NATO ridiculed plan to seize Kaliningrad region in Russia

21
The plan for the capture of the Kaliningrad region by NATO troops, developed by senior researcher at the US Jamestown Foundation, Dr. Richard Hooker, was the subject of deserved ridicule from the leadership of the Kaliningrad region.



During communication with the correspondent RBC, Kaliningrad Region Governor Anton Alikhanov called Hooker's “plan” “American stupidity” and suggested awarding him the Nebula Prize, which was established by the American Association of Science Fiction Writers and awarded for best works in the genre of science fiction or fantasy.

The governor noted that he had the feeling that such plans in the USA were not written by real experts, but by people creating pulp fiction.

Recall that earlier we wrote that according to the plan set forth by American scientists, in the event of a military conflict with Russia, NATO armies will need two weeks to capture the Kaliningrad region with the destruction of all echelons of air defense and missile defense, and then another two weeks to hold out until the "main forces. "

It is difficult to say what Hooker meant by the arrival of the main forces, since it is obvious that after four weeks of conflict between the North Atlantic Alliance and Russia, which has huge stockpiles of nuclear weapons, there would hardly be a place on the planet where these “main forces” could exist.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    27 October 2019 18: 06
    The Yankees have already "erased" North Korea from the map, but the eraser turned out to be the wrong system and SK is still alive and well.
    They isolated Russia - insulating tape, it turns out, was not enough. And now they want to seize part of the territory of Russia.
    Question: But the ass of the Americans will not stick together from fear? Or do their generals think only in the lower hemispheres?
    1. +2
      27 October 2019 20: 47
      From fear of the priest does not stick together, but rather ...
  2. +2
    27 October 2019 19: 56
    They consider us fools who will go and attack with bayonets at the ready!
  3. +3
    27 October 2019 20: 49
    And who will specifically conduct the capture operation? Please announce the entire list.
    1. +1
      27 October 2019 22: 44
      Ukrainians are ahead on dashing horses.
      1. +2
        28 October 2019 22: 12
        Machines, they gobbled up their nags a long time ago ...
    2. +3
      28 October 2019 01: 03
      It is said: to hold out for 4 weeks, just the Estonians will catch up ... their quick reaction forces.
  4. +5
    28 October 2019 06: 04
    Another stupid attempt to drag the EU into a war with Russia. Now the hands of the Poles, there are enough bad heads. And they don’t even hide: you just start, and we will help.
    1. +6
      28 October 2019 07: 30
      The Georgians have already been helped, and the Kurds are now being helped !!!
  5. +1
    28 October 2019 09: 46
    Do not laugh before a possible fight.
  6. -4
    28 October 2019 16: 27
    Hi!
    If a local war is without nuclear weapons, but with nuclear weapons, then NATO can capture Kaliningrad in a day - this is not debatable. But will the milestone be held?
    There are three factors - marine, air and land.

    Here everything is decided interconnected.
    If we lose at sea and under, we lose the possibility of quick assistance to the surrounded Kaliningrad. If we lose the sky, then we lose the land approach.

    Cruise missiles can give volleys of a maximum of 500 launches. We have no more there. And they can destroy a maximum of 30% of NATO’s capacity in this region. Then they will recover quickly.

    Next - the question - press the button - TNW?
    If so, then we completely lose Belarus, Kaliningrad, Moscow and St. Petersburg will be destroyed. Yes. In return, we will destroy several NATO cities and bases in Europe.

    But after that, the NATO land wedge will begin. Banderlogs will immediately approach, everywhere there will be explosions from nuclear weapons ...

    But here we must understand: Russia, having uncovered 60% of its capacity, will fight 30% with NATO forces.

    What to do? The eternal question. Well, do not retreat. Here we will need a sacrifice from each of us - to stop the enemy. And that’s it.
    Those. work in the rear for defense, engineering work in defense, and go on a task - knowing that we won’t return from there.
    Then we will defeat the enemy. Even he is technically strong in quantity.
    But to say - "ha-ha, we have the most powerful equipment, and we have the strongest soldiers" - is impossible. Even Marshal Zhukov did not say this about the Nazis and always attacked the enemy - only if the forces outnumbered the Germans.

    Thank you for attention.
    1. +8
      28 October 2019 22: 28
      Citizen, to remind you that the GDP said to the question, what will happen if SOMETHING esovtsev jerk into the territory of the Russian Federation?
      Let's start: in the Russian Federation they understand perfectly that all these European mongrels (with the exception, perhaps, of the Serbs) will not take a step without receiving an order from the Pentagon regional committee. And knowing this, for a long time in the Russian Federation they no longer live with illusions that we will have to "fight" with one of the amers' satellites. they understand very well that the RF Armed Forces are at the highest point of readiness and are professionally prepared (and, moreover, they are perfectly motivated) over the past 28 years. And the professionalism of the RF Armed Forces is constantly growing. Therefore, NOT ONE of the NATO satellites will not last even three days (we will not take into account - we will count on the clock there). Therefore, they will pile up in a crowd (although the leaders of these "European states" understand perfectly well how everything will turn out for "their" countries, but they WILL NOT be in these countries themselves - they will run away IMMEDIATELY with the beginning of the database) ... So ... The Russian Federation gave the following answer: WE WILL NOT MEET FORCES WITH ANYONE FROM NATO - THE STRIKE WILL BE DONE INSTANTLY DECISION-MAKING CENTERS, regardless of which part of the territory of the Russian Federation will be invaded.
      So here it is somehow ...
      1. -3
        29 October 2019 04: 11
        Like Marshal Tukhachevsky, fiery speeches can be spoken and written.
        This is good, but in real life it will be completely different.
        Underestimate the enemy.
        The enemy is strong, and has three (at least) military-technical superiority.
        Before 1941 they also said so - "we will beat the enemy on his territory." But in reality they retreated to Moscow. And most importantly, the Russian divisions retreated. After that, divisions came from Central Asia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, the Far East, the Caucasus. It was then that the enemy was somehow stopped.
        1. +2
          29 October 2019 12: 47
          Quote: OXOTHuK Sakha
          The enemy is strong, and has three (at least) military-technical superiority.

          Unreasonable statement. NATO has no superiority in aviation in Europe. In terms of air defense tactical nuclear weapons, tanks and electronic warfare systems, Russia is ahead of the rest.

          Quote: OXOTHuK Sakha
          But in reality they retreated to Moscow. And most importantly, the Russian divisions retreated. Then came the divisions from Central Asia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, the Far East, and the Caucasus. Then they somehow stopped the enemy.

          Bad you taught history. In the USSR, divisions were not formed on an ethnic basis. And they helped to defend the capital, the civilian population mobilized to create anti-tank fortifications and Siberian divisions urgently deployed across half the country to Moscow.
        2. 0
          29 October 2019 17: 44
          It is foolish to compare only the quantity, but about Russian divisions, it’s generally written utter nonsense, it’s immediately clear where the winds are blowing, here it is, a perversion of history in action !!!
        3. +1
          2 November 2019 00: 55
          Present-day NATO is not the kind of NATO that was before, not even the 2000 level. Moreover, not the level of the late 80s. The officially prescribed time for the deployment of the NATO rapid reaction forces is 70 days from the moment of the order. Our forces of constant readiness only 6 hours. You can not continue further. The amount of iron is not quality! A soldier always fights, and with this, NATO is far from as rosy as Hollywood and agitation show.
        4. 0
          2 November 2019 21: 11
          You carefully read WHAT the leadership of the Russian Federation responded? There is a suspicion that no.
          Once again, for especially hard ones - "... we will not measure our strength ..."And this is a blow of strategic forces. You need to explain WHAT IS IT? Or figure it out for yourself? And your example of Tukhachevsky is out of place here. You are comparing incomparable.
  7. +3
    29 October 2019 17: 37
    What naive fools these Americans are, they really still believe in fairy tales about the fact that it is possible to start a war with Russia, to emerge from it as a winner and, what is most ridiculous, to remain safe and sound after all this, what an absurd stupidity, well, as they say Dreaming is not harmful, let them dream !!!
  8. +2
    29 October 2019 18: 00
    These Americans have learned the wretched nonsense from their wretched slaves - Ukrainians. For these ultra-gluttons, this is a phenomenon at the genetic level ... Thus, they compensate for their inferiority complex ...
    1. 0
      2 November 2019 21: 12
      Svidomo ordinary - it is contagious ...
  9. +2
    29 October 2019 18: 03
    Much more likely is that we will return Russia to Alaska and California, and Mexico annexed by Texas Americans, than Americans will try to conquer Russian territories ...