Russia and Ukraine signed an agreement on oil transit for 10 years

December 3 2019 21

NAK Naftogaz Ukrainy and PJSC Gazprom find out relations regarding gas transit and supplies of “blue fuel” to Ukraine, Ukrtransnafta PJSC and Transneft, without raising a noise, signed an additional agreement to the current contract for the transit of Russian oil through Ukrainian territory. According to the document, Kiev over the next 10 years will provide Moscow with services for the transportation of "black gold" to Europe.

On December 3, 2019, PJSC Ukrtransnafta and PJSC Transneft entered into an additional agreement to the agreement on the provision of oil transportation services through the territory of Ukraine, which extends its validity for 10 years - from January 1, 2020 to January 1, 2030

- said in an official statement of Ukrtransnafta.

It should be noted that Ukrtransnafta is the operator of the main oil pipelines (MP) of Ukraine (the second largest in Europe). The founder of the company and the sole shareholder is Naftogaz Ukrainy. In turn, Transneft PJSC is the Russian natural transport monopoly and the largest operator of oil pipelines and oil product pipelines in the world.

The message of Ukrtransnafta PJSC clarifies that the said document was signed by Nikolay Gavrilenko, General Director of the company and Sergey Andronov, Vice President of Transneft. This happened in the framework of the International Conference "Energy in the 21st Century", held in Zagreb (Croatia).

The Ukrainian company explains that the signing of the document took place in accordance with the decision of its shareholder, Naftogaz Ukrainy, from November 27, 2019. In addition to the extension of the contract, the supplementary agreement updates a number of its provisions, taking into account the current state of changes in the oil transportation services market in the region. At the same time, the basic principles of cooperation remained unchanged (the procedure for payment for services and the interaction of technical services). Moreover, this additional agreement guarantees the safe and stable operation of the oil transportation system of Ukraine for a decade.

https://kosatka.media/

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

gorenina91

-5

3 December 2019 19: 02

- Well ... and ... and ... and ... and. ???
- Personally, I did not doubt it at all ... -And a long-term contract not even on gas .., but on the transportation of oil, which is much more time-consuming and technically more sophisticated ... -Belorussia, poor thing, probably already wrung its desperation hands ... Alas ...
- Am I glad ??? - Yes, I'm glad, of course ... -Everything goes exactly as I personally expected ...
- I am personally glad for the reason that I was not mistaken in "quality" and "belonging to a certain category" of the "O" group ... - This is the category of human everyday life, which ... - that is not suitable for a cook in the kitchen. .. what to manage .., and what they can be trusted to manage ... - Their destiny ... is to teach lessons in "cleverness" in chorus .., but to put me cons with a whole crowd, a crowd ... -That's all. ., what does this whole ... group "O" -Hahah ...
1. Pishenkov
  
  +3
  
  3 December 2019 20: 25
  
  Everything goes exactly as I personally expected ...
  
  - I somehow don’t remember that you "assumed" something similar about oil lately. About the fact that Ukraine needs to prolong gas transit for a long time, you were in favor, yes ... But on the existing and set by Ukraine conditions, everyone who has anything to do with this, at least in the Russian Federation, is definitely against ... That is, we do not agree with you ... But the transit of oil and the transit of gas are very different things, both in terms of volume and of strategic importance for the country. It is not for nothing that oil was signed and pumped "quietly", but with gas there are scandals all over the world ...
  So for now you can
  
  teach lessons in "cleverness" in chorus.
  
  and admire your own foresight, perhaps in front of a mirror ... And do not forget to smile broadly and triumphantly for the fullness of feelings ...
  
  Hahah ..
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

0

3 December 2019 19: 48

Uh Oil - it is in everyday life unnecessarily, you can pump it!
steelmaker

-5

3 December 2019 21: 08

Well, FANS of Putin and Miller, something you are not active! Oh yes. Emotions

Life is nothing without respect
empty water on an empty stomach!

All the same, $ turned out to be higher than respect for oneself and the country. Well, fans, how else should Ukraine shit Russia to be put in its place?
1. Pishenkov
  
  +2
  
  3 December 2019 21: 12
  
  Miller does not deal with oil. You read the article though, or cook your steel. Although I personally think that there is nothing to pump oil through them. We are for them an "aggressor country", and they are "fascists" for the Russian Federation ... so everything is somehow strange with this capitalism ... Well, this is what Russia will "reach" for if it does not stop in time ...
  1. Victor N
    
    0
    
    4 December 2019 10: 00
    
    Oil is more complicated: it goes to refineries tuned specifically for its refining.
steelmaker

-4

3 December 2019 21: 22

2024 any other - just not Putin or his successor!
1. Pishenkov
  
  +2
  
  3 December 2019 23: 02
  
  2024 any other - just not Putin or his successor!
  
  - good idea! Who? Maybe someone like Navalny will suit you? Or Chubais to the kingdom? Well, if anyone is better than Putin, then they are better, right?
  Well, yes, "any change is for the better" ... In the late 80s - early 90s, not everyone almost thought so, did they? And what did it lead to? I am amazed at what a short memory people have .... They say that every nation deserves its rulers. Correctly. By the end of the 90s, you see, the overwhelming majority had already realized that everything in the country was covered with a copper basin, then Putin came ... And if now the majority will be the same, forgetless, you will be rewarded with a new "Boris Yeltsin" or even worse ... you already deserve it.
  At the same time, I do not idealize Putin or his team in any way. In general, no one is perfect, and they have many disadvantages. And you will not please everyone in the country. But at the same time, I am absolutely sure that the leaders are the least in my memory, and it begins with Brezhnev, there simply was no one better in the country. Therefore, they slipped to where they slipped ... But Putin didn’t give the state an abyss and fell apart, he raised the country, raised its world prestige, raised the army, raised the industry, and began to return the lost territories ... It’s clear that people always want to more than there is. This is normal. But one must also have a conscience and objectivity! Compare what happened 20 years ago and what is now ...
  If you have something to say about this, tell me, but I doubt only that it will be something concrete and objective ...
  1. gore
    
    0
    
    4 December 2019 06: 46
    
    Well done, Lyokha! Beat the bastards!
  2. plabu
    
    0
    
    4 December 2019 07: 01
    
    Until 2024, about five years, is it too early to start talking about it now?
Sapsan136

+5

3 December 2019 22: 54

Apparently, it’s time to dismiss Transneft’s managers, since Ukraine will deal with this company in the same way as it did with Gazprom ... How many pseudo-effective managers still have in GDP, who miss a mop and a cleaning rag ...
1. Pishenkov
  
  +1
  
  4 December 2019 00: 25
  
  ... The pre-trial detention center misses them, not a rag ... as well as their direct bosses - billionaires ... they have to write off all this "fines", otherwise they only consider bonuses to themselves, but as a company in a minus - so not their problem, like ...
boriz

0

3 December 2019 22: 54

Please note: in both cases (both for gas and oil), there is only one owner - Naftogaz.
Which once again suggests that gas hype is a bare policy. There are two reasons, in my opinion:
1. For gas, we work closely and successfully with Germany. The crystal dream of the arrogant Saxons is to embroil Germany and Russia.
2. Oil is an energy carrier more compact and its reserves can be made practically everywhere (unlike gas). And oil is used less in heating, so interruptions in oil will not affect the bulk of the population so much. And the gas war of 2009 in Europe was well remembered.
Therefore, for oil - no Stockholm arbitration, long contracts are quietly in effect ...
And gas is a more effective weapon for escalating tensions.
1. Pishenkov
  
  +2
  
  4 December 2019 00: 08
  
  I hope that when signing a new agreement on oil, for as long as 10 years, the representatives of the Russian Federation took into account the experience of "arbitration" and entered into the agreement something more reasonable in terms of jurisdiction for resolving disputes. Otherwise, it's just for a period ... articles can be adjusted to fit this case ...
steelmaker

0

4 December 2019 11: 04

That's it. Some people have a short memory! The government of Primakov and Maslyukov have been forgotten! It was they who pulled out the country, and Putin already began to rule for free. And do not so hate your people 146 million, considering that there is no replacement for Putin !!!
1. Ravshan
  
  -5
  
  4 December 2019 11: 34
  
  Quote: steel maker
  The government of Primakov and Maslyukov have been forgotten! It was they who pulled the country out of experience.
  
  Yeah Faith is simpletons in a goldfish, a difficult pike and a magic wand, knows no boundaries. This explains the success of MMM and similar offices.
  1. Pishenkov
    
    0
    
    4 December 2019 14: 39
    
    With all the antipathy and rejection of your opinion in general, it’s hard to disagree here, specifically. Objectivity for the sake of ...
2. Pishenkov
  
  -1
  
  4 December 2019 12: 08
  
  With all due respect to E. Primakov, who was really just trying to preserve something that was possible under the existing conditions, it’s impossible to say that it was his government that pulled the country from somewhere ... Maybe he would, but they didn’t give it ... or failed ...
  On May 12, 1999, Primakov, having spent 8 months as prime minister, was dismissed by President Yeltsin, and it was during his rule that the worst financial crisis in the modern history of the Russian Federation fell. This did not happen through Primakov's fault, of course, everything was already going towards this before his arrival. So what could Primakov "raise" in this situation ??? Trying to hold back somehow is possible, but nothing more ...
  And on December 31, 1999, Putin was appointed acting president. Was it possible that after Primakov left, in mid-1999, Russia was already in "chocolate"? I don’t remember something. Rather, quite the opposite - in complete collapse, also in something brown, but it certainly wasn't chocolate .... And you definitely have problems with memory, in that case.
  And I'm not saying that there is no replacement for Putin, he is not eternal, moreover, I think that he will really leave in 2024. And the country WILL HAVE to find someone new. And this is a dangerous moment. And I personally FOR this to be Putin’s successor, and the country will not collapse again, as it was before ... Therefore, I’m definitely AGAINST formulations like
  
  any other-just not Putin or his successor
  
  - because everyone else who was or who is being drawn is only WORSE than Putin ... like what they did or propose to do ... Putin must leave, this is certain, but the course of the country should not change in any case. Otherwise, this country is over.
steelmaker

0

4 December 2019 13: 07

The 1998 "anti-crisis" government demonstrated a simple example of achieving stabilization, sharply increasing the amount of credit, ensuring industrial growth at a rate of more than 2% per month and reducing inflation by three times. What prevents the implementation of the ideas that the government was implementing today is not clear, the economist noted.

The lack of professionalism and qualifications of the central characters of today's cabinet is one of the barriers. At the time of the 2014 devaluation, the authorities could apply mechanisms to stabilize the ruble exchange rate, and we would get the same effect that was obtained at that time, ”explained Glazyev. Instead, the country received an increase in interest rates on loans, which made import substitution and development of production in general impossible.

Do not believe me, maybe Glazyev believe?
1. Pishenkov
  
  0
  
  4 December 2019 14: 29
  
  Glazyev? ... and I might even believe him if he says something concrete. So ask him why all this was not applied - he himself was the adviser to the President of the Russian Federation from July 2012 to October 2019, that is, the last seven years. Prior to that, he was involved in the affairs of the National Bank of the Russian Federation and foreign economic relations. That is, the most that neither is a competent person. What is he to blame? On the
  
  The lack of professionalism and qualifications of the central characters of today's cabinet
  
  that is, the one in which he himself was all this time ??? Very interesting, don’t find ??? ...
  And in the situation with the Primakov’s government, again, with all due respect to him personally, but after a complete fall in general, it’s much easier to achieve some growth in industrial production and a drop in inflation than in the conditions of stability + opposition from the West. And the growth of industrial production of the Russian Federation in 2018 amounted to 2,9%, according to the calculated months of 2019 - 2,6% (interfax).
  Now in Ukraine, too, everything seems to be "growing" in numbers, and the country in f ... exactly according to the same scheme as the Russian Federation in 1999. Primakov's merit is that he did not let the fall last. It is a fact. But his government has definitely not pulled the country out of nowhere. Not allowed. And this is also a government blunder. Many people also interfere with Putin, but he still moves where he sees fit ...
steelmaker

0

7 December 2019 16: 02

Well, the "face" and opened! If Glazyev is not your authority, then who? Links, photos, last name in the studio!