Novak said which ship will complete the "Nord Stream-2"

December 28 2019 16

Recently сообщалосьthat Russia has its own pipe-laying vessels to complete the construction of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline, which is already 93% ready. At the same time, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Kozak said then that Nord Stream-2 would be completed in the first half of 2020. And so, on December 27, 2019, the head of the Ministry of Energy of Russia, Alexander Novak, informed the public that Nord Stream-2 would be commissioned (launched) by the end of 2020.

The head of the department said that the specified gas pipeline could be completed by the Akademik Chersky pipe-laying vessel (operated by Gazprom Fleet LLC), which is now located in the port of Nakhodka (Primorsky Territory). However, he needs additional preparation for work in the Baltic and time for the transition to the opposite end of Eurasia.

Until the end of 2020, Nord Stream-2 will be launched. One option is the ship, which is now located in the Far East. But it will take some time for additional training

- said Novak.

We remind you that on December 20, 2019, Washington, worried about the "energy security of Europe", imposed sanctions against the "Russian flows" (Nord Stream-2 and Turkish Stream). At the same time, pipe-laying vessels of the Swiss-Dutch company Allseas, which was engaged in the laying of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline in the Baltic, stopped working.

It should be added that the construction of the second string (passing through Germany) of the EUGAL onshore gas pipeline (continuation of the Nord Stream-2 offshore gas pipeline) is also expected before the end of 2020.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Afinogen

0

28 December 2019 11: 35

Novak said which ship will complete the "Nord Stream-2"

Let Novak tell us better, are they going to sue the company that built SP-2 and sue it for a lot of money ??? Or all the financial losses associated with the flight of this company (you can’t call it any other way) will the Russian people pay again?
1. Arkharov
  
  +1
  
  28 December 2019 12: 50
  
  And you are sure that such a development of events was not provided for in the agreement. Do you think the Swiss are mutt?
  1. Afinogen
    
    0
    
    28 December 2019 13: 07
    
    Do you think that it was provided that when only a few kilometers were left to the goal (shore), the company curled up and left ??? It’s the same as if you were going to build a house and prescribed in the contract that the builders can drop everything and leave at any time, and finish building on you. Well this is completely absurd.
    1. Arkharov
      
      -4
      
      28 December 2019 18: 32
      
      I am 90% sure that the agreement provided for such a situation with unauthorized departure. I think that, in any case, on the part of the Swiss, there are no narrow-minded people there.
      1. S.V.YU
        
        0
        
        29 December 2019 13: 36
        
        The point is NOT in the treaty, but in the fact that the Russian leadership has a "gut" and "weak spirit" to sue!
        
        Arkharov
        
        -6
        
        29 December 2019 13: 48
        
        I think it's not the "gut" that matters. Rather, there is no legal basis to sue.
        
        Piramidon
        
        +2
        
        29 December 2019 19: 28
        
        Quote: S.V.Yu
        The point is NOT in the treaty, but in the fact that the Russian leadership has a "gut" and "weak spirit" to sue!
        
        Gazprom lawyers who made up the contract are obvious accomplices of the West. Therefore, no trial is planned. If there was at least some hope for a lawsuit, they would have long been trumpeted on all Internet branches. But they are silent.
    2. Piramidon
      
      +1
      
      29 December 2019 17: 51
      
      Quote: Athenogen
      Do you think that was provided
      
      Have you read this agreement? They'll write it off on "force majeure" and hello money.
      1. PSih2097
        
        0
        
        29 December 2019 21: 51
        
        Quote: Piramidon
        They'll write it off on "force majeure" and hello money.
        
        - they will write out bonuses for themselves, for this "force majeure", which they have organized.
chemurij

+2

28 December 2019 11: 52

The United States must have figured out all the possible options for our capabilities and understand that what has begun in any case will be completed, so all the fuss on their part is like they are trying to buy time. For what? This is the main question that we will find out the answer to in the near future, I think, they’re preparing dirty tricks, for the most part, games are not for children, they aren’t bash, and they won’t cost bruises;
Arkharov

-3

28 December 2019 12: 49

What the article is about and what’s new, this ship has been heard many times.
gorenina91

-1

28 December 2019 15: 08

- All this reminds of "Tsushima in reverse" ...
- Then, more than 100 years ago, Russia began to transfer the Baltic Fleet (the expedition of Kruzenshtern and Lisyansky is just resting) to Daln. East, to shamefully lose the naval battle to the Japanese ...
- And today from Daln. Eastern Russia needs to transfer a miserable little ship to the Baltic in order to win (or lose) the battle for SP-2 ...
- 100 years have passed, but nothing has changed ... -Never the same, the whole world does not like Russia and all the same, Russia constantly proves something to someone and tries to serve ...
-WAAAAASCH !!!!!
1. 123
  
  0
  
  28 December 2019 20: 44
  
  100 years have passed, but nothing has changed
  
  Geography is a conservative science.
  By reference book. The tragedy of Tsushima. Vladimir Semenov
  
  https://yadi.sk/d/b1_z-Bb93qF9mQ
2. S.V.YU
  
  +1
  
  29 December 2019 13: 40
  
  And Russia is NOT a girl of marriageable age and is NOT a spouse behind the stove to worry whether they love her or not! And the ships will still be transferred and the SP-2 will be completed!
PSih2097

0

29 December 2019 21: 48

Ltd.Gazprom fleet

- I wonder how an office with an authorized capital of 10 p. has such a vessel that stands under half a lard.
Yuri Nemov

+4

30 December 2019 11: 58

Undoubtedly, Switzerland will pay all the penalties (following the example of the incident with the French Mistrals). The money will go to pay for the training of Academician Chersky. The whole question is why the academician was not prepared in advance. Washington has long threatened with sanctions, during which time it was possible to prepare Chersky for work and keep close on the stream.