State of emergency in Sevastopol bay: decommissioned submarine sank, and then surfaced


December 12, 2019 we Reported about the fire that occurred at the Heavy aircraft carrier cruiser (TAVRK) "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov" during repairs at the pier of the 35th ship repair plant (Murmansk). And now, another state of emergency. On the night of December 15, 2019, the decommissioned floating dock PD-16 with the decommissioned submarine located in it sank in the southern bay of Sevastopol.


Sources in the military industrial complex specified that these facilities, at the time of the state of emergency, did not belong to the structures of the Black Sea Fleet (BSF) of the Russian Navy. No information on the victims. There are no official comments from senior officials and military either.

According to preliminary information, the sunken submarine is a decommissioned large diesel-electric submarine B-380 (formerly the Gorky Komsomolets, project 641B Som), which has been part of the Black Sea Fleet since 1982. This submarine was tormented for a long time, until April 29, 2016 the utilization tender from the Ministry of Defense was announced.




So, the sunken submarine B-380 surfaced on its own and lay on its port side, resting its cabin on the side of the floating dock. What emergency services of Sevastopol reported, suggesting that flooding of the floating dock could occur due to its technical condition - use and repair were impossible.

It is also known that the floating dock does not belong to the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “13 SRZ PRF” of the Ministry of Defense, its dismantling is planned. We remind that the big floating-dock "SPD-16" was laid in 1938 in Nikolaev. In 1941, it was commissioned and the flag of the auxiliary fleet was raised on it. He even participated in the defense of Sevastopol during the Second World War.

We remind you that on the night of October 30, 2018, a unique (the only one in the European part of Russia) giant floating dock PD-50, where the Admiral Kuznetsov was being repaired, sank in Murmansk.
Photos used: https://ru.wikipedia.org/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

17 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. beeper Offline
    beeper 15 December 2019 17: 08
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    Wow, this monument to the “Black Sea naval timelessness and the cut of the naval budget” - “floating ship with a submarine” has already become an integral entourage of the South Bay! yes
    And now, on the eve of the new fiscal 2020, “thirty years have passed”, Sevastopol suddenly lost its “landmark attraction” ....
    It will even be somehow unusual, upon leaving the station, not to see in the bay a "wonderful" floating structure with the most "long-repaired (probably already in the Guinness Book ?!)" submarine! wink
    I hope that so "Ruined" (hundreds of millions of rubles, and then drowned - "ends in the water" ?! winked ) The "decades-old" Gordian knot "will become a landmark prologue to the real revival of the Sevastopol ship repair at a new technical and organizational level (including with vigilant control over the effective TARGET spending of allocated funds and resources!) ?!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Upmost Offline
    Upmost (Innocent) 15 December 2019 21: 15
    -5
    • 0
    • 5
    And now, another state of emergency. On the night of December 15, 2019, the decommissioned floating dock PD-16 with the decommissioned submarine located in it sank in the southern bay of Sevastopol.

    In general, the Russian Federation decided in one fell swoop to get rid of the legacy of the damned communism-socialism.

    Not being able to independently build most of this heritage.
    1. Pishenkov Offline
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 16 December 2019 17: 12
      +3
      • 3
      • 0
      In general, the Russian Federation decided in one fell swoop to get rid of the legacy of the damned communism-socialism.
      Not being able to independently build most of this heritage.

      - somehow the logical connectives are not traced, from the word in general .... laughing I wanted to write something, but I don’t have time for thought at hand? ... laughing
  3. Upmost Offline
    Upmost (Innocent) 15 December 2019 21: 18
    -5
    • 0
    • 5
    We remind that the big floating-dock "SPD-16" was laid in 1938 in Nikolaev. In 1941 it was put into operation and the flag of the auxiliary fleet was raised on it. He even participated in the defense of Sevastopol during the Second World War.

    Under the patriots of the country and the fatherland was built and survived even in war.
    With effective managers (who pay little - they will flee abroad) - everything goes to waste.
    Bravo.
    1. 123 Online
      123 (123) 16 December 2019 07: 50
      +3
      • 3
      • 0
      Innocent, “Zaporozhye”, take away, finally, otherwise her same fate awaits, will disappear in the abyss of sea “beauty and pride” along with the welded pier.
      1. Upmost Offline
        Upmost (Innocent) 16 December 2019 14: 42
        -1
        • 1
        • 2
        Everyone has long forgotten about Zaporizhia.
        But we learn more and more about the “unparalleled-in-the-world” of the Russian Navy, and less and less it causes pride, even fear.
        Something like that.
        1. 123 Online
          123 (123) 16 December 2019 14: 47
          +2
          • 2
          • 0
          Everyone has long forgotten about Zaporizhia.
          But we learn more and more about the “unparalleled-in-the-world” of the Russian Navy, and less and less it causes pride, even fear.
          Something like that.

          But in vain they forgot, no one canceled the recycling fee. smile You’ll learn what’s new about the fleet, it’s good, improve the educational level. Don’t worry about pride, we will be proud ourselves, this is enough, but don’t be afraid, “a soldier will not offend a child”, the fleet must be respected. hi
    2. Pishenkov Offline
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 16 December 2019 17: 16
      +3
      • 3
      • 0
      ... but it was necessary to leave the dock in the ranks of 1938? Or how? Is it okay that the T-34 is also all in scrap or on pedestals?
      But I agree with the "effective managers", only considering that this dock has been standing there for a long time, and with the submarine, and the Navy does not belong to all of them, these managers, "effective", apparently, were initially not even Russian, and Ukrainian ... Although there are enough of them "effective" in the Russian Federation, unfortunately ... what is Roskosmos worth ...
      1. Bitter Offline
        Bitter (Gleb) 17 December 2019 02: 05
        +2
        • 2
        • 0
        ... it was necessary to leave the dock in service in 1938?

        It was not necessary to bring the situation to an absurdity, to write off and evacuate in a timely manner, or vice versa.
        How can it be that military property, even if only in 1812, turned out to be ownerless?
        Why do the corresponding structures not monitor the state of "dangerous" objects?
        You can do it much more environmentally friendly and cheaper if you do not wait for accidents,
        then throughout the country fewer floating docks will sink.
        1. 123 Online
          123 (123) 17 December 2019 07: 21
          +3
          • 3
          • 0
          It was not necessary to bring the situation to an absurdity, to write off and evacuate in a timely manner, or vice versa.

          Where to evacuate? To Sevmash? Or to the Baltic? I believe that they should have been disposed of, it never occurred to you that this is not a priority and in the Crimea the production capacities of the shipbuilding industry are still being restored after the "Sumerian Golden Age"?
          1. Bitter Offline
            Bitter (Gleb) 17 December 2019 10: 11
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            Undoubtedly, as well as the fact that this is a source of danger.
            If it was impossible to evacuate, it was necessary to secure, not ignore.
            For example, put this "monument" of the South Bay on a temporary "pedestal" so that it does not roll over.

            not a priority

            But now, very much so. And the dough for urgency will be thrown. Business.
            There are enough resources to carry out such work, it just seems that not all contracts are not for everyone.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Upmost Offline
    Upmost (Innocent) 16 December 2019 15: 18
    -1
    • 1
    • 2
    Quote: 123
    Learn what's new about the fleet, it's good, improve your educational level

    But there is nothing terrible in such information.
    The above-water part (remelting) is in a deplorably small (and mostly old) amount and condition.
    The underwater part (sub-melting) is also not super. Normal boats (NPS) are few, and they are not without problems.
    Missiles are also not ice - whatever one may say, Trident-2 itself will be better than the Mace, so in terms of the number of missiles on one boat the Americans are ahead - 24 versus 16. And the summer range is 11000 versus 9500.
    If about DEPL - this is generally an anachronism. Given the fact that the Russian diesel-electric submarines still have not received an anaerobic plant.
    There is only one under-carrier in the Russian Federation, both the Soviet and the current “imperial peppers” do not know how to ditch - they have already tried to drown it and set it on fire. It remains only to undermine it with a missile, which "accidentally" will fall into Kuzya during exercises.

    In general, only a country that has such fleet.
    1. 123 Online
      123 (123) 17 December 2019 08: 28
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      But there is nothing terrible in such information.

      You see, revered and nothing happened, continue, you are on the right track. good Learning is not scary, you will like it.

      The above-water part (remelting) is in a deplorably small (and mostly old) amount and condition.

      As I understand it, do you compare with the US Navy? Do you want to compare with yours? How are you doing, built up Ukraine? After all, you got a lot after the section. smile At least we were able to save the fleet, and did not transfer to pies, and although it is not without problems, it is developing. Anyway. You will probably laugh, but in terms of numbers the difference is not that big, as of 2018, the Russian Navy - 213 units, the US Navy - 239 units. Yes, the condition of the smelting, as you have expressed, is far from ideal, the collapse of the country, the division of the fleet, the lack of funding have not gone unnoticed, but this is still a real force to be reckoned with. Read at your leisure about the rearmament program, you will learn a lot of interesting things. The situation was corrected with the army, now the turn has reached the fleet. The share of modern weapons is already 62%. Follow the development of events in the coming years, you will learn a lot of unpleasant things for yourself. Our fleet, of course, is significantly inferior to the American, but everything was fine with the corvettes, the frigates went into the series, the destroyers and the BDK were next in line. There is a prospect. And you? By the way, how's it going overseas? Zomvolty went into a series?

      The underwater part (sub-melting) is also not super. Normal boats (NPS) are few, and they are not without problems.

      And there are many and no problems? What are we going to talk about? How much do you think is a lot or enough?

      Missiles are also not ice - whatever one may say, Trident-2 itself will be better than the Mace, so in terms of the number of missiles on one boat the Americans are ahead - 24 versus 16. And the summer range is 11000 versus 9500.

      Well, yes, bravo. good Tasks similar to those assigned to Trident, we mainly carry out ground-based missiles. Although in fairness, Sineva is inferior to Trident, also in terms of mass of warheads. Do you want to compare calibers with Tomahawks? Can you tell us about the development of hypersonic in America?

      If about DEPL - this is generally an anachronism. Given the fact that the Russian diesel-electric submarines still have not received an anaerobic plant.

      That's right, an anachronism. And in the USA, how are things with anaerobic plants?

      There is only one under-carrier in the Russian Federation, both the Soviet and the current “imperial peppers” do not know how to ditch - they have already tried to drown it and set it on fire. It remains only to undermine it with a missile, which "accidentally" will fall into Kuzya during exercises.

      How's your Varyag doing? A banner with a trident proudly flies over it? Look at the American ones, out of 110 ten are old, 6 or 7 are on the joke, they can’t go to sea, one new Ford is handsome, how is it going with him? Already can depart from the pier or not so far?
  6. Arkharov Offline
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 17 December 2019 07: 55
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    And you say boats are bad. Drown drown.
  7. Vitali r Offline
    Vitali r (Vitali R) 17 December 2019 09: 03
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Still, they did the right thing at 37 with enemies. Slander worse than the enemy!
    1. Bitter Offline
      Bitter (Gleb) 17 December 2019 10: 32
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      This is not sloppiness, this is a plan such a "priority" plan of authorities.
      There is nothing to cry and slander the system; one must bravely and steadfastly endure hardships and hardships.
      In modern conditions, the authorities already have immunity for all these tricks.
      Not "37", they don’t leave their own, they can throw them .. sometimes, but this is already a business.
  8. Victor Winner Offline
    Victor Winner (Victor the Winner) 23 March 2020 13: 46
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Three times I was under repair in PD-16. Several times went on the B-380 with the commander I. Panasenko. The death of such objects dear to the soul and the Navy always strikes the heart. So, the admirals immediately wrote them off from the Navy ?! This is similar to our cowardly and mediocre naval commanders. PD-16 with an experienced workforce literally worked wonders. I replaced 11,5 square meters. m strong housing. I read a lot of nonsense in the comments, I ask lay people not to write about fleets. Since the 60s of the last century, the USA has been ahead of us in the technologies of building low-noise submarines and noise-sensing sensitivity. Ahead and now. Only in the 80s we approached them, but the restructuring and collapse of the Union led to the destruction of all achievements. Now we are rumbling again and don’t hear anything, but there are no people at the helm of the RF Ministry of Defense and the Russian Navy who would be able to solve these problems. They are simply not there! And do not believe the propaganda in the media about our power. Lag in all areas of defense. There are no miracles, there are only cartoons that threaten the whole world with a nuclear war. From there, the results are as follows. We urgently need a reform of the Submarine Forces of Russia. But I managed to create the quietest boat in the world and drove the 209 project, and secretly conducted reconnaissance at the very bases of the Turkish Navy, and exposed the mine’s setting under the Bosphorus “Captors”. A lot depends on the commander. But now the commanders, even if they want to improve their boats, they will not give them. With my ideas, I increased the cost of repairs by 600 rubles. This is about 000 dollars at the time. Each fighter sought to improve his combat post. And the priorities on my ship were not set as the CPSU demanded. The service was led by professionalism and patriotism, not communist conviction.