“Historical war” with the West: how can Russia not lose the battle for truth


Currently, a consistent “historical war” is being waged in the West against Russia, the purpose of which is to make it as the successor of the USSR guilty at the beginning of World War II. The defeat of Moscow could result in the loss of all territorial acquisitions, for example, Kaliningrad and the Kuril Islands, as well as the “falling” of the Russian Federation on reparations, some countries are increasingly eager to raise the issue.


And this is not a joke and not an exaggeration at all. Russia is now in the role of a potential victim of a gang of “dirty policemen” who “graze” it and encroach on it from all sides. At the same time, we have already lost the battle for the minds.

Let us turn to the facts. The USSR is one of the victims of the aggression of the alliance of Nazi Germany and Japan. As a victorious country, the Soviet Union received a number of territorial acquisitions at the expense of Berlin and Tokyo. If the FRG authorities have not yet raised the Kaliningrad issue, then the Japanese have been demanding back “northern territories” from Moscow for decades.

What can the collective West and Japan, which has joined it, do for a cardinal change in the situation? It is true that the USSR and its successor to the Russian Federation must be made guilty at the beginning of World War II, that is, transferred to the status of an aggressor country. And a lot has already been done for this.

At firstFor starters, our enemies needed to equalize the USSR and the Third Reich, making the figures of Hitler and Stalin, Soviet communism and German Nazism identical. Despite the fact that these people and the social systems promoted by them were diametrically opposed, Western propaganda and domestic “anti-Soviet” achieved a lot by demonizing the USSR, personally Stalin and communism as a whole.

Hollywood did a good job, brainwashing viewers around the world, and domestic liberal figures. How many disgusting films and television series were shot in Russia with budget money, among other things, pseudo-documentary programs, books and memoirs were written that supposedly “expose” our “totalitarian past” with the “bloody tyrant” Stalin?

Secondly, back in 2008, a declaration was signed in the European Parliament calling for recognition of August 23 as the “European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism”. So, through the union of “and” and “Stalinism” before “Nazism”.

Why August 23? Because on this day of 1939 the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was signed. It makes no sense to sort out why and why it was written, everything has already been done before us. The most important thing here is the equating of the communist system with the criminal Nazi regime of the Third Reich, as well as the link to the date, which was to play in the future.

Thirdlyas we said, the “semantic bookmark” worked after only ten years. Last September, the same European Parliament adopted another resolution on the importance of preserving historical memory for the future of Europe. And here is what it says, important to you and me:

The direct consequence of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which was followed by the Soviet-Nazi border and friendship treaty of September 28, 1939, was the invasion of the Republic of Poland, first by Hitler, and two weeks later by Stalin, which deprived the country of independence and became an unprecedented tragedy for the Polish people, the Communist Soviet Union launched an aggressive war against Finland on November 30, 1939, and in June 1940 occupied and annexed parts of Romania - territories that had never been returned - and annexed independent republics ki Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.


So, we pay attention to the wording: “Soviet-Nazi treaty”, “invasion”, “aggressive war”, “occupation”, “annexation”, etc. Any lawyer understands where they are driving in the West. For people without a law degree, the European Parliament wrote in black and white: "The direct consequence of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was the Soviet invasion of Poland." In other words, before the direct accusation of the USSR and the Russian Federation in inciting the Second World War, there was one last step left.

When will it be done? Probably, when Russia is weakened by the severity of economic problems, it will be exhausted by some protracted and senseless war, and be in a state of political instability. It is then that our “friends and partners” from the West and the East will make claims to Kaliningrad and the Kuril Islands, “obtained as a result of an aggressive war by the aggressor”, will raise the question of reparations.

Is there anything you can do to prevent such scenarios? And it is possible and necessary.

1. We must actively engage in our own the economy, strengthening defense capabilities, increasing the level of education of the population.

2. It is necessary to stop this frenzied anti-Soviet propaganda bacchanalia, at least in our own country, to start making normal films about the war that they want to watch abroad.

3. We ourselves must go on the offensive on the ideological front. As a matter of fact, why should the start date of the Second World War be calculated on September 1, 1939? And why not offer to reckon its beginning from March 1939, when the Third Reich “resolved the issue” with the Sudetenland and the Czech Republic? By the way, this event was preceded by a Munich agreement, where Hitler’s hands were unleashed by the Western countries, Great Britain and France? And why not since 1937, when the allied Germany, Japan invaded China and occupied a number of its regions?

If in Russia everything remains on its own, then the result of this inaction can turn out to be extremely disastrous for our country.
Used photos: http://mil.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

15 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Oleg Rambover Offline
    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 2 March 2020 16: 23
    -2
    • 2
    • 4
    Let us turn to the facts. The USSR is one of the victims of the aggression of the alliance of Nazi Germany and Japan.

    Japan??? Attacked the USSR?
    In my opinion, the author is engaged in rewriting history. And yes, Poland was a victim of Soviet aggression.

    Convention on the Definition of Aggression, adopted July 3-5, 1933

    Article 1. Each of the High Contracting Parties undertakes to recognize in its relations with each of the others, starting from the day this Convention enters into force, the definition of an attacker explained in the report of the Security Committee of May 24, 1933 (Politis report) at the Conference on Disarmament made on the basis of the proposal of the Soviet delegation.
    Article 2. In accordance with this, it will be recognized as an attacking party in an international conflict, - subject to the agreements between the parties involved in the conflict, - the state that committed one of the following actions:
    1) declaration of war to another state;
    2) the invasion of the armed forces, even if without declaring war, on the territory of another state;
    3) an attack by land, sea or air armed forces, even if without declaring war, on the territory, sea or air forces of another state;
    4) sea blockade of the coast or ports of another state;
    5) assistance to armed gangs formed on their own territory and invading the territory of another state, or refusal, despite the demands of the attacked state, to take all possible measures on their own territory to deprive these gangs of any assistance or protection.
    Article 3. No considerations of a political, military, economic or other order may serve as an excuse or excuse for the attack provided for in article two ...
  2. Valentine Offline
    Valentine (Valentin) 2 March 2020 17: 58
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    Or maybe this honesty and childish naivety is enough for us, enough to deceive ourselves - we are now living in a different world, in a world of hungry jackals, with whom we must behave accordingly, and we are again looking for ourselves, on our own neck, for the next "sisters" and "brothers" who, taking advantage of our kindness, like Ukraine and other former "sisters", stuck a knife in our backs .... How much did we regret our "brothers" Western Ukrainians, who were a completely different nation, in everything times fiercely hated the USSR and Russia, when in 1956 the last Bandera was captured, but six months later, Judah Nikita pardoned them all, “forgetting” what they did during the war with our people, and now this infection of Bandera has infected almost the whole of Ukraine, and all this is due to our “tolerance” and political expediency. Can it be that our rulers do not see that the United States, under its star-striped, is again gathering those who fought against us with fascist Germany, where our people lost 27 million of our citizens, and we all scream, and wag our tail, and we , still, wallow in the mud, spit on us and humiliate. After all, we still have one way out - to close the entire border with the West, stop all relations with them, reorient to the East, India, China, the Pacific countries, and those who have money in foreign banks-suitcase-station-New York, and forever .... What a shame that even those three Baltic farms spit on us, and we all dutifully wipe ourselves. MUCH !!!!!
  3. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 3 March 2020 07: 30
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Quote: Oleg Rambover
    Let us turn to the facts. The USSR is one of the victims of the aggression of the alliance of Nazi Germany and Japan.

    Japan??? Attacked the USSR?
    In my opinion, the author is engaged in rewriting history. And yes, Poland was a victim of Soviet aggression.

    Convention on the Definition of Aggression, adopted July 3-5, 1933

    Article 1. Each of the High Contracting Parties undertakes to recognize in its relations with each of the others, starting from the day this Convention enters into force, the definition of an attacker explained in the report of the Security Committee of May 24, 1933 (Politis report) at the Conference on Disarmament made on the basis of the proposal of the Soviet delegation.
    Article 2. In accordance with this, it will be recognized as an attacking party in an international conflict, - subject to the agreements between the parties involved in the conflict, - the state that committed one of the following actions:
    1) declaration of war to another state;
    2) the invasion of the armed forces, even if without declaring war, on the territory of another state;
    3) an attack by land, sea or air armed forces, even if without declaring war, on the territory, sea or air forces of another state;
    4) sea blockade of the coast or ports of another state;
    5) assistance to armed gangs formed on their own territory and invading the territory of another state, or refusal, despite the demands of the attacked state, to take all possible measures on their own territory to deprive these gangs of any assistance or protection.
    Article 3. No considerations of a political, military, economic or other order may serve as an excuse or excuse for the attack provided for in article two ...

    You are doing a substitution of concepts. I wrote "victim of union aggression." Did Germany and Japan have an alliance? It was. One of the members of the union attacked the USSR? Attacked. Demagogy on your part.
    You are just one of those anti-advisers who work against your own country from the inside.
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 4 March 2020 00: 29
      -3
      • 0
      • 3
      This is you doing the substitution of concepts, demagoguery and pulling an owl on the globe. If Japan is responsible for the aggression of an ally of Germany, then the USSR is also responsible for the nuclear bombing of Japan or the destruction of Dresden. Or did all the members of the pre-war Olympic movement also “attack” the USSR, because one of its members attacked the USSR? I have given above a definition of aggression, by the way, adopted at the initiative of the USSR.

      Article 2. In accordance with this, it will be recognized as an attacking party in an international conflict, - subject to the agreements in force between the parties involved in the conflict, - statefirst to do one of the following:

      "Union aggression" is some kind of literary term.
      In addition, if we talk about the union of Germany and Japan, as I understand it, we are talking about the Berlin Pact, then there was a special point:

      Article 5. Japan, Germany and Italy confirm that the above articles in no way affect the political course that currently exists between each of the three parties to the pact and the Soviet Union.

      History doesn’t teach anything, lying has become one of the main reasons for the death of the USSR, citizens have lost faith in the Soviet state because they constantly lied, and citizens knew about it.
    2. 321 Offline
      321 (321) 4 March 2020 05: 56
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Quote: Marzhetsky
      ... You are just one of those anti-advisers who work against your own country from the inside.

      I can not disagree with you, although this is no longer a secret, and quite a while ago.
      But about the conclusions in your article - “... who want to look there ...” - until any clucking aimed at condemning the USSR-RF is paid, or accompanied by any other incentives, such a desire is extremely unlikely - in my opinion ... hi
      1. Oleg Rambover Offline
        Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 4 March 2020 12: 09
        -2
        • 0
        • 2
        About ... A fighter for a bright past pulled himself up! Greetings!

        Quote: 321
        while any clucking aimed at condemning the USSR-RF WILL BE PAYED

        That Prigogine trolls have been caught more than once, what is called red-handed, but at least once the State Department’s trolls were caught?
        Oh yes, you basically do not argue your statements.
        1. 321 Offline
          321 (321) 4 March 2020 22: 20
          0
          • 0
          • 0
          You’re more likely a fighter, but the fighters themselves don’t like to write about it, well, how can they deal with criticism, but no one else)
          But in one thing you guessed it today, I don’t argue with you hi
          PS "Catch" gathered me ?? Well, good luck with that. bully
          1. Oleg Rambover Offline
            Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 6 March 2020 12: 12
            -2
            • 0
            • 2
            Quote: 321
            You’re more likely a fighter, but the fighters themselves don’t like to write about it, well, how can they deal with criticism, but no one else)

            Uh ... what? Who forbids you what? Thank God, it’s not Stalin’s time here, engage in criticism of health.

            Quote: 321
            But in one thing you guessed it today, I don’t argue with you

            This is understandable, you have nothing to say.

            Quote: 321
            Are you going to "catch" me ?? Well, good luck with that.

            Again, it’s hard to understand what you wanted to say?
            1. 321 Offline
              321 (321) 6 March 2020 22: 13
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              Quote: Oleg Rambover
              Quote: 321
              You’re more likely a fighter, but the fighters themselves don’t like to write about it, well, how can they deal with criticism, but no one else)

              Uh ... what? Who forbids you what? Thank God, it’s not Stalin’s time here, engage in criticism of health.

              Quote: 321
              But in one thing you guessed it today, I don’t argue with you

              This is understandable, you have nothing to say.

              Quote: 321
              Are you going to "catch" me ?? Well, good luck with that.

              Again, it’s hard to understand what you wanted to say?

              Well, if it’s hard for you to understand what they write to you in response to your own comment, these are definitely NOT my problems, re-read them yourself again, then again - and so on until you understand the meaning of what you wrote. And the fact that it was NOT about prohibitions, but about something completely different - well, you still haven’t managed to understand this.hi
              And you should not ascribe to someone what they wrote to you specifically - criticism - this is something you and your kind have briefly stated - it’s “unsatisfactory”, and the level of grammar is almost at your level, which you don’t read is all bad, but it’s your views, they are of little interest to me, but you really have nothing to say - I do not consider it necessary to waste time even trying to convey to you at least something, at least some knowledge and facts - you already have experience, it’s useless to you, he understands military affairs at the level of Ellochka - cannibals, but posts on military operations and designs under bnoe "knowledge" you wrote does not interfere with ... hi
              PS In one piece of your opus I agree - you must read, but consider Mussolini a classic - this is "strong." bully
              1. Oleg Rambover Offline
                Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 7 March 2020 11: 26
                -3
                • 0
                • 3
                Quote: 321
                Well, if it's hard for you to understand

                You repeat, work without a twinkle. Better write about sausage. And the dignity of the social system based on the taste of ice cream.

                Quote: 321
                PS In one piece of your opus I agree - you must read, but consider Mussolini a classic - this is "strong."

                Are you sitting behind my "creativity"? Cute.
                If Lenin and Marx are classics of communism, then the founder of fascism is probably a classic, respectively, of fascism?
                1. 321 Offline
                  321 (321) 7 March 2020 16: 39
                  +1
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  Quote: Oleg Rambover
                  ... You repeat, you work without a twinkle. Better write about sausage. And the dignity of the social system based on the taste of ice cream ...

                  You have to adapt to your level of intelligence and perception - you write more difficult, you just DO NOT understand. bully
                  And what other instructions will follow from you, what else should I write about?
                  If you, that your ancestors and relatives are NOT able to feed themselves normal, at least decent, not to mention high-quality, food - what in the USSR, what now - and you can’t understand in any way that food is without preservatives and chemicals, which was then, now has become even more inaccessible - for you first of all.

                  Quote: Oleg Rambover
                  ...You sit for my "creativity"? Cute.
                  If Lenin and Marx are classics of communism, then the founder of fascism is probably a classic, respectively, of fascism?

                  Well, is it something to keep track of fascism and its classics, or is that how you work? bully
                  Your original “work" then ...
                  And you are faithful to your traditions - emphasized by me. hi
                  1. Oleg Rambover Offline
                    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 8 March 2020 12: 40
                    -1
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    Quote: 321
                    You have to adapt to your level of intelligence and perception - you write more difficult, you just DO NOT understand.

                    Sorry, I have not served in the army for 20 years, make a discount.

                    Quote: 321
                    If you, that your ancestors and relatives are NOT able to feed themselves normal, at least decent, not to mention high-quality, food - what in the USSR, what now - and you can’t understand in any way that food is without preservatives and chemicals, which was then, now has become even more inaccessible - for you first of all.

                    You have a direct cult of some kind of food. There are more important things in life. This speech of yours says about you that you are a Soviet citizen (except for your usual rudeness), for whom something to get is the meaning of existence.

                    Quote: 321
                    Well, is it something to keep track of fascism and its classics, or is that how you work?
                    Your original “work" then ...

                    Yes, I’m tracking, I am worried about the presence of fascist sentiments in Russia. I hope you do not allow yourself to speak out on fascism? After all, you do not argue on topics about which you do not understand anything, and not having familiarized yourself with the basics of fascism, what can be understood in it.

                    Quote: 321
                    And you are faithful to your traditions - emphasized by me.

                    Well done, found a mistake, take a pie from the shelf.
                    1. 321 Offline
                      321 (321) 8 March 2020 17: 02
                      0
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      Quote: Oleg Rambover
                      Quote: 321
                      You have to adapt to your level of intelligence and perception - you write more difficult, you just DO NOT understand.

                      Sorry, I have not served in the army for 20 years, make a discount.

                      Quote: 321
                      If you, that your ancestors and relatives are NOT able to feed themselves normal, at least decent, not to mention high-quality, food - what in the USSR, what now - and you can’t understand in any way that food is without preservatives and chemicals, which was then, now has become even more inaccessible - for you first of all.

                      You have a direct cult of some kind of food. There are more important things in life. This your speech says about you that you owls. a citizen (except your usual rudeness), for whom something to get is the meaning of existence.

                      Quote: 321
                      Well, is it something to keep track of fascism and its classics, or is that how you work?
                      Your original “work" then ...

                      Yes, I’m tracking, I am worried about the presence of fascist sentiments in Russia. I hope you do not allow yourself to speak out on fascism? After all, you do not argue on topics about which you do not understand anything, and not having familiarized yourself with the basics of fascism, what can be understood in it.

                      Quote: 321
                      And you are faithful to your traditions - emphasized by me.

                      Well done, found a mistake, take a pie from the shelf.

                      Why do I need your pie, especially in your new opus there are still mistakes - so there will be a lot of pies, and it will not get fat for long, and you have poor-quality ones, so many pies, why do I need this? bully
                      And EVERYTHING ELSE IS AT YOU - the next series of blah blah blah in your performance, and whoever wrote about rudeness here - gives out the signs at a time, tries to put on labels, who is there, who should write what, who shouldn’t write, so you get the answer, but you still need to understand it, but with understanding you have a problem ...
                      PS And it’s time for you to already understand that getting to know the basics and understanding the topic is MISCELLANEOUS) bully
                      PPS There will be no discounts. hi
                      1. Oleg Rambover Offline
                        Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 10 March 2020 00: 21
                        -1
                        • 0
                        • 1
                        Quote: 321
                        Why do I need your pie, especially in your new opus there are still mistakes - so there will be a lot of pies, and it will not get fat for long.

                        So wonderful, your food problems will be solved.
                        Your stupid rudeness something tired me again.
                        PS It is hard to believe that a person who writes so primitively (one opus about sausage is worth something) and is so rudely rude, conducts some kind of scientific or teaching activity. Yes, and a former officer. You should be ashamed, because of you I was a little disappointed in this world. I usually trust people, but there is little hope that you have thought up everything about your activity.
                        All the best.
                      2. 321 Offline
                        321 (321) 10 March 2020 04: 19
                        0
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        Quote: Oleg Rambover
                        Quote: 321
                        Why do I need your pie, especially in your new opus there are still mistakes - so there will be a lot of pies, and it will not get fat for long,

                        So wonderful will decide your food problems.
                        Your stupid rudeness something tired me again.
                        PS It is hard to believe that a person who writes so primitively (one opus about sausage is worth something) and is so rudely rude, conducts some kind of scientific or teaching activity. Yes, and a former officer. You should be ashamed, because of you I was a little disappointed in this world. I usually trust people, but there is little hope that you invented everything about your activity.
                        All the best.

                        What to me must - I’m quite capable of understanding even without the writings of "literate people" like you, and what you personally think about my education, and about everything else - I have already written more than once, I will repeat it personally for you - you are NOT the one whose opinion plays at least some role for me, so all of your frustrations and stuff you have to go through yourself.
                        And don’t hope, I didn’t invent it, and the students at the lecture have been gathering for many years in much larger quantities than they should have, quite a while asked “why?”, The answer is “you are telling so interestingly” - get ready, they will come soon and ask you - why are you lying to them? About the fact that in the USSR it was only bad, that Stalin was exclusively an executioner, and no one else, I’m telling them the truth that there is NOT only black, or only white, but mostly black is to your liking - this is YOUR choice here you have to answer for it - you have to answer ...