The Verkhovna Rada thought about selling water to Crimea


Problems with filling the budget forced Ukrainian lawmakers to think about resuming water supply to the Crimea. For the money, of course.


Yury Aristov, the head of the budget committee of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, spoke about this in a comment for the “Schemes” project of Radio Liberty in October 2019.

According to the Ukrainian parliamentarian, the proceeds from the sale of water to the peninsula could become a source of replenishment of the country's budget:

There was an idea - to sell water. Israelis actually sell water to a warring country, they earn. So we had an idea, for example, to sell water to Russia.

At the same time, the People’s Deputy said that speaking of Russia, he means Crimea, which previously received water through the North Crimean Canal, blocked by Ukraine in 2014, after the population of the peninsula in a referendum decided to join Russia.

In such moments, the duplicity of the Ukrainian authorities is manifested, which, not tire of ringing that Crimea is Ukrainian and its population is under occupation, are considering the issue of selling water to the inhabitants of the peninsula.

Fortunately, Russia has resolved the issue of providing Crimea with water. Yes, there were certain losses, but now the life of Crimeans does not depend on the whims of the Ukrainian authorities.
Photos used: Aleksander Kaasik / wikipedia.org
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

24 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. gorenina91 Offline
    gorenina91 (Irina) 1 February 2020 18: 00
    +6
    • 6
    • 0
    Fortunately, Russia has resolved the issue of providing Crimea with water.

    - The author, but can be more detailed ... to highlight ...
    1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
      Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 1 February 2020 18: 24
      +2
      • 4
      • 2
      The Crimean canal in Crimea is used as a cascade of small reservoirs. There isn’t enough rice, but the fish is found.
    2. 89210393092 Offline
      89210393092 (Igor) 2 February 2020 11: 21
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      https://rg.ru/2019/10/10/reg-ufo/v-krymu-zelenskomu-napomnili-o-meste-istokov-dnepra.html
  2. GRF Online
    GRF 1 February 2020 18: 14
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    The first steps towards recognizing Crimea as Russian. In one form or another - they are inevitable ...
    Here, most importantly, the contract is correctly drawn up.
  3. Panting Offline
    Panting (Vyacheslav) 1 February 2020 18: 17
    -1
    • 1
    • 2
    A reasonable thought always comes afterwards.
  4. Russia can also sell water to Belarusians and Ukrainians!
    1. Dima Dima_2 Offline
      Dima Dima_2 (Dima Dima) 2 February 2020 00: 11
      -1
      • 1
      • 2
      Yes, they seem to have enough of their own)
  5. Natan bruk Offline
    Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 2 February 2020 01: 20
    -1
    • 2
    • 3
    Delivered the last paragraph about the fact that Russia “solved the issue” :))) In which place did it “decide”? Most recently, after 5 years, they “overcame” the Crimean authorities themselves declared that the water situation, it turns out, is very difficult. Anonymous author, do you hold all readers for blockheads?
  6. beeper Offline
    beeper 2 February 2020 01: 24
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Well, almost the old "Jewish joke" turns out with these "cunning", as they think of themselves!) "Kiev" w / Bandera "- on the topic,

    How Abram took out the garbage. He threw a little coat over his shoulders, a bucket in his hand, and, as he was in flip flops, he went out the door .... and for about three hours neither hearing nor spirit, Sarah was exhausted, waiting for her missing husband. But still he came back, with an empty bin:
    - "Where have you been for so long, because I sent you just to take out the trash ?!"
    - "And yet I sold it, Sarochka!" yes

    What am I doing ?! To the fact that (a priori incompetent in the management of such a country as the ex-USSR, and even a large city - for example, post-Maidan metropolitan Kiev with "tired bridges" and leaky city communications!) Farmer "Maidan authorities", from a filing pursuing their own targets, Majlis extremist Turkoman and the Svidomo mayduns-Nazaroders who joined them, declared a “blockade of the Crimea,” including, and unlawfully cut off the water supply through the Crimean Canal.
    The overtly gloating Kiev maydauns believed that they only make the Crimean population worse, but with this shutdown (for stopping the supply and subsequent "pumping" of water, the Russian authorities initially offered Kiev a regular "subscription fee", but it turns out that in the "modern" Ukraine "that the mercantile desires of a handful of marginal extremists, pathological sadists, murderers and looters, anti-people and anti-state, are placed above the interests of the" country "and the multinational Ukrainian population!) fool Dnieper water in the Crimea is much more "shot in the foot itself!"
    By their "spontaneous decision", in an effort to annoy the Crimeans (who absolutely "did not accept" the anti-people Bandera-Nazi "Maidan values!" the banderlogs of the Crimean Canal were flooded by abundant Dnieper waters, swamping, vast territories — residential villages and cellars — wells in them, fields and pastures, unnaturally desalinating sea water off the Kherson coast, violated biocenose!
    And this, artificially created by militant Russophobe degenerates, an environmental catastrophe on land and at sea (and in the air - birds also suffer, and poisonous dust from dehydrated tailings "of the Crimean titanium plant" punished by prices "quite reaches the amer" fallow "territory , suffocatingly covering residents of the Kherson region!) only worsened every day!

    So, it’s already “baking” the Kiev Maydauns - you cannot put an ecological disaster in the “fallow” Black Sea coast under the cloth!
    But these “w / Banderaites”, the Wolens-Nolens, forced to solve the problem at the root of the decaying Kherson region (and the dying coastal sea, with its fishing and recreational zones!) And now find ways to “utilize” the Dnieper water that they do not need, now, as in Volume a joke "," sell your garbage "more expensive, and even claiming that they supposedly" do a favor to Russia ", and not to themselves (how can I be with," fixed "in the post-maid criminal code, the banderlaw statement that" Crimea- Tse Ukrayina! "??!)" ??!
    winked
    1. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 2 February 2020 10: 36
      -2
      • 1
      • 3
      I have one question about “waterlogging” and “unnatural desalination” - and until the 1950s the Dnieper flowed into the Black Sea is also unnatural?
      1. beeper Offline
        beeper 2 February 2020 13: 09
        +1
        • 2
        • 1
        hi Natan Bruk, if you ignore this your clumsy trolling (no offense yes ) of my comment that you will reasonably tell readers about current ecological disaster in the Kherson region and ways to resolve this urgent (artificially created Russophobic "Maidan authorities" !!!) problems?!
        1. Natan bruk Offline
          Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 3 February 2020 09: 15
          -2
          • 0
          • 2
          What exactly is an "environmental disaster"? Just don’t tell me about the “swamping” and other horror stories - there is no catastrophe there, less trust the stupid things from the tabloid media. Dnieper water flows into the Black Sea in exactly the same way as before the construction of the canal. And then for some reason there was no swamping.
      2. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
        Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 2 February 2020 14: 49
        +1
        • 2
        • 1
        Quote: Natan Bruk
        until the 1950s the Dnieper flowed into the Black Sea is also unnatural?

        You see, after the construction of the canal, an infrastructure was created along it that would fade without the canal. You cannot close the channel on the head gateway. And you can’t cover it less, the speed of the current will drop, and Kherson will receive green slurry. It is necessary to build a spillway into the sea, but there, apparently, an earthen bed was dumped, which does not save from seepage. And the estuary will turn from salty to unleavened, without hamsa and tyulka.
        1. Natan bruk Offline
          Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 3 February 2020 09: 19
          -2
          • 0
          • 2
          On the channel, in fact, there are hydraulic structures. Now the water that went into the canal goes to the Black Sea, that's all. And what kind of an estuary is the conversation about, Dnieper? So it’s generally bland until it sinks into the sea.
          1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
            Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 3 February 2020 09: 24
            +2
            • 2
            • 0
            Is coming. But not on a capital waterproofed channel, but on a quickly dug ditch. That’s why bogging is. And the drain goes to Perekop Bay, 200 km from the Dnieper Estuary.
            1. Natan bruk Offline
              Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 3 February 2020 09: 31
              -2
              • 0
              • 2
              What ditch? Blocked the entrance to the channel. The water that went into the canal now does not go there, but flows along its channel further into the sea.
              1. Oyo Sarkazmi Offline
                Oyo Sarkazmi (Oyo Sarkazmi) 3 February 2020 17: 46
                +1
                • 1
                • 0
                The channel cannot be closed. It flows 500 km across the territory of Ukraine, and hundreds of enterprises are tied to it. And the amount of water cannot be reduced - in the absence of a flowering, it will bloom. Look at the satellite - from Tavriisk to Armyansk - solid fields.
                1. Natan bruk Offline
                  Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 4 February 2020 07: 50
                  -2
                  • 0
                  • 2
                  What is 500 km? The entire channel is 293 km. The entrance to the territory of Crimea is blocked. What is in the territory of Ukraine is understood. In winter, there was practically no water there.
                  1. Natan bruk Offline
                    Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 4 February 2020 09: 13
                    -2
                    • 0
                    • 2
                    In Ukraine, the channel runs 140 with a small km. And no “hundreds of enterprises” are tied to it. In Ukraine, ron was used almost exclusively for irrigation.
        2. Natan bruk Offline
          Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 4 February 2020 09: 16
          -2
          • 0
          • 2
          By the way, about Kherson in general stupidity. Drinking water there is not at all from the canal. Where do you get all this blizzard from?
  7. 89210393092 Offline
    89210393092 (Igor) 2 February 2020 11: 25
    +4
    • 4
    • 0
    Eternal freeloaders have forgotten where the Dnieper originates, because it can happen, Russia will sell the Dnieper water to Ukraine)))
    1. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 3 February 2020 09: 24
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      Russia gives only about a quarter of the Dnieper runoff.
  8. bear040 Offline
    bear040 2 February 2020 21: 17
    +6
    • 6
    • 0
    Well then, ALL water flowing from the Russian Federation to Ukraine should be paid for Ukraine ...
    1. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 3 February 2020 09: 25
      -2
      • 0
      • 2
      Yes, change the course of the Dnieper, as your clown from the State Duma suggested, Lukashenko will be very happy :)))