The Verkhovna Rada thought about selling water to Crimea

24

Problems with filling the budget forced Ukrainian lawmakers to think about resuming water supply to the Crimea. For the money, of course.

Yury Aristov, the head of the budget committee of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, spoke about this in a comment for the “Schemes” project of Radio Liberty in October 2019.

According to the Ukrainian parliamentarian, the proceeds from the sale of water to the peninsula could become a source of replenishment of the country's budget:

There was an idea - to sell water. Israelis actually sell water to a warring country, they earn. So we had an idea, for example, to sell water to Russia.

At the same time, the People’s Deputy said that speaking of Russia, he means Crimea, which previously received water through the North Crimean Canal, blocked by Ukraine in 2014, after the population of the peninsula in a referendum decided to join Russia.

In such moments, the duplicity of the Ukrainian authorities is manifested, which, not tire of ringing that Crimea is Ukrainian and its population is under occupation, are considering the issue of selling water to the inhabitants of the peninsula.

Fortunately, Russia has resolved the issue of providing Crimea with water. Yes, there were certain losses, but now the life of Crimeans does not depend on the whims of the Ukrainian authorities.
  • Aleksander Kaasik/wikipedia.org
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    1 February 2020 18: 00
    Fortunately, Russia has resolved the issue of providing Crimea with water.

    - The author, but can be more detailed ... to highlight ...
    1. +2
      1 February 2020 18: 24
      The Crimean canal in Crimea is used as a cascade of small reservoirs. There isn’t enough rice, but the fish is found.
    2. +1
      2 February 2020 11: 21
      https://rg.ru/2019/10/10/reg-ufo/v-krymu-zelenskomu-napomnili-o-meste-istokov-dnepra.html
  2. GRF
    0
    1 February 2020 18: 14
    The first steps towards recognizing Crimea as Russian. In one form or another - they are inevitable ...
    Here, most importantly, the contract is correctly drawn up.
  3. -1
    1 February 2020 18: 17
    A reasonable thought always comes afterwards.
  4. +1
    1 February 2020 18: 49
    Russia can also sell water to Belarusians and Ukrainians!
    1. -1
      2 February 2020 00: 11
      Yes, they seem to have enough of their own)
  5. -1
    2 February 2020 01: 20
    Delivered the last paragraph about the fact that Russia “solved the issue” :))) In which place did it “decide”? Most recently, after 5 years, they “overcame” the Crimean authorities themselves declared that the water situation, it turns out, is very difficult. Anonymous author, do you hold all readers for blockheads?
  6. 0
    2 February 2020 01: 24
    Well, almost an old "Jewish joke" turns out with these "cunning ones), as they think of themselves!)" Kiev "w / Bandera" - on the topic,

    How Abram took out the garbage. He threw a little coat over his shoulders, a bucket in his hand, and, as he was in flip flops, he went out the door .... and for about three hours neither hearing nor spirit, Sarah was exhausted, waiting for her missing husband. But still he came back, with an empty bin:
    - "Where have you been for so long, because I only sent you to take out the trash ?!"
    - "And yet I sold it, Sarochka!" Yes

    What am I doing ?! To the fact that (a priori incompetent in governing such a country as the ex-Ukrainian SSR, and even a large city - an example of this is post-Maidan capital Kiev with "tired bridges" and leaky city communications!) targets, the Mejlis Turkomans-extremists and the "Svidomo" Maydauns-Nazimaroders who joined them, declared a "blockade of Crimea", including unlawfully blocking the water supply through the Crimean Canal.
    The openly gloating Kiev maydauns believed that they were doing worse only to the Crimean population, but by this blocking "that the mercantile desires of a handful of marginal extremists, pathological sadists, murderers and marauders, anti-people and anti-state, are put above the interests of the" country "and the multinational Ukrainian population!) fool of the Dnieper water in the Crimea, much more "shot in the leg"!
    By their "spontaneous decision", in an effort to annoy the Crimeans more (who absolutely "did not accept" the anti-people Banderonazi "values ​​of the Maidan"!), The "Maidan authorities" doomed "their own" Kherson region to a real ecological catastrophe, since Banderlogs, the Crimean Canal, the abundant Dnieper waters flooded, swamping, huge territories - residential settlements and cellars - wells in them, fields and pastures, unnaturally desalinating sea water near the Kherson coast, violated the entire coastal biocenosis!
    And this, artificially created by militant degenerate russophobes, an ecological catastrophe on land and at sea (and in the air - birds also suffer, and poisonous dust from the dehydrated "tailings" of the "punished with prices" Crimean titanium combine completely reaches the amero "fallow" territory , suffocatingly covering the inhabitants of the Kherson region!) is only getting worse every day!

    So, the Kiev maydauns are already "hot" - the ecological disaster in the "long-term" Black Sea region "cannot be shelved"!
    But these "w / Bandera", the Volens-Nolens forced to solve the problem at the root of the rotting Kherson region (and the dying coastal sea, with its fishing and recreational zones!) And find ways to "utilize" the Dnieper water they do not need, now want to, as in " anecdote "," to sell your garbage "at a higher price, and even declaring that by doing this they allegedly" are doing a favor to Russia "and not to themselves (what about the" enshrined "in the post-Maidan Criminal Code, the banned statement that" Crimea tse Ukraine! "??!)" ??!
    winked
    1. -2
      2 February 2020 10: 36
      I have one question about “waterlogging” and “unnatural desalination” - and until the 1950s the Dnieper flowed into the Black Sea is also unnatural?
      1. +1
        2 February 2020 13: 09
        hi Natan Bruk, if you ignore this your clumsy trolling (no offense Yes ) of my comment that you will reasonably tell readers about current ecological catastrophe in the Kherson region and ways of resolving this vital (artificially created by the Russophobic "Maidan authorities" !!!) problems?!
        1. -2
          3 February 2020 09: 15
          What exactly is an "environmental disaster"? Just don’t tell me about the “swamping” and other horror stories - there is no catastrophe there, less trust the stupid things from the tabloid media. Dnieper water flows into the Black Sea in exactly the same way as before the construction of the canal. And then for some reason there was no swamping.
      2. +1
        2 February 2020 14: 49
        Quote: Natan Bruk
        until the 1950s the Dnieper flowed into the Black Sea is also unnatural?

        You see, after the construction of the canal, an infrastructure was created along it that would fade without the canal. You cannot close the channel on the head gateway. And you can’t cover it less, the speed of the current will drop, and Kherson will receive green slurry. It is necessary to build a spillway into the sea, but there, apparently, an earthen bed was dumped, which does not save from seepage. And the estuary will turn from salty to unleavened, without hamsa and tyulka.
        1. -2
          3 February 2020 09: 19
          On the channel, in fact, there are hydraulic structures. Now the water that went into the canal goes to the Black Sea, that's all. And what kind of an estuary is the conversation about, Dnieper? So it’s generally bland until it sinks into the sea.
          1. +2
            3 February 2020 09: 24
            Is coming. But not on a capital waterproofed channel, but on a quickly dug ditch. That’s why bogging is. And the drain goes to Perekop Bay, 200 km from the Dnieper Estuary.
            1. -2
              3 February 2020 09: 31
              What ditch? Blocked the entrance to the channel. The water that went into the canal now does not go there, but flows along its channel further into the sea.
              1. +1
                3 February 2020 17: 46
                The channel cannot be closed. It flows 500 km across the territory of Ukraine, and hundreds of enterprises are tied to it. And the amount of water cannot be reduced - in the absence of a flowering, it will bloom. Look at the satellite - from Tavriisk to Armyansk - solid fields.
                1. -2
                  4 February 2020 07: 50
                  What is 500 km? The entire channel is 293 km. The entrance to the territory of Crimea is blocked. What is in the territory of Ukraine is understood. In winter, there was practically no water there.
                  1. -2
                    4 February 2020 09: 13
                    In Ukraine, the channel runs 140 with a small km. And no “hundreds of enterprises” are tied to it. In Ukraine, ron was used almost exclusively for irrigation.
        2. -2
          4 February 2020 09: 16
          By the way, about Kherson in general stupidity. Drinking water there is not at all from the canal. Where do you get all this blizzard from?
  7. +4
    2 February 2020 11: 25
    Eternal freeloaders have forgotten where the Dnieper originates, because it can happen, Russia will sell the Dnieper water to Ukraine)))
    1. -1
      3 February 2020 09: 24
      Russia gives only about a quarter of the Dnieper runoff.
  8. +6
    2 February 2020 21: 17
    Well then, ALL water flowing from the Russian Federation to Ukraine should be paid for Ukraine ...
    1. -2
      3 February 2020 09: 25
      Yes, change the course of the Dnieper, as your clown from the State Duma suggested, Lukashenko will be very happy :)))