"Dismissed due to loss of confidence": Putin removed the scandalous head of Chuvashia from his post

January 29 2020 17

On January 29, 2020, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree dismissing the head of Chuvashia, Mikhail Ignatiev, in connection with the loss of confidence. By the same decree, the head of state appointed Oleg Nikolaev as interim head of Chuvashia. The document has already entered into force and published on the official website of the Kremlin.

Dismiss Ignatiev Mikhail Vasilievich from the post of head of the Chuvash Republic in connection with the loss of confidence in the President of the Russian Federation

- the document says.

To appoint Oleg Alekseevich Nikolaev as the interim Head of the Chuvash Republic until the person elected by the Head of the Chuvash Republic takes office

- the decree says.

It should be noted that after the signing of the decree, the Russian leader held a working meeting with Nikolaev. By the way, the 50-year-old Nikolaev is from Chuvashia. From October 5, 2016 to January 29, 2020, he, as a deputy from Just Russia, headed the committee of the lower house of parliament for nationalities.

We remind you that in January 2020, Ignatiev “became famous” at once with two resonant acts (scandals) that were egregious in their immorality. The first happened at the congratulation of media workers on their professional holiday. On it, Ignatiev openly called for a "wet" of journalists who, as it seems to him, write only in order to "earn on different schemes." Naturally, the Russian Journalists Union did not appreciate the official’s “joke”.

However, Ignatiev did not stop there and after some time there was another unpleasant incident with his participation, after which he began to be called on the Network "master" and "master of keys." The scandal occurred when Ignatyev, tall in stature and position, at the ceremonial presentation of the keys to the fire engine, forced an EMERCOM officer to jump after them. This "joke" is no longer regarded by the leadership of the Ministry of Emergencies. After that, Ignatiev was expelled from the United Russia party.

http://kremlin.ru/

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Port

+5

29 January 2020 19: 12

An EMERCOM officer who jumped was also fired for his disgraceful officer rank.
1. beeper
  
  +1
  
  29 January 2020 22: 30
  
  Nda, not so this bureaucratic narcissist - "trainer (snickering barchuk" on trust ")", as, humiliatingly jumping for the key, the "Emergencies Ministry officer" struck me ...
  1. A.Lex
    
    +2
    
    31 January 2020 14: 07
    
    In-in - would be normal (if he was well-mannered) would simply turn around and return to duty, and a simple man in uniform - would light up the snout for such humiliation.
    1. beeper
      
      +2
      
      31 January 2020 15: 12
      
      Or, he could just stand to himself straight, calmly looking at the grimacing swaggering bureaucrat, how much would he have the courage, standing in front of everyone, to hold his hand with the key funnyly raised up ?! How would he "get out" of this situation ?!
      After all, with every second of the prolonged pause, the "playful" governor would look more and more stupid and stupid, publicly standing in front of the public and the military in such an absurd pose ?!
      
      And what, he would not give the key to this (reflexively ?!) "bending in a jump" Major of the Emergencies Ministry (would he take it for himself ??! ), if he did not jump after him ??!
      
      Well, yes, then, probably, offended by his own "failed joke", the spoiled barchuk would "edifying" revenge on the "too proud" officer, because there will always be helpful "well-wishers" from the authorities ?!
      But a major would not have lost his face as an officer of the Ministry of Emergencies .... although, he himself knows best, everyone decides for himself what is more important to him ....
      1. A.Lex
        
        +1
        
        3 February 2020 14: 34
        
        Everything is true, except for one thing - the major has no relation to the military in the same way as the Ministry of Emergencies for the Defense Ministry.
        
        beeper
        
        +1
        
        3 February 2020 14: 45
        
        Well, this is complimentary (like even the "generals of the Ministry of Emergency Situations" are in life, if the "right husband" is a wife ??!), In memory of their former head of the Ministry of Emergency Situations, the current minister of the Ministry of Defense ?!
        Pride, of course, is expensive, but still bad when a person does not have it!
        
        A.Lex
        
        +1
        
        3 February 2020 14: 46
        
        I do not argue with you, just the word "military" in your comment is clearly superfluous.
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

+3

29 January 2020 19: 51

These are the outrages the Chuvash bourgeoisie is creating!
1. A.Lex
  
  +3
  
  31 January 2020 14: 10
  
  ....... if only the Chuvash ... For it is a way of thinking and a model of behavior - the standard among those who FOLLOWED to high posts. Ordinary people are a lower caste for them, but they are celestials, neither accountable nor untouchable. ... they think they are gods ...
GRF

+3

30 January 2020 05: 00

And this is in public, and what happened behind closed doors ... well, what really trust is here ...
Putin heard the indignation of the people on social networks - this is good, but there should be an official way for the people to evaluate any official, and with a bad rating they must be removed from duty ... and with a good one - reward.
1. A.Lex
  
  +4
  
  31 January 2020 14: 16
  
  And here, video surveillance of officials in their offices would greatly help - all the working time. As soon as video surveillance is interrupted - loss of confidence ... and - free! (True, the equipment malfunction must also be taken into account, but here the supervisory authorities must monitor it). And it is PROHIBITED to engage in official affairs during non-working hours (using official position for personal purposes, including personal enrichment). Which of them will not suit - to go free, to engage in personal affairs, but not at the post.
  1. GRF
    
    +1
    
    31 January 2020 20: 59
    
    It would be possible to add to your idea the rotation of high-ranking officials who make decisions on the ground, six months, a year, two and in another region, so that they would not be so overgrown with corruption ties ....
    Then b and the state payment of office apartments and cars would be more understandable and justified ...
    1. A.Lex
      
      +3
      
      3 February 2020 14: 31
      
      Zhenya, here I do not quite agree with you. And that's why:
      There are people who know the whole internal situation on the spot. It is suitable for rural areas and for areas in areas for councils.
      And in general - if a person faithfully performs his duties on the spot (in the same city), why break the mechanism? After all, until the newcomer finds out everything, works with the team ... a year and passed ... the shift again ... And when to WORK? Not everything is so simple here. One cannot approach everyone.
      1. GRF
        
        +1
        
        3 February 2020 15: 21
        
        The idea, of course, is utopian, but not because there is no uniformity of governance in a multinational country on the ground, or who will be offended by partial trust, or the difficulties of collectivizing a "newcomer", just no one will voluntarily share power, as well as limit themselves -or "independent" control.
        Nevertheless, without losing hope, it is possible to correct the idea:
        let a trusted rotated curator put his signature next to the signature of the current official (the auditor is not the only one who will ever check or not check, but a permanent one, and the periodic audit is not canceled) or a collegium of replaced local citizens (something like a jury), let local people will be informed and agree with the adoption of a decision.
        Responsibility is not so terrible as irresponsibility, but the authorities are not beneficial for the people to understand this.
        
        A.Lex
        
        +3
        
        3 February 2020 16: 03
        
        Not so utopian video surveillance. The time will come - we'll see ... Already ordinary workers in the offices are under video surveillance ... There is little left ... Our boss set up a camera in his office to show the inspectors what and how (in case of accusations of anything) in case of contentious issues or).
        
        GRF
        
        +2
        
        4 February 2020 05: 15
        
        With all our hands for all sorts of additional controls, including video surveillance, even despite various difficulties: significant spending on infrastructure, what video resolution, how long the information is stored, with or without sound, the difficulty of finding (temporary) interesting moment.
        To discuss criminal issues (affecting decision making), it is possible to get out of the video in your office, to be a counterparty in makeup, and there are non-verbal means of communication.
        Unfortunately, video surveillance will not solve, for example, this: they lick one street every year, and beat another on the streets for years or build a new one for a new cottage ...
        
        And an outside curator or board should have the right to disagree, let them justify and prove the correctness of the decision.
        I am for publicity, but all kinds of secrets, unfortunately, are against ... (sometimes they are needed, especially at the level of specialists, but more often - they only help to deceive). Naturally, a non-disclosure statement may be taken from the curator or the board.
        
        After all, they violate something like that - in compliance with all legislative norms: they simply sell the state to someone who needs a cheaper market or to buy from someone who needs more for the state than they can ...
        
        A.Lex
        
        +2
        
        6 February 2020 20: 32
        
        Nobody says that it will be easy, but you need to start with something. And then - experience and REASONABLE innovations.