Iran has developed 13 options for US revenge for Suleymani

Iran’s Supreme National Security Council is developing options for possible action against the United States in response to the assassination of Al-Quds commander General Kassem Suleimani.

As follows from a statement by Security Council Secretary Ali Shamkhani made to the Iranian edition of Fars, today there are 13 options for revenge on the Americans.

According to him, even the most sparing of the developed options can become a "historical nightmare" for the United States.

The Security Council Secretary claims that the Americans know that they can not oppose anything from Iran’s response.

If US forces do not want to leave the region on their own, we will force them to do so.

- noted Shamkhani.

The statements of representatives of the Iranian authorities can be treated differently, however, the sequence of actions of Tehran testifies to the seriousness of intentions to avenge the death of Suleymani, the only Iranian general who was called “Sardar” (military leader) without mentioning his name.

So, in addition to developing options for revenge, Iran is introducing a legislative framework for actions against the Americans: the republic’s parliament unanimously supported the bill, according to which the Pentagon is recognized as a terrorist organization, and Al-Quds receives additional funding.
Photos used: Mahdi Sigari /
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter


Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 7 January 2020 17: 08
    • 0
    • 5
    Perhaps the Iranians will commemorate US President Trump, who delivered them from Suleimani, with a kind word because the “geopolitical virus” that Suleimani infected the Iranian elite was very expensive for ordinary Iranians. This is not only about Suleymani. It is almost always a disaster for a country when leaders are embraced by the desire to “become visible in the international arena”, “have influence”, etc. etc.
    This is a disaster for several reasons - firstly, it is always expensive - money is taken away from what citizens need and spent on some unproductive needs. Secondly, it is not just useless expenses - it is always an obligation to bear the same useless expenses in the future. Because if you are responsible for something, then when things go there at random - and they always go at some point - you will still need to spend money. And so it can be ad infinitum. Sometimes a "geopolitical virus" leads to disastrous consequences.
  2. Panting Offline
    Panting (Vyacheslav) 7 January 2020 17: 57
    • 1
    • 0
    Less words and threats are needed.
  3. Alexzn Offline
    Alexzn (Alexander) 7 January 2020 18: 52
    • 2
    • 2
    Iran is a very dangerous enemy. Fact.
    At the same time, one must understand the eastern traditions, talk beautifully and threaten the mother of all wars and the gates of hell.
  4. Valentine Offline
    Valentine (Valentin) 8 January 2020 07: 19
    • 3
    • 1
    That is exactly how Saddam Hussein spoke - yes, we’re wow, we’ll break it at once, we are stronger than ever, but in the end .....
    But the Yankees, of course, have already gone too far, they have laid a big bolt on everything and everyone, and it cannot go on like that, somewhere it’s sinking.
  5. The comment was deleted.