The second deck MiG-29K crashed in India


On Sunday, during a planned training flight over the western Indian state of Goa, the Indian MiG-29K combat aircraft crashed.


This is stated in a statement by a representative of the Indian Navy on a Twitter page.

As follows from the message, the fighter pilot used the catapult and remained alive. By happy coincidence, the plane crashed in a deserted place, and therefore there were no casualties and destruction.

The Indian Navy command announced the start of an investigation into the causes of today's disaster.

Indian media recall that this is the second case in the past six months: in November 2019, in the same state near the village of Verna, the same MiG-29K crashed.

According to the results of the investigation into the November catastrophe, it was found that the cause of the accident was a bird falling into the engine of the combat vehicle. Pilots took the car away from the village and then ejected.

A disaster video appeared on the network, showing that the plane came in from the sea and crashed deep into Goa.


Recall that India has the fourth largest combat fleet after the United States, Russia and China, and the Indian Navy is armed with about forty deck-based naval fighters MiG-29K and MiG-29KUB (combat training).
Photos used: https://www.flickr.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

9 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 23 February 2020 14: 12
    -3
    • 1
    • 4
    Definitely a technique.
    1. 123 Offline
      123 (123) 23 February 2020 15: 16
      0
      • 3
      • 3
      Definitely a technique.

      Bravo. good How quickly did you analyze and make a conclusion. what Did you try to get a job at the IAC? winked
      1. Arkharov Offline
        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 23 February 2020 17: 03
        -3
        • 1
        • 4
        Do you think the pilot burning the bull unsuccessfully threw out a burning engine in flight? You can still try to dump the birds, but they, as a rule, tend to get into the engine when taking off.
        1. 123 Offline
          123 (123) 23 February 2020 17: 21
          0
          • 3
          • 3
          Do you think the pilot burning the bull unsuccessfully threw out a burning engine in flight? You can still try to dump the birds, but they, as a rule, tend to get into the engine when taking off.

          Bird in November, a video on YouTube for 3 months hanging. The causes of the new accident are not reported. hi
          1. Arkharov Offline
            Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 24 February 2020 11: 33
            -1
            • 0
            • 1
            Well, what do you yourself think, which can, purely theoretically, be the cause of engine fire in flight. Is it already in flight? Here, it seems, you do not have to be seven spans in the forehead and work in the IAC, the possible reasons have already been listed. What is one other than the two, in which 90% is one more likely? Give me one more possible reason, wait?
            1. 123 Offline
              123 (123) 24 February 2020 12: 35
              +2
              • 2
              • 0
              Well, what do you yourself think, which can, purely theoretically, be the cause of engine fire in flight. Is it already in flight?

              Purely theoretically, anything. Do not forget, we are talking about the Indian army, it has its own traditions. Perhaps the technicians were not diligent in teaching and poorly understood the "sacred ritual" of handling the technique. recourse Unlike these gunners: winked



              There seems to be no need to be seven spans in the forehead and work in the IAC, possible reasons have already been listed.

              What kind? "Definitely a technique." Bravo again. good Definitely, an airplane is a technique, not an animal, and the accident is not a consequence of its illness. winked "Bird hit"? This reason was voiced in the November accident. There are no more versions yet. request Unlike you, the rest of the experts are more cautious in their assessments and prefer to wait for the results of the investigation, at least preliminary. To make a "diagnosis" by reading 2 paragraphs on the site, not all specialists can yet. repeat

              What is one other than the two, in which 90% is one more likely? Give me one more possible reason, wait?

              Failure of equipment can be caused both by factory defects and improper maintenance. You never know, suddenly the maintenance technician stupidly did not twist the fuel line. Without the results of inspection, decryption of information from the "black boxes", conclusions should not be made. So, I'm sorry, I’ll wait for the results and will not put forward any versions, request I'm not a fortuneteller. no
              1. Arkharov Offline
                Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 24 February 2020 14: 43
                -1
                • 0
                • 1
                Failure of equipment can be caused both by factory defects and improper maintenance. You never know, suddenly the maintenance technician stupidly did not twist the fuel line.

                I did not talk about how and why the equipment failed, but that it technique. Which you confirmed without coming up with anything else.
                1. 123 Offline
                  123 (123) 25 February 2020 09: 04
                  -1
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  I did not talk about how and why the equipment failed, but that it technique. Which you confirmed without coming up with anything else.

                  Bravo again. good An airplane is a technique, not an animal. yes Congratulations. drinks The title "Captain Evidence 2020" is yours. yes
                  1. Arkharov Offline
                    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 25 February 2020 11: 17
                    0
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    Either you do not quite understand what you read, or pretend to be?