Fire at Admiral Kuznetsov: combat crews fight for ship survivability

22

The situation that arose as a result of a fire on the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier cruiser, which arose in the energy compartment, continues to be difficult.

Currently, firefighters continue to fight for the survivability of the ship. Due to the large area of ​​ignition and the fact that the extinguishing is complicated by the design of the ship, it was decided to fill the burning energy compartment with water. The fire is assigned the second category of complexity.

Currently, it is known that 11 people were injured in a fire, while six of them are in serious condition and placed in intensive care.

Most of the victims received poisoning from combustion products and burns of the respiratory tract.

In total, at the time the fire started, 400 people were involved in the repair work on the ship. At the site of the fire extinguishing there is the governor of the Murmansk region Andrei Chibis.

The cause of the fire could be a violation. equipment safety during welding in the hold of the first compartment, which led to the ignition of the power cable laid in different compartments of the vessel, which significantly complicated the work of firefighters.

The United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) will conduct an internal investigation to determine all the circumstances of the incident.
  • https://ru.krymr.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. DVF
    +2
    12 December 2019 17: 54
    I think the usual sloppiness.
    1. +1
      12 December 2019 23: 17
      The loss of competence in the field of repair and modernization of such ships led to casualties and property damage ... at first they drowned the dock, now they burned the aircraft carrier ...

      ... suffered a fire 11 people, while six of them are in serious condition and placed in intensive care

      The victims will file lawsuits against USC ... and pay for all of the Russian Federation, i.e. Russian taxpayers ...
  2. 0
    12 December 2019 18: 07
    Well, yes, yes, the market will settle everything, decide everything ... Cheaper, faster and better - this is the market demand ... How to combine this? As a result, we save on people, specialists, protective equipment, on technologies, etc. etc. ... And in the end - Oh!
  3. -4
    12 December 2019 18: 51
    So the end of the "Kuze" misbehavior has come. It is possible that the fire was organized by interested persons in order to hide the extent of the theft, or maybe just to justify the final write-off of this full-time product of the Soviet military-industrial complex - to repair it and bring it into a more or less suitable state, Putin's Rashka has no means. no technological capabilities. Anyway, if you think about it: why should frosty Nigeria need an aircraft carrier, even such a premature one? laughing
    1. -1
      12 December 2019 23: 21
      Anyway, if you think about it: why is a frosty Nigeria an aircraft carrier, even such a premature one?

      Warm congo laughing (the country of the "aggressor" freezing without gas), it is definitely not needed fellow (I mean the Navy in general) ... laughing
  4. +3
    12 December 2019 19: 14
    Let the grandfather of the Russian fleet die already - he was not a tenant from the stocks ...
    1. +1
      12 December 2019 23: 50
      Let the grandfather of the Russian fleet die already

      Let all the "grandfathers", "grandmothers" die as soon as possible and you will be happy. good
      With the “money saved” it will be possible to build yachts the size of a destroyer and gas carriers, and it is better to convert strategic bombers into personal civilian jets, at least somehow the costs are compensated.
      Buy something decent from the Chinese / Koreans, the French, or, finally, the Dutch, with Google’s assistant and Google maps. laughing
      Soviet aviation was almost rocked. The civilian, Soviet, navy are also following the same zigzags.
      The "zealous capitalists", in the fight against the remnants of the past, continue to destroy everything in a row - "to the core."
      And then ... privatize and poke one’s pockets, but maybe they’ll build something somewhere, or it’s better to invest in Africa.
      It was not possible to drown, therefore, it is necessary to burn. Everything goes according to plan. hi
  5. -2
    12 December 2019 22: 20
    Quote: krasstar
    grandfather of the Russian fleet

    He is grandfather former soviet fleet. And it will remain as long as you do not rename it.

    And in the asset of the RUSSIAN fleet (post-Soviet construction) there are only "pugs-Karakurt".
    1. +1
      12 December 2019 23: 33
      Quote: UpperMost
      Quote: krasstar
      .. grandfather of the Russian fleet

      He is grandfather former soviet fleet. And it will remain as long as you do not rename it.

      Well, in the Soviet Navy he was far from being a grandfather -

      launched in 1987 year.

      The term of such ships in the Navy is up to 50 years, look at the age of American aircraft carriers, the United States got rid of multi-purpose aircraft carriers from a conventional military power plant (WWII) and the post-war period only at the end of the twentieth ....
      The British aircraft carrier "Hermes" (analogue of "Kuze") is still in the service of the Indian Navy, although it is much older than ours (adopted only in 1959) ...
      1. -2
        13 December 2019 22: 58
        Quote: commbatant
        The term of such ships in the Navy is up to 50 years

        That's the trouble.
        Usually after 15-20 years (25 years, this is in the best case), this is no longer a combat unit, but an old bucket with nuts.

        Quote: commbatant
        British aircraft carrier "Hermes" (analogue "Kuze") is still in the service of the Indian Navy

        And India, this, excuse me, what? A guiding star for anyone in the know?
        You still remember the French Foch. Which is now Sao Paulo in Brazil.
        By the way, that India, that Brazil, are much more economically powerful countries than Russia.
    2. -2
      13 December 2019 22: 48
      Quote: UpperMost
      And in the asset of the RUSSIAN fleet (post-Soviet construction) there are only "pugs-Karakurt".

      Legs are stretched on clothes.
  6. -3
    12 December 2019 23: 01
    Daniel did not die - so the sore crushed ...
  7. +2
    12 December 2019 23: 39
    If what official sources write, the burning of diesel fuel was the reason ....
    The rhetorical question is, how and who carries out welding work in the presence of fuels and lubricants .... in general, the roof went off for effective meneger ...
    OSK that an induction steam generator cannot buy in order to steam any compartments, tanks, pipelines ....
    The liberal managers completely forgot that the Fire Safety and Safety Regulations were written in blood and tragedy ....
    1. +1
      15 December 2019 14: 45
      According to other sources,

      falling scale ignited power cables

      Apparently, some safety measures were purely symbolic in nature (the protocol was completed, signed and okay).
      The question arises about the qualifications of specialists involved in work at such an object. You can no longer talk about the organization of supervision of flammable work.
      Due to the negligence of some, others are doomed to feat.
      Expensive price. sad
      And it’s hard to believe in randomness.
  8. 0
    13 December 2019 00: 04
    In general, the ship will be flooded by Sunday ... a finely crafted sabotage, as with the dock ...
  9. -1
    13 December 2019 05: 47
    Quote: commbatant
    Well, in the Soviet Navy he was far from grandfather

    I had something else in mind - that "Kuzya" was manufactured and launched in the USSR.

    And in the Russian Federation for all the years of the Infallible, they did not bother to pre- or build a plant to produce such vessels.

    But they riveted an army of networked "sips", which foaming at the mouth prove why it is precisely Russia, as a continental country (with its several fleets!) That does not need aircraft carriers.
    1. -2
      13 December 2019 23: 06
      Quote: UpperMost
      And in the Russian Federation for all the years of the Infallible, they did not bother to pre- or build a plant to produce such vessels.

      And who needs them in the Russian Federation? These ships and the factories for their construction?
      In addition, who will design and build?
      There was no one in the USSR, and no one in the Russian Federation.
      What the Germans did not know how to do in the Reich, then, in the USSR, they did not know how to do either. Such a strange pattern can be traced.

      Quote: UpperMost
      ... why exactly Russia, as a continental country (with a few fleets!) do not need aircraft carriers.

      Not needed.
      Russia is not a rich country inhabited by a POOR population.
      Russian aircraft carrier NOT POCKET.
      Since the poorest of the countries that use used aircraft carriers (light) is Brazil, it is much (many times) richer than the Russian Federation.
      But aircraft carriers in Russia can still be built. But then there will be problems with food (accommodation, medical care, etc.) for builders. And also for everyone else.
      Further see "USSR experience".
  10. -1
    13 December 2019 05: 58
    Quote: aries2200
    finely crafted sabotage

    You know, I’m always surprised by such statements about sabotage.
    Actually, this word means "distraction / withdrawal / withdrawal / avoidance".

    And here I have two questions for you:
    1) What the abstraction could mean here? It’s not about the fact that while the ship was being extinguished, the saboteurs set fire to another.
    2) If (and I think that this is so) you meant "dirty trick", then a lot of questions need to be asked to the Infallible President, who came from the sphere of state security (even under the USSR).

    And the main question is how it turns out that in the nineteenth year of his successful presidency in the country under his control, unpleasant disasters occur every now and then:
    That plane crashed and caught fire
    That miracle plane was planted on a corn field,
    That plane (with an ensemble of songs and dances) crashed on take-off (when flying to Syria, during the period of turbulent victories by terrorists, remember?), And people died
    That flooded the largest (and only) in the country dock,
    Well, finally, it came to yet another problem with TAKR.
    I understand that you can’t control everyone. But if it’s NOT a diversion, then somehow it often happens.
    If it is DIVERSIONS, then what is the price of the Infallible, a former intelligence officer, who still has all this to do?
    1. -1
      13 December 2019 07: 25
      Quote: UpperMost
      ... You know, I’m always surprised by such statements about sabotage. Actually, this word means "distraction / withdrawal / withdrawal / avoidance" ...

      Interestingly, but you always and in everything strictly in Latin, please express yourself? good
      Since, if you don’t remember about the translation from Latin, the meaning of this word is completely different, but when you ascepals, like you, were interested in such “little things, right?”

      Quote: UpperMost
      ... But they riveted an army of networked "sips", which foaming at the mouth prove why Russia, as a continental country (with its several fleets!) Does not need aircraft carriers.

      Do you personally think that our country urgently needs such ships, and as much as possible? - this is YOUR OPINION, and nothing more, so such expressions - even about "sipping", at least about everything else - are not too polite (or cultural) at least, but the question arises - who will sponsor these projects? Do you personally?
      And why did our country need such monsters in huge quantities? Where is the provision of all this, who again will be the sponsor?
      And the fact that Russia is truly a continental country, WHAT is bad? Military bases in the same quantities as the Americans - why?
  11. -3
    13 December 2019 19: 47
    Quote: 321
    Military bases in the same quantities as the Americans - why?

    As an example:

    The Infallible decided to show the steepness in Syria (to drop terrorists at distant approaches / try new types of weapons / change the balance of forces in the Middle East - emphasize the necessary).

    There was a question about how to transfer military equipment and supplies to this very Syria.

    There are few ships, they are old. But there are no others.

    And old "sea trains" began to go to Syria, depleting their already small residual resource.

    Yes, they were so exhausted that all the available "first-ranked men" stood up for repairs.

    "Kuzya" so generally only made everyone laugh, starting from the process of crossing the ocean


    and until the subsequent "death" of aircraft.
    (Although the "patriots" here, too, calmly broadcast that everything was fine, and "the TAVKR fulfilled the assigned tasks normally).

    Remained "Gren" with "Gorshkov", who are now "blown away" for the rest.

    And there would be more "first-rankers", and other UDCs, and everything would be simpler.

    But alas, the money was invested in oligarch yachts (note, these people somehow cannot even be named businessmennot that patriots of Russia).
    1. +2
      13 December 2019 22: 55
      Your answer strongly resembles "there is an elder in the garden, and there is an uncle in Kiev," so you have about the same "logic", well, except for the aircraft carriers, there is absolutely nothing to transfer? So according to the same logic of yours, battleships need to be built, but what is there?
      Best of all, your views are confirmed by the very photo in which you can even see Fedya from that old Soviet comedy with your naked eyes, well, it’s trying to look like proof for you - well, try to continue in the same style, give free rein to you and your colleagues, you you’ll organize an arms race again, more precisely, super-expenditures on armaments. am
    2. -2
      13 December 2019 23: 09
      Quote: UpperMost
      And there would be more "first-rankers", and other UDCs, and everything would be simpler.

      Noticeably simpler. But noticeably hungrier. And colder in winter.

      Quote: UpperMost
      But alas, the money was invested in the yachts of the oligarchs

      You wouldn’t open your mouth to ANOTHER loaves less. You look, and your dream would have settled. And the chair would normalize too.
      And then after all, someone else's property obviously does not give you peace.