What is the story of the roaring NATO soldiers against the backdrop of the Iranian strike


What is the most important thing in a war? Modern weapons? Quality timely supply? Skillful command? Everything is so, but perhaps even more important is the personal preparation and moral and psychological qualities of each soldier, without which the effectiveness of all these "shooting pieces of iron" and the military operations carried out with their help decreases sharply.


The recent exchange of missile attacks between the United States and Iran has revealed two very important factors.

At firstTehran has demonstrated its willingness to respond by force even to the "hegemon."

Secondly, it turned out that not all NATO troops are morally prepared to be hit "in an adult way" with rockets. In order not to be unfounded, we give a fragment of an interview with a Danish sergeant named Yon, given to TV2 after being evacuated to Kuwait, which was in a bunker during an Iranian missile attack along with its soldiers:

The worst thing was the ignorance and powerlessness of the soldiers in the face of the expectation of new strikes. We did not know where and when the next rocket would fall. The soldiers reacted differently. Some sat and told jokes to protect themselves, some went inside, and some cried.


According to him, it was "indescribable." The negative impression was added that after the shelling, NATO soldiers had to walk around the territory of the base between helicopters torn in half. According to the sergeant, psychologists are already flying to Kuwait to assist the soldiers, which they simply need.

What I would like to say about this. They say that there are no atheists under fire, everyone is praying, even atheists, secretly. Therefore, we’ll not gloat over the “crying” NATO members directly. Another issue is that they came under fire from Iran under completely greenhouse conditions.

Apparently, Tehran deliberately leaked information about the planned attack in Iraq and Qatar, from where it immediately arrived at the Pentagon. NATO troops met rockets in a bunker from the time of Saddam Hussein, where they were not in danger. However, the demoralizing effect is obvious. One can imagine what would happen to the Western soldiers if they were under a full-fledged missile strike in an open field, without give-ups.

Yes, it’s not to play computer “shooters” and not “Papuans” to bomb from an unattainable height. Still, a collision with a strong systemic adversary, having a serious army and modern weapons, is a serious test even for NATO.

You can recall how in 2014, the domestic "drying" 12 times "flew" to the destroyer of the US Navy "Donald Cook". Being unarmed, the Russian aircraft had on board only the Khibiny electronic warfare complex, which made the warship helpless for the time being. As reported, after such a difficult moral test, several dozen American sailors filed a report on dismissal.
Ad
The publication is looking for authors in the news and analytical departments. Requirements for applicants: literacy, responsibility, efficiency, inexhaustible creative energy, experience in copywriting or journalism, the ability to quickly analyze text and check facts, write concisely and interestingly on political and economic topics. The work is paid. Contact: [email protected]
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. Igor Pavlovich Offline Igor Pavlovich
    Igor Pavlovich (Igor Pavlovich) 15 January 2020 15: 21
    10 th
    ..Yes, this is not to play computer "shooters" and not "Papuans" to bomb from an unattainable height.

    - Is it about Putin cartoons and Russian planes in Syria ???
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. qpeqop Offline qpeqop
      qpeqop (Sergei) 16 January 2020 10: 04
      +6
      But this is definitely not about those 16 fighters of the Russian Federation, which reflected more than 2 hours of the attack of 200 terrorists and won the battle. And certainly not about those pilots who blew themselves up with the last grenade and a bunch of attacking bandits.
    3. Jar.serge Offline Jar.serge
      Jar.serge (Reznik) 16 January 2020 11: 32
      +4
      No, this is so far about several Iranian missiles, developed 30 years ago. When it comes to Putin's "cartoons", not just a few will cry, and not only cry ...
    4. Jar.serge Offline Jar.serge
      Jar.serge (Reznik) 16 January 2020 11: 46
      +3
      As for the "Russian planes in Syria", then only the ardent "Americanolysis" do not agree that it was Russian planes that returned statehood to Syria and dispersed the gangs created with the money of the "enlightened" West.
    5. A.Lex Offline A.Lex
      A.Lex (Secret information) 17 January 2020 09: 41
      0
      Thank you Igor, now we know for sure that you are a true liberoid creak.
  2. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 15 January 2020 16: 23
    +1
    Quote: Igor Pavlovich
    ... Yes, it’s not to play computer “shooters” and not “Papuans” to bomb from an unattainable height.

    - Is it about Putin cartoons and Russian planes in Syria ???

    - each about his own ...
  3. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 15 January 2020 23: 25
    -2
    You can recall how in 2014, the domestic "drying" 12 times "flew" to the destroyer of the US Navy "Donald Cook". Being unarmed, the Russian aircraft had on board only the Khibiny electronic warfare complex, which made the warship helpless for the time being. As reported, after such a difficult moral test, several dozen American sailors filed a report on dismissal.

    And then they found an aunt that invented it all ...
    So it is here. 21st century, someone said something - no photo, no confirmation, and immediately an analogue of "peremogi" over NATO ...

    And how many evil NATO members died there, from 2 of these Iranian strikes ??? None say ???
    And the Iranians? + foreigners?
    Somehow, a dozen specially uncleaned helicopters from the field are still ambiguous for the dead people from the Boeing ... IMHO.
    1. Aleksey Glotov Offline Aleksey Glotov
      Aleksey Glotov (alexey glotov) 16 January 2020 04: 14
      +5
      Show this aunt ... heh heh daughter of a Crimean officer.
      Iran in this situation is not as bloodthirsty as the United States ... respect to the Iranians.
      1. Panting Offline Panting
        Panting (Vyacheslav) 16 January 2020 08: 15
        0
        But they will not show it, because the skin color is chocolate.
    2. Panting Offline Panting
      Panting (Vyacheslav) 16 January 2020 08: 19
      0
      And you can submit a photo of this aunt, show photos of assembled and laid out helicopters, etc.
      1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
        Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 16 January 2020 09: 04
        -1
        I can not.
        I'm not fond of trolls. I don’t put them in my daddy.

        But when it was popular, they found, from memory I say, the source of these crowds writing tearful letters and Yusovites leaving the Navy.
        By the way, there were several analyzes of this case at VO, directly from TX equipment, flight, etc.
    3. A.Lex Offline A.Lex
      A.Lex (Secret information) 17 January 2020 09: 46
      +1
      Uh-huh ... she invented ... And she also invented the footage with the "drying" flight of this very "cookie" ... Yes, all this is the invention of the Kremlin bots. We are aware of the fact that you worship the Yankees.
  4. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 16 January 2020 07: 30
    +4
    Quote: Sergey Latyshev
    And then they found an aunt that invented it all ...
    So it is here. 21st century, someone said something - no photo, no confirmation, and immediately an analogue of "peremogi" over NATO ...

    And how many evil NATO members died there, from 2 of these Iranian strikes ??? None say ???

    Firstly, where is this aunt and why are you so sure that she invented everything?
    Secondly, no one died from the blow precisely because Iran had leaked information in advance. Or are you reading through a line?
    1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
      Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 16 January 2020 09: 28
      -1
      1) cm above.
      2) for the dead - a few missed - then 80 people, then not a single one. Therefore, in question I wrote.
      Merged - so merged. Politics. If he had not yet cocked his citizens, it would have been wonderful in general.

      But while it happened, what happened.
      Boeing eclipsed a dozen helicopters, IMHO.
      By the way, everywhere is given without translation and subtitles ... and:

      ... I understand Danish a little. He said that for the first time he came under such heavy fire .... but he did not say that someone was crying or panicking! He said that we did not have the opportunity to act, as we were taught, but simply sat in the bunker by order ....

      It will be necessary to search more precisely, suddenly the newsmen are right ..... græde - cry in Danish, looking for ...

      Does anyone know Danish?
  5. trahterist Offline trahterist
    trahterist (Elmars) 16 January 2020 17: 01
    0
    What are atheists believers?
    In an extreme situation, I personally begin to care completely, and I think about prayers in the very last resort.
  6. Denis Malygin Offline Denis Malygin
    Denis Malygin (Denis Malygin) 21 January 2020 15: 17
    +1
    Don't underestimate a potential adversary. The function of "throwing hats" took place in 1939-40.