How the Anglo-Saxons tried to steal the Victory from us

2
In the media of the USA and Britain it is often possible to see materials, as if these countries had played a decisive role in the victory over Hitlerism, and the Soviet Union only “stood next to it”. But the matter is not only in propaganda. It turns out that these states, which were considered allies of the Soviet Union in World War II, tried to appropriate the victory in 1945, moreover, not in the media, but in reality.





Candidate of Historical Sciences Sergey Latyshev writes on the website of Tsargrad TV channel that Britain made plans to capture Berlin in order to attribute the victory to itself. And the United States staged an invasion of parts of Germany and the Czech Republic to get German nuclear Technology. In this way they wanted to defeat the USSR.

The historian also recalled the operation called "The Unthinkable", which was planned by "our allies." She envisaged that after the war in Europe ended, the Red Army would be attacked by 47 Anglo-American divisions and approximately 10-12 German. But the operation was rejected, as the "allies" were afraid of the superiority of the Soviet forces. They concluded that victory would not succeed, despite even superiority in naval forces and strategic aviation. As a result, they had to put the plan of the operation “under the cloth”.

But London and Washington did not part with the idea of ​​stealing a victory. Moreover, Britain wanted to achieve victory in World War II, and the United States was preparing for the next.

British Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery dreamed of the laurels of George Zhukov. At the same time, he was not at all an outstanding commander, but was, as they say now, highly PR. He knew how to win victories only if he had multiple superiority over the enemy or if the enemy was weakened to such an extent that he could no longer fight.

In recent months, World War II Montgomery has made a pretty successful career in North Africa, that is, in a secondary direction. He did not achieve any success either in Italy, or in Holland, or in Normandy, but he was very ambitious. Therefore, he was eager to enter victorious into Berlin. The British argued that whoever enters this city is the victor in the war.

Montgomery wrote in his memoirs:

As soon as we crossed the Rhine, I began to discuss with Eisenhower plans for further operations. We had several meetings. I have always considered Berlin a goal of paramount importance; it was political center, and, ahead of the Russians on the way to it, we would greatly facilitate our post-war tasks


In addition, in order to steal a victory from the USSR, it was necessary that the troops of the "allies" enter Vienna, Prague and other European cities earlier than the army of the USSR. Field Marshal believes that Western political leaders did not manage effectively and missed those chances.

In the autumn of 1944, I clearly understood that the way we conduct business we adopted would lead to consequences that would be felt long after the end of the war; then it seemed to me that we all "screwed up ... I must admit that this is what we did

He wrote.

However, most likely, the American associates deliberately prevented the ambitious Briton from realizing their plans. First, the United States (as well as the British leadership) feared quite openly "cheating" against Stalin. Secondly, Washington was interested in waging the next war against the USSR, and for this he wanted to save the lives of German soldiers.

So, one of the German "tank aces", Otto Carius, recalled that he once negotiated with one of the American commanders, and he advised to take care of his people, because soon they would be needed to carry out "joint tasks."

The United States also had another important goal. They sought to get ahead of everyone else in order to take possession of German nuclear facilities and take out everything they could - raw materials, equipment and even specialists. And destroy everything else, so that the USSR does not get anything, because they saw him as a future enemy.

The author of the article claims that Hitler Germany already had nuclear weapons by the middle of the war. The Nazis were close to creating an intercontinental ballistic missile. And on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, not American but German bombs were dropped, which the US took.

The next victim of the attack after Hiroshima and Nagasaki was to become the Soviet Union. When US President Harry Truman returned from the Postdam Conference, he ordered Eisenhower to prepare a plan for a nuclear war against the USSR. Our country was saved by the fact that the Americans did not yet have their own nuclear bombs, and the German ones were not enough.

The Soviet Union also fell into the hands of a part of German technology. And after the Second World War ended, the main task in the USSR was to create a nuclear shield.

In 1950, recalls Latyshev, the Korean War began. Washington had by then superiority over the USSR in the number of nuclear bombs. But the course of the conflict made the United States convinced that they could not deliver nuclear weapons to where they needed to, since Soviet aviation proved to be a serious force that managed to provide significant opposition. There was no lag in the USSR in rocket technology. Due to the fact that the USSR had powerful weapons, the Third World War was avoided at that time.

The coming Victory Day is a good occasion to once again recall this. As well as morality arising from expensive historical experience: in order to live in peace you need to be strong

- concluded the historian.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

2 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    8 May 2018 21: 32
    there was also the "dropshot" plan from Churchill, the "totality" plan from Eisenhower ...
  2. +1
    9 May 2018 17: 03
    Victory Day has a bad effect on some organisms that have not passed evolution and make them think not in the pinnacle of evolution, but in a different place.