In Iran, revealed the details of the crash of the Ukrainian liner

January 9 2020 36

The Iranian Civil Aviation Organization has published a preliminary report on the crash of a Boeing 737-800 of the Ukrainian airline UIA, which crashed yesterday shortly after taking off from Tehran's Imam Khomeini Airport.

As follows from the document, eyewitnesses saw that the passenger liner was burning and fire spread through its fuselage right up to the collision with the ground.

The department’s experts also note that, judging by the flight path, the crew knew about some kind of malfunction on board, turned the plane around and headed towards the airport, but the Ukrainian crew did not make any emergency messages.

A preliminary cause of the accident is engine failure. The final conclusions will be made after the decryption of the records of "black boxes".

The crash of Boeing "Ukraine International Airlines" at the time of the highest aggravation of relations between Iran and the United States, caused a lot of speculation in the Ukrainian media and social networks.

The most common stuffing was the statement that on the wreckage of the liner there were traces of the striking elements of the rocket and the stewardess called that the liner was fired.

The scale of insinuations was such that the president of Ukraine in his video message was forced to ask him to refrain from speculating and wait for the results of the investigation.

Oliver Holzbauer/wikipedia.org

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Arkharov

-9

9 January 2020 13: 53

The scale of insinuations was so ...

- But what, the authors already know for sure that these are insinuations? But Iran has many questions, for example: why didn’t Iran close its airspace, having a good idea of what was happening at that moment, and what could it lead to further? Why did the crew not give a distress signal, what are the characteristic holes in the skin, why does the plane consist of a bunch of small fragments, practically without large ones? What about the black boxes? If everything is normal, it would seem, make the decryption of the boxes as open as possible, in some European country, such as, for example, the decryption of the boxes of the Malaysian Boeing was done in the UK (to which, by the way, neither side has any complaints), with the involvement of all interested parties ? In your own interests? In addition to the original video, with the fall of something very burning, a video appeared with a powerful flash and the scattering of many small burning fragments of the fuselage:

I can’t judge how similar it is to “engine explosion”?
1. Tektor
  
  +9
  
  9 January 2020 18: 32
  
  They wanted to shut down this plane in order to accuse Iran of a crime, which, they say, is already shooting down civilian planes from impotence. And only the fact that Iran managed to launch its short-range ballistic missiles before the Boeing incident does not allow us to take such a position ... the disaster was planned in advance: the details of the plating of another Boeing with traces of striking elements and the remnants of missiles were loaded into the cargo compartment in advance ... I could not report anything to Earth (about the complete loss of control of the board), and the tragedy itself happened a couple of minutes later, when the board gained the required altitude for "downing".
  1. Arkharov
    
    -7
    
    9 January 2020 18: 43
    
    Tektor
    Well, finally, the "stale corpses" began. Did you invent "it" yourself, or did you find it somewhere in the backyard of conspiracy sites, among the truthful stories about the reptilians and the ark of the New Testament?
    1. isofat
      
      +4
      
      9 January 2020 18: 54
      
      ArkharovThis is a parody! A parody of your comment above.
      PS Sorry, could not resist.
      1. Arkharov
        
        -4
        
        9 January 2020 18: 59
        
        isofat
        And you succeed. You see, they write this, especially some authors of articles, that I am not surprised at anything. I think 90% of local readers believed in all this and completely agreed with it that it was so. This is how "sensations" are born. And you just don't write for such sites?
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        9 January 2020 19: 18
        
        Arkharov, I do not write. I happened to be on the site, came across a publication about the "Blue Bird". This prompted me to register. Interesting site.
        
        Arkharov
        
        -1
        
        9 January 2020 19: 21
        
        What is the Blue Bird?
        
        isofat
        
        0
        
        9 January 2020 19: 33
        
        My very first comment. There is a photo there.
2. Bulanov
  
  0
  
  10 January 2020 09: 38
  
  Great Britain is the birthplace of "White Helmets" ...
  1. isofat
    
    +3
    
    10 January 2020 10: 50
    
    Quote: Bulanov
    Great Britain is the birthplace of "White Helmets" ...
    
    Bulanov, United Kingdom, the homeland of Jack the Ripper, who was never found!
3. jar.serge
  
  +6
  
  10 January 2020 10: 54
  
  There will be official results - there will be a topic. And so Iranians should not be kept for idiots, not Ukraine, tea, shoot down a plane full of Iranian citizens, a few minutes after takeoff from the capital's airport. By the way, the air defense of such objects is permanent and the air defense radar operators know the schedule of civilian aircraft by heart. Well, and to shoot down an airplane with an operational-tactical missile "ground-to-ground" and after the shelling has already ended, this is how you need to be a "couch general" in order to conceive of this. And the last one noticed that almost all airlines stopped flights from Tehran and only Kolomoisky UIA continues to fly, that's certainly blood money.
  1. Arkharov
    
    -3
    
    10 January 2020 10: 57
    
    jar.serge
    It’s clear that I’m not ... you.
    
    On August 17, 2010, Iranian air defense systems shot down an F-4 "Phantom" fighter of the Iranian Air Force using the TOR complex near the Bushehr nuclear power plant.
    1. jar.serge
      
      +5
      
      10 January 2020 12: 46
      
      There are restricted areas for flights, where air defense facilities are simply required to shoot down ANY aircraft. In particular, zones above nuclear power plants or some areas above the capitals of states. Rust’s landing on Red Square, as an example, does not lead ....
      1. Arkharov
        
        -3
        
        10 January 2020 13: 11
        
        jar.serge
        Yes there are. But this indicates a general organization of the process.
The comment was deleted.
Panting

+1

10 January 2020 08: 18

The main reason for the crashes and crashes of aircraft, in my opinion, is the composition of passengers on board, if you carefully analyze.
1. Arkharov
  
  -3
  
  10 January 2020 09: 42
  
  Panting More often krivoruky id ... you on the earth. For examples in the Donbass and Syria, you do not need to go far.
  1. Panting
    
    0
    
    10 January 2020 21: 54
    
    Arkharov! According to Youtube, this is how Chinese stealth technology specialists flew on MH-17, and specialists from the Iranian nuclear program flew on UIA Boeing. Well, etc.
    1. Arkharov
      
      -2
      
      11 January 2020 08: 48
      
      Panting
      An analyst named "Youtube" is very authoritative. Of course, they flew here and there, but not by stealth and nuclear technologies, but by extraterrestrial intelligence and reading thoughts at a distance.
  2. Astronaut
    
    0
    
    11 January 2020 12: 04
    
    And the borozopisy inflate this topic)
Arkharov

-3

10 January 2020 13: 14

Quote: Jar.serge
Well, to shoot down an airplane with an operational-tactical missile "ground-to-ground", and after the shelling has already ended, this is how you need to be a "sofa general" in order to contemplate this.

Where did you get this? Who claimed that?
123

+3

10 January 2020 13: 19

As I understand it, at the moment there are three main versions: a technical malfunction, a planned diversion, a missile hit.
The Iranian missile version will be actively promoted as the most "promising" one. Firstly, it fits into the logic of events, sanctioning pressure on Iran will intensify as on a state shooting down civilian aircraft. Secondly, the phrase "Iranian air defense" in conjunction with "Russian air defense systems" will become "toxic", they say, supplying weapons to Iran is just awful. Indeed, in August, the term of the embargo on arms supplies to Iran ends. There is a prospect for the technical re-equipment of the Iranian armed forces, primarily the air defense and the "antique" Air Force park.
The version of a technical malfunction will be heavily rubbed into the background, the plane is three and a half years old, a week ago it underwent full maintenance. It's a big rusty coffin nail for Boeing, it's just the end for them. By the way, is Ukraine the only country where the Boeing 737 has not been taken out of service? Somehow it is necessary to explain this, solidarity with "senior comrades" or greed of Kolomoisky ...
As for the sabotage, it is likely, if I am not mistaken, the engine was on fire, the crew was trying to return to the airfield ..... the lack of radio communication looks very strange. In addition, if a sabotage was planned, it is easier to do in Ukraine, "controlled territory".
The missile, of course, could have been, the operator’s mistake or carelessness should not be discounted, especially since the situation is tense, everything is on the brink of war. But it could be MANPADS, a height of 2 is quite within reach.
The main thing now is not to allow Western and "pro-Western" experts to unfold, there will be no objective investigation there. Do not believe me - ask Malaysia.
1. The comment was deleted.
2. Arkharov
  
  -2
  
  11 January 2020 08: 50
  
  The main thing now is not to allow Western and "pro-Western" experts to unfold, there will be no objective investigation there.
  
  - Well, they didn't give it? Another attempt at falsification failed?
  1. 123
    
    0
    
    11 January 2020 09: 00
    
    - Well, what was "not given"?
    
    Not allowed. They figured it out.
    
    Attempts to falsify failed?
    
    And who was going to falsify what?
    1. Arkharov
      
      -2
      
      11 January 2020 09: 02
      
      And what, immediately the Iranians did not know about this? You rub it to someone else. Here on the site there is someone.
      1. 123
        
        0
        
        11 January 2020 09: 06
        
        And what did the Iranians immediately not know about this?
        
        I don’t know, they haven’t called yet today, they’re probably busy Maybe they checked the information. There was a start, but they hit - they did not hit, they were determined according to the results of the inspection.
        
        You rub it downs.
        
        Doesn't suit you? Try the Star Balm in whiskey ..... might help ..
boriz

+2

10 January 2020 13: 43

The normal version is the answer for the attack on the base in Kenya. And the reason is normal, and there was a time for preparation, and God knows what resources: a pair of Stinger. And there even one is enough. And the performers are not necessarily the United States. Israel will join with pleasure. This is their region, the possibilities are wider than in the USA.
If you think about it, then the explanation that the Ukrainian board can be found. The gas transit agreement was signed across the US interests, they do not need this transit at all. And Israel might not like the last Bandera escapade.
What is not the version?
As for the technique.
There are only two engines. They are pushed forward relative to the wing. The nozzle is in the middle of the wing width. Stinger flies into the nozzle and explodes. The engine is collapsing. At the time of destruction, the turbine still spins at a terrible speed and the blades fan out almost along the wing (slightly obliquely, due to the sweep of the wing).
No line from the gun is needed. And in the wing - a fuel tank. A fire starts, the wing mechanization is disrupted (there is a lift, the flaps / slats are not yet in flight position), the aircraft is practically uncontrollable.
The blades also fall into the fuselage (albeit a little), which they could have broken, only a specialist will say.
Attack conditions - just for MANPADS. If they wanted to substitute the Russian Federation, they would have dropped the plane into the Black Sea. In any way.
Now we must wait for finds from the area where the fire started. If it is a rocket, there must be its remains.
Although there may be options with external control. They well explain the lack of crew reports.
It's still a Boeing ...
1. 123
  
  +2
  
  10 January 2020 16: 19
  
  the plane is practically uncontrollable
  
  They deployed the plane, tried to return to the airfield.
  
  Now we must wait for finds from the area where the fire started. If it is a rocket, there must be its remains.
  
  That's right, we must wait for the results of the inspection. If there was a rocket, characteristic traces of damage will remain.
  1. boriz
    
    +1
    
    10 January 2020 20: 21
    
    They deployed the plane, tried to return to the airfield.
    
    It is said loudly. The plane began to leave to the right. It's all. If the mechanics of one wing are still working, but the other is no longer there, it is clear that it will drag it in one direction.
    
    ... characteristic traces of damage will remain.
    
    There must be a rocket shank. The height is small.
    1. 123
      
      +2
      
      10 January 2020 21: 07
      
      Will wait. There, they say, Ukraine gained access to black boxes. These now they will find a photograph of a Russian rocket, felt boots and a balalaika.
Dust

0

11 January 2020 03: 59

A video has already appeared on how to bring down a Boeing. This is what happens. Dark night, on the street no one, the author of the video smokes and waits for the plane to fly over and be hit by a rocket. He waited! This is Jack Pot! Bingo! .... Do you believe that? .... Or, it turns out, who filmed, knew that they would shoot down a Boeing?
1. 123
  
  0
  
  11 January 2020 08: 56
  
  Iran confirmed. An accidental launch of a rocket .... In general, nerves .... and low qualification.
gore

+2

11 January 2020 06: 02

Yes, what details can there be, if the whole world of high-likes is already convinced that it was the Russians "VARVARIANS shot down a CIVIL plane, and with SPECIAL CRUELY."
Most of all in this story, it’s just a pity for the pan-head. Now the media vector has moved to Iran, but all the same, Russia can be spoiled by such stuffing there ...
The comment was deleted.
1. 123
  
  0
  
  11 January 2020 08: 58
  
  And Iran, though not immediately, but acted with dignity. By the way, an example for some.
  
  That's right. Great example. I would like to know the information from Ukrainian radars.
commbatant

0

11 January 2020 11: 29

Iran said the Ukrainian plane was shot down by mistake ...

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said that the Boeing 737-800 of Ukraine’s International Airlines was shot down by air defense systems of the republic due to human error. According to him, Tehran deeply regrets what happened and expresses condolences to the families of the victims of the crash.

https://russian.rt.com/world/article/706565-iran-oshibka-samolyot-ukraina?
The comment was deleted.
SANDRO

-2

12 January 2020 10: 28

Russians' love for Iran is off the charts! Still would! In the world, the USSR / Russia (I write together, since in foreign policy, they are one and the same), there are only three true and true friends: Venezuela, North Korea and the Persians ... Why is this so, the history is long and terrible, now it is not about her ... I read the comments and am surprised, as if the same person writes them! Technical analysis of the flight, Trump, NATO, Kolomoisky, and not a word of compassion for the victims of another monstrous crime of the Persians, by the way, who have already admitted their guilt! People, come to your senses! You are kind of like believing Christians! Where is your pain for innocently murdered souls ?! Is the love for the Persians imposed by your leadership so managed to twist your brains ?! There is one well-known political saying that is very suitable for this situation: "He's a son of a bitch, of course, but this is our son of a bitch!" Who is the "ON", I think, it became clear ...