
  5. 0
    8 March 2020 09: 00
    And on Gom. TASS and others. Until now, the articles are:

    The militants of the proclaimed DNR shot down the An-26 plane of the Ukrainian Air Force.

    I remember then there were a lot of witnesses. Brave peasants spoke of flashes in the sky, etc.

    Well, now - yes, 2 fighters, 2 dispatchers, a witness mechanic, and Poroshenko, who almost marked himself ... these are such media clues ...
    1. +1
      8 March 2020 11: 31
      Well, that’s logical. The plane was shot down (An-26) - there were witnesses. And in the case of the MH-17, where do witnesses come from for what they did not shoot down?
      1. 0
        8 March 2020 20: 28
        The fact of the matter is that there was no AN-26. Time and place exactly correspond to the downed Boeing. Our TV men were lousy - they released the story in hot pursuit, without checking. And it turned out to be MN-17. Russia 24 removed this issue.
  6. +1
    April 4 2020 19: 05
    Ukraine was shot down, definitely, by order of the State Department!