Russian patrol in Syria threw Molotov cocktails

November 18, 2019 36

The Kurdish population of the border regions of Syria continues to attack the military police patrols of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, each time increasing the degree of these attacks.

If at first stones were used during the attacks, then later the sledgehammers went into action, with which the attackers tried to harm the armored vehicles.

But the aggressive population of the region did not stop there either. One of the latest videos on the net captured an attack on a patrol during which the Molotov cocktail was first used.

One of the attackers threw a Molotov cocktail at the Typhoon armored car. Despite the fire that broke out on the armor, the Russian military did not respond to the provocation and proceeded further without the use of weapons.

It is noteworthy that the attackers not only know the time taken by Russian patrols, but also prepare for it.

There is no doubt that their actions are coordinated by the special services of those countries that are not interested in the onset of peace in this region, and the ultimate goal of provocations is to force the Russian military to use force to later present it to the media as evidence of cruelty towards civilians.

The military police of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation have already managed to prove their high professionalism in Syria. However, what if the next time an RPG is in the hands of the attackers?

http://www.dsnews.ua/

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

123

-1

18 November 2019 19: 14

There is no doubt that their actions are coordinated by the special services of those countries that are not interested in the onset of peace in this region.

Here are the special services and solve the issue. All the characters in the video are perfectly visible.
It’s not entirely clear what it was, it doesn’t look like regular patrolling, there’s only one car and you can’t see the Turks.
1. OXOTHuK Sakha
  
  -2
  
  19 November 2019 07: 05
  
  You can’t catch all the Kurds, then they will begin to extinguish ours in full. Still bearable. Here it is necessary to negotiate with the Kurdish rebels against the Turks.
Pishenkov

+2

18 November 2019 20: 50

... what if next time an RPG is in the hands of the attackers?

- it is necessary to immediately "put" those who throw stones and bottles, because this very RPG, if anyone has it in their hands, because they have it. All this has already taken place in various "hot spots", starting with Afgan. This audience does not understand a good attitude. There, if anyone has a stone or a bottle in their hands, it is only because at this particular moment this character simply does not have a machine gun or a grenade launcher. So maybe just not wait for ??? ....
1. Bitter
  
  +2
  
  18 November 2019 22: 13
  
  This audience does not understand the good attitude.
  
  And talk?
  This "public" was shown a carrot with the inscription Kurdistan many times and was once again given a ride.
  Now, some Turkish patrols are rolling out into the villages under the guise of Russian forces and taking notes. Soon, the Syrian services will catch up (maybe already on the ground) and all together will begin to neutralize the real Kurdish rioters together so that the leaders could not continue to arise.
  Bitterness, resentment and reaction are quite understandable, each of the participants has their own motives for aggression.
  ... to clarify. ... Those who disagree "to understand and forgive".
  1. Pishenkov
    
    0
    
    18 November 2019 22: 53
    
    They all have long been understood and forgiven, even more than they really deserve. If this were not so, then there would now be not Russian patrols, but exclusively Turkish ones. They have been hanging themselves "carrots with the inscription Kurdistan" for at least a hundred years, and they will not reach it themselves. It's time to understand that enough is enough. The pie was shared long ago without them. And in the region, not only the Kurds are such a people. But just proceeding from the fact that they have not yet understood, there is clearly no sense to communicate with them from the point of view of logic. As it makes no sense for them to have their own state - all these hundred years they have been waiting for someone from outside to create this "their" state for them. And from the outside, no one needs it ... that's a shame ...
    But if the RF Armed Forces themselves do not want to deal with them harshly, based on various political considerations, then after such a trick, you just need to make it clear to those who are considered to be their leadership: anger the Russians - they will leave and leave you to the Turks. And that's all. And do so at least in one place. And those will definitely "agree" with them, for all 100. Without snot.
    And then you can calmly patrol further. They will begin to vomit again - leave again and let the Turks go. Such things, by the way, are not at all necessary to decide at the very top - amicable arrangement of unit commanders is enough. In practice, it even works better ... Only the media should not be allowed to shoot, and that’s all - silence and order.
    1. Bitter
      
      +1
      
      18 November 2019 23: 19
      
      anger the Russians - they will leave and leave you to the Turks. And that’s it.
      
      So maybe these are some Turkomans, they’ll quite like it for themselves.
      
      leave again and let the Turks go.
      
      The meaning of the Turkish presence is to try to expand the radius of the settlement of Turkomans in the "reconciliation" zone as much as possible. Good too.
      In general, peace will be there, for a long time, only to dream.
      1. Pishenkov
        
        -1
        
        18 November 2019 23: 46
        
        Kurds are not Turkomans. These are their worst enemies. You, apparently, are not familiar with the situation in the region.
        The Turks don't even need to settle anyone there. It will be enough for them just to give a "free hand" to deal with the Kurds. They have a dream - to kill all Kurds on both sides of the border - both at home and in Syria, and to populate these places even with Syrian refugees, of whom they have 4 million and no one knows what to do with them ...
        My personal opinion: if the Turks are "given" the Kurds, I think, for such happiness, they will still buy the Su-57, the S-400, and the MS-21, and whatever you want, and they will also pay in advance ... this is Putin is unlikely to go. Although I do not really understand why - these Kurds are there for absolutely everyone, except themselves, like a bone in the throat - Turkey, Syria, Iran, Iraq and even ISIS with Nusra for the company, they are fighting absolutely against everyone, for this imaginary "state" , and if the problem is not fundamentally solved, then this will continue and will be for a long time.
        
        Bitter
        
        +1
        
        19 November 2019 11: 59
        
        These are their worst enemies.
        
        With the worst enemies you, of course, go too far. To the extent that real authorities allow them to be enemies, so will they. The fact that there are many Turkoman in these regions is a fact. The fact that they are oriented pro-Turkish is also undeniable. Patrolling is carried out throughout the territory, so the participation of Turkoman in these provocations is quite real.
        
        The Turks don't even need to settle anyone there. It will be enough for them just to give "free hand" to reprisal against the Kurds.
        
        Without external support, local Turkomans will not be able to pull it; they are not enough there for that. Plus, this gesture will give a signal to the Kurdish militias to return to the region (home) as soon as possible.
        
        if the Turks "give" the Kurds
        
        "Handing over" the Kurds to the Turks will not solve the problem, it will only exacerbate it. And not only at the local level, but also at the interstate level.
        The people have been partisans for decades (dynasties), it can be said that they can’t imagine anything else. There is an alternative. It is necessary to create civilian structures for maintaining order in the region, and they will be able to fight hooligans.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        -1
        
        19 November 2019 14: 25
        
        ... you all mixed up in a mess - and the Turks, and Turkoman, and what I wrote too.
        Kurds are enemies of the Turks, even those who live in Turkey itself - with the exception of one "moderate" pro-Kurdish party represented in parliament, practically all Kurdish organizations in Turkey are officially considered terrorist, with all the consequences ...
        Turkomans are ethnic Turks living in adjacent territories outside Turkey, including those that the Kurds are going to make Kurdistan. They themselves have paramilitary organizations that are subordinate, in fact, to Turkey. But when I said "give" to the Turks, I did not mean the Turkomans, but the Turkish army. It is she who is able to "pacify" them.
        To the last paragraph: to create some kind of civil structures where, as you put it, the people have been partisans for decades, there is no point until you put things in order there. It just doesn't work. First, the end of "partisanship", the cleansing of territories, the disarmament of illegal groups, and then the creation of civilian structures, otherwise it simply does not work. Civilian structures cannot fight armed "hooligans" or simply mass riots, for this there are security forces.
        
        Bitter
        
        +1
        
        19 November 2019 22: 56
        
        Kurds are enemies of the Turks, even those who live in Turkey itself
        
        Do not paint horrors where there are none; there are about 25 million Kurds in Turkey.
        Everything is somehow arranged, a little better in the west, more modest in the east.
        They go to work, raise children, they are not driven to camps. And not everyone supports the PKK.
        
        I did not mean Turkoman
        
        And I, it is them and other Turkish organizations, since it is precisely to them that these provocations with patrols are beneficial.
        In the hope that the Russians will hand them over to "pacification" for this, and then both a couple and non-paramilitarists will receive cards in their hands.
        
        ..to create some civilian structures where, as you put it, the people have been partisans for decades, there is no point until you put things in order there. It just doesn't work.
        
        It is necessary to start somewhere, this very work.
        The Kurds have withdrawn their defense units from this zone, what about the Turkoman bandits? Or do they have an indulgence for the "tomatoes" and the S-400?
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +1
        
        19 November 2019 23: 38
        
        It is necessary to start somewhere, this very work.
        
        - it is necessary. With pacification and stripping. Turkey, although it still does not seem to many out of ignorance, is a fairly developed and highly organized country. Especially in terms of power structures. In this they will be more abruptly than many European states, if not all at all. And if the Turks did not have serious problems with the Kurds and their eternal separatism, then there would be no need to support the paramilitaries of the Turkomans' units outside the borders, whose commanders, by the way, for controllability, are Turkish security officials. And it all began many decades before Putin, "tomatoes and S-400". That is, as soon as the issue with the Kurds is resolved, the paramilitaries of the Turkomans will immediately disappear as if by themselves.
        I repeat: you have a very superficial view of the situation there.
        
        Bitter
        
        +1
        
        20 November 2019 00: 00
        
        You have the same.
        For at least a hundred years of this story with the Kurds and the end, you and I, in any case, will not be able to see.
        In this case, there is a sort of occupation of a part of the Syrian state embellished by various arguments and in the near future, nothing will disappear and disappear by itself, even if the Kurds are deported from there to Mars.
        
        if the Turks did not have serious problems with the Kurds and their eternal separatism, then there would be no need to support the paramilitaries of the Turkoman units abroad.
        
        Smiled. Who will allow them to keep paramilitaries in a functioning state (abroad)? It is necessary to ask the Iranians or the Russian Turkoman.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +1
        
        20 November 2019 00: 22
        
        Smiled. Who will allow them to keep paramilitaries in a functioning state (abroad)? It is necessary to ask the Iranians or the Russian Turkoman.
        
        - I have the impression that you either don’t understand what I’m writing, or pretending, or reading somehow in 2-3 words, or what ???
        If I am not mistaken, no one is talking about Iran, let alone Russia. Or maybe this patrol in Iran was thrown with bottles? Or in Russia, which, in your opinion, has a common border with Turkey? We are talking about Syria. There is war and chaos in Syria. And there are paramilitaries of the Turkomans there, and also in Iraq, where the same mess. And these detachments, from the point of view of the law, are as official as the Kurdish "troops" themselves, of which there, by the way, are several different groups, with different goals and different leaders. All of them, by and large, differ from officially recognized terrorists only in that the UN has not yet recognized them as terrorists. They are in the legal field just as much, for example, as there was the "army" of the Republic of Ichkeria and similar organizations. The Turks fight them through paramilitaries where they cannot enter the army. And by throwing bottles of gasoline into the armored personnel carriers of the RF Military Forces, these evil-doers do not even understand that they, the evil-doers, are protecting them there from certain death. Because initially the entire Turkish operation "Spring of Freedom" or whatever it was, was aimed precisely at cleansing the Kurds from these territories. And the cleansing of the Kurds, somewhere near the borders of Turkey, pretending to create a kind of Kurdistan, from the point of view of the Turks, will just calm down such crazy thoughts of Turkish Kurds inside the country, thus introducing them into the mainstream of normal life, going to work and etc. And not in attempts to organize "liberation movements" ...
        
        Bitter
        
        +1
        
        27 November 2019 11: 38
        
        .... which, in your opinion, has a common border with Turkey? ... the "army" of the Republic of Ichkeria and the like ...
        
        And so what, this did not prevent the Turks and other partners from sending there (to Ichkeria) various "specialists" through their territory, and no occupation zones with patrols on the territories of neighboring states were created.
        In Donbass, there are no joint "humane" patrols.
        
        ..operation "Spring of Freedom" or whatever it is, was aimed precisely at cleansing the Kurds from these territories.
        And the cleansing of the Kurds, somewhere near the borders of Turkey ...
        
        .... accompanied by Russian patrols will be more humane.
        As I understand it, "cleansing" is also a very humane term. The old ones will be cleaned, and then the new ones will be settled and everything will be fine.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        0
        
        27 November 2019 11: 47
        
        Something again, you are all in a bunch .... here it is not even clear what can be specifically answered ...
2. Arkharov
  
  -2
  
  19 November 2019 06: 30
  
  ... it is necessary to immediately "put" those who throw stones and bottles, because this is the RPG, if anyone has it in their hands, since they have it. All this has already taken place in various "hot spots", starting with Afgan. This audience does not understand a good attitude.
  
  - and on what grounds was it necessary to "lay" the Afghans and what was the USSR doing in Afghanistan in general?
  1. OXOTHuK Sakha
    
    -2
    
    19 November 2019 07: 08
    
    If they start shooting against these villains, then, for sure, those armed "guys" with RPGs are waiting.
    Kurds are waiting for just that.
    1. Arkharov
      
      -1
      
      19 November 2019 08: 39
      
      Why are the Kurds villains? They, in fact, live on this earth for centuries.
      1. OXOTHuK Sakha
        
        -3
        
        19 November 2019 09: 07
        
        Yes, they live on their land and have the right to protect their lands, but our patrols only protect them from the Turks. This is like the OSCE in the Donbass. Those. if our patrols are there, then the Turks cannot open fire on these places.
        
        Arkharov
        
        -2
        
        19 November 2019 17: 05
        
        Somehow they did not appreciate this generous act. When there is an international mandate, then it will be "like the OSCE." I think they just want to be left alone.
      2. Bitter
        
        -1
        
        19 November 2019 12: 11
        
        For some reason, it was forgotten that the Kurds withdrew their troops from the region.
        There are provocations, but if you look not at the place you point your finger at, but just think to whom it plays into the hands -
        
        the Turks "give" the Kurds.
  2. Pishenkov
    
    -1
    
    19 November 2019 14: 42
    
    I am talking about what and how to do in a particular case "on the ground" to the soldier and his immediate commander. And based solely on their own opinion on this matter.
    In Afghanistan, Africa, Chechnya, Moldova, Georgia, Syria, etc. etc., the reasons for the appearance of Soviet and Russian military personnel are very different. But since they were there, then there were reasons. And if this is a war, then we must fight. I cannot judge whether the troops were sent to Afghanistan correctly or incorrectly, I went to school in 1979, but I can say for sure that they acted there incorrectly initially. Maybe even a "limited contingent", but there can be no "limited war". And looking at Syria, I see that, thank God, the RF Armed Forces have learned this. The Afghan experience also helped. In SAR, of course, the situation is very different and more complicated, but globally they acted correctly, therefore, the result is visible even in a short time. And in Afghanistan we spent 10 years, put people in, spent money, and the result is zero, by and large. Because they acted "limitedly" - here we are at war, but here we are not ...
    1. Bitter
      
      +1
      
      19 November 2019 23: 36
      
      spent time, put people, spent money, and the result -
      
      Very good!
      Someone passed everything overnight and received a prize for the struggle for world peace, only the world did not come.
      
      At that time, Afghanistan was growing before our eyes, development and construction ... and ... oh, yes, you know everything better than me. So "... sat and spent ..." - this is fundamentally wrong.
      
      Because they acted "limitedly" - here we are at war, but here we are not ...
      
      And in Syria the same rake, side view. The scale is different. The goals are also completely different.
      The grouping is many times more compact, it acts more carefully and the equipment, of course, is not from the 70s in service. But all the same, "maybe" comes periodically with inevitable consequences.
Igor Pavlovich

-2

18 November 2019 22: 34

Migratory birds fly
In the autumn, they gave blue
They fly to hot countries
And I stay with you.
And I stay with you
Native land forever!
I don’t need the Turkish coast,
And I do not need Africa.
I do not need someone else's sun,
Another's land is not needed.

1948 Vnukovo
M.V. Isakovsky. Poems.
Library of the poet. A great series. 2 ed.
Moscow, Leningrad: Soviet writer, 1965.
1. Pishenkov
  
  +2
  
  18 November 2019 23: 50
  
  ... and you yourself remained in your native country? Or did not listen to M.V. Isakovsky?
OXOTHuK Sakha

+2

19 November 2019 07: 06

Because of the idiotic "friendship" with the Turks, ours fell into the trap of Erdogan.
The incompetent strategy of the Kremlin.
OXOTHuK Sakha

0

19 November 2019 07: 10

You just have to put a strict condition on the Turks - you can’t beat the Kurds in their native land.
1. Pishenkov
  
  +1
  
  19 November 2019 14: 48
  
  ...Yes you? Chechens are allowed, Afghans are allowed, Palestinians are allowed, Syrians are allowed, Germans or Poles are also allowed ... in general, almost all wars take place on someone's "native land" ... how did they distinguish themselves ???
  Those who bury themselves can and should be beaten. Everywhere.
  1. OXOTHuK Sakha
    
    -1
    
    19 November 2019 15: 07
    
    And they are not Kurds. And Turkish hired "Molotovtsy", or Turkomans bought by the Turks.
OXOTHuK Sakha

-1

19 November 2019 07: 11

You just don’t need to be friends with the Turks in an embrace ... you need to help the Kurds, like the Armenians.
oracul

+2

19 November 2019 07: 56

The USSR, and then Russia, tried to understand and support the Kurds. However, judging by the way they behave, communication with the Americans obviously did not benefit them. But there is no silver lining. Apparently, we should also rethink something. With the United States, it is clear that Russia is their enemy. But the Kurds also seem to cease to be friends. With whom you will lead, from that you will be typed. It's a pity!
1. Pishenkov
  
  +1
  
  19 November 2019 14: 52
  
  ... yes, Banderlog won in Ukraine after the end of the Second World War, too, tried to "understand", they did not kill everyone, forgiven ... And today we are reaping the benefits. Maybe it's enough to walk on a rake ??? Why should we feel sorry for these Kurds, especially if they behave hostilely towards our troops ??? The same terrorists as the others there ...
  1. OXOTHuK Sakha
    
    -1
    
    19 November 2019 15: 09
    
    Come on, they are on their land, they won’t kill everyone, it will turn out the other way around - they will kill all of ours and plus the Turkoman + the whole gang of IS will join them.
    Then you’ll either have to bomb all the inhabitants, including the children, with napalm or retire to Tartus and take up defense there.
    1. Pishenkov
      
      0
      
      19 November 2019 15: 21
      
      you won’t kill all, it will be the other way around - they will kill all of ours and plus Turkomans will join them + the whole gang of IS
      
      - maybe aliens will come to help ??? Judging by your knowledge of the situation, and this is possible.
      And "own land" is also a very relative concept - the Kaliningrad region used to be also "own" for other people, and a third of the Czech Republic, and a third of Poland ... And there are other similar examples. Kurds, if they get it, can also cum ...
Sake

-2

19 November 2019 18: 33

They know that the valiant cosmonauts destroyed all of Syria, except Damascus (where the Jews destroy), killing hundreds of thousands of civilians in the process! As soon as the dust settles, the Syrians will calculate how much the "Syrian nights" have cost Russia and will roll out a reparation bill!
Sergey Antonov

0

20 November 2019 14: 23

There is no doubt that their actions are coordinated by special services.

... and then I fell under the table))))
OXOTHuK Sakha

-1

20 November 2019 16: 30

The Kremlin just needs to understand - why patrol there and whom to patrol?
Russian patrol helps whom? To the Turks? To the Kurds?
Does our patrol save someone? Or just wants to dictate in a foreign territory?

And why there is no patrolling in the gray zone in the Donbass?

After all, it is known about the collusion of the Kremlin with the Turks - to push and push the Kurds from their lands.
So, the Russian patrol there, like the Nazis in 1941 on Russian land, turns out.

Thus, we are still waiting for the hard resistance of the Kurds before the destruction of several of our BMPs.
Yes, the Kremlin will try to forcefully respond as in Chechnya, then we get a bloody war - already with the Kurds, who are much more warlike than the IG barmel.

If a batch begins with the Kurds, Iran will cease to help the Russian military in Syria.
gorenina91

+1

20 November 2019 17: 29

- Strange, but what then is the point of patrolling ???
- Suppress the actions of hooligans, the tricks of law-breakers, criminal acts of bandits ... etc ... -this is his purpose ...
- And then what ??? - An incendiary tank is thrown into a patrol armored car in order to destroy this patrol ... -And what ??? -And we all, together with our crew of this patrol car, are glad that no one died and that the car did not burn out ... -Well, our joy is clear ...
- And then what ???
- This is what happens ... that the purpose of the patrol is an attempt and the ability to endure the blows of stones, incendiary grenades ... and what's next in line (grenades, mines ... etc.) ... -in this all his "actions" are contained ... - The patrol itself cannot defend itself from an attack and punish the attackers .., let alone protect someone, even more so ...
- Ie the patrol plays the role of a "whipping boy" ... - while whipping ... and what will happen next ...