“They didn’t agree”: Minsk introduced a colossal tax on pumping Russian oil

January 11 2020 43

President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko has introduced an environmental tax on the transit of oil and oil products through the republic.

From now on, companies involved in oil transit through the republic, according to the decree approved by the head of state, are required to pay the state a tax of 50% of the profits.

The tax also affected the transit transportation of oil and oil products through Belarus through trunk pipelines.

Formally, the reason for introducing the tax was called the need to accumulate funds “to eliminate possible environmental consequences in the event of an accident on the main oil pipeline”.

However, it is no secret to anyone, and the head of Belarus himself does not hide this, that the reason for such measures was the unwillingness of the Belarusian side to purchase oil at prices offered by Russia.

Belarusian and Russian media cite the words of Alexander Lukashenko:

In a nutshell, why the president of Russia did not agree on oil. Because Russia wants us to buy oil from it at prices higher than world prices. Where is this seen ?! Therefore, I refused such oil.

The President of Belarus added that during the talks he said that the republic would look for other sources of oil purchase.

43 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Afinogen

+3

11 January 2020 10: 39

Well what are played with him ??? Not tired? Introduce the same tax on all goods from Belarus and all. And then Belarus will rise, for, except for Russia, nobody needs their goods. Belarusians themselves will throw off this long-sitting president.
1. Igor Pavlovich
  
  -4
  
  11 January 2020 12: 16
  
  Have you read the article to the end, or just the headline ???
2. GRF
  
  -1
  
  11 January 2020 12: 40
  
  Poroshenko thrown off? And Zelensky will not be thrown off, even if it gets worse ... What do we get from the chaos in Ukraine? If someone wants to commit suicide - his business, but help is not worth it, they will cope.
  In the West, Aboriginal politicians are rewarded for making "correct" decisions, the intractable are exchanged for those who agree to the proposed "awards" ...
  Where in the Russian Federation are the villas of "honorable" friends, with the help of which, in which case, and ata-that could be done?
  
  In addition, there should be a clear understanding of the benefits \ losses from being part of the Russian Federation, from an alliance with the Russian Federation, from hostility with the Russian Federation. And then, when prices for Russian goods are cheaper for foreigners (al goods are better) than inside the Russian Federation, this, of course, introduces a discord ...
3. Sake
  
  0
  
  12 January 2020 20: 27
  
  Luca knows that buying the so-called. "cheap" oil, he buys a rope in the trailer, on which he will be hung!
Sapsan136

+9

11 January 2020 12: 07

It’s time for Russia to impose a complete embargo on trade with the Russophobia republics of the USSR and not to give them a dime of credit anymore, otherwise their rudeness and consumer attitude towards the Russian Federation will never end ... It’s time to send home all the gasters and patriots of these countries who got lost in Russia, such as Sobchak and Yavlinsky ... In the United States, a person who obtains US citizenship vows to defend the United States and the interests of the United States with arms in their hands, including from their historical homeland ... Only Russia suffers outright enemies on its land, ready fight against the Russian Federation, its indigenous population and interests, and it’s time to tie it up ...
1. commbatant
  
  +1
  
  11 January 2020 12: 34
  
  Quote: Sapsan136
  It is time for Russia to introduce a complete embargo on trade with the Russophobia-sick republics of the USSR
  
  No way. Thus, we violate the rules of the WTO ...
  
  not give them a dime
  
  We can do this, just as we can demand to pay debts on those loans that the Russian Federation has not yet managed to write off Old Man ...
  In response to an increase in the cost of transit, the Russian Federation is forced to raise oil prices for the Buyer and it will be legal, if the Russian Federation incurs losses due to an additional charge imposed by the Republic of Belarus, the Russian Federation can compensate for this by imposing sanctions on food and some consumer goods, refuse purchases of engineering goods in Belarus in favor of Russian ....
  After the rupture of trade relations with Ukraine, the Russian Federation had enough time to carry out (at least its beginning) the export substitution of goods from the Republic of Belarus ....
  RF for Belarus is the main trading partner, and not vice versa ....
  When causing economic harm to the Russian Federation, the Union State (under-state) has no right to exist .... in any case, the Russian Federation does not benefit from it ....
  Joint defense issues can be resolved at the level of the CSTO ....
  1. Brancodd
    
    +2
    
    11 January 2020 15: 31
    
    Something done. The products of MZKT are partially replaced by products of BMZ.
    1. commbatant
      
      0
      
      11 January 2020 15: 33
      
      Quote: Brancodd
      Something done. MZKT products are partially replaced by BMZ products
      
      This could have been done earlier if it had not been for dying their KZKT in the 90s ...
  2. Sapsan136
    
    +8
    
    11 January 2020 16: 05
    
    WTO rules have been violated for a long time by imposing sanctions against the Russian Federation, so no one is stopping the Russian Federation from imposing its sanctions against anyone.
    1. commbatant
      
      0
      
      11 January 2020 16: 34
      
      Quote: Sapsan136
      WTO rules have been violated for a long time by imposing sanctions against the Russian Federation, so that no one bothers the Russian Federation to impose its sanctions against anyone
      
      This is not our method. Why do something straightforward and rude. Let the enemy feel guilty. Restricting the supply of food from the Republic of Belarus due to their poor quality and inconsistency with the sanitary standards of the Russian Federation, will allow us to say that the Republic of Belarus itself is to blame, which "poisons" the population of the Russian Federation, I think Oshishchenko's students will not be able to find microbes and worms in the products of Belarus ...
      Only talking about the debt of the Republic of Belarus to the Russian Federation will make the Republic of Belarus insolvent to other creditors (except for the IMF, of course) ...
      
      As of January 1, 2019, external government debt amounted to $ 16,9 billion, an increase of $ 0,2 billion from the beginning of the year (taking into account exchange rate differences), or 1,0%.
      
      Information from the Belarusian site on 10.01.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX
      
      https://myfin.by/wiki/term/vneshnij-dolg-v-belarusi
      
      Russia's largest debtor is Belarus - $ 7,55 billion June 1, 2019. Since 2012, Belarus’s debt to Russia has doubled. But in the summer of 2019, Moscow for the first time in recent years refused to refinance the current part of the Belarusian debt (First Deputy Prime Minister Anton Siluanov said in June that Moscow was expecting steps from Minsk towards economic integration). Belarus asked for a loan from China, and also carried out the placement of bonds in Russian rubles on the Russian market. China is the second largest lender to Belarus after Russia.
      
      November 08.2019, XNUMX
      
      https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5c26797267712a00abd75012/dolg-belarusi-pered-rossiei--restrukturizaciia-portfelia--5d5bd5b17cccba00adce1cd5
      
      I think the Old Man will not want to go to the next presidential term, because if the Russian Federation refuses to give new loans to the Republic of Belarus, it will be difficult for the Republic of Belarus to service old and new ones from the IMF and the EFR, the integration with the Republic of Belarus is economically disadvantageous, after all, the Russian Federation will still not allow the Republic of Belarus to join NATO, anyway, as part of that territory, which is now called Belarus ....
      1. Sapsan136
        
        +7
        
        11 January 2020 16: 41
        
        The methods of the Russian Federation can be used by anyone that it sees fit to protect its interests ...
      2. race
        
        -1
        
        12 January 2020 15: 58
        
        Quote: commbatant
        Restricting the supply of food from the Republic of Belarus due to their poor quality and inconsistency with the sanitary standards of the Russian Federation, will allow us to say that the Republic of Belarus itself is to blame, which "poisons" the population of the Russian Federation, I think Oshishchenko's students will not be able to find microbes and worms in the products of Belarus ...
        
        Of course, this is not a problem. Palm oil will help you. Bon appetit, as they say. But who will benefit from it in the end? Only to our "partners" overseas.
        
        commbatant
        
        +2
        
        12 January 2020 16: 55
        
        Quote: Rasen
        But who will ultimately benefit from this?
        
        First of all, to the Russian agricultural producer, the Republic of Belarus cannot supply the RF with food from anything that the RF itself cannot produce ....
        If the Republic of Belarus does nasty things to us in the fuel energy market, why can't the Russian Federation repay with the same coin in the food industry? Or is RB only the right to blackmail?
        
        Only to our "partners" overseas.
        
        With regard to "partners" from overseas, the Russian Federation has long imposed sanctions on the supply of agricultural products, in addition, unlike the US and the EU, they are not the BIGGEST borrowers of money from the Russian Federation ...
        Have you seen somewhere that a borrower breaks his hands to his lender, this, apparently, can only be done with the Russian Federation ...
        When Old Man is told that it is necessary to somehow conduct a common economic and foreign policy within the CIS, the EAC and the Union State of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation, the Old Man begins to whine that the Russian Federation is encroaching on the independence of the Republic of Belarus ....
        Old Man receives oil and gas from the Russian Federation at the lowest prices from the Russian Federation, and sells its surpluses at world prices to the EU, and now he wants the Russian Federation to supply gas and oil at domestic prices, when the Russian Federation refused to do this, the Republic of Belarus introduced an additional environmental tax with the Russian Federation ....
        RF, in order to avoid blackmail from the "brothers" in the future and began to build bypass gas pipelines, bypassing the CIS countries, but if RB is an unreliable economic partner of the RF, and the latter has to bear additional costs, then why does the RF need RB at all, well, at least , as a strategic ally ....
        After all, the Russian Federation renders RB economic, political and military assistance not for beautiful eyes, but counting on mutual support ....
        
        race
        
        -1
        
        12 January 2020 17: 37
        
        I do not justify Lukashenko in any way - he is still trying to sit on two chairs, although his actions are primarily aimed at observing the interests of the Republic of Belarus. But, as one well-known figure would say, you reason politically short-sightedly. Short-sighted reason, sir.
        
        race
        
        0
        
        12 January 2020 17: 42
        
        Quote: commbatant
        Old Man receives from the Russian Federation at the lowest prices oil and gas from the Russian Federation
        
        You have not answered what the lowest prices are. Where are the numbers?
        
        Quote: commbatant
        ... and sells its surplus at world prices in the EU
        
        Here it is possible to argue - not surplus oil, but its refined products: gasoline, diesel. fuel and stuff.
        
        commbatant
        
        0
        
        12 January 2020 18: 19
        
        Quote: Rasen
        Quote: commbatant
        Old Man receives from the Russian Federation at the lowest prices oil and gas from the Russian Federation
        
        You have not answered what the lowest prices are. Where are the numbers?
        
        Like last time I’ll answer you - Google will help you ... however, you didn’t dispute this argument of mine even then ..
        
        Here it is possible to argue - not surplus oil, but its refined products: gasoline, diesel. fuel and stuff.
        
        Needless to argue, and so it is clear, of course, oil products at Belarusian refineries, what does it change? Having received oil at low prices from the Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus refined it into gasoline, diesel fuel, etc. and sold them at world prices in the EU ...
        RB earned more on gas than if it sold just crude oil to the EU ...
        Or do you want to challenge the profit of the Republic of Belarus from the supply of cheap oil from the Russian Federation, but why didn’t Old Man find her a replacement from other oil sellers?
        
        commbatant
        
        +2
        
        12 January 2020 18: 33
        
        Quote: Rasen
        Quote: commbatant
        Old Man receives from the Russian Federation at the lowest prices oil and gas from the Russian Federation
        
        You have not answered what the lowest prices are. Where are the numbers?
        
        Prices for 2016, the volume of oil supplies to Poland and Belarus are approximately the same, consider yourself:
        Poland - 9,3 million tons for $ 5,4 billion.
        RB - 9,4 million tons for $ 4,1 billion.
        
        https://www.forbes.ru/biznes-photogallery/341975-po-druzhbe-i-morem-kuda-techet-nasha-neft?photo=6
        
        The "holiday of life" for the Republic of Belarus is over, and Father in 2017 raised tariffs for transit, and in 2020 he has already invented an environmental fee for this transit ....
        Maybe Old Man and the citizens of Belarus do not like the pricing policy, I’m a citizen of the Russian Federation and I will welcome any sanctions against Belarus, because in connection with the constant blackmail, the actions of the Republic of Belarus lead to losses of the Russian Federation, and therefore to mine ...
        
        race
        
        -1
        
        12 January 2020 19: 59
        
        Quote: commbatant
        Prices for 2016, the volume of oil supplies to Poland and Belarus are approximately the same, consider yourself:
        Poland - 9,3 million tons for $ 5,4 billion.
        RB - 9,4 million tons for $ 4,1 billion.
        
        So it was in 2016! And didn’t you find Google fresher data? It turns out that for Poland the price is $ 580 / ton, and for Belarus - $ 436 / ton. In fact, comparing the price of oil for the Republic of Belarus and Poland is not entirely correct, since Poland is not a member of the EAEU, and geographically it is further than the Republic of Belarus, which logically leads to an increase in the cost of oil for deliveries to Poland. It is more logical to compare with the price of oil, for example, for Armenia or the Central Asian republics. Although in Central Asia almost everyone has their own oil.
        In addition, these figures are doubtful, because in 2019 oil was supplied to the Republic of Belarus by
        
        an average price of $ 400 per ton (about $ 54,8 per barrel). The average price of Russian Urals brand oil on the world market in 2019 is $ 63,5 per barrel.
        
        https://udf.by/news/economic/204668-mozhet-li-belarus-obojtis-bez-rossijskoj-nefti.html
        
        That is, the price of oil for the Republic of Belarus was about 80% of the world. And that was perfectly acceptable. But at what price did Lukashenko offer to buy oil in 2020, that he rebelled so much? According to some reports - $ 417 / ton.
        
        commbatant
        
        0
        
        12 January 2020 23: 48
        
        Rasen (Yaroslav) Today, 19:59
        So it was in 2016! And didn’t you find Google fresher data? It turns out that for Poland the price is $ 580 / ton, and for Belarus - $ 436 / ton. In fact, comparing the price of oil for the Republic of Belarus and Poland is not entirely correct, since Poland is not a member of the EAEU, and geographically it is further than the Republic of Belarus, which logically leads to an increase in the cost of oil for deliveries to Poland. It is more logical to compare with the price of oil, for example, for Armenia or the Central Asian republics. Although in Central Asia almost everyone has their own oil.
        Additionally, these figures are in doubt
        
        Well, if the numbers are in doubt, then find your sources starting in 2016.
        
        So far, Russian oil is cheaper for Belarus than any alternative. But that will change in 2024.
        
        - article from the Belarusian website, from 09.01.2020/XNUMX/XNUMX
        
        https://ex-press.by/rubrics/ekonomika/2020/01/09/poka-rossijskaya-neft-dlya-belarusi-deshevle-lyuboj-alternativy-no-eto-izmenitsya-v-2024-godu
        
        Here is an article clearly indicating why the Old Man rebelled so, respectively, you will not find in any source the price of oil for the Republic of Belarus above the world, because the discount was originally laid for RB ....
        
        https://www.kp.ru/daily/27077.5/4148369/
        
        According to Belneftekhim, in the conditions of a tax maneuver in 2019, the price of Russian oil imported to Belarus was about 80% of the world oil, at the beginning of 2020 - 83%. Neither Minsk nor Moscow disclose the price of supplies. According to Belstat, In January-October 2019, Belarus imported oil from Russia at an average price of $ 364 per ton.
        Read more:
        
        https://news.tut.by/economics/667535.html
        
        Belarusian website, article dated January 04.01.2020, XNUMX
        
        According to Belneftekhim, currently the price of oil supplies from the Russian Federation is 83% of the world oil price. The size of the premium is 10 dollars per ton.
        Read more:
        
        https://news.tut.by/economics/668228.html
        
        - the same site, but another article dated 10.01.2020
        It seems that everything is clear what people write, Belarus needs cheap oil, Belarus needs state-owned integration (to somehow, apparently, justify and justify the loss in the selling price), if Old Man continues to resist and "turn on the stupid", he will get the cost of oil is 100% of the world and it is logical ...
        RB now plays the role of a girl who receives gifts from you and dynamite you ....
        The President of the Russian Federation must somehow make excuses to the voters why the Russian Federation supplies oil to Belarus cheaper than other countries (in connection with this, it incurs losses in the form of lost taxes from oil companies), and the integration of the two countries declared by the two presidents of the Republic of Belarus and the Russian Federation (justifying such losses) no ....
        
        race
        
        0
        
        13 January 2020 21: 30
        
        Thank you for the links. I already read all these articles. I think it was interesting for you to read. Now you will also be aware of oil prices.
        Next time, comrade, we’ll also analyze gas prices.
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +4
        
        12 January 2020 19: 51
        
        You might think that you have something Belarusian, except potatoes ... We have enough of our own potatoes, but without the (Belarusian) pineapples we will live somehow ... we will buy where they grow, and this is definitely not Poland ...
        
        race
        
        -3
        
        13 January 2020 21: 36
        
        Quote: Sapsan136
        You might think that you have something Belarusian, except potatoes ... We have enough of our own potatoes, but without the (Belarusian) pineapples we will live somehow ... we will buy where they grow, and this is definitely not Poland ...
        
        Ah, how witty! Could you come up with nothing better? Even, somehow it’s not a shame. But if you are not in the know, then I recommend that you pay attention to dairy products in the store. If you do not live quite off the beaten path, then you will need to find something from Belarusian production (cheese, butter).
        
        commbatant
        
        +2
        
        13 January 2020 23: 10
        
        Quote: Rasen
        If you do not live quite off the beaten path .....
        
        I do not live in the wilderness, and the products from the Republic of Belarus have become much less, and the attitude towards specialized stores selling "Belarusian products" has become much less ...
        
        ... then you’ll have to find something from Belarusian production (cheese, butter)
        
        This is not for long ... after the breakdown of the sowing and harvesting in the Republic of Belarus due to the lack of fuel and lubricants, you will have more mundane tasks ...
        Or do you really think that all the milk in Belarus is produced, and all the potatoes grow only in Belarus?
        "Great Ukrainians" also thought so, now they buy potatoes abroad ...
        
        race
        
        -2
        
        13 January 2020 23: 48
        
        Quote: commbatant
        This is not for long ... after the breakdown of the sowing and harvesting in the Republic of Belarus due to the lack of fuel and lubricants, you will have more mundane tasks ...
        Or do you really think that all the milk in Belarus is produced, and all the potatoes grow only in Belarus?
        "Great Ukrainians" also thought so, now they buy potatoes abroad ...
        
        You are a good person. Just a good soul.
        For your information, I have always been for the unification of Russia and Belarus, even for the incorporation of Belarus into Russia. And now I am reading your messages and thinking: why the hell do I need to live with you in the same state?
        
        commbatant
        
        +1
        
        14 January 2020 00: 30
        
        Quote: Rasen
        For your information, I have always been for the unification of Russia and Belarus, even for the incorporation of Belarus into Russia.
        
        Otherwise, take loans from the whole world, take offense at your main Lender, and then condescendingly say to him: "Okay, take me as collateral, I agree" ......
        
        And now I am reading your messages and thinking: why the hell do I need to live with you in the same state?
        
        Do it right. Today’s RF, it’s not the former 90s deceived by all the RSFSR ... it can give it too much in the teeth, and the closer the person who betrayed it, the stronger the blow will be in the teeth ...
        
        You are a good person. Just a good soul.
        
        Evil. It is easy to be kind when giving gifts to others at the expense of your people ...
        If the empirialists attack the Republic of Belarus, I (like most Russians) will not stay away, but not because of your Old Man, but because the Belarusians died during the Second World War near Volokolamsk and Kursk, Stalingrad and the Caucasus, defending my RSFSR .... otherwise go your way in search of a new cash cow that you can constantly cheat and speculate on the attachment of the Russian people to Belarusians ...
        
        race
        
        0
        
        14 January 2020 20: 05
        
        Quote: commbatant
        Quote: Rasen
        For your information, I have always been for the unification of Russia and Belarus, even for the incorporation of Belarus into Russia.
        
        Otherwise, take loans from the whole world, take offense at your main Lender, and then condescendingly say to him: "Okay, take me as collateral, I agree" ......
        
        Personally, I have not taken any loans either in the Russian Federation or from you personally. What claims do you personally have for me? And do not generalize me with the Belarusian leadership. I am not a member of it, and I do not agree with many of his decisions.
        In the above phrase, I expressed my personal opinion to you. What other claims do you personally have for me?
        
        race
        
        -1
        
        14 January 2020 20: 59
        
        Quote: commbatant
        Do it right. Today’s RF, it’s not the former 90s deceived by all the RSFSR ... it can give it too much in the teeth, and the closer the person who betrayed it, the stronger the blow will be in the teeth ...
        
        And how are successes, many have already counted their teeth?
        What betrayal are you talking about? Who betrayed you at all, except for your own officials who care only about their own wallet, and not about the welfare of Russian people and Russia.
        
        https://topcor.ru/12711-glava-schetnoj-palaty-ocenil-masshtaby-vorovstva-iz-federalnogo-bjudzheta.html
        
        First you restore your order, and then we’ll talk about unification.
        And another question for you. Why does the Russian government refuse to switch from the dollar to national currencies in payments for gas and oil supplied to Belarus? Despite the fact that the leadership of the Republic of Belarus has made such a proposal more than once. So, all this your dedollarization is only in the words of your officials.
        
        commbatant
        
        +2
        
        16 January 2020 01: 03
        
        Rasen (Yaroslav) First you restore your order, and then we’ll talk about unification.
        
        I am personally against the unification of the Russian Federation with any of the "breadwinners" of the RSFSR during the Union ...
        30 years since Russia was not part of the Union, it somehow did not swell from hunger without Belarus or without Ukraine ....
        
        Why does the Russian government refuse to switch from the dollar to national currencies in payments for gas and oil supplied to Belarus? Despite the fact that the leadership of the Republic of Belarus has made such a proposal more than once. So, all this your dedollarization is only in the words of your officials.
        
        Well, probably because the Old Man takes loans from the Russian Federation not in rubles and resells the EU the surplus of Russian gas and fuel, produced from Russian oil for the euro ....
        
        race
        
        -2
        
        16 January 2020 21: 42
        
        Quote: commbatant
        Well, probably because the Old Man takes loans from the Russian Federation not in rubles and resells the EU the surplus of Russian gas and fuel, produced from Russian oil for the euro ....
        
        Loans in what currency are issued, in that and returned. If at all come back, of course.
        I will not argue about oil - oil products produced from it are sold all over the world, and you are wrong about gas - there is no surplus gas. RB buys gas only for domestic consumption.
        
        race
        
        -1
        
        16 January 2020 21: 49
        
        Quote: Rasen
        I am personally against the unification of the Russian Federation with any of the "breadwinners" of the RSFSR during the Union ...
        
        For your information, during the time of the Union, the BSSR always had a surplus, and, among other things, due to it, the Transcaucasian, Central Asian republics and the Baltic states were fed from the Union budget.
        
        commbatant
        
        +1
        
        16 January 2020 22: 08
        
        Quote: Rasen
        For your information, during the time of the Union of the BSSR always had a surplus
        
        That's true, like the RSFSR .... about always you are wrong, most likely since the 60s ...
        
        including, at the expense of it, the Transcaucasian, Central Asian republics and the Baltic states were fed from the Union budget.
        
        В including и due to the BSSR, took more from the budget of the RSFSR ...
        
        race
        
        +1
        
        16 January 2020 22: 53
        
        Quote: commbatant
        The truth is, like the RSFSR .... you are always wrong about always, most likely from the 60s ...
        
        What is, that is, twenty years it took to recover from the war.
        
        Quote: commbatant
        Including and at the expense of the BSSR, they took more from the budget of the RSFSR ...
        
        Do you like to find fault with words. Or was it incomprehensible what I said? You would think that one BSSR fed the whole Union?
        The Union was fed by three: the RSFSR, the Ukrainian SSR and the BSSR. Each contribution corresponds to its place in this list. Is it clearer now? Of course, the lion's share of the Union budget was taken from the RSFSR. Although there was a complicated scheme: there were enterprises and cities of union subordination.
        
        Sapsan136
        
        +2
        
        14 January 2020 09: 26
        
        For the most part, I am indifferent to this, but there is a lot of milk and domestic, and you still look for someone to sell ... In the EU, you definitely do not need it ... Get ready to send cows under a knife and put your teeth on the shelf without work.
        
        race
        
        -1
        
        14 January 2020 21: 01
        
        Quote: Sapsan136
        For the most part, I am indifferent to this, but there is a lot of milk and domestic, and you still look for someone to sell ... In the EU, you definitely do not need it ... Get ready to send cows under a knife and put your teeth on the shelf without work.
        
        And all the best for you in the New Year 2020!
    2. Sake
      
      -6
      
      11 January 2020 18: 29
      
      What sanctions were introduced against the Russian Federation and for what?
  3. Sake
    
    -1
    
    12 January 2020 21: 51
    
    Maybe it's time in Russia to turn on the brain and become adequate neighbors? In history, everything has always been that Muscovy captured the neighboring countries and peoples, but not the other way around! That is why everyone is mistrusting and apprehensive, not knowing what kind of fool they’ll include in Moscow today, what tomorrow?
    1. plabu
      
      -1
      
      12 January 2020 23: 52
      
      Quote: Sake
      Maybe it's time in Russia to turn on the brain and become adequate neighbors? In history, everything has always been that Muscovy captured the neighboring countries and peoples, but not the other way around! That's why everything is to you with distrust and apprehension.without knowing what a fool they’ll include in Moscow today, what tomorrow?
      
      Again he took up his own - on behalf of "all" to write - - who are you to portray something? - go read textbooks, at least according to international law, you look, and you learn at least something.
    2. commbatant
      
      +1
      
      13 January 2020 00: 13
      
      Quote: Sake
      Maybe it's time to Russia turn on the brains and become adequate neighbors?
      
      That is, the Russian Federation and its people become inadequate when the Republic of Belarus stops giving freebies? Well, here on the site often hurray-patriots reproach the Russian Federation for not helping Ukraine enough, so it's better to dot the "and" right away, we will still be to blame, according to the experience of Ukraine and Belarus, he will never remember in the future that was the backbone of the Russian Federation, and the Muscovites are to blame for her troubles ...
      It’s better to run now, then it will be more difficult ....
      
      In history, everything has always been that Muscovy captured the neighboring countries and peoples, but not the other way around! That's why everything is to you with distrust and apprehension.
      
      Here you will single out the Republic of Belarus from the RSFSR in the 19th year of the last century, and then after 100 years they will prove to you that the Republic of Belarus is thousands of years old, and Russia has always encroached on foreign lands, including and Belarusian, completely insolent ...
      .... do not want to get rid of the Russian (Soviet) legacy to the "orphans" from Poland to return the western lands of the Republic of Belarus, there is no reason, but in the Smolensk region they remember their lands as part of the Republic of Belarus ...
Port

+1

11 January 2020 12: 35

The habit of living at the expense of Russia in the limitrophs in the blood.
boriz

+1

11 January 2020 16: 25

But isn’t it time for the old man to take a break from the works of the righteous? Explicitly reworked ...
1. commbatant
  
  +1
  
  11 January 2020 17: 05
  
  Quote: boriz
  But isn’t it time for the old man to take a break from the works of the righteous? Explicitly reworked ...
  
  If the Russian Federation finally began to count the money of its taxpayers when issuing loans to Belarus (gratuitous, non-repayable, interest-free), then why should he be the Old Man, and so he will say that everything flourished with me, it’s better for him to really leave ...
The comment was deleted.
Dzafdet

+1

11 January 2020 18: 26

Just dad had 2 billion dollars in guaranteed income from oil and gas. And used to it. And now he was deprived of this income, hence the reaction ...
Vkd dvk

0

13 January 2020 00: 59

Quote: Athenogen
Well what are played with him ??? Not tired? Introduce the same tax on all goods from Belarus and all. And then Belarus will rise, for, except for Russia, nobody needs their goods. Belarusians themselves will throw off this long-sitting president.

Since such a transit will become unprofitable for us, to reduce, systematically, and pursue a policy similar to knocking the Baltic states out of transit. Start influencing the minds of the population (not with the oligarchs of Belarus), bringing the Old Man under impeachment.