Earth populations want to force reduction
Forced reduction of the population of our planet has long been "food" for numerous conspiracy theories. However, despite the warnings of adherents of such concepts, there are more and more people on Earth every year, which so far has made the above-mentioned statements "slightly inappropriate." However, the day before we received an allegedly scientific justification for the need to “slightly thin out the human ranks” in the name of saving the ecosystem.
More than 11 thousand scientists from 153 countries of the world published a document calling urgently to save our planet from future climate change. Moreover, the latter, according to experts, will be much more terrible and destructive than is commonly believed. Consequently, measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must be taken decisively and urgently.
Along with traditional methods (renewable energy sources, etc.), more radical measures were voiced. For example, stop breeding. Fortunately, “soft” methods, such as promoting contraception, abortion and gender equality, have so far been proposed to solve this problem.
True, if we take into account the statistics, according to which we will already be 11 billion by the end of the century, it becomes obvious that propaganda alone cannot be dispensed with. But scientists so far prefer not to talk about it.
Fortunately, such a “reduction” does not threaten our country. According to rough estimates, by 2078 we will be 160 million people. At that time, the population of India, Pakistan, Nigeria and a number of African countries will almost double by 2050. This, in turn, threatens problems such as uncontrolled migration and war. At the same time, no one cancels the “climate catastrophe”. However, the fact that the latter is caused by the activity of people raises some doubts.
Back in the 50s of the last century, NASA came to the conclusion that the main reason for the change in climate is the displacement of the orbit and the axial inclination of the Earth. In 1982, this theory was confirmed by the US National Academy of Sciences. However, the prevailing opinion about the dangers of greenhouse gases could not be influenced.
Today, the struggle for ecology has reached a new level and has become a tool policy и economics. Due to the growing popularity of the “possessed schoolgirl” Greta Tunberg, children and adolescents in the United States began to file class action lawsuits against the government for the fact that the latter deprives “unborn generations” of their right to live on a “clean planet”.
True, the young activists were apparently not explained that, given the measures to reduce the population proposed on the eve, the aforementioned generation runs the risk of not being born at all. Moreover, the United States, as a country with positive demographic growth, will certainly touch on this.
More than 11 thousand scientists from 153 countries of the world published a document calling urgently to save our planet from future climate change. Moreover, the latter, according to experts, will be much more terrible and destructive than is commonly believed. Consequently, measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must be taken decisively and urgently.
Along with traditional methods (renewable energy sources, etc.), more radical measures were voiced. For example, stop breeding. Fortunately, “soft” methods, such as promoting contraception, abortion and gender equality, have so far been proposed to solve this problem.
True, if we take into account the statistics, according to which we will already be 11 billion by the end of the century, it becomes obvious that propaganda alone cannot be dispensed with. But scientists so far prefer not to talk about it.
Fortunately, such a “reduction” does not threaten our country. According to rough estimates, by 2078 we will be 160 million people. At that time, the population of India, Pakistan, Nigeria and a number of African countries will almost double by 2050. This, in turn, threatens problems such as uncontrolled migration and war. At the same time, no one cancels the “climate catastrophe”. However, the fact that the latter is caused by the activity of people raises some doubts.
Back in the 50s of the last century, NASA came to the conclusion that the main reason for the change in climate is the displacement of the orbit and the axial inclination of the Earth. In 1982, this theory was confirmed by the US National Academy of Sciences. However, the prevailing opinion about the dangers of greenhouse gases could not be influenced.
Today, the struggle for ecology has reached a new level and has become a tool policy и economics. Due to the growing popularity of the “possessed schoolgirl” Greta Tunberg, children and adolescents in the United States began to file class action lawsuits against the government for the fact that the latter deprives “unborn generations” of their right to live on a “clean planet”.
True, the young activists were apparently not explained that, given the measures to reduce the population proposed on the eve, the aforementioned generation runs the risk of not being born at all. Moreover, the United States, as a country with positive demographic growth, will certainly touch on this.
Information