Poklonskaya told the UN how to cover the circles of "homegrown Hitlers"


On her Telegram channel, Natalia Poklonskaya posted a post in which she offers the UN an effective way to make the world cleaner and brighter.


The deputy chairman of the State Duma committee on international affairs offers a reputable international organization to compile a list of “historical villains” that cannot be justified under any circumstances.

She further explains the mechanism that makes this excuse impossible:

There can be no partial shade. And those who start flirting with the Nazis will receive international isolation and condemnation. It can be entire countries, foundations, commercial companies, or individual businessmen who finance this plague. If they cease to receive silent approval from abroad, they will immediately close all these circles of home-grown Hitlers.


The deputy on the example of Ukraine showed that humanity has become an indifferent observer, and such a position will inevitably lead to a new Holocaust:

This is what happened in Odessa (people who were burnt alive in May 2014), the Donbass and thousands of people killed, the preparation of concentration camps for the objectionable, the punitive battalions of the "Right Sector" *, "Azov" *, the torchlight procession in honor of Stepan Bandera, an attempt to rewrite the history of World War II.


In conclusion, Natalia Poklonskaya urged to stop and punish the fascist rabble, as this is the common duty of mankind to the memory of millions of dead people.

* -extremist organization banned in Russia
Used photos: http://www.kremlin.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

17 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Panting Offline
    Panting (Vyacheslav) 24 January 2020 21: 19
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Cover up the United States and there will be no more Hitlers, Talibans, Isis and the like. Total business.
  2. commbatant Offline
    commbatant (Sergei) 24 January 2020 21: 37
    +1
    • 3
    • 2
    Look good, Natalya Vladimirovna!
    1. Valentine Offline
      Valentine (Valentin) 25 January 2020 10: 29
      +2
      • 4
      • 2
      Well, well, they’ve survived, we already have a disgrace for some compliment to a beautiful woman.
  3. Valentine Offline
    Valentine (Valentin) 25 January 2020 09: 42
    +2
    • 4
    • 2
    No, Natasha, while America is still alive, there will always be a "Samosa son of a bitch, but he is our son of a bitch." In the prewar years, Hitler was fed, clothed, supplied to all countries of Europe, now Ukraine is no longer needed by anyone in the same way, and not out of love for it is supported by those who supported Hitler at the time, and our homegrown partigenigenos need to be planted in "black craters" ", and to the Kolyma, or Taimyr tundra, to Calargon.
  4. Oleg Rambover Offline
    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 26 January 2020 01: 27
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    Natalya Poklonskaya, of course, is a pleasant woman, but the deputy chairman of the State Duma committee on international affairs is too much.
    There is no clear definition of fascism, but common signs stand out: nationalism, leaderism, militarism, xenophobia, revenge, anti-liberalism and anti-communism. I do not follow Ukraine, but in my opinion, it does not fall under most of these signs.
    More interesting to read the definition of Umberto Eco.
    1. 321 Offline
      321 (321) 26 January 2020 07: 00
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      Quote: Oleg Rambover
      Natalya Poklonskaya, of course, is a pleasant woman, but the deputy chairman of the State Duma committee on international affairs is too much.
      There is no clear definition of fascism, but common signs stand out: nationalism, leaderism, militarism, xenophobia, revenge, anti-liberalism and anti-communism. I do not watching Ukraine, but in my opinion, it does not fall under most of these signs.
      More interesting to read the definition of Umberto Eco.

      Your version of the definition is not that at the gate, it does NOT crawl into anything at all.
      1. Oleg Rambover Offline
        Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 26 January 2020 13: 24
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        So rather share your definition, I think everyone will be interested to know it.
        1. 321 Offline
          321 (321) 26 January 2020 23: 29
          -1
          • 0
          • 1
          To begin with, from the text that I wrote initially, there is a minimal amount left - that the text, the meaning, the grammar you have is “lame”, the moderators have to fix it, bully and as for definitions, more precisely definitions, since there are as many of them even on the wiki, start with them. hi
          1. Oleg Rambover Offline
            Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 27 January 2020 22: 58
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            You are not cheating on yourself, as always, essentially you have nothing to say. You would first read the wiki yourself.

            PS And anyway, who answered whom and what and what - you don’t know how to answer in decent language - well, I can sympathize, but there’s nothing to help you personally.

            That is, the rudeness of your brother's mind commbatant does not cause righteous anger in you, and the answer (not concerning you) to this rudeness of a person who does not share your views causes your discontent, and you also express rudeness as discontent.
            OK. Directly felt officer integrity and directness.
            1. 321 Offline
              321 (321) 28 January 2020 04: 54
              -1
              • 0
              • 1
              I have to repeat for you again, well, as usual - firstly, what you personally think, I somehow do not care, well, you are NOT one of those whose opinion is important to me ...
              Secondly, I already wrote, and again I have to repeat it - from the initial comment, the main idea of ​​which was that before discussing high matters, it would be nice to remember elementary as well, there was a minimum - the moderators themselves corrected and corrected, well, that commas and other punctuation marks in the internet have almost atrophied, everyone is almost used to it, in my opinion, but how can you not know the basic, not observe and not follow this ??? - It’s not absolutely accurate, but your original text was something from the series - "... I can’t follow Ukraine ..." - but after that all your thoughts with a high calm look very "original" very well. hi
              And this despite the fact that, in my opinion, you personally have not even found the Unified State Exam yet, well, it seems to me ...
              Even in this answer you are again “true to yourself”, albeit less clearly expressed - “your brother’s mind”, “answer (not concerning you)”, well, go on, here I can’t help with anything. hi
              And finally - do you judge officers? In order to do this, at a minimum, you need to imagine what you don’t have and what fright you suddenly decided that I would report to you, or should, with whom and what I discussed, including in my personal correspondence? Does the crown still press you? bully
              1. Oleg Rambover Offline
                Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 29 January 2020 01: 55
                0
                • 1
                • 1
                You have a talent. So many letters and so little meaning. What do you write there? Monograph? Do not share after publication? Just curious.

                First, about rudeness, it started with someone writing about foot and ... and so on - and again you get the liberal logic - we can, but for the rest ... it won’t work out ...

                PS And anyway, who answered whom and what and what - you don’t know how to answer in decent language - well, I can sympathize, but there’s nothing to help you personally.

                You yourself do not see a contradiction in your words?
                1. 321 Offline
                  321 (321) 29 January 2020 05: 23
                  0
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  Again, anyone is to blame for you, well, except for you, beloved ones, if you, and not only you, don’t understand the hints, you already wrote, there’s nothing to help me with, but to whom of the colleagues I wrote here, whether Pishchak, Combatant or Sake - about what, when and how - I’m not going to report, neither to you, nor to anyone else ...
                  I don’t see the contradictions, taking into account what has just been said, I won’t share a monograph - firstly, I still need to finish writing it, and secondly, I’m not going to “decipher” here or in other places except thematic forums - why should I ?
                  PS There were no objections from you about the grammar, nor about the judgments about the officers - it’s already good, but in this comment you are true to your habits or traditions - “write” - an imperative form, another would be more appropriate, yes okay... hi
            2. Arkharov Offline
              Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 30 January 2020 19: 24
              -1
              • 0
              • 1
              Oleg Rambover
              Directly felt officer integrity and directness.

              - rather, a soldier’s ...
              1. 321 Offline
                321 (321) 30 January 2020 21: 11
                -2
                • 0
                • 2
                Quote: Arkharov
                Oleg Rambover
                Directly felt officer integrity and directness.

                - rather, a soldier’s ...

                Another iksperd showed up, specialty right. bully
                You might think that your opinion interests me at least a little bit, but you are "walking ischo" (s), apparently, it’s familiar with you ... hi
                1. Arkharov Offline
                  Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 31 January 2020 09: 10
                  0
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  321 Offended?
                  1. 321 Offline
                    321 (321) 31 January 2020 21: 08
                    -1
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    Quote: Arkharov
                    321 Offended?

                    Why did you decide this? You and not only be offended - do not respect yourself, so do not wait for you to be the rest of the representatives ... hi
  5. Monster_Fat Offline
    Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 26 January 2020 07: 48
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    Did you write directly on Twitter? Why not on the fence? On the fence with the same success you can write for the UN. yes