Sberbank sale: a scam or a “deal of the century”?


The other day it became known that the Russian government, with the money of the National Welfare Fund (NWF), will buy from the Central Bank of the Russian Federation a controlling stake in Sberbank of the Russian Federation. Even at first glance, the "deal of the century" looks "unclear." The more details appear, the more questions arise in whose interests all this is actually done.


The inhabitants are presented with this financial manipulation as the return of state control over the country's largest systemically important bank. Finance Minister Anton Siluanov said:

The financial regulator should not be a member of the organizations that it regulates, over which it oversees.


It seems to be right, but immediately logical questions arise. Why did the government arrange in previous decades that there is such an obvious and flagrant conflict of interest in the combination of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and Sberbank? Why is it necessary to correct this nonsense right now and precisely at the expense of the NWF? It is worth recalling, how did Sberbank get into the ownership of the Central Bank, and what is our mega-regulator of the financial market in its essence?

A lot has already been said that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is an extremely specific office. On the one hand, his assets are, as it were, in federal ownership, and his head is appointed by the State Duma on the proposal of the president, and he is accountable to her. On the other hand, it is accountable - it does not mean it is controlled, but these are two big differences, and legally the Central Bank of the Russian Federation is not a state authority, remaining independent of the government. Very original design, you will not say anything. There are many conspiracy and not very theories about how through the Central Banks of different countries the US Federal Reserve exerts its influence on their financial sector. The question is debatable, but the recommendations of the IMF in the Central Bank of the Russian Federation are definitely listened to. By the way, it is he, and not the state, who owns all our gold and currency reserves.

Let's look at the dotted history of Sberbank ownership. Today it is the largest transnational bank of the Russian Federation. His brand alone is estimated at 670,4 billion rubles, the most expensive in the country. The Central Bank of the Russian Federation owns 50% plus one voting share. The remaining shares are in free float. According to some reports, up to 45% of Sberbank shares are in the hands of large foreign speculators. We will return to this question in more detail later.

If you look at the "deal of the century" in dynamics, then it looks as follows. First, the Central Bank of the Russian Federation acquired a controlling stake in Sberbank at a “bargain price”, because underestimated estimates of its market value were “drawn” by American companies. Further, with the direct support of the mega-regulator, that is, with an obvious conflict of interest, Sberbank grows to the state of a market monster. Then the most interesting thing happens.

The question is, if the transaction is between government agencies, why not just transfer the shares of Sberbank to the balance of the RF Ministry of Finance?

However, under the leadership of the "effective manager" Elvira Nabiullina, the CBR became unprofitable. Due to the “hurricane” mopping up of the banking sector and unsuccessful stock exchange games, the Central Bank showed losses in the amount of 2017 billion rubles in 435,3, and 2018 billion in 434,7. That is, from such a “Central Bank of the Russian Federation independent of the state and therefore effective”, there has been no use of the federal budget in the past few years. Ms. Nabiullina is categorically against the transfer: only selling for real money, which will allow her to cover a hole in the balance sheet and something else to herself, when the question arises about the results of her managerial activities.

Where to get the money for the Central Bank, independent of the state, to make ends meet? Of course, we have with you, from our National Welfare Fund. Recall that there was just enough money accumulated to be able to invest in the development of our own economics. But instead, 2,45 trillion rubles will be pulled out of the NWF, which will go to the "deal of the century." This means that the Fund’s reserve will automatically fall below a certain level, and the use of public money for the development of the country will again have to be forgotten for a long time. Probably until the next "deal of the century."

But that is not all. It is clear that we are losing from these manipulations, and who then wins?

The fact is that when the beneficiary changes, minority shareholders get the right to sell their assets. As we mentioned above, more than 45% of Sberbank shareholders are foreign speculators. So they will have the opportunity to skim the cream, because according to the results of 2019, Sberbank will show a record profit - about 1 trillion rubles. This is money that the bank pulled out of the economy in order to be valued and sold at a higher price.

If everyone is happy with everything and no one’s heads fly at the behest of the country's leadership from such “deals of the century”, then we probably deserve such “top managers”.
Photos used: Konstantin Evstegneev / wikipedia.org
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

13 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dmitry S. Offline
    Dmitry S. (Dmitry Sanin) 20 February 2020 12: 12
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    It’s a pity ... It’s a pity that I can’t understand anything in this situation.
    1. Observer2014 Offline
      Observer2014 20 February 2020 18: 45
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      It’s a pity ... It’s a pity that I can’t understand anything in this situation

      On, take and listen in general terms. wink

  2. Dust Offline
    Dust (Sergei) 20 February 2020 12: 16
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    Aunt Nabi didn’t say how she received Sberbank? All these years she hasn’t invested a penny in the development of Sberbank, which she got for free ... And now, only for sale! Why not a scam !!!
  3. Vladimir_ Voronov (Vladimir) 20 February 2020 12: 35
    -1
    • 1
    • 2
    “Look at the root,” said Kozma Prutkov, and your articles not only at the level of kitchen conversations, they also suggest that you sold for “thirty pieces of silver”.
    1. 123 Offline
      123 (123) 20 February 2020 13: 49
      +3
      • 3
      • 0
      “Look at the root,” said Kozma Prutkov, and your articles not only at the level of kitchen conversations, they also suggest that you sold for “thirty pieces of silver”.

      I often disagree with the arguments and conclusions of this author, often opinions differ radically, but not this case. With a few exceptions, the opinion is about the same. Rather, this is a different angle of consideration of the problem, but the conclusions are approximately similar. If you want, let's try to make out everything calmly, reasonably, without scandal hi
  4. Marzhecki Online
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 20 February 2020 13: 16
    +3
    • 4
    • 1
    Quote: Vladimir_Voronov
    they also suggest that you sold for “thirty pieces of silver”.

    Thank you ...
    And to whom it was sold, if not a secret? And what is the relationship between the publication and the assumption of "selling the motherland for 30 pieces of silver"? Is it me, or something, I twist and turn state property as I want?
    PS: if you personally don’t like my articles and feel any personal dislike, read others, and don’t hang labels on other strangers. That’s the whole piece of advice.
    1. Vladimir_ Voronov (Vladimir) 20 February 2020 14: 54
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      The fact is that the Anglo-Saxon partners and you were very nervous about this news. And if they got nervous, then the power came to them on their favorite callus.

      Look at the root

      Strategic victory is important. No one won the war without loss.
  5. Marzhecki Online
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 20 February 2020 13: 32
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Quote: Vladimir_Voronov
    "Look at the root," said Kozma Prutkov, and your articles are not only at the level of kitchen conversations ...

    In my opinion, I quite reasonably and reasonably explained the essence of the ongoing processes. If they do not suit you personally, you can refute them just as reasonably. If this works out.
    If you personally do not like this picture of the world, I recommend other authors: R. Ishchenko, A. Rogers, A. Chaldey and so on. They, too, will clearly and beautifully explain and justify everything to you. You'll like it. By the way, the first two of these are political emigrants and from Russia they write all about their home country. This is about the silver coins.
    PS Personally, I am Russian and live and work in the Russian Federation. Yes, I am very critical of our realities, but I write about this reasonedly and consistently.
  6. steelmaker Offline
    steelmaker 20 February 2020 13: 38
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    I’m not good at such “finances”. And at first I thought that the state would take Sberbank under its control in this way. Early happy. And the author is rather right - this deal does not bode well for the people.
  7. Marzhecki Online
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 20 February 2020 13: 56
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    Quote: 123
    “Look at the root,” said Kozma Prutkov, and your articles not only at the level of kitchen conversations, they also suggest that you sold for “thirty pieces of silver”.

    I often disagree with the arguments and conclusions of this author, often opinions differ radically, but this is not the case. With a few exceptions, the opinion is about the same. Rather, this is a different angle of consideration of the problem, but the conclusions are approximately similar. If you want, let's try to make out everything calmly, reasonably, without scandal hi

    Thanks. Not expected. hi
  8. andrew42 Offline
    andrew42 (Andrei) 20 February 2020 14: 02
    +3
    • 3
    • 0
    Simply withdrawing money from the budget fund to private hands for an asset that the state does not need. Large private co-owners of Sberbank want money, preferably from the budget, preferably a lot.
  9. Marzhecki Online
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 20 February 2020 15: 33
    +3
    • 3
    • 0
    Quote: Vladimir_Voronov
    The fact is that the Anglo-Saxon partners and you were very nervous about this news. And if they got nervous, then the power came to them on their favorite callus.

    The Anglo-Saxon partners are one of the main beneficiaries from the sale of shares at an inflated price. Plus, they pull out funds from the NWF, which could go to the development of the Russian economy.
    Understand one more thing: the West is not single and monolithic; it is a complex conglomerate of competing groups with their own interests and the media covering them.
  10. gorenina91 Offline
    gorenina91 (Irina) 20 February 2020 18: 42
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    Most likely, our not very successful government and even more unsuccessful "effective managers" - Elvira Nabiullina and the Company ... will try to crank out the Trishkin Kaftan scam ... - they will try to somehow reverse the situation with Gazprom’s losing policy and the fall of all economic Russian regalia ... For this, a temporary take-off of Sberbank shares is useful; Well, the rise of Blue Chip shares ... - Gazprom ...
    - Well, this one-time trick can be quite profitable, for taking off assets ... .. - again, foreign speculators will squeeze out the lion's share of profit ...
    - Well, large Russian shareholders trade well and make good; and then Sberbank’s shares may fall and Russian minority shareholders ... get a minimum ... - Well, where will the main gain from sales go ...- you can only guess ...- what if they really want to support the Russian economy .. . -Though.........
    - In other words ... - Sberbank will “sail off” from the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, and it will not “moor” to something else ...