“Historical war” with the West: how can Russia not lose the battle for truth

March 2 2020 15

Currently, a consistent “historical war” is being waged in the West against Russia, the purpose of which is to make it as the successor of the USSR guilty at the beginning of World War II. The defeat of Moscow could result in the loss of all territorial acquisitions, for example, Kaliningrad and the Kuril Islands, as well as the “falling” of the Russian Federation on reparations, some countries are increasingly eager to raise the issue.

And this is not a joke and not an exaggeration at all. Russia is now in the role of a potential victim of a gang of “dirty policemen” who “graze” it and encroach on it from all sides. At the same time, we have already lost the battle for the minds.

Let us turn to the facts. The USSR is one of the victims of the aggression of the alliance of Nazi Germany and Japan. As a victorious country, the Soviet Union received a number of territorial acquisitions at the expense of Berlin and Tokyo. If the FRG authorities have not yet raised the Kaliningrad issue, then the Japanese have been demanding back “northern territories” from Moscow for decades.

What can the collective West and Japan, which has joined it, do for a cardinal change in the situation? It is true that the USSR and its successor to the Russian Federation must be made guilty at the beginning of World War II, that is, transferred to the status of an aggressor country. And a lot has already been done for this.

At firstFor starters, our enemies needed to equalize the USSR and the Third Reich, making the figures of Hitler and Stalin, Soviet communism and German Nazism identical. Despite the fact that these people and the social systems promoted by them were diametrically opposed, Western propaganda and domestic “anti-Soviet” achieved a lot by demonizing the USSR, personally Stalin and communism as a whole.

Hollywood did a good job, brainwashing viewers around the world, and domestic liberal figures. How many disgusting films and television series were shot in Russia with budget money, among other things, pseudo-documentary programs, books and memoirs were written that supposedly “expose” our “totalitarian past” with the “bloody tyrant” Stalin?

Secondly, back in 2008, a declaration was signed in the European Parliament calling for recognition of August 23 as the “European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism”. So, through the union of “and” and “Stalinism” before “Nazism”.

Why August 23? Because on this day of 1939 the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed. It makes no sense to sort out why and why it was written, everything has already been done before us. The most important thing here is the equating of the communist system with the criminal Nazi regime of the Third Reich, as well as the link to the date, which was to play in the future.

Thirdlyas we said, the “semantic bookmark” worked after only ten years. Last September, the same European Parliament adopted another resolution on the importance of preserving historical memory for the future of Europe. And here is what it says, important to you and me:

The direct consequence of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which was followed by the Soviet-Nazi border and friendship treaty of September 28, 1939, was the invasion of the Republic of Poland, first by Hitler, and two weeks later by Stalin, which deprived the country of independence and became an unprecedented tragedy for the Polish people, the Communist Soviet Union launched an aggressive war against Finland on November 30, 1939, and in June 1940 occupied and annexed parts of Romania - territories that had never been returned - and annexed independent republics ki Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.

So, we pay attention to the wording: “Soviet-Nazi treaty”, “invasion”, “aggressive war”, “occupation”, “annexation”, etc. Any lawyer understands where they are driving in the West. For people without a law degree, the European Parliament wrote in black and white: "The direct consequence of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was the Soviet invasion of Poland." In other words, before the direct accusation of the USSR and the Russian Federation in inciting the Second World War, there was one last step left.

When will it be done? Probably when Russia weakens from weight economic problems, will be exhausted by some protracted and senseless war, be in a state political instability. It is then that our “friends and partners” from the West and the East will make claims to Kaliningrad and the Kuril Islands, “obtained as a result of an aggressive war by the aggressor”, will raise the question of reparations.

Is there anything you can do to prevent such scenarios? And it is possible and necessary.

1. We must actively engage in our own economy, strengthening the defense capability, raising the level of education of the population.

2. It is necessary to stop this frenzied anti-Soviet propaganda bacchanalia, at least in our own country, to start making normal films about the war that they want to watch abroad.

3. We ourselves must go on the offensive on the ideological front. As a matter of fact, why should the start date of the Second World War be calculated on September 1, 1939? And why not offer to reckon its beginning from March 1939, when the Third Reich “resolved the issue” with the Sudetenland and the Czech Republic? By the way, this event was preceded by a Munich agreement, where Hitler’s hands were unleashed by the Western countries, Great Britain and France? And why not since 1937, when the allied Germany, Japan invaded China and occupied a number of its regions?

If in Russia everything remains on its own, then the result of this inaction can turn out to be extremely disastrous for our country.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Oleg Rambover

-2

2 March 2020 16: 23

Let us turn to the facts. The USSR is one of the victims of the aggression of the alliance of Nazi Germany and Japan.

Japan??? Attacked the USSR?
In my opinion, the author is engaged in rewriting history. And yes, Poland was a victim of Soviet aggression.

Convention on the Definition of Aggression, adopted July 3-5, 1933

Article 1. Each of the High Contracting Parties undertakes to recognize in its relations with each of the others, starting from the day this Convention enters into force, the definition of an attacker explained in the report of the Security Committee of May 24, 1933 (Politis report) at the Conference on Disarmament made on the basis of the proposal of the Soviet delegation.
Article 2. In accordance with this, it will be recognized as an attacking party in an international conflict, - subject to the agreements between the parties involved in the conflict, - the state that committed one of the following actions:
1) declaration of war to another state;
2) the invasion of the armed forces, even if without declaring war, on the territory of another state;
3) an attack by land, sea or air armed forces, even if without declaring war, on the territory, sea or air forces of another state;
4) sea blockade of the coast or ports of another state;
5) assistance to armed gangs formed on their own territory and invading the territory of another state, or refusal, despite the demands of the attacked state, to take all possible measures on their own territory to deprive these gangs of any assistance or protection.
Article 3. No considerations of a political, military, economic or other order may serve as an excuse or excuse for the attack provided for in article two ...
Valentine

+1

2 March 2020 17: 58

Or maybe we have enough of this honesty and childish naivety, stop deceiving ourselves - we now live in a different world, in the world of hungry jackals, with whom we need to behave accordingly, and we are all again looking for ourselves, on our own necks, the next "sisters" and "brothers" who, taking advantage of our kindness, like Ukraine and other former "sisters", stuck a knife in our backs .... How much did we regret our "brothers" Western Ukrainians, who were a completely different nation, in all times that fiercely hated the USSR and Russia, when in 1956 the last Banderaite was captured, but six months later Judas Nikita pardoned them all, "forgetting" what they did during the war with our people, and now this infection of Bandera has infected almost all of Ukraine, and all this thanks to our "tolerance" and political expediency. Can't our rulers see that the United States, under its stars and stripes, is again gathering with us those who fought against us with Nazi Germany, where our people lost 27 million of our citizens, and we are all squealing and wagging our tail, and we still wallow in the mud, spit on us and humiliate us. After all, we still have one way out - to close the entire border with the West, end all relations with them, reorient ourselves to the East, India, China, Pacific countries, and those who have money in foreign banks-suitcase-train station-New York, and forever .... What a shame that even those three Baltic farmsteads spit on us, and we all humbly dry ourselves off. DOCLE !!!!!
Marzhecki

0

3 March 2020 07: 30

Quote: Oleg Rambover
Let us turn to the facts. The USSR is one of the victims of the aggression of the alliance of Nazi Germany and Japan.

Japan??? Attacked the USSR?
In my opinion, the author is engaged in rewriting history. And yes, Poland was a victim of Soviet aggression.

Convention on the Definition of Aggression, adopted July 3-5, 1933

Article 1. Each of the High Contracting Parties undertakes to recognize in its relations with each of the others, starting from the day this Convention enters into force, the definition of an attacker explained in the report of the Security Committee of May 24, 1933 (Politis report) at the Conference on Disarmament made on the basis of the proposal of the Soviet delegation.
Article 2. In accordance with this, it will be recognized as an attacking party in an international conflict, - subject to the agreements between the parties involved in the conflict, - the state that committed one of the following actions:
1) declaration of war to another state;
2) the invasion of the armed forces, even if without declaring war, on the territory of another state;
3) an attack by land, sea or air armed forces, even if without declaring war, on the territory, sea or air forces of another state;
4) sea blockade of the coast or ports of another state;
5) assistance to armed gangs formed on their own territory and invading the territory of another state, or refusal, despite the demands of the attacked state, to take all possible measures on their own territory to deprive these gangs of any assistance or protection.
Article 3. No considerations of a political, military, economic or other order may serve as an excuse or excuse for the attack provided for in article two ...

You are engaged in substitution of concepts. I wrote "victim of union aggression". Did Germany and Japan have an alliance? Was. One of the members of the union attacked the USSR? Attacked. Demagoguery on your part.
You are just one of those anti-advisers who work against your own country from the inside.
1. Oleg Rambover
  
  -3
  
  4 March 2020 00: 29
  
  It is you who are engaged in substitution of concepts, demagoguery and drawing an owl onto the globe. If Japan is responsible for the aggression of Germany's ally, then the USSR is also responsible for the nuclear bombing of Japan or the destruction of Dresden. Or did all the members of the pre-war Olympic movement also "attack" the USSR because one of its members attacked the USSR? I have given above the definition of aggression, by the way, adopted on the initiative of the USSR.
  
  Article 2. In accordance with this, it will be recognized as an attacking party in an international conflict, - subject to the agreements in force between the parties involved in the conflict, - statefirst to do one of the following:
  
  Union aggression is some kind of literary term.
  In addition, if we talk about the union of Germany and Japan, as I understand it, we are talking about the Berlin Pact, then there was a special point:
  
  Article 5. Japan, Germany and Italy confirm that the above articles in no way affect the political course that currently exists between each of the three parties to the pact and the Soviet Union.
  
  History doesn’t teach anything, lying has become one of the main reasons for the death of the USSR, citizens have lost faith in the Soviet state because they constantly lied, and citizens knew about it.
2. plabu
  
  0
  
  4 March 2020 05: 56
  
  Quote: Marzhetsky
  ... You are just one of those anti-advisers who work against your own country from the inside.
  
  I can not disagree with you, although this is no longer a secret, and quite a while ago.
  But about the conclusions in your article - “... who want to look there ...” - until any clucking aimed at condemning the USSR-RF is paid, or accompanied by any other incentives, such a desire is extremely unlikely - in my opinion ...
  1. Oleg Rambover
    
    -2
    
    4 March 2020 12: 09
    
    About ... A fighter for a bright past pulled himself up! Greetings!
    
    Quote: 321
    while any clucking aimed at condemning the USSR-RF WILL BE PAYED
    
    That Prigogine trolls have been caught more than once, what is called red-handed, but at least once the State Department’s trolls were caught?
    Oh yes, you basically do not argue your statements.
    1. plabu
      
      0
      
      4 March 2020 22: 20
      
      You’re more likely a fighter, but the fighters themselves don’t like to write about it, well, how can they deal with criticism, but no one else)
      But in one thing you guessed it today, I don’t argue with you
      PS "Catch" me gathered ?? Well, good luck with that.
      1. Oleg Rambover
        
        -2
        
        6 March 2020 12: 12
        
        Quote: 321
        You’re more likely a fighter, but the fighters themselves don’t like to write about it, well, how can they deal with criticism, but no one else)
        
        Uh ... what? Who forbids you what? Thank God, it’s not Stalin’s time here, engage in criticism of health.
        
        Quote: 321
        But in one thing you guessed it today, I don’t argue with you
        
        This is understandable, you have nothing to say.
        
        Quote: 321
        Are they going to "catch" me ?? Well, good luck with that.
        
        Again, it’s hard to understand what you wanted to say?
        
        plabu
        
        +1
        
        6 March 2020 22: 13
        
        Quote: Oleg Rambover
        Quote: 321
        You’re more likely a fighter, but the fighters themselves don’t like to write about it, well, how can they deal with criticism, but no one else)
        
        Uh ... what? Who forbids you what? Thank God, it’s not Stalin’s time here, engage in criticism of health.
        
        Quote: 321
        But in one thing you guessed it today, I don’t argue with you
        
        This is understandable, you have nothing to say.
        
        Quote: 321
        Are they going to "catch" me ?? Well, good luck with that.
        
        Again, it’s hard to understand what you wanted to say?
        
        Well, if it’s hard for you to understand what they write to you in response to your own comment, these are definitely NOT my problems, re-read them yourself again, then again - and so on until you understand the meaning of what you wrote. And the fact that it was NOT about prohibitions, but about something completely different - well, you still haven’t managed to understand this.
        And you should not ascribe to someone what they wrote about you - criticism is for you and your kind - briefly formulating "has disappeared", and the level of grammar is practically at your level, that you cannot read it - everything is bad, but this your views, they do not interest me much, but you really have nothing to say - I do not consider it necessary to spend time even trying to convey anything to you, at least some knowledge and facts - you already have experience, it is useless for you, he understands military affairs at the level of Ellochka - cannibals, but posts on the topic of military operations and plans, such "knowledge" does not prevent you from scribbling ...
        PS In one piece of your opuses I agree - you need to read, but to consider Mussolini a classic is "strong".
        
        Oleg Rambover
        
        -3
        
        7 March 2020 11: 26
        
        Quote: 321
        Well, if it's hard for you to understand
        
        You repeat, work without a twinkle. Better write about sausage. And the dignity of the social system based on the taste of ice cream.
        
        Quote: 321
        PS In one piece of your opuses I agree - you need to read, but to consider Mussolini a classic is "strong".
        
        Are you sitting at my "creativity"? Nicely.
        If Lenin and Marx are classics of communism, then the founder of fascism is probably a classic, respectively, of fascism?
        
        plabu
        
        +1
        
        7 March 2020 16: 39
        
        Quote: Oleg Rambover
        ... You repeat, you work without a twinkle. Better write about sausage. And the dignity of the social system based on the taste of ice cream ...
        
        You have to adapt to your level of intelligence and perception - you write more difficult, you just DO NOT understand.
        And what other instructions will follow from you, what else should I write about?
        If you, that your ancestors and relatives are NOT able to feed themselves normal, at least decent, not to mention high-quality, food - what in the USSR, what now - and you can’t understand in any way that food is without preservatives and chemicals, which was then, now has become even more inaccessible - for you first of all.
        
        Quote: Oleg Rambover
        ...You sit behind my "creativity"? Nicely.
        If Lenin and Marx are classics of communism, then the founder of fascism is probably a classic, respectively, of fascism?
        
        Well, is it something to keep track of fascism and its classics, or is that how you work?
        Your original “work" then ...
        And you are faithful to your traditions - emphasized by me.
        
        Oleg Rambover
        
        -1
        
        8 March 2020 12: 40
        
        Quote: 321
        You have to adapt to your level of intelligence and perception - you write more difficult, you just DO NOT understand.
        
        Sorry, I have not served in the army for 20 years, make a discount.
        
        Quote: 321
        If you, that your ancestors and relatives are NOT able to feed themselves normal, at least decent, not to mention high-quality, food - what in the USSR, what now - and you can’t understand in any way that food is without preservatives and chemicals, which was then, now has become even more inaccessible - for you first of all.
        
        You have a direct cult of some kind of food. There are more important things in life. This speech of yours says about you that you are a Soviet citizen (except for your usual rudeness), for whom something to get is the meaning of existence.
        
        Quote: 321
        Well, is it something to keep track of fascism and its classics, or is that how you work?
        Your original “work" then ...
        
        Yes, I’m tracking, I am worried about the presence of fascist sentiments in Russia. I hope you do not allow yourself to speak out on fascism? After all, you do not argue on topics about which you do not understand anything, and not having familiarized yourself with the basics of fascism, what can be understood in it.
        
        Quote: 321
        And you are faithful to your traditions - emphasized by me.
        
        Well done, found a mistake, take a pie from the shelf.
        
        plabu
        
        0
        
        8 March 2020 17: 02
        
        Quote: Oleg Rambover
        Quote: 321
        You have to adapt to your level of intelligence and perception - you write more difficult, you just DO NOT understand.
        
        Sorry, I have not served in the army for 20 years, make a discount.
        
        Quote: 321
        If you, that your ancestors and relatives are NOT able to feed themselves normal, at least decent, not to mention high-quality, food - what in the USSR, what now - and you can’t understand in any way that food is without preservatives and chemicals, which was then, now has become even more inaccessible - for you first of all.
        
        You have a direct cult of some kind of food. There are more important things in life. This your speech says about you that you owls. a citizen (except your usual rudeness), for whom something to get is the meaning of existence.
        
        Quote: 321
        Well, is it something to keep track of fascism and its classics, or is that how you work?
        Your original “work" then ...
        
        Yes, I’m tracking, I am worried about the presence of fascist sentiments in Russia. I hope you do not allow yourself to speak out on fascism? After all, you do not argue on topics about which you do not understand anything, and not having familiarized yourself with the basics of fascism, what can be understood in it.
        
        Quote: 321
        And you are faithful to your traditions - emphasized by me.
        
        Well done, found a mistake, take a pie from the shelf.
        
        Why do I need your pie, especially in your new opus there are still mistakes - so there will be a lot of pies, and it will not get fat for long, and you have poor-quality ones, so many pies, why do I need this?
        And EVERYTHING ELSE IS AT YOU - the next series of blah blah blah in your performance, and whoever wrote about rudeness here - gives out the signs at a time, tries to put on labels, who is there, who should write what, who shouldn’t write, so you get the answer, but you still need to understand it, but with understanding you have a problem ...
        PS And it’s time for you to already understand that getting to know the basics and understanding the topic is MISCELLANEOUS)
        PPS There will be no discounts.
        
        Oleg Rambover
        
        -1
        
        10 March 2020 00: 21
        
        Quote: 321
        Why do I need your pie, especially in your new opus there are still mistakes - so there will be a lot of pies, and it will not get fat for long.
        
        So wonderful, your food problems will be solved.
        Your stupid rudeness something tired me again.
        PS It is hard to believe that a person who writes so primitively (one opus about sausage is worth something) and is so rudely rude, conducts some kind of scientific or teaching activity. Yes, and a former officer. You should be ashamed, because of you I was a little disappointed in this world. I usually trust people, but there is little hope that you have thought up everything about your activity.
        All the best.
        
        plabu
        
        0
        
        10 March 2020 04: 19
        
        Quote: Oleg Rambover
        Quote: 321
        Why do I need your pie, especially in your new opus there are still mistakes - so there will be a lot of pies, and it will not get fat for long,
        
        So wonderful will decide your food problems.
        Your stupid rudeness something tired me again.
        PS It is hard to believe that a person who writes so primitively (one opus about sausage is worth something) and is so rudely rude, conducts some kind of scientific or teaching activity. Yes, and a former officer. You should be ashamed, because of you I was a little disappointed in this world. I usually trust people, but there is little hope that you invented everything about your activity.
        All the best.
        
        What to me must - even without the scribbling of "literate" people like you, I am quite capable of figuring out what you personally think about my education, and about everything else - I have already written more than once, I will repeat myself personally for you - you are NOT the one whose opinion plays at least some role for me, so all your disappointments and so on you will have to go through on your own.
        And do not hope, I did not invent it, and the students have been going to lectures for several years in much larger numbers than it should be, they asked for a long time "why?", The answer - "you are telling so interesting" - get ready, soon they will come and ask already you - why are you lying to them? About the fact that in the USSR it was only bad, that Stalin was exclusively an executioner, and no one else, I tell them the truth that there is NOT only black, or only white, but you, basically, like black - this is YOUR choice, that's what you have to answer for - you are responsible ...