The Pentagon announces the elimination of the Iranian IRGC on the orders of Trump


On January 3, 2020, near the international airport of Baghdad (Iraq), as a result of a missile “defensive strike” by the United States, the commander of the special unit “Quds” (“Cods”) of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) of Iran Major General Kassem Suleimani was killed. The Pentagon has already stated that a special operation to eliminate (kill) a high-ranking Iranian military in Iraq was carried out by order of US President Donald Trump.


It should be noted that as a result of this action eight people were killed and this, without a doubt, will lead to even greater tension in the region. Five of those killed were representatives of the local Iraqi Shiite militia, including Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, deputy commander of the Iraqi People’s Mobilization Force. One civilian was also killed (in his car). In addition, twelve Iraqi troops were injured.

The US Armed Forces, in accordance with the President’s directive, resolutely carried out defensive actions, destroying the head of the Kuds KISR terrorist organization Kassem Suleimani’s defense team in defense of United States overseas personnel

- reported in a statement by the Pentagon.

The Americans emphasize that Suleimani "was actively developing plans to attack American diplomats and military personnel in Iraq and the entire region." Therefore, Washington had to strike at Suleimani to deter Iran from future attacks against the United States.

However, according to the American media, the Pentagon is completely unsure of Suleimani’s death and believes that DNA analysis will be required to confirm it. It is specified that the body of Suleymani was identified by the ring that he wore. At the same time, the US Armed Forces are on high alert.
Photos used: sayyed shahab-o-din vajedi / wikimedia.org
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

66 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 10: 13
    -6
    • 1
    • 7
    What did the late general do in Baghdad?
    1. Bakht Offline
      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 January 2020 10: 25
      +4
      • 7
      • 3
      The same as the Americans. I put things in order in the country.
      1. Arkharov Offline
        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 10: 46
        -5
        • 1
        • 6
        Bakht
        Order, speak? Do not bring the Lord.
        1. commbatant Offline
          commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 15: 02
          +1
          • 3
          • 2
          Quote: Arkharov
          Bakht
          Do not bring the Lord.

          You are doing it right .... And you (the Israeli military) will also break something from the so-called

          "Defensive strike"

          only already Iran ....
          1. Arkharov Offline
            Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 15: 28
            -3
            • 0
            • 3
            commbatant

            Israeli, - I say, - militarist
            Known to the whole world!
            Like a mother, I say, and like a woman
            I demand them to answer!
            Which year I am a widow
            All happiness is past
            But I stand ready
            For the cause of peace!
            As a mother I declare to you and as a woman! ..


            Galich
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Arkharov Offline
                Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 15: 49
                -4
                • 0
                • 4
                commbatant
                Thanks for the reminder, I know. Yes, now I think that the war of New Russia with the USA over Alaska is almost inevitable.
                1. commbatant Offline
                  commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 22: 09
                  +2
                  • 4
                  • 2
                  Quote: Arkharov
                  Yes, now I think the war of New Russia with the USA

                  You probably had the Russian Federation? Not at all. On the territory of the formerly New Russia of the 18th century for the most part, they live either in hospices, or in the pro-Ukrainian population, with the rare exception of several regions .... and, accordingly, why the Russian Federation are riddlers and the "fifth" column that impedes its development, we have enough liberals in Russia .....
                  Pensioners of Ukraine, when not being them, but voting for independence, let them remain the main "asset" of Ukraine, and let their children and grandchildren dream of a visa-free regime with the Russian Federation ....
                  Regarding the war of the Russian Federation with the United States over Alaska, this is nonsense ...
                  There is no point in fighting for the fact that you already have something like this (Siberia), but fighting the USA for Alaska with the PRC or someone else in the distant future will have to ...
                  1. Arkharov Offline
                    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 4 January 2020 09: 10
                    -3
                    • 1
                    • 4
                    commbatant
                    You have a completely atrophied sense of humor. How do you live like that?
                    1. commbatant Offline
                      commbatant (Sergei) 4 January 2020 12: 30
                      +2
                      • 4
                      • 2
                      Quote: Arkharov
                      How do you live like that?

                      You are surprised how Russians live without Soviet Jews and Germans who left the USSR in the 80s and 90s for nishtyaks in their “historical” homeland, we thought we would be lost without you, but no ...
                      1. Arkharov Offline
                        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 4 January 2020 12: 34
                        -3
                        • 0
                        • 3
                        commbatant
                        You actually know how to read, what was the question? Do you have not only a sense of humor, but also the ability to understand what you read? And how do you live - everyone can see.
                      2. commbatant Offline
                        commbatant (Sergei) 4 January 2020 12: 37
                        +2
                        • 3
                        • 1
                        Quote: Arkharov
                        And how do you live - everyone can see.

                        To whom and where is it seen? While I see how you, squinting, with trembling lips in fear, break from NURSs flying from the adjacent territory ...
                      3. Arkharov Offline
                        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 4 January 2020 14: 55
                        -4
                        • 0
                        • 4
                        commbatant
                        And then what are the questions about the response? Here you are all accessible and explained. Thanks.
                      4. commbatant Offline
                        commbatant (Sergei) 4 January 2020 14: 57
                        +3
                        • 4
                        • 1
                        Quote: Arkharov
                        you are all accessible and explained.

                        If that were the case, then Israel would leave the occupied Palestinian territories and return the GAR to the SAR, and so you are constantly tyrannizing the peaceful and working people of Palestine and the SAR ....
                      5. Arkharov Offline
                        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 4 January 2020 16: 07
                        -4
                        • 0
                        • 4
                        commbatant
                        What are these occupied territories? And, as a result of Arab aggression? And there are generally working people? It seems that for the most part they live on the handouts of their "fierce enemy", having created practically nothing of their own over the decades? Yes, and when you need to establish your life, you need to "fight", but for now, they consider it an opportunity to go to work on the territory of their hated neighbor?
                      6. commbatant Offline
                        commbatant (Sergei) 4 January 2020 17: 28
                        +3
                        • 4
                        • 1
                        Quote: Arkharov
                        What are these occupied territories? And, as a result of Arab aggression?

                        One of the 4 Arab-Israeli wars, the Jews began in the BV, forgot?

                        Unlike the Soviet Union, Israel was not the first to experience complexes about the outbreak of war. Therefore, on June 5, 1967, Israeli Air Force aircraft launched simultaneous air strikes at all Egyptian airfields.
                        UN Security Council 22 November 1967 adopted a resolution providing for the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from the territories occupied during the Six Day War. However, it is known that it was not executed by the Israeli side.

                        https://topwar.ru/117273-shest-dney-pobedy-i-porazheniya-kak-izrail-razgromil-arabskuyu-koaliciyu.html

                        In that war, you took the Golan away from the "orphans" ... return someone else's, especially the sources of fresh water that are there ...
              2. S.V.YU Offline
                S.V.YU 4 January 2020 19: 25
                -1
                • 0
                • 1
                In any case, it’s much better than in the "non-down"!
      2. S.V.YU Offline
        S.V.YU 4 January 2020 19: 23
        -1
        • 0
        • 1
        So New Russia Alaska is not needed! She was SOLD by all the rules, Alexander the second! There are no complaints against the USA in this regard! So calm down, horse!
        1. Arkharov Offline
          Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 5 January 2020 12: 06
          -3
          • 0
          • 3
          S.V.YU
          How good would it be? ANR? !!! True, there, I’m afraid, even the snow would disappear right away ...
  • Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 15: 30
    -3
    • 1
    • 4
    commbatant
    I'd like to hope that with a “defensive strike” everything will end, and preferably forever.
    1. commbatant Offline
      commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 15: 47
      +2
      • 4
      • 2
      Quote: Arkharov
      commbatant
      I'd like to hope that with a “defensive strike” everything will end, and preferably forever.

      Not at all. It may turn out that for Jewish and Anglo-American comrades, everything will only begin ...
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Bakht Offline
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 January 2020 15: 41
    +3
    • 5
    • 2
    The Lord did not bring, the American order. According to the Coalition, from August 2014 to March 2019, 34 thousand air strikes were carried out and more than 1300 civilians were killed. Nobody remembers about the destroyed infrastructure and the destroyed country.
    Everyone has their own idea of ​​the order. Who likes what
  • Potapov Offline
    Potapov (Valery) 3 January 2020 10: 21
    +1
    • 3
    • 2
    Normal, so humanly. Russians are only being planted, Iranians are already being killed ...
    1. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 10: 29
      -4
      • 1
      • 5
      Potapov
      By the way, didn’t you know that Iran is the main, most ardent, champion of democratic universal values?
      1. A M Offline
        A M (A M) 3 January 2020 10: 43
        0
        • 2
        • 2
        Before the Islamic Revolution of 1979, that was how it was, but now there is nothing. Hands will be cut off for theft and they will say that it was so.
        1. commbatant Offline
          commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 15: 17
          +1
          • 4
          • 3
          Quote: AM M
          Before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, it was

          Where does such knowledge come from? Apparently, you wanted to say that the shah’s regime was pro-American and Israeli, and therefore consider it more democratic?

          The internal politics of the Shah of Iran was distinguished by authoritarianism and a desire to suppress any opposition tendencies. The main enemies of the regime were proclaimed Communists and Islamists, against whom brutal repressions were undertaken.
          In the fight against internal opposition, the Shah relied on a policy of harsh terror against his opponents. A powerful and extensive SAVAK security service network was created (Sazman-e Ettela'at va Amniyat-e Keshvar - Country Information and Security Service). Direct assistance to the Shah in the creation of special services was provided by specialists from the Central Intelligence Agency of the United States. Over the years of the existence of the ominous intelligence service of SAVAK, about 380 thousand people were tortured in Iran. In prisons of the Shah’s regime, counterintelligence officers used the most brutal torture, of course, denied at the official level. Tortures by electric current, injuries of the genitals, and tooth extraction - all these bullying and torment against the opposition were regularly practiced in the dungeons of the Shah’s regime.
          It came from the Shah and national minorities. Iran is a multinational country, and the Persians do not even make up the majority of the population. Nevertheless, taking a course towards Persian nationalism, the Shah government oppressed the peoples living in the west, south, east of Iran - Kurds, Azerbaijanis, Turkmens, and Balochs. The latter often revolted against the central government.
          ...... the Islamic Revolution that took place in February ended with the creation of a new type of state, unparalleled in the modern Muslim world. The next three-plus decades of Iran’s history are the way to go. turning the country into a developed modern power of regional significance, which was able to combine scientific, technical and economic progress with the preservation of traditional cultural and religious values.

          https://topwar.ru/72007-islamskaya-revolyuciya-v-irane-krasnyy-sektor.html

          However, the Islamic Revolution of 1979 did not put the Anglo-Saxons in any way to arm the IRI "to the teeth" during the Iran-Iraq War ...
          So, comrades Jews, you either remove the cross or put on your pants ....
          1. Arkharov Offline
            Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 15: 35
            -3
            • 1
            • 4
            commbatant
            And who were you for during the Iran-Iraq war?
            1. commbatant Offline
              commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 15: 51
              +1
              • 2
              • 1
              I studied at school then, but apparently, if the USSR had border conflicts with Iran (which supported the Mujahideen in Afghanistan in the war against the Shuravi), and not with Iraq, then probably for Iraq ...
              1. Arkharov Offline
                Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 15: 57
                -4
                • 1
                • 5
                commbatant
                Look, did you even have your own opinion then? Always “hesitate with the party line”?
                1. commbatant Offline
                  commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 16: 08
                  +2
                  • 4
                  • 2
                  Quote: Arkharov
                  commbatant
                  Look, did you even have your own opinion then?

                  It seems he wrote clearly - for Iraq?

                  Quote: Arkharov
                  Always “hesitate with the party line”?

                  A schoolboy could not even be a party member under the USSR ... Or do you know nothing about the Soviet school and the requirements for joining the CPSU (and bypassing, according to your logic, the Komsomol) ....
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Bakht Offline
          Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 January 2020 15: 43
          +1
          • 3
          • 2
          The East has always been cruel. Saudi Arabia is even worse. But there, people do not worry about rights.
          1. commbatant Offline
            commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 15: 52
            -1
            • 1
            • 2
            Quote: Bakht
            The East has always been cruel. Saudi Arabia is even worse. But there, people do not worry about rights.

            And the Israeli state is one of the faithful allies of the ....
          2. Arkharov Offline
            Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 15: 58
            -2
            • 1
            • 3
            Bakht
            Yes, something Saudi does not proclaim the destruction of entire states as its primary task.
            1. Bakht Offline
              Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 January 2020 16: 34
              +2
              • 4
              • 2
              Talking and doing are two big differences. So far, Iran is not at all engaged in the destruction of entire states.
              Human beings are busy promoting their values ​​around the world. Missile bombs. But they do not really care about these very rights in Saudi Arabia. Is there anything to object to? Faithful ally of the States. I meant exactly that.
          3. S.V.YU Offline
            S.V.YU 4 January 2020 19: 31
            -1
            • 0
            • 1
            East is a delicate matter!
      2. isofat Offline
        isofat (Sergei) 4 January 2020 00: 46
        +2
        • 3
        • 1
        Arkharov, are you able to explain to us what it is - democratic universal values? Perhaps there are other real values?
  • gorenina91 Offline
    gorenina91 (Irina) 3 January 2020 11: 21
    -6
    • 0
    • 6
    - Yes ..., the Americans and Israel ... - yes, smear this Iran ... how ... how ... how ... how ... like Libya ... -Help, in the end, Russia. .. - Today, Russia simply does not know what it is doing ... -Russia is very weak today and is ready to grovel in front of everyone, even in such insignificance ... like Erdogan and others like him ... -Help the sick and poor Russia, which I found such “friends” of my own indiscretion whom I’m ready to support at my own expense and serve them faithfully as much as you like ...
    - Take this Iran to smithereens ... - And Israel itself will immediately become calmer; and Turkey will immediately look down and tighten its tail; and insolent and presumptuous, imagining himself the ruler of the world, China will also begin to behave much more modestly ...
    1. commbatant Offline
      commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 15: 41
      +3
      • 5
      • 2
      gorenina91 (Irina) Today, 11:21
      -Help sick and poor Russia

      My country and my people - everything is fine with them, believe me.

      Take this Iran to smithereens ...

      About this, every time during the period of elections in the Russian Federation, Russian liberals ask the US ambassador to Moscow regarding the Russian Federation ...
      But, apparently, the United States does not want to deprive the West of the oil and gas infrastructure of the Persian Gulf countries ... but will Israel intercept missile defense / missile defense of Iran (delivered by North Korean comrades) medium-range missiles .... over their cities, even Allah does not know ...
      By the way, google something about Wind Rose if the US uses tactical nuclear weapons in that region ....

      And Israel itself will immediately become calmer

      ... the Jewish state will be calm only when there are no other states on our planet ...

      Turkey will immediately turn down and tighten its tail

      ... you mean the operations of the Turkish Armed Forces against the Kurds, it’s full of you, they have always been supported by the USA earlier (do not read periodicals?
      In due time, Iraq poisoned its Kurds with gases and there was nothing for him for that, from the word at all ...

      and insolent and presumptuous, imagining himself the ruler of the world, China will also begin to behave much more modestly ...

      What is the impudence of the PRC? Name at least one country that was subjected to air and missile strike by the PLA, including after a demonstration at the UN of test powder in vitro ...?
      Maybe China introduced political or economic sanctions against any country without a UN Security Council resolution ...?
  • Besmaster Offline
    Besmaster (Alexander) 3 January 2020 14: 08
    +2
    • 3
    • 1
    Orwell. 1984. War is peace. A missile attack is a defensive action.
    1. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 14: 45
      -5
      • 0
      • 5
      Besmaster
      I wonder whose missile attack do you mean?
      1. commbatant Offline
        commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 15: 45
        +3
        • 4
        • 1
        Quote: Arkharov
        Besmaster
        I wonder whose missile attack do you mean?

        You do not know how to read, my young anti-Russian "friend"?
        It seems that the article for those who can read Russian clearly says -

        as a result of a missile “defensive strike” by the USA.
        1. Arkharov Offline
          Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 15: 47
          -3
          • 0
          • 3
          Why anti-Russian? You do not confuse the concept of Russia (country) with the concept of regime (power)?
          1. commbatant Offline
            commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 16: 01
            +1
            • 3
            • 2
            Quote: Arkharov
            Why anti-Russian? You do not confuse the concept of Russia (country) with the concept of regime (power)?

            The Russian people will not forget the “work” of your regime in the 90s .... and for the liberal intelligentsia of Russia at any time there was always a “MODE” in Russia, and not the legitimate authority chosen, it gave you (among your kind) moral the right (as you thought) to a derogatory attitude towards the Russian people, who chose their representatives in power ... which, however, does not stop all of you from receiving money, grants, etc. from this “MODE”
            For example, many Russian state universities - Moscow State University, the Higher School of Economics, etc., major theaters annually receive funding from taxpayers, which does not prevent its professors and actors from making insulting speeches to the REGIME and the peoples of the Russian Federation ....
            1. Arkharov Offline
              Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 16: 05
              -3
              • 0
              • 3
              For example, many Russian state universities - MSU, HSE, etc., major theaters annually receive funding from taxpayers.

              - and what, their employees should not have an opinion now? You just well noticed that this is the money of taxpayers, which these employees are, and not the authorities.
              1. commbatant Offline
                commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 16: 11
                +1
                • 3
                • 2
                Quote: Arkharov
                commbatantFor example, many Russian state universities - MSU, HSE, etc., major theaters annually receive funding from taxpayers.

                - and what, their employees should not have an opinion now?

                In everyday life, this is called - PROSTITUTION ....
                1. Arkharov Offline
                  Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 16: 35
                  -2
                  • 0
                  • 2
                  commbatant
                  Why do these professors at all. Well, if they could break their jaw, break a brick on their head, withstand five hits on the press, drink a bubble of vodka from their throats, this is a professor, but they don’t understand that it’s unpleasant for ordinary people, they’re sitting and writing something. And to them the state must pay money for this. So do you think?
                  1. commbatant Offline
                    commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 16: 56
                    +1
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    Quote: Arkharov
                    commbatant Why do these professors at all. Well, if they could break their jaw, break a brick on their head, withstand five hits on the press, drink a bubble of vodka from their throats, this is a professor, but they don’t understand that it’s unpleasant for ordinary people, they’re sitting and writing something. And to them the state must pay money for this. So do you think?

                    Not at all. Not in my opinion. There is a professor teaching students who is engaged in creativity and self-perfection, but at the same time he does not agree with the authorities for one or another of its decisions, this is normal.
                    1. It is abnormal when this professor receives grants from the power that he hates and continues to scold her ...
                    2. It is abnormal when this professor receives grants from a country that imposes sanctions against the country where he was born and lives, for his scientific articles, monographs, etc., in which he disagrees with the authorities for one or another of its decisions. ..
                    And in the first and in the second case, if this professor receives money from the “MODE” that he hates or from a foreign state that is fighting against his country, he is a FORGIVER .... regardless of his gender, male or female .. .
                    1. Arkharov Offline
                      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 17: 02
                      -1
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      commbatant
                      In fact, 90% of researchers do not receive any grants, but live on a well-earned salary. And you think that any person can be bought with a grant? Even if he received a grant from the state (not just from representatives of political authority, this, as you rightly wrote, is the taxpayers' money) for scientific activity (and no one gives anything to the other), he is now obliged to give up his conscience and beliefs licking someone’s boots?
                      1. commbatant Offline
                        commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 17: 05
                        -1
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        Quote: Arkharov
                        commbatant
                        In fact, 90% of researchers do not receive any grants, but live on a well-earned salary. And you think any person can be bought with a grant? Even if he received a grant from the state for scientific activity (and no one gives anything to the other), is he now obliged to sacrifice conscience and convictions to lick someone’s boots?

                        And why did he get it, got a ration, so he agreed with everything ....
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                  2. 321 Online
                    321 (321) 3 January 2020 18: 15
                    +1
                    • 3
                    • 2
                    Quote: Arkharov
                    ... And you think that any person can be bought with a grant? Even if he received a grant from the state (not just from representatives of political authorities, this, as you rightly wrote, is the taxpayers' money) for scientific activities (and nobody else gives anything), now he is obliged to give up his conscience and convictions on the coffin of his life licking someone’s boots?

                    You ask this question to your like-minded people, those who wrote books on Soros money in which about the USSR, that in the Great Patriotic War, that in WWII, it was mentioned almost a couple of paragraphs, but here the deeds of the allies somewhere in Africa were signed perhaps not as a decisive contribution to the fate of that war, thanks to such "writers" we already have a "coleisurengoy" now, and whether it will still be ...
                    But personally, this option just suits you, judging by your comments - this is your choice, and the fact that you simply do not answer my comments is read anyway, so you just have nothing to object to, it turns out like this. hi
                  3. Arkharov Offline
                    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 18: 24
                    -2
                    • 0
                    • 2
                    321
                    You offended? I'm not from evil. There’s nothing to answer.
                  4. 321 Online
                    321 (321) 3 January 2020 18: 43
                    -1
                    • 1
                    • 2
                    Quote: Arkharov
                    321 You offended? I'm not from evil. There’s nothing to answer.

                    Why did you decide this? But who knows ... bully
                    The main thing is that they read the answers to your opuses, and your reaction is not very interesting to me.
      2. 321 Online
        321 (321) 3 January 2020 16: 32
        +1
        • 3
        • 2
        Quote: Arkharov
        ... receive funding from taxpayers "- and what, their employees should not have their own opinion now? You just well noticed that this is the taxpayers' money, which these employees are, and not the authorities.

        As they said in the movies -

        ... do not confuse personal wool with state.

        bully - money to whom are allocated? Institution, what does the personal opinion of employees? Does it not coincide with the position of the institution? Velkam, look for an institution whose position is close to you, otherwise - it’s called the first ancient profession, when you think one thing at home, and at work, like, another ...
  • Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 15: 54
    -3
    • 0
    • 3
    commbatant
    But you never know what is written in your article, here is also an authoritative source for me. The missile strike, as you know, was not one.
    1. commbatant Offline
      commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 16: 04
      +1
      • 2
      • 1
      Quote: Arkharov
      commbatant But you never know what is written in your article, here is also an authoritative source for me.

      .... have you been banned in google? Give your source ....
      1. Arkharov Offline
        Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 16: 27
        -2
        • 0
        • 2
        At least four rockets exploded as a result of an attack on a military base north of Baghdad, where US forces are deployed. This was announced on Sunday by Al Arabiya, citing a representative of the Iraqi security forces.

        TASS, December 30th.
        1. commbatant Offline
          commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 16: 32
          +2
          • 3
          • 1
          Quote: Arkharov
          commbatantASS, December 30th.
          At least four rockets exploded as a result of a strike at a military base north of Baghdad, where US forces are deployed. This was announced on Sunday by Al Arabiya, citing a representative of the Iraqi security forces.

          And to hell with them, Russian citizens did not suffer ...
          I thought about the fact that you provide me with a source about the democratic shah’s regime, and you are all about Americans, your eternal Jewish habit of evading the question and skipping the topic ...
          1. Arkharov Offline
            Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 3 January 2020 16: 38
            -2
            • 0
            • 2
            commbatant Do not you remember what was written 2 posts above?

            But you never know what is written in your article, here is also an authoritative source for me. Missile strike, as you know, was not one.

            What is the shah’s regime and what does Russian citizens have to do with it? It seems that there were no Russians with the general in the car either?
            1. commbatant Offline
              commbatant (Sergei) 3 January 2020 16: 58
              0
              • 2
              • 2
              Quote: Arkharov
              What does Russian citizens have to do with it? It seems that there were no Russians with the general in the car either?

              I say, the Russians suffered, I do not care about the rest ....
  • Besmaster Offline
    Besmaster (Alexander) 8 January 2020 19: 38
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    Quote: Arkharov
    Besmaster
    I wonder whose missile attack do you mean?

    American, of course. They called their attack a defense. Well, war is peace. Lies are true. What Orwell saw in a dream, I see now.
    1. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 8 January 2020 20: 07
      -3
      • 0
      • 3
      Besmaster
      And what, you have a hammer and sickle in the far corner pushed? And you are not a Trotskyist, by any chance? What about the world revolution?
      1. Besmaster Offline
        Besmaster (Alexander) 19 January 2020 00: 08
        0
        • 1
        • 1
        No, not Trotskyist. I am a Stalinist. It seems that nothing is pushed, the hammer and sickle on the flag should be in the corner, but where do you think? Most likely, it is with your eyes when you see the Soviet flag. Maybe this is fear?
        1. Arkharov Offline
          Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 19 January 2020 07: 26
          -5
          • 0
          • 5
          Besmaster
          I think the Stalinist is even worse, the Trotskyist is better. Trotsky, for objective reasons, did not succeed in urging so much.
          1. Besmaster Offline
            Besmaster (Alexander) 20 January 2020 04: 45
            +1
            • 2
            • 1
            Arkharov
            I think a Stalinist is better than a liberal. For objective reasons, Stalin didn’t succeed in annoying so much.
            1. Arkharov Offline
              Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 20 January 2020 08: 27
              -3
              • 0
              • 3
              Besmaster He is in this case, “champion”, perhaps absolute.
              1. Besmaster Offline
                Besmaster (Alexander) 21 January 2020 01: 36
                0
                • 1
                • 1
                Arkharov
                The liberals in this case are “champions,” perhaps absolute.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Port Offline
    Port 19 January 2020 08: 43
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    Quote: Arkharov
    Trotsky, for objective reasons, did not succeed in urging so much.

    The Gulag was one huge synagogue from the top to the top, Trotsky has something to be proud of, the countrymen did not disappoint, there was no need to be shy and pretend to be a sheep.