State of emergency in Sevastopol bay: decommissioned submarine sank, and then surfaced


December 12, 2019 we Reported about the fire that occurred at the Heavy aircraft carrier cruiser (TAVRK) "Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov" during repairs at the pier of the 35th ship repair plant (Murmansk). And now, another state of emergency. On the night of December 15, 2019, the decommissioned floating dock PD-16 with the decommissioned submarine located in it sank in the southern bay of Sevastopol.


Sources in the military industrial complex specified that these facilities, at the time of the state of emergency, did not belong to the structures of the Black Sea Fleet (BSF) of the Russian Navy. No information on the victims. There are no official comments from senior officials and military either.

According to preliminary information, the sunken submarine is a decommissioned large diesel-electric submarine B-380 (formerly the Gorky Komsomolets, project 641B Som), which has been part of the Black Sea Fleet since 1982. This submarine was tormented for a long time, until April 29, 2016 the utilization tender from the Ministry of Defense was announced.




So, the sunken submarine B-380 surfaced on its own and lay on its port side, resting its cabin on the side of the floating dock. What emergency services of Sevastopol reported, suggesting that flooding of the floating dock could occur due to its technical condition - use and repair were impossible.

It is also known that the floating dock does not belong to the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “13 SRZ PRF” of the Ministry of Defense, its dismantling is planned. We remind that the big floating-dock "SPD-16" was laid in 1938 in Nikolaev. In 1941, it was commissioned and the flag of the auxiliary fleet was raised on it. He even participated in the defense of Sevastopol during the Second World War.

We remind you that on the night of October 30, 2018, a unique (the only one in the European part of Russia) giant floating dock PD-50, where the Admiral Kuznetsov was being repaired, sank in Murmansk.
  • Photos used: https://ru.wikipedia.org/
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. beeper Offline beeper
    beeper 15 December 2019 17: 08
    0
    Wow, this monument to the "Black Sea naval timelessness and the cut of the naval budget" - "floating dock with a submarine" has already become an integral part of the South Bay! yes
    And now, on the eve of the new financial 2020, "not even thirty years have passed," Sevastopol suddenly lost its "iconic landmark" ...
    It will even be somehow unusual, upon exiting the station, not to see in the bay a "wonderful" floating structure with the most "long-term repair (probably already in the Guinness Book ?!)" submarine! wink
    I hope that so "Ruined (for hundreds of millions of rubles, and then drowned -" ends in water "?! winked ) "The multi-decade" Gordian knot "will become a milestone prologue to the actual revival of the Sevastopol ship repair at a new technical and organizational level (including with vigilant control over the effective TARGETED spending of allocated funds and resources!) ?!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Upmost Offline Upmost
    Upmost (Innocent) 15 December 2019 21: 15
    -5
    And now, another state of emergency. On the night of December 15, 2019, the decommissioned floating dock PD-16 with the decommissioned submarine located in it sank in the southern bay of Sevastopol.

    In general, the Russian Federation decided in one fell swoop to get rid of the legacy of the damned communism-socialism.

    Not being able to independently build most of this heritage.
    1. Pishenkov Offline Pishenkov
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 16 December 2019 17: 12
      +3
      In general, the Russian Federation decided in one fell swoop to get rid of the legacy of the damned communism-socialism.
      Not being able to independently build most of this heritage.

      - somehow the logical connectives are not traced, from the word in general .... laughing I wanted to write something, but I don’t have time for thought at hand? ... laughing
  3. Upmost Offline Upmost
    Upmost (Innocent) 15 December 2019 21: 18
    -5
    We remind that the big floating-dock "SPD-16" was laid in 1938 in Nikolaev. In 1941 it was put into operation and the flag of the auxiliary fleet was raised on it. He even participated in the defense of Sevastopol during the Second World War.

    Under the patriots of the country and the fatherland was built and survived even in war.
    With effective managers (who pay little - they will flee abroad) - everything goes to waste.
    Bravo.
    1. 123 Offline 123
      123 (123) 16 December 2019 07: 50
      +3
      Innokenty, take the "Zaporozhye", finally, otherwise the same fate awaits, "beauty and pride" will perish in the abyss of the sea together with the welded berth.
      1. Upmost Offline Upmost
        Upmost (Innocent) 16 December 2019 14: 42
        -1
        Everyone has long forgotten about Zaporozhye.
        But about the "unparalleled-in-the-world" of the Russian Navy, we learn more and more, and less and less it causes at least pride, at least fear.
        Something like that.
        1. 123 Offline 123
          123 (123) 16 December 2019 14: 47
          +2
          Everyone has long forgotten about Zaporozhye.
          But about the "unparalleled-in-the-world" of the Russian Navy, we learn more and more, and less and less it causes at least pride, at least fear.
          Something like that.

          But in vain they forgot, no one canceled the recycling fee. smile What's new about the fleet you learn, it's good, raise your educational level. Don't worry about pride, we ourselves will be proud, that's enough, but there is no need to be afraid, “a soldier will not offend a child,” the fleet must be respected. hi
    2. Pishenkov Offline Pishenkov
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 16 December 2019 17: 16
      +3
      ... but it was necessary to leave the dock in the ranks of 1938? Or how? Is it okay that the T-34 is also all in scrap or on pedestals?
      But I agree with "effective managers", only considering that this dock has been there for a long time, and with the submarine, and all this does not belong to the Navy, then these "effective" managers, apparently, were not even Russian from the beginning, and Ukrainian ... Although there are enough of them in the Russian Federation, unfortunately ... Roscosmos alone is worth something ...
      1. Bitter Offline Bitter
        Bitter (Gleb) 17 December 2019 02: 05
        +2
        ... it was necessary to leave the dock in service in 1938?

        It was not necessary to bring the situation to an absurdity, to write off and evacuate in a timely manner, or vice versa.
        How can it be that military property, even if only in 1812, turned out to be ownerless?
        Why don't the relevant structures monitor the state of "dangerous" objects?
        You can do it much more environmentally friendly and cheaper if you do not wait for accidents,
        then there will be fewer floating docks across the country to sink.
        1. 123 Offline 123
          123 (123) 17 December 2019 07: 21
          +3
          It was not necessary to bring the situation to an absurdity, to write off and evacuate in a timely manner, or vice versa.

          Where to evacuate? To Sevmash? Or to the Baltic? I suppose they should have been disposed of, did it ever occur to you that this is not a priority task and in the Crimea the production capacities of the shipbuilding industry are still being restored after the "Sumerian Golden Age"?
          1. Bitter Offline Bitter
            Bitter (Gleb) 17 December 2019 10: 11
            +1
            Undoubtedly, as well as the fact that this is a source of danger.
            If it was impossible to evacuate, it was necessary to secure, not ignore.
            For example, put this "monument" of the South Bay on a temporary "pedestal" so as not to overturn.

            not a priority

            But now, very much so. And the dough for urgency will be thrown. Business.
            There are enough resources to carry out such work, it just seems that not all contracts are not for everyone.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Upmost Offline Upmost
    Upmost (Innocent) 16 December 2019 15: 18
    -1
    Quote: 123
    Learn what's new about the fleet, it's good, improve your educational level

    But there is nothing terrible in such information.
    The above-water part (remelting) is in a deplorably small (and mostly old) amount and condition.
    The underwater part (sub-melting) is also not super. Normal boats (NPS) are few, and they are not without problems.
    Missiles are also not ice - whatever one may say, Trident-2 itself will be better than the Mace, so in terms of the number of missiles on one boat the Americans are ahead - 24 versus 16. And the summer range is 11000 versus 9500.
    If about DEPL - this is generally an anachronism. Given the fact that the Russian diesel-electric submarines still have not received an anaerobic plant.
    The Russian Federation has only one under-aircraft carrier, both Soviet, and the current "imperial peppers" do not know how to ditch it - they have already tried to drown it and set it on fire. The only thing left to do is to blow it up with a rocket, which "accidentally" will hit Kuzya during exercises.

    In general, only a country that has such fleet.
    1. 123 Offline 123
      123 (123) 17 December 2019 08: 28
      +1
      But there is nothing terrible in such information.

      You see, revered and nothing happened, continue, you are on the right track. good Learning is not scary, you will like it.

      The above-water part (remelting) is in a deplorably small (and mostly old) amount and condition.

      As I understand it, do you compare with the US Navy? Do you want to compare with yours? How are you doing, built up Ukraine? After all, you got a lot after the section. smile At least we were able to save the fleet, and did not transfer to pies, and although it is not without problems, it is developing. Anyway. You will probably laugh, but in terms of numbers the difference is not that big, as of 2018, the Russian Navy - 213 units, the US Navy - 239 units. Yes, the condition of the smelting, as you have expressed, is far from ideal, the collapse of the country, the division of the fleet, the lack of funding have not gone unnoticed, but this is still a real force to be reckoned with. Read at your leisure about the rearmament program, you will learn a lot of interesting things. The situation was corrected with the army, now the turn has reached the fleet. The share of modern weapons is already 62%. Follow the development of events in the coming years, you will learn a lot of unpleasant things for yourself. Our fleet, of course, is significantly inferior to the American, but everything was fine with the corvettes, the frigates went into the series, the destroyers and the BDK were next in line. There is a prospect. And you? By the way, how's it going overseas? Zomvolty went into a series?

      The underwater part (sub-melting) is also not super. Normal boats (NPS) are few, and they are not without problems.

      And there are many and no problems? What are we going to talk about? How much do you think is a lot or enough?

      Missiles are also not ice - whatever one may say, Trident-2 itself will be better than the Mace, so in terms of the number of missiles on one boat the Americans are ahead - 24 versus 16. And the summer range is 11000 versus 9500.

      Well, yes, bravo. good Tasks similar to those assigned to Trident, we mainly carry out ground-based missiles. Although in fairness, Sineva is inferior to Trident, also in terms of mass of warheads. Do you want to compare calibers with Tomahawks? Can you tell us about the development of hypersonic in America?

      If about DEPL - this is generally an anachronism. Given the fact that the Russian diesel-electric submarines still have not received an anaerobic plant.

      That's right, an anachronism. And in the USA, how are things with anaerobic plants?

      The Russian Federation has only one under-aircraft carrier, both Soviet, and the current "imperial peppers" do not know how to ditch it - they have already tried to drown it and set it on fire. The only thing left to do is to blow it up with a rocket, which "accidentally" will hit Kuzya during exercises.

      How is your "Varyag" doing there? Above him proudly flies a banner with a trident? Look at the American ones, ten out of 110 are old, 6 or 7 are laid up, they cannot go to sea, one new Ford is handsome, how is it going with him? Already can move away from the pier or not yet?
  6. Arkharov Offline Arkharov
    Arkharov (Grigory Arkharov) 17 December 2019 07: 55
    -1
    And you say boats are bad. Drown drown.
  7. Vitali r Offline Vitali r
    Vitali r (Vitali R) 17 December 2019 09: 03
    +1
    Still, they did the right thing at 37 with enemies. Slander worse than the enemy!
    1. Bitter Offline Bitter
      Bitter (Gleb) 17 December 2019 10: 32
      +1
      This is not slovenliness, this is a plan, a "priority" plan of authorities.
      There is nothing to cry and slander the system; one must bravely and steadfastly endure hardships and hardships.
      In modern conditions, the authorities already have immunity for all these tricks.
      Not "37", they do not abandon their own, they can throw it .. sometimes, but this is already a business.
  8. Victor Winner Offline Victor Winner
    Victor Winner (Victor the Winner) 23 March 2020 13: 46
    +1
    Three times I was under repair at PD-16. Several times went to the B-380 with the commander I. Panasenko. The death of objects so dear to the soul and the Fleet always hits the heart. So, the admirals immediately wrote them off from the Navy ?! It looks like our cowardly and incompetent naval commanders. PD-16 with an experienced work team literally worked wonders. I was replaced by 11,5 sq. m of a durable case. I read a lot of nonsense in the comments, I ask non-professionals not to write about fleets. Since the 60s of the last century, the United States has been ahead of us in technologies for building low-noise submarines and sensitivity for noise direction finding. They are ahead even now. Only in the 80s did we come close to them, but perestroika and the collapse of the Union led to the destruction of all achievements. Now we rumble again and hear nothing, but there are no people at the helm of the RF Ministry of Defense and the RF Navy who would be able to resolve these problems. They just don't exist! And do not believe the propaganda in the media about our power. Lagging in all areas of defense. There are no miracles, there are only cartoons that threaten the whole world with nuclear war. From there, the results are as follows. We urgently need a reform of the Russian Submarine Forces. I managed to create the quietest boat in the world and drove the 209 project, and secretly conducted reconnaissance at the very bases of the Turkish Navy, and exposed a mine setting near the Bosphorus by Captors. A lot depends on the commander. But now the commanders, even if they want to improve their boats, will not give them. With my ideas, I increased the cost of repairs by 600 rubles. This is about $ 000 at the time. Each fighter strove to improve his combat post. And the priorities on my ship were not set in the way the CPSU demanded. Professionalism and patriotism were placed at the head of the service, not communist conviction.