NATO requires Russia to stop "humanitarian convoys" and support for Donbass

The North Atlantic Alliance and some of its members suddenly became concerned about the aggravation of the situation in the Donbass, which arose as a result of provocations from the Ukrainian army.

At first, NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu stated that the alliance was concerned about the escalation in eastern Ukraine, which “undermines the Minsk accords and efforts to resolve the conflict peacefully.”

Further, in spite of the obvious facts, the bloc’s spokesman made a verbal somersault and called on Russia to “withdraw its troops, stop supporting the separatists and make real efforts to implement the Minsk agreements”.

Suddenly, in a unanimous voice with Lungescu, a statement was made by British Permanent Representative to the UN Karin Pierce, who called on Russia to stop the practice of sending "unexpected humanitarian convoys" to the Donbass.

In addition, Pierce noted that London supports the agreements reached in Minsk and endorses the desire of Vladimir Zelensky to end the conflict in eastern Ukraine exclusively by diplomatic methods.

Against the backdrop of the fact that during the five years of the civil war in Ukraine, neither NATO nor Great Britain bothered to organize humanitarian assistance to the republics, which fought off the aggression of Kiev, such statements sound extremely strange.

It can be assumed that the statements of the representatives of NATO and Great Britain would have some weight.

However, after what the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance have done with Libya, the words Lungescu and Pierce look like extreme hypocrisy.
  • Photos used: Insider /
The publication is looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. Nick Offline Nick
    Nick (Nikolai) 19 February 2020 19: 25
    NATO's naive immediacy even touches. laughing
    1. A.Lex Offline A.Lex
      A.Lex (Secret information) 21 February 2020 13: 27
      NATO is an illegal Anglo-Saxon terrorist organization ...
  2. steelmaker Online steelmaker
    steelmaker 19 February 2020 19: 33
    And I said that nobody needs this Dobass, except for the Russians. He would have been attached long ago, like CRIMEA, by referendum! It certainly won’t be worse! We now have Ukrainians working from Kharkov, so they are seriously telling us that the Ukrainians of the Second World War won with their second Ukrainian front !!! In their brains powdered! And if nothing is done now, then the massacre in the future will definitely be! Russian Russians!
    1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
      Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 19 February 2020 19: 46
      Donbass needs to be returned to Russia, here I agree with you, and anti-Russian elements should be evicted from the territories of Russia, like the Germans from Kaliningrad, we do not need bandits and terrorists in Russia who are sick with Russophobia! In the end, even in NATO countries they can easily be deprived of a residence permit, or imprisoned for activities directed against the state!
    2. andrew.strygin Offline andrew.strygin
      andrew.strygin (Andrey Strygin) 19 February 2020 20: 11
      Probably from the young. We also already have these. THANKS to nits democrats (liberals).
      1. Panting Offline Panting
        Panting (Vyacheslav) 19 February 2020 21: 20
        Yes, they are everywhere - both with us and with you.
  3. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
    Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 19 February 2020 19: 43
    Or maybe NATO will stop helping the fascist Bandera regime of Avakov and the company and stop climbing the borders of Russia like a typhoid louse ?! Build a wall with Mexico, and the genocide of the Russian people, which you organized in the Donbass, will come back to you!
  4. andrew.strygin Offline andrew.strygin
    andrew.strygin (Andrey Strygin) 19 February 2020 20: 09
    Insanity grew stronger - the trees bent. But this is still a warm-up. Zee invited foreign troops to his territory. Oh, it’s bad if our guys have to be there.
  5. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 19 February 2020 20: 36
    Or maybe this NATO still needs to remove the port and stand in a pose?
    1. Panting Offline Panting
      Panting (Vyacheslav) 19 February 2020 21: 21
      They can, therefore, die of happiness!
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Anchonsha Offline Anchonsha
    Anchonsha (Anchonsha) 20 February 2020 00: 56
    However, the Pentagon has earned and European leaders have taken a peak, spitting on the fact that the United States will not leave them alone and will begin to suppress their freedoms. We were faced with a choice, most likely, we had no other choice but to take LDNR under our protection. And the West was preoccupied with the opportunity to appropriate the lands of Ukraine. There is nothing more for them to enrich. Only this is not understood by Ukrainians and their Bandera leadership.
  8. LeftPers Offline LeftPers
    LeftPers (Anton) 20 February 2020 08: 21
    We take part of the title phrase: "NATO demands from Russia ....." - the middle finger sticks out and the article ends.
  9. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
    Bulanov (Vladimir) 20 February 2020 10: 26
    If NATO demands, then it is necessary to stop, as they require, the supply of oil, gas, electricity to Ukraine. Remove Russian banks from Ukraine and transfer them to Crimea. And then in the Crimea it is impossible to buy Gazprom shares. Better yet, find a new Sudoplatov in Russia and then, perhaps, NATO will lag behind Ukraine and Russia at the same time.
  10. Dzafdet Offline Dzafdet
    Dzafdet (Sergei) 20 February 2020 12: 26
    It is necessary in response to give NATO members a foam member.
    1. A.Lex Offline A.Lex
      A.Lex (Secret information) 21 February 2020 13: 17
      No, Sergey. Better yang glass - they do not deserve more!
  11. Roarv Offline Roarv
    Roarv (Robert) 20 February 2020 14: 59
    Oh, this is not good, but without forcing peace in any way, South Ossetia will have to sell Kalibr missiles to Donbas, and Abkhazia will have to enter its Navy into the Azov Sea, fighting through proxies of participants ...
  12. Tektor Offline Tektor
    Tektor (Tektor) 20 February 2020 15: 01
    I immediately recall the maxims about the "wrong side of history" in Russia. Well, the important thing is not which side is considered correct from the point of view of the West, but which story Russia considers correct. Here we will adhere to that.
  13. Wooh Offline Wooh
    Wooh (Barmaley) 20 February 2020 15: 05
    The softness of the Russian authorities began to annoy me. What are they all afraid of? Send them ... and they themselves will run around. I have studied Western psychology for 20 years. I work with them. bully
    1. A.Lex Offline A.Lex
      A.Lex (Secret information) 21 February 2020 13: 25
      Barmaley, and some of our officials are just AFRAID that they will be excommunicated from the possibility of going abroad, to all kinds of symposia and rest there. The problem is not in the West, but in the bureaucracy of Russia. You need to put your own in a stall.
  14. NATO requires Russia
    stop the convoys
    and for this they promise
    award an order!