Kremlin commented on Buk’s involvement in Boeing’s crash


Recently сообщалосьthat according to a document prepared in the bowels of the Netherlands Military Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) and published by independent journalists, “flight MH17 flew out of reach from all the places established and used by Ukraine and Russia where the Buk-M1 systems were deployed. This information has already been commented by the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov.


According to Peskov, published data only once again confirm the correctness of Russia.

This once again indicates that there are still a huge number of questions, and questions that most seriously cast doubt on a biased position that has been repeatedly voiced (about the causes of the disaster - ed.)

- said Sands.

Unfortunately, Russia was denied the right to become a member of an international investigation team

- reminded Peskov.

In turn, Senator Franz Klintsevich, a member of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security, provided the newspaper "Sight" your vision of the situation.

Dutch intelligence, unlike the CIA, does not collect intelligence on photojacks from social networks. They will probably be put in place for such a great liberty as an objective analysis

- considers Klintsevich.

Nevertheless, the Dutch secret services are extremely interested in an objective investigation of this case.

- noted Klintsevich.

The most important question is why there is a delay in the start of the trial regarding the disaster of the Malaysian Boeing. The answer is simple: because Russia is ready for it, but its Western prosecutors are not. There was only a demonstration of fakes, explicitly modeled or taken from social networks, unprofessional photo-toads and so on. All this, of course, played a certain role - public opinion was swayed, Russia was accused, sanctions were imposed

- reminded Klintsevich.

And now you have to answer. There will be a court and evidence will be presented, lawyers and journalists will work. Therefore, Russia has nothing to worry about: among the many journalists from around the world there will be those who understand that discovering the truth is a chance for them. A chance to become famous, to make a sensation, to prove yourself as an objective reporter. And the usual pressure from the United States on the world media with a message that there are only two opinions - ours and the wrong one, will not work

- the senator is sure.

So all attempts to accuse Russia with the help of primitive fabricated evidence lose their force. By the way, they didn’t go through in Syria with the story of the “white helmets” and the alleged chemical attack. A serious evidence base is needed for the charges, and Russian opponents do not have it. Including, in the crash of the Malaysian Boeing in eastern Ukraine

- summed up Klintsevich.

We remind you that the Boeing 777 "Malaysian Airlines" crashed over the Donbass on July 17, 2014. As a result, 298 people died. At the same time, on March 9, 2020, in The Hague (Netherlands), the trial of suspected of involvement in the crash of the airliner should begin.
Ad
The publication is looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. BMP-2 Offline BMP-2
    BMP-2 (Vladimir V.) 18 February 2020 19: 15
    +3
    Let us remind you: on July 16, 2014, on the YouTube channel "Viyskove Television of Ukraine", which is the official video hub of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, a video was released that the Ukrainian military, armed with "Buki", took up combat duty in the zone the so-called ATO.
    1. BMP-2 Offline BMP-2
      BMP-2 (Vladimir V.) 19 February 2020 11: 59
      +1
      For non-believers "miners":



      Watch with 4: 48.
  2. orange Offline orange
    orange (ororpore) 18 February 2020 21: 31
    +1
    But this statement disavows the fact that the MN-17 was shot down by the Ukrainian Buk. Earlier, Almaz-Antey experts provided evidence that the Boeing could be shot down only from the Ukrainian side.
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 19 February 2020 00: 27
      +1
      Well, then the three-kilometer fighter pilot Voloshin, sent by the dispatcher Carlos, tried to shoot down Putin’s plane, flying hundreds of kilometers at other times, but they all messed up.
    2. g1washntwn Offline g1washntwn
      g1washntwn (George Washington) 19 February 2020 06: 19
      0
      This statement is about nothing. The Netherlands intelligence data is based on the testimony of an unnamed person. He could weave anything. Including the half-truth that is so loved in the West. This person might be aware of the current disposition of the Ukrainian air defense positions, but he might not know about the special operation and provocation at all. But his testimony seems to whitewash the Ukrainian side and give a chance to again shift the focus of public opinion to the "BUK-ghost". IMHO, another step in misinforming the investigation and society.
  3. Ukrainians shot down, aimed at Putin, but (thank God) they were mistaken!
  4. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 19 February 2020 09: 08
    -3
    Yes, here are the bastards!
    I have forgotten the names of 2 pilots who shot him down, 2 dispatchers that were pointing, and the beginning. communication through which Poroshenko personally by phone !! asked the pilots to tag !! it's better! (was in the news media)

    And on TASS and other news so far the news of the downed An lies ...
  5. Arkharov Offline Arkharov
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 19 February 2020 09: 21
    -2
    Something already about the "new evidence" all sluggish somehow, without a spark. With Leontyev, everything was much more lively and convincing.
  6. The comment was deleted.