The media found out about the number of Americans affected after Iran's missile strike


The American media reported on the consequences of Iran’s “harsh” revenge when a missile strike was launched at US bases in Iraq for the assassination of Al-Quds commander General Suleymani.


Defense One, citing its own sources in US military circles, reports that after rockets hit the Ain al-Assad airbase in western Iraq and the base in Erbil, eleven American soldiers were hospitalized with a concussion.

Also, the authors of the material report that after a missile strike from Iran, the US coalition allies chose to withdraw their forces from the territory of military bases owned by the Americans.

Such a huge disproportion - a strike by two dozen ballistic missiles, tentatively precision guided by the Fateh-110 and as a result of eleven hospitalized “suspicious” of concussion of soldiers, suggests that all of Iran’s “cruel” revenge was aimed exclusively at the domestic consumer.

For comparison, in October 2017, without any allegations of "cruel" revenge, a hundred Boko Haram militants in Niger, armed exclusively with small arms, ambushed near the village of Tongo-Tongo, during which four American greens were killed and wounded. berets.
Photos used: Hossein Velayati / wikipedia.org
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

44 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. steelmaker Offline
    steelmaker 17 January 2020 09: 07
    +2
    • 4
    • 2
    Well, the victims appeared. And they said that they had warned and managed to escape. Let's wait a little longer and the dead will appear, or who have died from fright?
  2. 69 Offline
    69 17 January 2020 10: 18
    0
    • 2
    • 2

    Better a terrible end than horror without end.
    1. Aleksey Glotov Offline
      Aleksey Glotov (alexey glotov) 19 January 2020 03: 58
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      Wonderful photo ... more often like that. smile
  3. Natan bruk Offline
    Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 17 January 2020 11: 00
    -4
    • 0
    • 4
    Here it is possible to agree with the author that such cruel revenge was aimed solely at preserving the face. Moreover, the Americans, apparently, were completely agree on this. After all, it was still necessary to try so that there would not be a single killed or at least seriously injured, and any significant damage. On the other hand, no matter how the Iranians crowed that they would inflict a terrible blow on Israel, but in fact - nothing but a shock of air. They just understand very well that in the case of Israel, the situation is completely different. There will be no agreements.
    1. Aleksey Glotov Offline
      Aleksey Glotov (alexey glotov) 19 January 2020 04: 05
      +1
      • 2
      • 1
      This is what you call a concussion ... the blow was 100 percent good.

      1. Natan bruk Offline
        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 19 January 2020 14: 50
        -2
        • 0
        • 2
        1 (one) helicopter was damaged, the landing pad was damaged, not a single seriously wounded one. What do you call “100% good”? Ah, well, a couple more empty sheds :))) And yes, with regard to Israel it was precisely a concussion. In pure form.
        1. shinobi Offline
          shinobi (Yuri) 23 January 2020 06: 38
          +2
          • 3
          • 1
          For the United States, the life of a soldier costs exactly as much as is invested in his ammunition and weapons. The soldier himself is worthless. After hitting the hangars and warehouses, the Iranians first of all demonstrated their high-precision weapons that they have them and they are ready to use them. And they hit the most sensitive place of the Yankees, a wallet. A soldier is a low-cost and quick-change unit. Infrastructure and technology are expensive, requiring time and a lot of money. The fact that, according to official figures, there is no loss, the matter is most likely random.
          1. Natan bruk Offline
            Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 24 January 2020 05: 04
            -3
            • 0
            • 3
            It’s you, rather, about Russia - about the life of a soldier, since you have an idea of ​​the American army from the yellow “patriotic” publications. And what is this “high-precision weapon" if there is minimal material damage and seriously injured - not a single one? But in fact, this is not accidental - the Iranians did their best not to inflict any serious damage, so as not to run into a crushing answer. Their "blow" - only to save face and nothing more. It was quite suitable for Americans. And to understand this, it is enough to recall their frantic crowing about how they would hit Israel in revenge for their banged state terrorist. Well, hit? After all, they understand that Israel cannot afford such agreements and in the event of an attack on it, the consequences for Iran will be most dire. One of the chiefs of the Israeli General Staff at one time said that Iran’s attack on Israel would be the end of Persian civilization. This doctrine has not changed today.
            1. shinobi Offline
              shinobi (Yuri) 26 January 2020 11: 40
              +2
              • 2
              • 0
              Apparently, you are a fan of the United States, but not important. For every killed American soldier, US military companies receive between $ 4 and $ 12 in net profit. You can continue to believe in the value of the life of a US soldier for the United States. I’m not going to prove anything, the Internet will help you. Want, dig up Old. She is freely available. Read the unclosed information for the US Congress. Fascinating reading.
              1. Natan bruk Offline
                Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 27 January 2020 09: 19
                -3
                • 0
                • 3
                Well, with the drain of you. Sending to the Internet with a call to dig up Old is just that. But in fact - it’s not that I am a fan of the USA, but it’s ridiculous to read the arguments from a person who is unlikely to have seen a living American, but knows about the American army exclusively from “patriotic” sources. If I was interested, I was in the United States twice and was interested in the American army, and I also talked with local Americans, because I know English well. So, the Russian citizen was very amused about the value of the life of an American soldier. Who would say ...
                1. shinobi Offline
                  shinobi (Yuri) 31 January 2020 01: 16
                  +1
                  • 2
                  • 1
                  I saw Americans and not only alive, I had a chance to communicate. You, my dear, have a very strong misconception about sending to the Internet. When sent to the Internet, this means that the interlocutor understood that this is a fanatic, and further conversation is a waste of time and effort.
                  1. Natan bruk Offline
                    Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 31 January 2020 08: 50
                    -2
                    • 0
                    • 2
                    When sent to the Internet, it means that the interlocutor does not have any arguments, and it means the drain and nothing else.
                    1. shinobi Offline
                      shinobi (Yuri) 31 January 2020 10: 51
                      +2
                      • 2
                      • 0
                      Yes, yes, blessed are those who believe.
                    2. 321 Offline
                      321 (321) 31 January 2020 22: 08
                      +1
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      Quote: Natan Bruk
                      When sent to the Internet, it means that the interlocutor does not have any arguments, and it means the drain and nothing else.

                      More often than not, this suggests that there is no desire to even try to fill the gaps in the opponent’s knowledge, especially if he is able to find the information himself, if he wants, of course, otherwise the proofs will spread to you (everyone) and begins - "well, is that source "," would you ... have suggested looking "- so yourself and ONLY yourself. hi
                      1. Natan bruk Offline
                        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 31 January 2020 22: 32
                        -1
                        • 0
                        • 1
                        Well, who would doubt :))) The absence of arguments is justified in this way.
                      2. 321 Offline
                        321 (321) 31 January 2020 23: 05
                        +1
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        Indeed, who would doubt laughing that the reluctance to at least do something yourself is served under the sauce of the opponent’s “lack of arguments” - and only on their own. hi
                      3. Natan bruk Offline
                        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 31 January 2020 23: 23
                        -1
                        • 0
                        • 1
                        What exactly is “done”? Anyone who claims something, and when they require proof of these claims, sends to the Internet to search for himself, is nothing more than a balabol.
                      4. 321 Offline
                        321 (321) 1 February 2020 06: 52
                        +1
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        I didn’t doubt a similar version of your answer :))) I have already given examples of what happens after the proofs are presented, here your like-minded people have repeatedly demonstrated this ... hi
  • Ahmed Markhud Offline
    Ahmed Markhud (Ahmed Makhhud) 19 January 2020 10: 21
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    First let Israel deal with Hezbollah.
    1. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 19 January 2020 15: 00
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      Yes, in 2006 I figured it out pretty well. Until 2006, no matter the day, they were bombarded and provoked, and after the 14th year there was absolute silence on the Israeli-Lebanese border, they were afraid to fart in the Israeli direction, and Nasrallah, the same 14th year, sits like a rat in a bunker 99% of the time. This is not counting how many hezbollons have already been sent to the gurus over the years in Syria, including quite high-ranking ones. It was simply said clearly that next time there will be an unlimited operation using about 5% of the IDF’s capabilities, and all of Lebanon will be destroyed, and the responsibility for this will be on the Lebanese government, which allowed the creation of a parallel terrorist army under the auspices of Iran.
  • Tektor Offline
    Tektor (Tektor) 17 January 2020 11: 04
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    There is a version that the Iranians shot down a Ukrainian Boeing because an agent, smeared in the assassination of Al-Quds commander General Suleymani, left Iranian territory on it.
    1. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 17 January 2020 11: 41
      -3
      • 0
      • 3
      Why couldn’t it be slammed before departure? Conspirological versions can be put forward very much, but usually everything turns out to be much more banal. Apparently, they just have a wild mess in the air defense + the absolute lack of professionalism of the staff. Confuse a 40-meter Boeing at an altitude of more than 2000 with a missile about 30 meters long that comes into impact at an altitude of about 6 meters ... There are also “communication problems” ...
      1. Aleksey Glotov Offline
        Aleksey Glotov (alexey glotov) 19 January 2020 04: 06
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        Yeah, somehow an eyewitness to the accident at the scene of the Boeing’s death turned out to be successful ... I found a flying Boeing in the black sky ... well, very well.
        1. Natan bruk Offline
          Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 19 January 2020 15: 10
          -1
          • 0
          • 1
          Yes, there are spies all around.
  • 69 Offline
    69 18 January 2020 07: 43
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    Quote: Natan Bruk
    in the case of Israel, the situation is completely different. There will be no agreements.


    The dog of war does not agree with this.
    1. Aleksey Glotov Offline
      Aleksey Glotov (alexey glotov) 19 January 2020 04: 07
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      smile Bedbug of war ... one bullet and my friend fell.
      1. Natan bruk Offline
        Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 19 January 2020 15: 11
        -1
        • 0
        • 1
        Well, maybe there are bugs in your army, but we have defenders of the motherland.
    2. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 19 January 2020 15: 05
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      And no one is going to negotiate with Shiite Islamofascists. Although against Iran as such, Israel has nothing, until 1979 they were in excellent relations. It is the Iranians themselves, in fact, tired of this regime, nowhere else to go. Well, while holding on bayonets. If you had seen the Iranians come off, falling to the West. Iranians, by the way, too.
      1. 321 Offline
        321 (321) 1 February 2020 06: 55
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        Quote: Natan Bruk
        ... The Iranians themselves, in general, are tired of this regime, nowhere else to go. Well, while holding on bayonets. If you had seen the Iranians come off, falling to the West. Iranians, by the way, too.

        Well, judging by only “tearing away,” as you wrote, the Finnish regime is also terribly tired of it — well, judging by how they sometimes come off, for example. bully
        1. Natan bruk Offline
          Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 1 February 2020 10: 36
          -1
          • 0
          • 1
          The “tearing away" of the Finns consists only in the fact that they can get drunk on vodka for cheap and nothing more. They can do it at home, but it will be expensive. But in Iran they will do such a bo-bo. For joint dances and violation of the Islamic dress code, too. Therefore, the "gap" among the Iranians over the hill is not the same as that of the Finns.
          1. 321 Offline
            321 (321) 1 February 2020 11: 37
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            Of course, not like that, BUT someone here recently wrote that detachments indicate dissatisfaction with the regime, no? laughing
            Is the difference in divisions so important in this case? hi
            I’m all of this to the fact that stamps are not the best adviser in such cases ...
            1. Natan bruk Offline
              Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 1 February 2020 15: 29
              -1
              • 0
              • 1
              Not. Finns go to St. Petersburg exclusively to get drunk cheaply. They are quite happy with the regime. Iranians can’t afford anything “like this” at home - they don’t have a drink, go to dances with girls, or dress an Iranian like she would like. And try say a crooked word towards the clergy. And the standard of living in Finland and Iran, to put it mildly, is incomparable. That's why the youth in Iran regularly buzzes, and their army with basijs is being wetted. This is not Finland for you.
              1. 321 Offline
                321 (321) 1 February 2020 21: 58
                +1
                • 1
                • 0
                Remain further in your beliefs about who has “what” - why should I even try to convince or convince you?
                1. Natan bruk Offline
                  Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 2 February 2020 01: 12
                  -1
                  • 0
                  • 1
                  Right. Do not engage in sophistry.
                  1. 321 Offline
                    321 (321) 2 February 2020 06: 57
                    +1
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    Any other instructions? laughing
                    Well, what do you need, and what do not need to do? bully
                    And sophistry, and not only, I can, and not bad, this, by the way, your colleagues said, though a little earlier ... request
                    1. Natan bruk Offline
                      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 2 February 2020 10: 31
                      -1
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      Yes, what directions ... Do what you want. Only, actually, sophistry is a deliberate and deliberate erroneous judgment in order to mislead an opponent.
                      1. 321 Offline
                        321 (321) 2 February 2020 13: 13
                        +1
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        That's exactly why, almost especially for you laughing wrote - "and not only." hi
    3. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 19 January 2020 15: 06
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      In fact, dogs of war are mercenaries. In Israel, the army is exclusively conscripted.
  • Port Offline
    Port 24 January 2020 06: 43
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    Quote: Natan Bruk
    One of the chiefs of the Israeli General Staff said at the time that Iran’s attack on Israel would be the end of Persian civilization.

    Iran fired off at the US bases without any problems, and he only remembers you after your next vile trick, you run into a new dog - where will you snoop this time?
    1. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 27 January 2020 09: 26
      -3
      • 0
      • 3
      You would first ask what exactly was in Pesach and who had someone there so that you don’t look like a laughing stock. after all, they wanted to make them “drape” :))) That's it, portyusha. Only you just have to crow about the “drape” :)))
  • Port Offline
    Port 27 January 2020 11: 30
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    Quote: Natan Bruk
    That's it, portyusha. Only you have to crow about the "drape"

    A nation that celebrates a shameful drape is a pitiful sight, no matter how you get out.
    1. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 28 January 2020 03: 42
      -3
      • 0
      • 3
      Are you talking about Arabs in all Arab-Israeli wars? Yes, the sight is really pathetic. And yes, until recently, Syria and Egypt actually celebrated their drapes. Well, they live in their parallel reality.
  • Port Offline
    Port 28 January 2020 07: 24
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    Quote: Natan Bruk
    Are you talking about Arabs in all Arab-Israeli wars?

    You can yulit and dodge as much as you like, there is such an expression - to celebrate a coward, for some it is considered a holiday.
    1. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 31 January 2020 08: 55
      -2
      • 0
      • 2
      Why should I dodge? It was the Arab clients of the USSR who celebrated the coward, and it was they who considered it a holiday - every year in Egypt and Syria parades were held to celebrate the “victory” in the 1973 war. This is after a shameful defeat, when the IDF stood 100 km from Cairo and 40 km from Damascus. But then again, there are so many who live in parallel reality.