The main myths about the "prosperous" Russian Empire

The Russian Empire, which at the beginning of the 20th century was one of the largest countries in the world, ceased to exist after the 1917 revolution and became a thing of the past. However, today, the ennobled image of tsarist Russia is heavily imposed on our society, embellished with numerous myths that contradict historical facts.


So, one of them says that the Russian Empire was an industrialized country. But in fact, at the beginning of the last century, Russia remained a predominantly agrarian power, and its share in world industry was only 5%.

Misconceptions are also stories about the "abundant" life of peasants. Feudal remnants, low land, technical backwardness and crop failure often became the cause of mass starvation. One of the most significant happened in 1891 and covered 17 provinces.

The myth of the high wages of workers can also be attributed to this. In 1912, the average per capita income in the Russian Empire was 110 rubles. For comparison, when converted to rubles, in Germany this figure reached 300, in England - 500, and in the USA - 720 p.

There was no national equality in tsarist Russia. Many peoples of the empire were subjected to severe oppression. For them, a special term was even introduced - “foreigners”.

Often the Russian Empire is credited with high morality, but this is also a myth. The beginning of the 20th century was the dawn of drug addiction in the country, and legal prostitution was perceived as a natural order of things.

As for education, its accessibility is also greatly exaggerated. By 1914, there were only 1000 students per 59 students.

And finally, another misconception is the assertion that in the Russian Empire there were no prerequisites for a revolution. By 1917, the autocracy began to lose support among all classes, and social relations within the country represented a tangle of contradictions.

The myths spreading today about the prosperous Russian Empire are nothing more than capitalist propaganda aimed at further strengthening the bourgeoisie and exploiting the working class.

Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

21 comment
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. GRF Offline
    GRF 14 February 2020 10: 44
    +2
    • 4
    • 2
    Oh, it's not hard to fool me!
    I'm glad to be deceived myself!


    With what relish they still love my Patronymic in d ... to smear and prepositions will find harmonious for this.
    I realized that everything is always bad with us, maybe enough about that, eh, "truth-loving"?
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 14 February 2020 21: 23
      +1
      • 4
      • 3
      And no one smears. One must be fair in one's historical memory. Remember not only the good, but also the bad DO NOT FORGET. If in RI everything was so good, then why did the people FOLLOW Bolsheviks ??? After all, if the people did not support the Bolsheviks so much that they managed to fight back not only from the “whites” (this is a collective image - there was enough of everything there), but (mainly) from intervention (including those supporting the counter-revolution MATERIAL AND FINANCIAL). If the people did not support, the government of the CPSU (b) would collapse in the very first months of the Civil War.
      PS ... did not evaluate you ...
      1. GRF Offline
        GRF 15 February 2020 07: 22
        +1
        • 2
        • 1
        I understand that this flow cannot be stopped: from - so it is necessary to - well, it was!
        I do not dispute the facts cited in the article; I am talking about something else. You don’t understand me and figs with him, try to understand Pele:
        Once upon a time, the legendary Pele was invited to the training of the Soviet national football team, saying that you can advise. Pele carefully studied all the techniques, listened to the trainers and delivered his verdict. “Here in Brazil,” Pele says, “they’re not training like that. You are constantly struggling with disadvantages, working to eliminate them, and we, on the contrary, are working on the development of our strengths and advantages. Then the flaws themselves disappear and the athlete does not need to be customized ... "
      2. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergey G) 16 February 2020 00: 25
        0
        • 1
        • 1
        The people did not follow the Bolsheviks; they were driven there by deception. Remember the loud slogans of those years. "Land to the peasants." But in the end, the land was not given to the peasants and the available land was taken away almost completely!
        1. A.Lex Offline
          A.Lex (Secret information) 16 February 2020 12: 01
          -1
          • 1
          • 2
          Citizen, the people of the SAM followed them. Are you of such a low opinion of the people that you assume a long-standing belief of the people in deception? Otherwise, the power of the Bolsheviks should have collapsed no later than six months later.
        2. Bitter Offline
          Bitter (Gleb) 21 February 2020 00: 10
          -1
          • 1
          • 2
          ... did not follow the Bolsheviks; they were driven there by deception.

          The people went after the “communist" Yeltsin, the result was still deplorable both in the territorial plan, and in the humanitarian, and in the demographic. hi
        3. German Germanov Offline
          German Germanov (German Germanov) 21 February 2020 10: 33
          -1
          • 1
          • 2
          Right! And they didn’t give the land, and the enterprises - they all seized on themselves. We built locks for ourselves, bought superyachts, rafted money into offshore, kids in sfords, and acquired foreign real estate. They didn’t build a damn, the Germans were bombarded with corpses, the atomic bomb was stolen from amers. And to the people, so as not to buzz, they stuck free education, medicine, housing, other penny benefits. But now - grace!
          1. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergey G) 21 February 2020 19: 28
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            What kind of nonsense? I ask you not to distort my words.
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. A.Lex Offline
    A.Lex (Secret information) 14 February 2020 21: 16
    0
    • 3
    • 3
    This is RI - its elite and its people at that time:








    And this is not talking about child mortality in the Russian Empire - 2nd place (after Mexico) ...
    1. GRF Offline
      GRF 15 February 2020 07: 56
      +2
      • 3
      • 1
      From these photographs we can conclude: to fight for social justice is pointless.
      Victims are in vain. 2nd place? Rejoice, not the first! "Everything is back to square one" - is that not a myth? And the West is helping us intensely in this self-indulgence. And the goal is simple - the suggestion that "under Western rule, the Slavs will live better!"
      Especially in the massacre against other Slavs who do not agree with this.
      Good intentions, as they say ...
      1. A.Lex Offline
        A.Lex (Secret information) 16 February 2020 11: 34
        +1
        • 3
        • 2
        Zhenya, where did you see at me that

        ... under Western rule, the Slavs will live better !?

        You are confusing something. My opinion is that the Anglo-Saxon nation ALWAYS poked its nose into the internal affairs of Russia. And for me, these insolents must be discouraged once and for all climb to us. It’s better, of course, to bomb them ... but it’s a little ... And so - a ban on the actions of any NGOs in the territory of the Russian Federation. And these photos are what was already in our history and because of what the people went after the Bolsheviks. To prevent this from happening again, our elite must be shaken periodically so that they do not swim in fat.
      2. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergey G) 16 February 2020 19: 09
        +2
        • 2
        • 0
        It has been proved more than once that such and similar photographs were taken after the revolutionary coup and civil war!
    2. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergey G) 16 February 2020 00: 28
      0
      • 2
      • 2
      For comparison, show the Soviet elite, especially during the time of the beloved and beloved Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev. His personal fleet of cars, endless Kremlin banquets that will envy any royal feasts! Etc. etc.
      1. German Germanov Offline
        German Germanov (German Germanov) 21 February 2020 10: 43
        0
        • 2
        • 2
        Well! What am I talking about? Kings would be envious! You, citizen, read the classics, but delve into them. Bunin, Korolenko, Gorky ... It is a pity that you will not hear my grandfathers and grandmothers. They would tell you a lot about the "blessed" pre-revolutionary times.
        1. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergey G) 21 February 2020 19: 31
          +1
          • 1
          • 0
          Read Gorky? This is that Gorky with whom Lenin corresponded in 1913, quote:

          The Austrian war with Russia would be very useful for the revolution (throughout Eastern Europe), but it is unlikely that Franz Josef and Nikolasha would give us this pleasure.

          IN AND. Lenin - Complete Works, Moscow: 1967. T. 48. p. 155.

          Just listen to these scoundrels, who, one and a half years before the war, write about it as a fact of a fact, while experiencing "pleasure"!
  5. Whitesnow Offline
    Whitesnow (Oleg) 14 February 2020 22: 23
    +3
    • 3
    • 0
    720 rubles at the exchange rate of 1913 is 371 dollars. And according to some reports, 344. Probably, Negroes received about the same amount. And Latinos.
  6. Whitesnow Offline
    Whitesnow (Oleg) 14 February 2020 22: 25
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    Although if everything was so good, then the 5000 members of the RSDLP (b) would not have bent such a huge country.
    1. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergey G) 16 February 2020 00: 30
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      This is how to say it. Having come to power, the Soviets adopted criminal Order No. 1, which destroyed the army. Then it’s a matter of technology ...
  7. Irokez Offline
    Irokez (Sergei) 15 February 2020 23: 23
    +2
    • 3
    • 1
    Yes damn, again everything is bad with us and everything is fine with them. This is also a myth. The growth rate of the economy was the largest of all the cap.countries, and if it had not been for us to have revolutionized us and internal strife among our own, it is not known who would be the locomotive now.
    They can say that everything is bad, everyone can, but even under Khrushchev, it seems, they compared the achievements of our modern Soviet economy in the economy of tsarist Russia in 1913, because they were quite comparable things. Well, in 1913, and the middle of the 20th, how can one stagnate in such a period of time. I understand that war, devastation, and so on, but for half a century, science, production, and labor productivity should have fled far from the past 1913.
    It is comrade Lenin and others like him, and before that, the bourgeoisie, blamed tsarism, for it did not fit into their plans, and Kerensky, like Gorbachev, began the destruction, and then at the right moment the Bolsheviks were simply given power in the right place, for it all went according to plan, and they tell us here that the Bolsheviks seized power. Even Lenin himself expressed that autocracy would fall in 20-25 years, when the moment would come, but he was surprised how easy it all turned out, as we did in perestroika.
    Everything went according to the plans of the world bourgeois capitalists, for they saw in the future Russia a huge development potential, and comrade. Lenin by revolution and civil war, and there also by intervention, drove specially the people of Russia into savagery, agrarianism and dependence on Western players. Just as in this film, and with greater cruelty, they suppressed the uprisings and discontent of workers and peasants, destroyed the intelligentsia and education, allowed women hands on the legislative level and the feeling that they purposefully reduced the population.
    Everything was, but in this film not a word about it, but only that our grandfather Lenin and VKPb saved us. This is the MYTH.
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 16 February 2020 11: 57
      0
      • 3
      • 3
      ... Lenin by revolution and civil war, and there also by intervention drove specially the people of Russia into savagery, agrarianism and dependence on Western players.

      Are you seriously? Well, you have porridge in your head! Although why porridge? This is a completely deliberate lie, which is broadcast from the West to prove that the October revolution was in vain, and that under the tsar, everyone would live better, and even better, would live under the capitalists. Tell us who started the Civil War and the intervention in detail -

      Lenin ... civil war

      - I have not seen more nonsense yet.
      Once again - if everything was so bad with the Bolsheviks, then why did the PEOPLE SUPPORT THEM? If the Bolsheviks did not have the support of the people, then their power would not have lasted even six months.
      Another lie

      the Bolsheviks were simply given power in the right place

      The Bolsheviks simply "picked up" this power, because the disorder and vacillation in power had reached the point that no one wanted to take responsibility for the state of affairs in the country.
      Another lie that the Bolsheviks overthrew the king. The Bolsheviks did not participate in this. This is the initiative and execution of the very RI elite.
      If everything was so good in RI, then why was there such a high mortality rate (including the highest infant mortality rate)?
  8. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergey G) 16 February 2020 00: 40
    +1
    • 3
    • 2
    Such articles are released specifically to bleach Soviet rule. But it is worth noting that the Soviet Union collapsed, having both developed industry, and universal literacy, and a socialist lifestyle. But all of the above did not prevent him from “safely” going into oblivion. It is worth noting the fact that already from the 70s in the USSR, agricultural production was rapidly falling. A considerable amount of grain was purchased abroad. The Soviet trading system showed its complete unsuitability (just remember the store shelves of those years). And there are many such examples.