Kedmi: United European Army will be the Fourth Reich for Russia

November 26, 2019 21

Israeli political scientist Jacob Kedmi on the TV show “Evening with Vladimir Solovyov” told who the united European army will be fighting, the creation of which is now much said by EU leaders.

According to the former head of the Nativ intelligence agency, if the project of the united European army is implemented, then the only goal of this Fourth Reich will be the fight against Russia.

Kedmi recalled that in 1945, the Soviet Union defeated the last army of a united Europe, which was called the “Wehrmacht”:

In addition to the Wehrmacht, there can be no single European army. United Europe fought against Bolshevism, with the Soviet Union, only within the framework of a single Third Reich. Or there will be a Fourth Reich, and then there will be a united Europe that will fight against Russia, or not.

Actually, giving an assessment of the Nazi Wehrmacht as a unified European army, Kedmi did not say anything new: that is how Europeans themselves, who were direct participants in the events, evaluated it.

This is especially well said in the book Hitler for a Thousand Years, written by the Belgian fascist Leon Degrell, who, as part of the Wehrmacht, reached Kharkov, and then barely managed to take his legs:

It was at this time that suddenly on June 22, 1941, a preventive war against the Soviets began, accompanied by Hitler's call for volunteers from all over Europe to take part in the battle, which was to become not only a war of the Germans, but a war common to all European soldiers. For the first time since 1940, a pan-European plan emerged.

However, history has repeatedly shown how the campaigns of a united Europe against Russia end. And the "Fourth Reich", if it takes place, is unlikely to be an exception.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

steelmaker

+1

26 November 2019 11: 08

And you might think that now the European army is not directed against Russia? If Europe really begins to build its army, then they will first begin a showdown with the United States. And this could drag on for a decade before Europe begins to threaten Russia. Even having created this army, I do not think that Europe would dare to go to war with Russia - scientists already! But the current army, incited by the United States, is capable, at least, of a great provocation. Therefore, Kedmi, rather, scares Russia and hopes that the United States will not allow the creation of an army of Europe.
1. g1washntwn
  
  +5
  
  26 November 2019 12: 17
  
  In general, I do not see a strong difference between NATO and the pan-European army. Purely visual rebranding. France, with its own nuclear weapons, portrays independence even more or less, but the rest try to jump off the US economic orbit at the level of a kindergarten matinee.
Pishenkov

+3

26 November 2019 12: 23

Kedmi usually says a lot, often very intelligent. So far, we are not talking about the "Third Reich", the fourth, etc. - I understand that he is a Jew, I understand that all the events related to the Holocaust are taken for a living, but he is very inadequate to these topics ... And he sees this "Reich" even in the form of Austrian police, seeing which he, in his own words in one of the same programs of Solovyov, cried and clenched his fists with hatred ... this being there as a tourist with children. Even in the studio I shed a tear at one recollection. What then went there, to this Austria and Germany, I wanted to ask if he falls into such a comatose there ... This is despite the fact that more Jews left Russia for Germany than for this very Israel, and nothing, they live quite well for themselves ... no "Reich" ... So about different "Reichs" the words Kedmi should be taken with a large reserve.
It is now just his native Israel behaving like Hitler's Germany on the eve of the Second World War - provocation after provocation. And the Europeans are definitely not going to fight with Russia. In this case, the different Balts and Poles have hopes only for the Americans, and besides them, no one there is particularly keen on confrontation with the Russians. So in this regard, Russia should not be afraid of any "European army", and also listen to Kedmi's ramblings about this. I would say that for the Russian Federation this is rather a much more profitable option than NATO, in which European security is led by those who are not in Europe themselves, but want to make it their base for the offensive and at the same time the target for Russian missiles, leaving this, as they think, America is safe ... With the "European army" on European security, a more adequate dialogue will definitely be possible ...
1. Arkharov
  
  -2
  
  26 November 2019 20: 37
  
  What are the provocations of Israel?
  1. Pishenkov
    
    +3
    
    26 November 2019 21: 18
    
    Something today, apparently, "the day of the defender of Israel" or something like that - well, everything is straight up a mountain for the Jewish state!
    And provocations - yes, you know, missiles are allowed into our area of responsibility in the SAR from the territory of a neighboring state, so that carriers could not shoot down; it’s actually I am silent that this is called aggression against another sovereign state; then they warn about the attack, if they decide to warn, a couple of minutes before its implementation, as a result, an aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces shot down by friendly anti-aircraft fire; then they directly help terrorists with money and weapons, again by the fact that they act against the government of the SAR and the Russian Federation ... Citizens of the Russian Federation are extradited to the United States, although the Russian Federation also requires extradition ... Not enough ???
    1. Arkharov
      
      -4
      
      27 November 2019 09: 14
      
      And if, for example, from these territories, apparently, pro-Iranian terrorists who are there with the knowledge of the Syrian authorities shell the territory of Israel? And who shot down the plane, and not because of the crooked arms and missiles of local air defense? And do you have specific documents on helping Israel terrorists? Or someone, like Kedmi and Satanovsky, or any other characters, shouting at each other and spraying with saliva, you have something tossed at Solovyov, and you hung up your ears?
      1. Pishenkov
        
        +3
        
        27 November 2019 11: 41
        
        Israel officially helps the Kurdish SDF units, they themselves do not hide it. Belokasochniki go to them across the border, if anything ... and this is also their official information. From which territories something is being let in, "most likely", this is exactly the same as the famous "chemical attacks" of the air force of Assad, Skripali, the explosions of tankers in the Gulf, etc. - who, what, where and from where, it is not very clear, but at the same time everyone knows who to punish ... And the plane was shot down due to the fact that the Israelis set it up - they knew for sure that they were covering for them, therefore they already informed about the attack in the process of execution. And then the S-200 does not disassemble the target, it takes the one that is closer and more ... the air defense crew reacted to the enemy target, and it covered up with our aircraft ... These are friends ... And everyone loves them so much, they are "9 May celebrate with us "- that's an achievement! For this fact, apparently, everything can be forgiven ...
        
        Arkharov
        
        -5
        
        27 November 2019 13: 01
        
        Israel officially helps the Kurdish troops ... Squirrels to them go across the border, if that ... and this is also their official information.
        
        - If possible, explain what you do not like here? Maybe I don’t know something or don’t understand? Everything else is a conscious and deliberate distortion of facts.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +4
        
        27 November 2019 13: 53
        
        I do not like that Israel is openly helping the enemies of Russia and Russia's allies - the ATS. SDS and similar detachments are structures that entered into open confrontation with the SAR troops, with Israeli money and with Israeli weapons, with the goal of disintegrating the ATS as a single state. They, for promises and handouts addressed to them, supported and support the illegal deployment of US troops hostile to the Russian Federation in the SAR. And the Russian Federation now pays with its money and the lives of its military personnel in opposition to all this.
        "White Helmets" is an organization hostile to the SAR and the Russian Federation, created by the special services of Great Britain (that is, also by our enemies), which many times organized provocations against the troops of the Russian Federation and the SAR. Israel actively provides logistics and any other assistance it can for their activities.
        Enough of this explanation, so that you understand what I do not like here?
        
        And besides this, I repeat, I do not like attacks on Syrian territory, an airplane of the Russian Air Force, shot down through the fault of Israel, as well as the work of Israeli special services aimed at directly opposing the goals of the Russian Federation in the SAR. Or is it your way
        
        conscious and deliberate misrepresentation of facts.
        
        At the same time, I fully understand why Israel does all this. I understand what are the security interests of this country. Both the army and the Israeli special services are doing this as they can and consider it necessary. And also in the framework where they are still allowed to go ...
        But I am RUSSIAN (I don’t know who you are), and therefore I look at all this exclusively from the point of view of the interests of the Russian Federation and the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. But the interests and security of Israel to me, at the same time, do not give a damn about the deepest way. These are their interests, not mine. And if tomorrow morning it suddenly turns out that Israel is no more, I will not be warm or cold in this regard, not fun and not sad ...
        
        Arkharov
        
        -3
        
        27 November 2019 14: 17
        
        So all your statements are sewn with white thread, it’s not often that you’ll come across that. I look, you have absolutely reinforced concrete confidence in all matters, I read and it immediately seems that I forced myself to watch the next Sunday issue of the TIME program, or the next program about radioactive ashes from Kiselyov. Are you firmly convinced that you correctly understand the interests of Russia? And do you manage to somehow relate them to the interests of the ruling regime?
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +3
        
        27 November 2019 14: 30
        
        I am firmly convinced that Russia's interests at this particular moment, whatever they may be, are definitely not Israel's security. Any actions of any state against the actions and goals of the RF Armed Forces are hostile and require suppression, military or diplomatic. And the "ruling regime" is what the state currently embodies and protects its interests.
        Moreover, from my personal point of view (although, of course, everything has its own shortcomings and those who are dissatisfied - it simply doesn’t happen without it) what Putin does and represents as the leader of the state, and the policy he pursues is the best, what Russia has received, at least over the past 100 years, and most likely, much more ...
        And about the "white thread" - well, if you are so smart, then take and prove the opposite to my statements ... just not in the form of HIGHLY LIKELY, but on facts ...
        
        Arkharov
        
        -4
        
        27 November 2019 17: 24
        
        After one phrase, I no longer have questions in principle. Not now, nor in the future.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        0
        
        27 November 2019 20: 01
        
        Good! I suppose this phrase is about Putin ...
        
        The comment was deleted.
Hayer31

+1

26 November 2019 12: 46

Strengthening Europe, firstly, is not beneficial to the United States and Israel, which is why Kedmi says so. And on the contrary, it is beneficial for Russia. That's all.
SERGEY SERGEEVICS

+2

26 November 2019 13: 40

And what is not immediately the "Fifth Reich"? In the conditions in which Europe is, they cannot even create a militarized army, not to mention some kind of "4th Reich". Looks like they again wanted to get cuffs from the Russian boot.
gorenina91

+2

26 November 2019 20: 48

Kedmi: United European Army will be the Fourth Reich for Russia

- Well, actually ...- the first European Union (EU) created Hitler and ... and ... and ... and ... this whole EU worked against the USSR ...
- All this "former EU" cannot forgive itself such a monstrous shame, when almost all of Europe absolutely voluntarily, without any resistance, worked for Hitler ...; until Hitler was destroyed by the USSR ...
- Well, now the same EU (I mean the same composition) has worked for the Americans for a very long time and ... and ... and ... and ... maybe this "zeal" it began to fizzle out and a new political component (rather, economic) has worked, which prompts this EU to change its "benchmarks" ...
- But, personally, I believe that this does not mean that this current EU has the courage to at least somehow portray a military confrontation against Russia ...
Radical

-2

26 November 2019 21: 12

According to the former head of the Nativ intelligence agency, if the project of the united European army is implemented, then the only goal of this Fourth Reich will be the fight against Russia.

More precisely - not a fight, but an invasion ....
1. Pishenkov
  
  -1
  
  26 November 2019 21: 41
  
  ... and invading Russia without the help of the United States, in your opinion, is more convenient for them than with NATO? For this, the "Fourth Reich" and the European army? Or do you and Kedmi think that they miss Hitler's laurels so much that they are even ready to fight against the Americans with the Second Front? Well, so that everything is really quite similar? ... And the Reich, and the invasion ...
  But seriously, it's even a pity that all this is bullshit in the moonlight - both the "Fourth Reich" and the "European Wehrmacht". Now this new "Reich" would not have hindered Europe at all to restore order within itself, and we would have to conclude a new "pact" with them and henceforth both sides would not violate it, so that the Poles and Americans would do it ... - for them it is their whole life was the biggest nightmare you can imagine ...
2. Arkharov
  
  -2
  
  27 November 2019 17: 23
  
  According to the former head of the intelligence agency "Nativ"
  
  - You read about this "head of special services", a lot of interesting things.
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

0

27 November 2019 00: 04

They are Bulgarians, Romanians, Balts and so on. Poles will be thrown under Russian machine guns? Well, come on - we’ll destroy it, so be it! Just chur, pay for the work of indemnities!
zenitovets

+1

29 November 2019 22: 02

In the event of war, we will leave the charred and scorched desert from Europe, so that they will no longer need an army.