Now everyone: Russians will confiscate illegally acquired property

November 12, 2019 30

Failure of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the complaints of the convict for bribery of ex-colonel of the Ministry of Internal Affairs Dmitry Zakharchenko, his relatives and friends, may become a precedent to which judges will refer when making decisions in similar cases.

The essence of the complaint was that the applicants, among whom, apart from the former policeman, were his parents, sister and former girlfriends, doubted that the rules on controlling the expenses of officials were lawfully applied to them.

The complaint was based on the lack of convincing evidence from the Prosecutor General that the source of these funds was Zakharchenko’s illegal income.

However, the Constitutional Court ruled that in the rules allowing the seizure of property in favor of the state, if it was acquired for income the legitimacy of which was not confirmed by any persons, and not just officials and members of their families, specified in the law on control over the expenses of civil servants (spouses and minors children), there are no contradictions with the Basic Law.

Edition "Vedomosti" gives the opinion of the lawyer Alexander Gorbatenko, who claims that now the property of any person can be turned into state revenue if he does not prove the legitimacy of his origin. Moreover, according to the lawyer, it will be possible to prove only with the help of a tax certificate in form 2-NDFL.

Recall that in 2017, by the decision of the Nikulin court of Moscow, property worth more than 9 billion rubles was seized from the above applicants.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

steelmaker

+2

12 November 2019 13: 26

Got it! Not even 30 years have passed! Or maybe just accept the law, as in the USSR?
1. Conn
  
  -3
  
  13 November 2019 20: 28
  
  Then you have to start with Putin and his henchmen in the government, the State Duma, the Federation Council and others in the subjects of the federation!
2. isofat
  
  0
  
  7 January 2020 22: 35
  
  steelmaker, the country needs people who have mastered all the methods of capitalist production well.
Felix Chuykov

+1

12 November 2019 14: 17

Who are the judges?

Burdened by corruption
Get up, branded with a curse!

Felix Chuykov
November 12 2019 years
vvnab

0

12 November 2019 20: 18

Oh wow! All the same !?
1. Conn
  
  0
  
  13 November 2019 20: 26
  
  No, of course, they will basically confiscate them from hicks, such as Baba Klava's nurses and from collective farmers who "enriched themselves" by selling milk from the cow Mashka!
vvnab

+1

12 November 2019 20: 22

I remember this, with permission to say, the dispersal of the parliament in 93 recognized as unconstitutional and ...? Dear people, just wipe this piece of paper, as always before.
1. sgrabik
  
  +1
  
  13 November 2019 00: 56
  
  So we will wait and see how this law will really work, exclusively selectively, or it will really be the same for everyone without exception !!!
The comment was deleted.
The comment was deleted.
Screw

-1

13 November 2019 12: 06

Please note - there is no author's signature. Any statement can be distorted, according to Hegel (see Science of Logic). And the headline - with a howling tragedy ... was the "master" at Yale University?
Pishenkov

+5

13 November 2019 12: 13

... illegally acquired property will be confiscated from Russians

- and rightly so, if, of course, they start not with those who have "unsubstantiated" 6 acres with a house or "three-ruble note" in a panel house, but with those who somehow took and "privatized" at one time almost the entire industrial and the economic potential of the USSR. These are our billionaires - such uniquely "successful entrepreneurs" and, apparently, nothing else than "financial geniuses" who suddenly have capital out of nowhere comparable to the richest estates in the world, who have been building their fortunes for centuries. Where did they come from, I wonder, right after the collapse of the country, in which everyone seemed to be equal? It would be very interesting to look at their tax returns from the very beginning of the 90s, and understand where such happiness comes from? ...
1. Sergey Nikolaev_2
  
  0
  
  7 January 2020 13: 41
  
  Well, you, in the Russian Federation the law is like a drawbar, he turned kudy, that’s what happened!
Ferropanda

+1

13 November 2019 15: 39

Well, you only read the headlines. = (((

... specified in the law on control over the expenses of civil servants

In other words, this applies only to state employees / civil servants, as well as to their close / distant relatives. Those. this does not apply to oligarchs. Ordinary citizens, as before tax had fallen and fined / imprisoned for tax evasion, it will continue to fall.
If you "found" a three-ruble note or 6 acres, then you have hidden income and you will be asked to "find more income somewhere" and pay the tax / fine. If a civil servant who is prohibited from engaging in other activities has extra money, then everything is confiscated from him, because he either stole from the state, or committed actions that harm the state.
Krasstar

-2

13 November 2019 20: 21

If anyone knows who greeted Putin from the planted governors-on the way ... Immediately put the president, leave his underpants out of his property, though ... our president didn’t leave us any underpants either ....
Vkd dvk

+1

14 November 2019 10: 41

Quote: steel maker
Got it! Not even 30 years have passed! Or maybe just accept the law, as in the USSR?

Is the seizure of a crook and his accomplices (family members) made illegally? There is a law; there was no application of it. And now the Constitutional Court has shown how it should be used in judicial practice. You don’t see that we have an unwritten rule - it’s better not to finish than to override. For the sake of liberals united around the world.
1. plabu
  
  0
  
  14 November 2019 12: 30
  
  Congratulations, you’ve almost returned to the old practice, as it used to be - CSIR, or ChSVN, I don’t remember exactly, you wrote ALL of relatives and family members into accomplices (and are they exactly that?) And acquaintances, this is also strong)
  can not answer, it’s already clear that for you - yes ...
Vkd dvk

0

14 November 2019 10: 55

Quote: krasstar
If anyone knows who greeted Putin from the planted governors-on the way ... Immediately put the president, leave his underpants out of his property, though ... our president didn’t leave us any underpants either ....

And what are you doing here, with dashing dummies in sight?
Look out the window. In the courtyards of imported cars are almost on the roofs, there is nowhere to put. Supermarkets are crowded. So they are buying. Show me at least one idiot importing goods without a chance to sell. Bastards whine like you, but ordinary people live. It is difficult, of course, I would like better, but they live.
1. plabu
  
  +1
  
  14 November 2019 12: 37
  
  Import cars and markets are breaking, say?)))
  Is there anything that public transport used to go to, where on a regular basis, several times a day, now there can easily be one flight a day? So, in many ways, a car is a compelled thing, and in many cases a loan, and those guys who trade, noted a decrease in the average bill, despite the increase in prices, does not mean anything?
  About the quality of what's in the markets, will we talk?
  1. Tashavt
    
    -2
    
    11 January 2020 03: 32
    
    Where is the guarantee that in the USSR there was no g .... in products?)))) My friends worked in the 80s in the same meat packing plants and even then they were shoving rubbish. They always said on TV then - that everything was bad. Remind me about salary? from 70-1000 rubles. And I wonder how they lived at 70 - no one thinks to this day. But in the USSR everything was great !!! And they do not even think about what the pension was from 70. Didn't live the same way. And not everyone had a car, and not everyone could get an apartment (even in the same Moscow, vaunted so far ....). And there were cooperatives ("illegal") for buying an apartment, because the apartment could then be taken away anyway. So it's the same as the mortgage now ..... And convince me that everything was better then. And the government then seized too .... and sneezed at the common people. And taxes at one time were the same on everything, from all buildings. Nobody wants to remember this ..... You distort the whole story, who only praises the USSR .....
    1. plabu
      
      +1
      
      11 January 2020 11: 13
      
      To begin with, I must to convince? What a fright, who knows, but I wrote a little earlier completely about the OTHER - to me, and not only to me, they wrote and write how everything is fine now, the carts in the shops are packed and there is no place to put cars - so I just tried to remind that those lotteries that employees have at work are nothing more than unwillingness to supply themselves with what they need - well, if you have no brains, of course, I wrote about villages, read a little earlier, and transport - about cars - then it was possible to get to any village by public transport, unlike now ...
      Yes, and about what you wrote - they considered the pension differently then, my grandmother never in my life received more than 100 rubles, and did not work for some time, BUT she had a pension of 55 rubles with copecks, for all household needs there was enough for me to go to the movies and ice cream too - so your attempts to prove that it was only bad then - this is the same distortion, no better than those who only praise the USSR, as you wrote, but I’ve just tried and am trying to remind you, especially to those who cannot compare themselves, The USSR was both good and bad, and so almost everywhere ...
    2. plabu
      
      +1
      
      11 January 2020 12: 03
      
      I almost forgot - both in the government, and not only, there were those who came there to enrich themselves then, BUT - they did not flaunt it all, as now, and they could easily get it for that too - I don't remember exactly the year, but an acquaintance in Moscow turned to the Ministry, they sent him, in short, he took him and wrote to the party control commission - and this began, so there were levers of influence then, and my grandfather wrote to the Pravda newspaper what was going on in their village, The local eagles reprimanded him there on the party line, like for criticism - after receiving the letter, a correspondent from the newspaper arrived, figured it out and wrote - and the reprimand was canceled to his grandfather, and some in the leadership were changed there, but now where are we going to write? Millions of calls have already come to the direct line, so this is already unrealistic, and there are few other ways left ...
      As for the apartments - I got out of the classroom a few decades after leaving school, there were four without apartments - one got divorced and the apartment was left to my wife and children, plus three who removed the shoulder straps of pensioners from the sun, that's all, but it's not in Moscow, there I was not interested in the housing issue ...
Vkd dvk

-1

14 November 2019 11: 20

Quote: Conn
No, of course, they will mostly confiscate from hicks, such as Baba Klava's nurses and from collective farmers who "enriched themselves" by selling milk from the cow Mashka!

Your fear does not count. For the work is huge - there are many of them, and there is nothing to take from them. Only people like you carry sieve water.
Vkd dvk

+1

15 November 2019 22: 40

Quote: 321
Import cars and markets are breaking, say?)))
Is there anything that public transport used to go to, where on a regular basis, several times a day, now there can easily be one flight a day? So, in many ways, a car is a compelled thing, and in many cases a loan, and those guys who trade, noted a decrease in the average bill, despite the increase in prices, does not mean anything?
About the quality of what's in the markets, will we talk?

We will be. Public transport. Will you carry passengers at your own expense if this does not make a profit? You will, if someone (the state) will compensate. The state does not have its own money. It cannot print as much as it wants.
Economists say, and I believe them, that money is materialized labor. And money is the equivalent of labor. And to have more, including in the state budget, you need to work. In particular, to you. For printed money not provided with labor is toilet paper. So, if the state gives you compensation for idleness, then, therefore, everyone will pay, including those who never travel along this route. Including in Siberia. Right? Not. Only those who use should pay. Few of them? So, let them organize a cooperative, and carry themselves to their cooperative cars. A freebie ended with the demise of the USSR.
You didn’t stand in line for pea-corn brown bread? In the Khrushchev era.
Have you played a "lottery" organized at work between employees in order to buy a saucepan or a set of dishes with your hard-earned money? There were only sellers in the stores, moreover, turning .. go to the buyer, and motion .. they showed that the product you were asking was not. You didn’t buy on business trips, in Moscow, 10-15 kilograms of sausage in a grocery store on Belorusskaya, standing in line for 3 hours, in a crush, and listening to the insult of the seller, asking, with a mockery, whether you should cut the sausage? (Then Muscovites took 300-350 grams, thinly cut in the same place, in stores with such devices such as knives). To take a piece for them was a trap.
1. plabu
  
  0
  
  16 November 2019 06: 13
  
  How many Pontovs do you have?) Well, maybe this will pass, although, judging by your mood, it’s unlikely, but even so, these are YOUR problems ...
  And now, in essence - I didn’t buy it on Belorusskaya, there was another metro station, and what the hell did you and not only you decide that you ONLY found it all and this is like your privilege?)
  Schazzz, wait, they’ll tell me tales here - in one clever little book, is the Constitution called, is it written about the SOCIAL state? Is it written - that the state MUST be transported, albeit in minimal sizes, but to PROVIDE - only thanks, including there are still many quarrelsome haters like you, and the government is trying to give all these functions a big bolt with parting, and you applaud him joyfully - but this is again your problem, so your opuses about the cooperative with transport go to tube and further to to you ..., well, the further route, I hope you know, or tell?
  And who wrote here a little earlier - about a bunch of imported cars and about mountains of products in the markets? Would you and not only you know what these products are now made of, but when were you interested in such details? It’s more important for you to write about bread in the time of Khrushchev, and even with an anguish to make it more poetic)))
  And about the dishes, fig it in the lottery, if you realize that in rural stores there were times when a bald line could be found there, and not just dishes - women's leather gloves, and Yugoslav took, and Austrian, local people did not need them from the word at all, because they were not weak, and the Adidas sneakers were in the village general store, and because of the size - well, there was nobody there with size 47, and because of the price, and you play your lotteries there further))
  And your opuses - about money, supposedly not states and others from the same series, are not impressive until you can).
  Well, the last one so far - those trading in me ... didn’t turn to that part of the body - why, you ask them, maybe because, despite the width of the counter, I could easily slap on that very part, as you might guess, why could - write here).
2. Tashavt
  
  0
  
  11 January 2020 03: 24
  
  What a lie about Muscovites)))) no one ever asked us. And they always took a piece. Something you confused with the visitors))))) with yourself, apparently, and your parents / relatives)))))
Vkd dvk

0

17 November 2019 23: 30

Quote: 321
How many Pontovs do you have?) Well, maybe this will pass, although, judging by your mood, it is unlikely, but even so, these are YOUR problems ...
And now, in essence - I didn’t buy it on Belorusskaya, there was another metro station, and what the hell did you and not only you decide that you ONLY found it all and this is like your privilege?)
Schazzz, wait, they’ll tell me tales here - in one clever little book, is the Constitution called, is it written about the SOCIAL state? Is it written - that the state MUST be transported, albeit in minimal sizes, but to PROVIDE - only thanks, including there are still many quarrelsome haters like you, and the government is trying to give all these functions a big bolt with parting, and you applaud him joyfully - but this is again your problem, so your opuses about the cooperative with transport go to tube and further to to you ..., well, the further route, I hope you know, or tell?
And who wrote here a little earlier - about a bunch of imported cars and about mountains of products in the markets? Would you and not only you know what these products are now made of, but when were you interested in such details? It’s more important for you to write about bread in the time of Khrushchev, and even with an anguish to make it more poetic)))
And about the dishes, fig it in the lottery, if you realize that in rural stores there were times when a bald line could be found there, and not just dishes - women's leather gloves, and Yugoslav took, and Austrian, local people did not need them from the word at all, because they were not weak, and the Adidas sneakers were in the village general store, and because of the size - well, there was nobody there with size 47, and because of the price, and you play your lotteries there further))
And your opuses - about money, supposedly not states and others from the same series, are not impressive until you can).
Well, the last one so far - those trading in me ... didn’t turn to that part of the body - why, you ask them, maybe because, despite the width of the counter, I could easily slap on that very part, as you might guess, why could - write here).

I did not understand, and you showed a little book in the deli, with the colorful name of the Constitution, which says that you need to sell so much of what you want. For in a socialist state - EVERYONE for work. True, from each - according to ability. That is, you could not be a fig, because you did not have the latter, and to you - according to your work. Which, by the way, has no units. And therefore, it was possible .....
1. plabu
  
  0
  
  18 November 2019 06: 17
  
  What you didn’t understand does not surprise anymore, it’s just time for you to understand that there are a lot of grocery stores, but the state is one - with all the ensuing consequences - neither I nor you pay taxes to the grocery stores - well, lightly), but to that very state - to the fullest.
Vkd dvk

+1

18 November 2019 12: 56

Quote: 321
What you didn’t understand does not surprise anymore, it’s just time for you to understand that there are a lot of grocery stores, but the state is one - with all the ensuing consequences - neither I nor you pay taxes to the grocery stores - well, lightly), but to that very state - to the fullest.

So far, that very state has not put things in order. When any grocery store can now cut off profit of 400% (and how does it differ from tax?), And make it so that you can take no more than 5% from you, taking the TAX from superprofits from those grocery stores to your budget, that will be the same.
Until that very state destroys hypernets, quickly negotiating with prices, which is called cartel conspiracy everywhere, does not create competition, before itself (what can we expect a change in another?) There will be what it is.
So far, the very state will struggle with rising prices by withdrawing money and storing it in foreign vaults from its enemies, demanding that the oligarchs not do the same - idiocy. Until that very state does not understand that inflation can be defeated not by the lack of money among citizens, but by competition. Everywhere and in everything will be what you see.
1. plabu
  
  +1
  
  7 January 2020 22: 12
  
  In the deli, with a profit of 400 percent, I just won’t go and I won’t buy anything there, there are options besides hyper and other markets - I don’t know what prevents you from using them, and for some reason you suddenly decided to change the subject - initially they started about something completely different, now they suddenly continued about it is unclear what - and even now, using the same state, it’s still possible to arrange transport and carry out repairs - you just need to know and understand the system, and it’s quite possible to use it for how long - I do not presume to predict, but work t ...
  And at first you wrote about - That nobody will import without a chance - the number of those who sell or do is getting smaller, why should it?
Vkd dvk

+1

9 January 2020 00: 12

Quote: 321
In the deli, with a profit of 400 percent, I just won’t go and I won’t buy anything there, there are options besides hyper and other markets - I don’t know what prevents you from using them, and for some reason you suddenly decided to change the subject - initially they started about something completely different, now they suddenly continued about it is unclear what - and even now, using the same state, it’s still possible to arrange transport and carry out repairs - you just need to know and understand the system, and it’s quite possible to use it for how long - I do not presume to predict, but work t ...
And at first you wrote about - That nobody will import without a chance - the number of those who sell or do is getting smaller, why should it?

Are you sure that a grocery store that is not connected to a supply network, such as Magnet, Pyaterochka, can be found somewhere? Why do our farmers howl, not having the opportunity to get involved in retail chains? Can not. It’s easier for traders not to toil around with transport, washing potatoes, packaging, and so on, and writing paper and a steamer from Israel is another way to drive us all.
Where did you see our real competitive relationship between the subjects of SALES? We buyers are competing. There are a lot of shops. The core network is almost the only one in the country. What is the difference, if a dozen grocery stores are lucky from one base, will their price differ greatly? Renting a building only.
1. plabu
  
  0
  
  9 January 2020 06: 28
  
  I wrote earlier, in response to the "lottery" - there would be a desire, you can always find, but most are just too lazy ...
  And about the bases - they have their own at each network, did not know? Relatives worked - and in Magnet, though still under Galitsky, and in X5, although not yesterday, but you can get an idea.
  And again - not you at the very beginning wrote -
  
  ... Look out the window. In the courtyards of imported cars are almost on the roofs, there is nowhere to put. Supermarkets are crowded. So they are buying. Show me at least one idiot importing goods without a chance to sell. Whining bastards like youand ordinary people live. It is difficult, of course, I would like better, but they live ....
  
  - What are you doing then? You eat ...
  That is, at first - in your opinion, everything is as if good, but now it is already becoming clear that everything is bad, how can such metamorphoses be understood? Cars, markets - most cars are on credit, but this, in your opinion, is good, right?
  You would decide for yourself - good or bad.