Manifesto of a complete break with the West: why Putin is changing the Constitution


At 18 p.m. Moscow time on March 2 of this year, the acceptance of amendments to the second reading of the bill amending the Russian Constitution ended. Of course, the most significant among them is a package of proposals from the one who, in fact, acted as the initiator of the constitutional reform - President Vladimir Putin of the country. All his ideas, set out in a very voluminous (two dozen pages) document, have yet to undergo wide discussion and pass the test of a popular vote on April 22, but the main conclusions can be drawn now.


The vision presented by the leader of the state for the changes necessary for the basic law of Russia, means, first of all, the final rejection of attempts to build "friendly relations" with the West. At a minimum, to achieve such a goal at all costs. What exactly indicates this?

For our Soviet motherland! With God...


Among the president’s ideas right now, immediately after they were publicized, which criticized both abroad and within the country, one can safely attribute the most irritants to Putin’s desire to enshrine in the Constitution a special mention of “faith in God,” as one of the main ideals “transmitted us ancestors ”, the introduction of the concept of“ state-forming people ”(naturally, Russian, not“ Russian ”) and, perhaps, an indication of the“ thousand-year history ”of our country, the direct continuity of the current state from both the Russian Empire and Soyu and of Soviet Socialist Republics. It may seem to some that these novelties include contradictory and even incompatible moments, however, only one who does not know the essence of Russian history and does not want to really delve into its meaning, content with miserable ideological cliches, can think so. Finally, the president’s desire to put an end to the opposition between the Soviet and “non-Soviet” periods of development of our country, following which some people try to present them almost as antagonistic, should be recognized as more than correct. Nothing but new speculations leading to the contention and division of the Russian people into "white" and "red", "monarchists" and "Stalinists", and so on, it does not bear us. Everything is empty and far-fetched. The best confirmation of my opinion is photographs of heroes on whose breasts the St. George Crosses and the Order of the Red Star and the Red Banner perfectly coexisted. This is our true story and our true pride. The fact that the Constitution was proposed to introduce a provision on the inadmissibility of attempts to distort the first and belittle the second is simply a recognition of a long overdue need.

What is characteristic is that the critics of the announced changes that were immediately announced cannot clearly explain and, especially, justify their own rejection, completely. Thus, the Chairman of the Council of Muftis of Russia Ravil Gainutdin and the Mufti of Tatarstan Kamil Samigullin, who expressed their own disagreement, stated that “representatives of different faiths have different perceptions of the concept of God.” So what?! Someone is going to forbid them? Note that this is not about asserting the primacy of any particular religion. Orthodoxy, which is the most significant denomination in the state, is not mentioned at all. It would seem that representatives of any clergy should only rejoice at such amendments, but no - they are still unhappy. Where is the logic here? And on the other hand, Dmitry Peskov has already to explain to the journalists, terribly worried about “how they will treat the atheists after that”, that Russia is not going to depart from the principles of a secular state and force someone into any kind of church. Nevertheless, the mention of faith, as the main spiritual value of our people, is necessary - otherwise moving to the future along the path of secularization that the “civilized world” has long and firmly embarked on, one can achieve a lot. In Iceland, for example, last year the parliament took, and equated religion with ... weapons of mass destruction! And in many countries of Western Europe, today unconditionally surrendering to crowds of Muslim migrants, it all started with the fact that empty churches began to turn into “art objects” one after another, or even go to demolition. Atheists will not be forced to baptize, but at least some barrier to destructive unbelief must be set.

Conservatism? And great!


By the way, no less, and even much more than the mention of the fundamental law of faith, the religious leaders mentioned above are concerned about the words about the “nation-forming people”: “What is this news? We are all Russians! ” Who argues ... But one cannot argue with the fact that more than 80% of the country's population are just Russians. No one is going to prescribe any special rights or privileged provisions regarding them in the Constitution, however, a certain clearly defined status for a people that for centuries has borne the bulk of the worries and efforts to build and protect a common house, you see, is more than appropriate. In the same way, as well as amendments regarding the inadmissibility of attempts to alienate any territories of Russia, as well as calls for such actions. This is all called a statist approach. Moreover, it is perfectly clear that if such a package of constitutional amendments is adopted, it will be possible to speak with absolute confidence about the complete departure of our country from decades of “liberal democratic” and so-called “universal human values” imposed on it. The consolidation at the level of the country's main law of the positions of traditionalism, healthy conservatism, and those spiritual and moral ideals that have been professed in it for centuries - this is the main thing that Russia can and must contrast the West today with its latest attempts to weaken and destroy it. The whole history of the Fatherland is more than obvious: we are not afraid of external enemies as much as internal confusion. It is worth starting to stagger to the fundamental foundations - and that's all, wait for the troubles, fratricide, foreign invasion and decay. Only in the last century it was like this twice - in 1917, and in 1991.

Having adopted the updated Constitution, our country will declare to the whole world that in the future it intends to be guided exclusively by its interests, values ​​and ideals, and not imposed, “proposed” or “recommended” by those whose main dream and goal is to disappear from this world both Russia and Russian. How much indignation will be on this occasion, how much anger! By the way, it has already begun - clinging to the most outrageous amendment from the point of view of the “common people”, recognizing marriage as an exclusively union of a man and a woman, they have gone into all the grave main “shouts” of our “friends”. Air Force, Deutsche Welle, and beyond, on all the well-known list. How can they agree with the similar, if last year the European Commission proudly reported that the "level of support" of various perverts in the Old World had already reached an average of 76%? In Sweden and the Netherlands, this is 97-98% altogether ... What about the White House administration, which again last year announced with great fanfare the start of a “global campaign for LGBT rights” ?! My answer is simple - to roll into your sodomite hell exclusively on your own. Without us, without Russians. Well, I don’t wish that in our country children would receive LGBT education lessons in schools, like in Scotland or, excuse me for frankness, masturbation, like it happens in primary schools in the British county of Warwickshire! Or to be taken on “educational excursions” to a zoo, such as London, where a couple of crazy penguins were declared “feathered representatives of the gay community”. Chur us from this, chur! What such disgusting can do with people who once shook half the world is perfectly demonstrated by the example of the Germans - half a million people gather there for gay parades in Berlin and 10 thousand per year of “perverse” marriages are registered. But only in the Bundeswehr there is absolutely no one to serve. And to those who “lost their shores” and behave like conquerors, “give the guests of the country” a shortcut - all the more so.

It is clear that much more anger in the West will not be caused by those innovations that “infringe upon the rights” of various perverts, but by basic, fundamental things, such as the principle of the supremacy of Russian law over the “universal” one. This is much more serious. There, even the UN in its desire to curry favor with the masters from Washington, who seem to have finally turned this completely degraded “office” into their own mouthpiece, reached the announcement of our pilots, who are now fighting in Idlib with terrorists, “war criminals”. That is, the laws and rules of the war are violated by our pilots, without whose heroism and dedicated military work ISIS would freely frolic in the Middle East to this day, and not the Turkish thugs who invaded uninvited into the territory of a sovereign state just to save and support these same terrorists? ! Here it is in all its glory - the "logic" of the West, its "laws" and "values", which we are invited to strictly follow. Will we lose something by refusing to do this? It is extremely doubtful. One of these days, one of the official representatives of the United States stated once again that his country would never recognize Crimea as Russian. Consequently, sanctions and other anti-Russian demarches will continue. The fact that Russia from now on, and I really want to believe, forever, rejects such claims, choosing its own path, its truth and its faith, gives us all hope that really something important, cardinally important will change in the life of the country. It will change not in words but in deeds.

No one says that the next step aimed at maximizing distance from the West will not be painful, will not lead to certain consequences that not everyone will like. However, the only other way available to us today besides this is complete surrender and surrender of national interests. The situation over the past 5-6 years has come to what it has come to, and the third is simply no longer given. The Kremlin, it seems, is fully aware of this and made the corresponding choice. April 22 to confirm or deny it will be the whole people of Russia.
Used photos: kremlin.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

43 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Monster_Fat Offline
    Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 4 March 2020 09: 16
    -18
    • 8
    • 26
    The author clearly comprehends about “gays,” “Russianness,” and “Western values” (“values,” about which, in fact, have no idea, everything is at the level of emotions, and “kissel-nightingale” TV), obviously misses “ the tsar "and the whip of the" master ", therefore, does not see behind the tinsel thrown for the plebs, for what all this fuss with" changing the Constitution "is actually being conceived. Well, well, go ahead and with the song, "for the new Constitution." laughing love
    1. 123 Offline
      123 (123) 4 March 2020 10: 35
      +5
      • 14
      • 9
      The author clearly comprehends about “gays,” “Russianness,” and “Western values” (“values,” about which he actually has no idea - everything is on the level of emotions, and the “kissel-nightingale” TV), clearly misses “ the tsar "and the whip of the" master ", therefore, does not see behind the tinsel thrown for the plebs, for what all this fuss with" changing the Constitution "is actually being conceived. Well, well, forward and with the song - "for the new Constitution." laughing love

      As I understand it, do you have any complexes? request Judging by the emoticons, do you build eyes for the author? winked You alone from the first note guessed all the “treacherous intentions of the Kremlin”, but you will not share your sacred knowledge with us, mere mortals? I must disappoint you, you do not correspond to the image of a mysterious and penetrating aristocrat, no judging by the photograph, the last t-shirt is no longer washing off, and it would be nice to shave. sad Judging by the text, the internal content corresponds to the exterior. negative
    2. molotkov60mkpu Offline
      molotkov60mkpu (Yuri) 4 March 2020 12: 49
      +1
      • 6
      • 5
      Although the changes are incomplete, but how do the changes you make do not satisfy you? Maybe they do not fully reflect our aspirations, but they are not directed against the people and the country.
    3. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 4 March 2020 13: 07
      +6
      • 11
      • 5
      Well, if you, a monster, are satisfied when your child of the masculine sex is shown at school how to please such an individual as you - this is your business. But this CATEGORALLY is not necessary neither to me, nor to the greater part of Russia. Just like the CONTINUOUS story of my homeland. With all the pros and cons. Refusing from terrible pages, we will refuse and from light. And this is unacceptable. But we have an advantage over the West - you can leave Russia if you are not comfortable with restoring order in the country and if you are so enlightened and tolerant.
      1. Rus Offline
        Rus 4 March 2020 13: 45
        -12
        • 6
        • 18
        You are such a distant person! You write your nonsense! History and gays. And if your child or acquaintance becomes gay, what will kill him for this? And about history, do you want to tell the USSR uncensored lived? There was no truth at all.
        1. 321 Offline
          321 (321) 5 March 2020 05: 58
          0
          • 2
          • 2
          The difference between destruction and the lack of propaganda, it turns out, needs to be explained and clarified ...
          And how then is your writings different from delirium? - NOTHING ...
        2. Kostyar Offline
          Kostyar 5 March 2020 16: 22
          +1
          • 2
          • 1
          The Great Soviet Encyclopedia of Gays and Other Lesbian Pederasts calls it mentally ill people who need to be treated in special psychiatric establishments !!!
          1. Nikolaevich I Offline
            Nikolaevich I (Vladimir) 6 March 2020 02: 07
            0
            • 0
            • 0
            Quote: Bone
            The Great Soviet Encyclopedia of Gays and Other Lesbian Pederasts calls it mentally ill people who need to be treated in special psychiatric establishments !!!

            Well, right! Just a question: do you praise or reproach TSB? what
        3. A.Lex Offline
          A.Lex (Secret information) 9 March 2020 17: 20
          +2
          • 2
          • 0
          Dima, Dima ... how sad everything is with you ... The history of the country is what it is - we haven’t created another, but there’s nothing there ... And to abandon it is what they want to impose on us. Or rewrite (which was more than once). Everything has been for centuries. But Russia is still there. And history is our memory.
          Now about the buggers. Among my acquaintances such is not observed (I am not so illegible to get such ACQUAINTANCES). Now about the children - are you really so SMART (because of the editorial policy to write harsher - they will erase the comments) to THINK so? Can you write about your children like that? Can you write to make your child a pederast? Or can you only write about other people's children? Do you have a conscience, bastard? For an ordinary normal family, this is a tragedy. And for you, probably, this is normal ...
          Regarding pederasty - if an EXTERNAL person does not impose his views on me - I do not care. Let him live with it AS he wants. This is his problem, not mine. Once again - I do not communicate with such people (I was lucky, unlike you) and I do not have such needs for communication with these individuals. Once again - it is not imposed - everything is fine (that is, it does not scream at every corner that he is a pederast). If he is trying to get into this with me in communication - just turn around and leave (or leave). In the society where I LIVE, the attitude towards these citizens is unequivocal - you don’t vote, then everything is fine (we came across here at different times - they lived simply, without advertising their inclinations, although they knew about them). Most people consider this a deviation from normality - such as a genetic mutation, a malfunction in the genocode. Therefore, they are treated as if they were sick, but not dangerous (they even feel sorry for something - the person was unlucky just at conception). But nothing more!
          And about killing - this is for the swan. This is for them - everyone who does not share their views, they are banned for life (if they had their will, they would be shot).
          Now about the USSR ... This tragedy of the destruction of the country will be described over time ... and they will give an assessment. The history in the USSR was different - they preferred to forget something, rewrite something, reformat something else. But the bulk of the events were described correctly. The fact that the USSR described the PREVIOUS history in their own way is the right of the winner, and the Bolsheviks defeated the bourgeois liberals for only one reason - THERE WOULD NOT WANT TO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE COUNTRY (but MAKING ON IT is for them ... just like in modern times !), having taken power from the tsar (yes, it was the bourgeoisie who overthrew the tsar, and not the Bolsheviks, as some people think) and began the collapse of the country!
          Therefore, we say that the history of the country was different, but it is EVERYTHING EVEN FOR THOUSAND YEARS OLD!
          And censorship ... it is different. And it SHOULD BE ... As in religion, there should be prohibitions in laws. If there are no prohibitions, then EVERYTHING CAN BE ... For example - cannibalism. After all, if someone wants to do this - he (in your opinion) can not be forbidden? As well as publish information about ... the consideration of cannibalism, as about another feature. Are you for such FREEDOM? Oh well...
          1. Rus Offline
            Rus 18 March 2020 19: 57
            -1
            • 0
            • 1
            We have a law and it is for everyone! Constitution with my civil rights! And here cannibalism !? Is there really that?
    4. rotkiv04 Offline
      rotkiv04 (Victor) 4 March 2020 13: 28
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      And what is the essence of this "fuss"?
    5. The comment was deleted.
  2. Radikal Offline
    Radikal 4 March 2020 12: 02
    0
    • 7
    • 7
    The vision presented by the leader of the state for the changes necessary for the basic law of Russia, means, first of all, the final rejection of attempts to build "friendly relations" with the West.

    This is the fantasy of the author of the article, no more. lol
  3. ustal51 Offline
    ustal51 (Alexander) 4 March 2020 12: 03
    +4
    • 6
    • 2
    The Scots were surprised. Even the right way ... without training are not capable ...
    1. gore Offline
      gore (Alexander) 5 March 2020 06: 17
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      ustal5, they are geyropeytsy ...
  4. steelmaker Offline
    steelmaker 4 March 2020 12: 12
    10
    • 13
    • 3
    About 1000 amendments have already been made to the Constitution. If people are so unhappy, why edit something? Maybe take a new one? After the execution of the Supreme Council, this Constitution has no right to a moral EXISTENCE !! What the author has listed can be written in one phrase. But the guarantees of free education, medicine, the right to work, for some reason are not discussed. Although this is most of all broken with us! I listened to the speech of Zhirinovsky, so he generally says that there will no longer be a presidential election. There will be a State Council, he will choose the president. Discussion on the articles of the Constitution will not be, I understand correctly? And if everything goes as it goes, I will not participate in this and I do not advise others. They decided everything without us !!!
    1. Rus Offline
      Rus 4 March 2020 13: 40
      -1
      • 3
      • 4
      Need to go and vote for or against! Let's see how many people are in their right mind and how many are blurred by promises.
    2. Nikolaevich I Offline
      Nikolaevich I (Vladimir) 6 March 2020 02: 13
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      Quote: steel maker
      After the execution of the Supreme Council, this Constitution has no right to a moral EXISTENCE !!

      Oh my! How "running" in my head! And what does the Constitution have to do if it was "raped" by the ruling regime? So maybe not the Constitution, but the ruling regime "has no right to a moral EXISTENCE ..."?
  5. molotkov60mkpu Offline
    molotkov60mkpu (Yuri) 4 March 2020 12: 45
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    And the Ideals will probably find reflection in Ideology?
  6. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 4 March 2020 12: 57
    -3
    • 3
    • 6
    The next nonsense.
  7. yuriy55 Offline
    yuriy55 (Yuri Vasilievich) 4 March 2020 13: 09
    +3
    • 5
    • 2
    Manifesto of a complete break with the West: why Putin is changing the Constitution

    And exactly - Putin?

  8. A.Lex Offline
    A.Lex (Secret information) 4 March 2020 13: 22
    +8
    • 8
    • 0
    But the amendment that natural resources should belong to the people, for some reason, doesn’t ... And our private property has too many unreasonable rights.
  9. Rus Offline
    Rus 4 March 2020 13: 37
    -3
    • 4
    • 7
    Quote: Monster_Fat
    The author clearly comprehends about “gays,” “Russianness,” and “Western values” (“values,” about which he actually has no idea - everything is at the level of emotions, and the “kisser-nightingale” TV) clearly misses “ the tsar "and the whip of the" master ", therefore, does not see behind the tinsel thrown for the plebs that for which, in fact, all this fuss is being started with the" amendment of the Constitution ". Well, well, forward and with the song - "for the new Constitution." laughing love

    Right.
  10. Oleg Rambover Offline
    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 4 March 2020 13: 38
    -4
    • 3
    • 7
    state-forming people

    This thesis really carries a danger to the integrity of the country, and the author

    a clearly defined status for a people that for centuries has borne the largest part of the worries and efforts to build and protect a common house, you see, is more than appropriate.

    - this only confirms.

    consolidate in the Constitution a special mention of “faith in God,” as one of the main ideals ...

    What to do with Buddhists? They seem to have no God.

    Nevertheless, the mention of faith as the main spiritual value of our people is necessary - otherwise one can go a long way towards the secularization that the “civilized world” has long and firmly embarked upon.

    The most called secular societies in the world are Russia and China (let's say thanks to the Communists), in comparison with us the USA is a very religious society, even Ukraine is a much more religious country.

    It is clear that much more anger in the West will not be caused by those innovations that “infringe on the rights” of various perverts, but by basic, fundamental things, such as the principle of the supremacy of Russian law over the “universal” one.

    Article 15, 17, 46, 69 does not change, and there it is about the priority of international law.

    In general, it is difficult to understand why all this stagnates.

    And yes, about LGBT people and traditional values.
    The concept of "third Rome" was introduced by a certain monk Philotheus in his letter to Grand Duke Ivan III (the father of Ivan the Terrible). The letter was entitled "MESSAGE TO THE GREAT PRINCE BASIL, IN SAME ABOUT THE CORRECTION OF THE SACRED SIGN AND ON THE SODOM FORM". So, quite traditional values.
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 4 March 2020 14: 18
      -3
      • 1
      • 4
      What am I, Vasily III, of course.
  11. astepanov Offline
    astepanov (Alexey) 4 March 2020 18: 24
    -1
    • 4
    • 5
    "They will not forcefully baptize atheists, but at least some barrier to destructive unbelief must be put."

    Since when has unbelief become destructive? And after this statement, I still have to believe that we are not pulled into the clerical swamp?
    And about the state-forming Russian people: I have no blood whatsoever. And so, half of the inhabitants of Russia. Who will be distinguished and how: Russian, not Russian? Enter the column "nationality" again? Or on a territorial basis?
    I won’t go to vote for this circus. Or vote against.
  12. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 4 March 2020 18: 50
    +1
    • 4
    • 3
    .. why Putin is changing the Constitution.

    Is it really unclear to anyone - why? Are there any?
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 4 March 2020 20: 03
      -3
      • 1
      • 4
      I do not understand. Somehow, all this is complicated, if I just wanted to stay in power, I could just remove a few words about the deadlines, and I would remain up to a deep senility and a tombstone.
  13. Nikolay Malyugin (Nikolai Malyugin) 4 March 2020 19: 59
    -1
    • 1
    • 2
    In economic terms, nothing will change. Both buyers and sellers will be satisfied. And the rest? Each person lives his own life. Their interests.
  14. Wanderer039 Offline
    Wanderer039 4 March 2020 21: 02
    +5
    • 9
    • 4
    Well, firstly, in Russia no one is forcibly holding anyone, especially those who are Russians (84% of which in the Russian Federation) and Russia do not like. Secondly, in the United States, one recently demanded that he be allowed to marry his own car ... What can I say? The nuthouse misses such !!! I am unequivocally for the indivisibility of Russia and against the violation of its territorial integrity, and it is high time for all those craving for the collapse of Russia, patriots of foreign states lost in Russia to be deprived of Russian citizenship and deported from Russia to their homeland, for which they are ready to fight against the Russian Federation, eating Russian bread today. .. which is unacceptable. The US will always have a positive attitude towards all kinds of fascists and terrorists if the US can use them against the Russian Federation ... At one time, the US president said about one Latin American dictator like this - (I apologize to the moderators, but this is a quote)

    Maybe this is a son of a bitch, but this is our son of a bitch ...

    Here they are, the words of the President of the United States and the attitude of the United States to all the neo-Hitlers gearing the United States ... The United States will always defend its own, even if it turns out to be its own like Goebbels.
  15. Roarv Offline
    Roarv (Robert) 4 March 2020 21: 27
    +6
    • 6
    • 0
    Based on today's realities ...
    The fact that in the country recession, stagnation, and stabilization is found extreme - the Constitution. Not individuals, officials, deputies, senators, but the culprit of everything and everything. The main legal document is the Constitution - let's cut it ...
    This is my question - where did the Constitutional Court look for 30 years, + a scout with a lawyer ???
  16. Sergey Latyshev Offline
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 4 March 2020 21: 50
    +2
    • 5
    • 3
    I have not read the amendments yet. But in theory, then Gorbachev should also be given a senator, as a former president, because the Russian Federation is the declared heir to the USSR.

    There are already Sobchachki, and billionaires with a pitchfork over the hill and tax evasion, and the killers were .... Decent company.
    1. g1washntwn Offline
      g1washntwn (George Washington) 5 March 2020 06: 11
      +1
      • 3
      • 2
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      I have not read the amendments yet. But in theory ...

      ... you need to go to the office and clarify. Come criticize only after that.
      1. Sergey Latyshev Offline
        Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 5 March 2020 10: 18
        -1
        • 1
        • 2
        This is not criticism. This is a possible option.
  17. Rusa Offline
    Rusa 4 March 2020 23: 09
    -1
    • 3
    • 4
    Good post. Respect to the author. I fully support.
  18. Under this wonderful little article an old bearded joke came up in my head:

    - How much will a bottle of vodka cost in Moscow in 2030?
    - Five yuan.

    Paper can stand it.
    1. g1washntwn Offline
      g1washntwn (George Washington) 5 March 2020 06: 12
      +2
      • 3
      • 1
      ... well, or a burger on a street in New York will cost 15 cents. There is such a joke too.
  19. kot711 Offline
    kot711 (vov) 5 March 2020 17: 23
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    The author, I can remind you, if you didn’t know or forgot, German-Fash buckles. invaders was also written - God is with us. And yet, God helps someone who helps himself.
  20. Rinat Offline
    Rinat (Rinat) 5 March 2020 18: 43
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    I fully support the author. Long-term consequences, after changing the Constitution in the declared direction, abruptly change the alignment, both in domestic and in foreign policy. And the consequences of this alignment will extremely painfully affect the enemies of the Russian autocracy. Our internal liberalism, of course, is dissatisfied with this alignment, since the changes made invalidate their efforts to destroy our state. I am aware that in the country there is no way to change the many economic and social problems that are taking place, and yes, it won’t be easy, that’s for sure.
  21. Nikolaevich I Offline
    Nikolaevich I (Vladimir) 6 March 2020 02: 29
    +3
    • 3
    • 0
    To prescribe faith in God in the constitution means to end the position that "the church is separate from the state!" It is not about faith in God that “clergymen” and “clergymen" "cherish"! And we are talking about the "merging" of the state and the church in the "first stage" ... the replacement of the state by the church - in the second ...! That's what the top of the Russian Orthodox Church dreams of! What are the inadequate statements of the clergy who are often attributed to the manifestation of the senility of "individual clergy" if it were not for the suspicion that the church is preparing to act as a political party, as a political "power"! And the goal of any "serious" political party is to seize power!
  22. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 7 March 2020 10: 55
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    Quote: Oleg Rambover
    I do not understand. Somehow, all this is complicated, if I just wanted to stay in power, I could just remove a few words about the deadlines, and I would remain up to a deep senility and a tombstone.

    As president for life? Isn’t it easier to transfer to the State Council, giving it a bunch of powers without responsibility? And then you can put relatives there after yourself, making the post inheritable.
    1. Monster_Fat Offline
      Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 8 March 2020 09: 41
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      Isn’t it easier to transfer to the State Council, giving it a bunch of powers without responsibility? And then you can put relatives there after yourself, making the post inheritable.

      In-in. And also to give the "inner circle" a lifelong senatorialism - such as the "untouchables". But this is only the beginning - "when the cooperative" Lake "comes to taste," amendments and amendments to the Constitution ", they will not be stopped anymore .... why not be shy - they will write again, instead of fighting the" gays "for the purity of morals, it is necessary for "counteraction to agents of the State Department and enemies of the people, entrenched absolutely everywhere" ... And to the nearby plebs, only in the "gays" the problems seem ...
    2. Oleg Rambover Offline
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 8 March 2020 13: 30
      -2
      • 0
      • 2
      All this is complicated, uncertainties and instability are created, the new president will pull the blanket in any way, the powers cannot be pulled, the security forces (at least for now) remain subordinate to the president, it is generally unlikely that a relative will be left behind. You imagine Putin as a kind of Doctor Evil, who understands that he is doing the wrong things, but continues to do them. And it seems to me that he considers himself a good president for Russia and a patriot and acts, at least in matters of principle, in accordance with his idea of ​​the benefits of Russia.
      PS His ideas do not coincide with mine.
  23. Nikolay Malyugin (Nikolai Malyugin) 27 March 2020 21: 19
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    A complete break with the West will not work. And do not wishful thinking. That's when we build industries capable of processing our raw materials, then something can be outlined. Our neighbor China will be with us against the United States. But it is not beneficial for him to have a powerful capitalist state at his side. Are we going to stop exporting oil to the United States and other countries with the adoption of the Constitution?