How Americans Prepare a “Road to Moscow” in the Baltic States


And again, we are forced to return to the topic of the Baltic states, potentially the most “hot spot” in a possible confrontation between NATO and Russia. We will demonstrate how the United States is preparing military infrastructure for the deployment of troops and clearing the road in front of its armored vehicles, without disdaining any methods.


So, in the spring of next year, Europe will host the largest NATO exercises since the Cold War. According to Reuters, the Pentagon will transfer 20 American troops with armored vehicles to Russian borders. The Baltic region continues to actively militarize, tensions are gradually increasing.

And then Washington’s plans quite unexpectedly rested in one "little man." Rather, it is one of the richest people in Latvia, respected local politician Aivar Lembergs, who is the mayor of the port city of Ventspils.

At first, the unusual Latvian mayor put the interests of the city entrusted to him above the Russophobic line of Riga. Lembergs defended the participation of Ventspils in the construction of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline. It was necessary to stop the excess of an independent and initiative town governor at the level of a government decree that deprived the port of this work.

Secondly, the mayor of Ventspils spoke extremely negatively about the “defenders” of Latvia from NATO, with whom the small republic was able to get to know well during the increased military exercises:

The sailors of NATO in Ventspils behaved like a pig, ignored the laws of Latvia and the rules of self-government. Having drunk, they celebrated the need for public places and shop windows, vomited, publicly drank alcohol, which is not allowed. They also plucked flowers from flower beds to give them to prostitutes.


Tse Europa ... Minister of Defense Raymond Vejonis was forced to delicately acknowledge the correctness of Lembergs, expressing a wish to the Allied soldiers to respect the host country.

As a result, the mayor of Ventspils received the label of “enemy of NATO” only for defending the interests and sovereignty of his country. But the last straw was his reluctance to provide a port for the needs of the North Atlantic Alliance.

Recall that Latvia has a military port of Liepaja. But the desire to use all Baltic ports at full capacity is evidenced by the modernization of a more peaceful Ventspils. So, powerful moorings were built in it, capable of receiving armored vehicles weighing up to 68 tons. For example, Abrams tanks.

What did freethinking turn out to be for an unusual Latvian policy?

Nothing good. “The most democratic country in the world”, the USA, imposed sanctions on the unproven corruption allegations against the mayor of Ventspils, and Lembergs was put on the US sanctions list with his port. Official Riga immediately nationalized the port of Ventspils, and at the same time the port of Riga, transferring them to its direct control. The United States removed the sanctions from Ventspils, but left Aivar Lembergs personally.

This is how issues are resolved in a "civilized" Europe. The US and NATO are very serious.
Photos used: https://defense.gov/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

20 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Alexzn Offline
    Alexzn (Alexander) 29 December 2019 10: 30
    -5
    • 5
    • 10
    First a silly, provocative headline, then ridiculous generalizations about a "civilized" Europe ... Why? (rhetorical question)
    1. Arkharov Offline
      Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 29 December 2019 11: 10
      -7
      • 2
      • 9
      As always kindle. Probably missed the war?
      1. Bakht Offline
        Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 29 December 2019 11: 56
        +6
        • 8
        • 2
        I have a little question. Who missed the war?
        Some are pumping military power along the borders of another state. This is normal? 20 thousand with armored vehicles is a reinforced tank division.
        Others just gave the wrong headline. And then I’m not sure that is not the one.
        So who exactly is missing the war?
        1. zas Offline
          zas (Shakhriyar Shakhov) 30 December 2019 09: 03
          -5
          • 0
          • 5
          It is quite rational for NATO to protect the Baltic states from polite stray vacationers and other Kadyrovites. What's not clear?
          1. 321 Offline
            321 (321) 30 December 2019 10: 52
            +2
            • 2
            • 0
            It is not clear to whom and why this "sprat cemetery" suddenly so required? bully
          2. S.V.YU Offline
            S.V.YU 30 December 2019 11: 17
            +3
            • 4
            • 1
            But Russia does not need these under-states sprats and for nothing! Enough, train on the Russian neck!
          3. Bakht Offline
            Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 30 December 2019 12: 08
            +3
            • 3
            • 0
            Everything is incomprehensible. Suppose Russia sends a tank division to Cuba or to Venezuela. will the Americans also consider this normal?
            What is the likelihood that the Russian Federation will now attack any NATO country?
            Easy to defend when no one attacks. For the gifted: deploying 20 at the borders of any country is a provocation and an occasion for war.
    2. S.V.YU Offline
      S.V.YU 29 December 2019 13: 32
      +1
      • 2
      • 1
      It is clear that the question is rhetorical! After all, your Ukraine is also “tseevropa”! And as for the Americans, there’s a saying -

      Put the pig at the table, she and her legs on the table!
    3. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 30 December 2019 09: 10
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      AlexZN, then (the answer is also rhetorical) ...
  2. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 29 December 2019 12: 11
    +1
    • 3
    • 2
    Quote: Bakht
    Others just gave the wrong headline. And then I’m not sure that is not the one.
    So who exactly is missing the war?

    All right, say it. But for some it’s convenient to put everything upside down.
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 30 December 2019 09: 16
      +3
      • 4
      • 1
      Sergey, and they cannot do otherwise - they are turned back by the truth. After all, they are “liberals” or “non-brothers” (that those others are haters of the Republic of Ingushetia, the USSR, the Russian Federation ... and any other Russia, if it is not the bedrock of the Amers).
  3. Gennady Skorov Offline
    Gennady Skorov (Gennady Skorov) 29 December 2019 15: 17
    +3
    • 5
    • 2
    Quote: Marzhetsky
    some are comfortable putting everything upside down

    Well, yes, the Americans are expanding the port so that the tankers can smell the flowers. Of course, they have no thoughts of attacking Russia. How could you think so?
  4. Valentine Offline
    Valentine (Valentin) 29 December 2019 18: 06
    +3
    • 5
    • 2
    Under NATO law, these three Baltic lathes are Washington’s property, and they do everything they want there, and this is their business, the same with Poland, Hungary and Romania, and soon with Ukraine, and traditional weapons, we don’t to cope, because they will fly like locusts, and even a Japanese mother from the East will send her samurai to us, and we will only have one, if, of course, they will be the first to pull - the whole world is in ruin with the help of a nuclear product, and, of course, the first should get Uncle Sam, well, and the other sisters earrings ..... Now from us NOTHING Oh, it doesn’t depend, the Yankees shod themselves in nonsense, gnawing for power and Capitol Hill, and now you can’t calm them down and stop them, even the Yellowstone supervolcano’s explosion will not help ..... Nothing, guys, Sergei Kuzhugetovich knows very well what to do is not Yeltsin, not Grachev and Kozyrev, so that everything will be fine and peaceful, not all of America consists of only idiotic suicides.
  5. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 30 December 2019 06: 39
    -1
    • 1
    • 2
    Quote: Gennady Skorov
    Quote: Marzhetsky
    some are comfortable putting everything upside down

    Well, yes, the Americans are expanding the port so that the tankers can smell the flowers. Of course, they have no thoughts of attacking Russia. How could you think so?

    you do not blame me, but to the gentlemen of the liberals, who have their own interpretations
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 30 December 2019 09: 18
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      Sergey, this is his irony, addressed not to you.
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. zas Offline
    zas (Shakhriyar Shakhov) 30 December 2019 09: 23
    -3
    • 1
    • 4
    What American imperialism is, what was Soviet and Putin’s (this one is the smallest of all, it mostly opens its mouth to the “little brothers” from the former USSR, where it is “geopolitically” advantageous to play the card of the “Russian world”).
    1. The comment was deleted.
  9. Sergey Latyshev Offline
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 30 December 2019 09: 39
    -2
    • 0
    • 2
    And how a year ago they laughed at the 12th or 6th Latvian NATO tanks !!! I don’t remember exactly the quantity.
  10. zas Offline
    zas (Shakhriyar Shakhov) 30 December 2019 09: 40
    -1
    • 1
    • 2
    Where else could the fabulous poke after Ukraine and Syria with Libya? To Belarus, the Baltic states, Kazakhstan.
    1. S.V.YU Offline
      S.V.YU 30 December 2019 11: 20
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Do not bother your head, it will not bother you. Train your NATO boots to lick!
  11. Regis Offline
    Regis (Sergey Kopan) 25 February 2020 18: 08
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    Democracy from the USA marches in the Baltic states with a steam rink.