Missiles "Caliber" in the exercises could not be launched on the first try

On October 17, 2019, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, trained the forces and means of strategic deterrence as part of the Thunder 2019 command and staff exercises. During these exercises, systems were also tested that reduce the launch time of Caliber missiles from "about three hours to 15 minutes."




According to the Russian media holding RBCreferring to its knowledgeable sources close to the power structures, the mentioned Caliber missiles were not launched at the first attempt. At the same time, the Russian Ministry of Defense denied problems with launches.

According to the source of RBC, tested the control system and the introduction of the flight mission. The launches themselves were carried out from the Tatarstan missile ship (RC) and the Grad Sviyazhsk small missile ship (RTO).

It was supposed to work out 15 minutes. But the Caliber team did not leave the first team. As a result, the missiles flew away, but not at the first attempt and after the activation of the backup launch systems

- clarified the source.

However, another informed source of RBC, close to the General Staff of Russia, confirmed that the "Caliber" really left the second or third attempt.


It should be added that on October 17, 2019, the Russian Ministry of Defense distributed a video of Caliber cruise missile launches from the head frigate of Project 22350 Admiral Gorshkov, which were held as part of the Thunder 2019 exercise.

At the same time, it was announced from the Caspian flotilla that the launches of the Caliber with the MRK Grad Sviyazhsk from the Caspian Sea were successful. As for the Tatarstan Republic of Kazakhstan, it never had the Caliber in service, and therefore, in principle, it could not launch them.
Photos used: https://kirill-nav.livejournal.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

15 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. 123 Offline
    123 (123) 21 October 2019 21: 35
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    According to the source of RBC, tested the control system and the introduction of the flight mission. The launches themselves were carried out from the Tatarstan missile ship (RC) and the Grad Sviyazhsk small missile ship (RTO).

    At the same time, it was announced from the Caspian flotilla that the launches of the Caliber with the MRK Grad Sviyazhsk from the Caspian Sea were successful. As for the Tatarstan Republic of Kazakhstan, it never had the Caliber in service, and therefore, in principle, it could not be launched.
    recourse
    Well, let's say a typo, the name was confused .... In the original article on RBC has already been fixed.

    The material has been changed. In the first version of the material it was reported that the launches of the "Caliber" in the framework of the exercises were carried out from the ships "Tatarstan" and "Grad Sviyazhsk". After the publication of the material, RBC interlocutors clarified that the launches were made from the Dagestan and Grad Sviyazhsk ships.

    https://www.rbc.ru/society/21/10/2019/5dad7fb79a794731f38da2df

    Russian Defense Ministry denies the problem, the Ministry of Defense against the "unnamed source", whom do we believe? Let's try to anyone. What is online?
    Launch from the shore - 1 rocket "Yars", "Iskander" -1 rocket.
    1. Start from the frigate Admiral Gorshkov - 1 Caliber rocket
    2. Launch from the submarine "Severodvinsk" - 1 rocket "Sineva"
    3. Launch from the Ryazan submarine - 1 Sineva rocket
    4. Launch from MRC Grad Sviyazhsk - 1 Caliber rocket



    Everywhere they launched on the first rocket, they just showed it from different angles. It seems that the missiles weren’t particularly scattered, so to speak, “a budget option.” We look at the article.

    The launches themselves were carried out from the Tatarstan missile ship (RC) (corrected to Dagestan) and the Grad Sviyazhsk small missile ship (RTO).

    The question arises, why everywhere on the first rocket, and two from the Caspian? Illogical. request
    You decide. I have "unnamed sources" that confuse the names of the ships and the number of missiles are not credible. Absolutely. In my opinion, “RBC” breaks another bottom. negative
    1. Pishenkov Offline
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 21 October 2019 23: 05
      +6
      • 6
      • 0
      As for the Tatarstan Republic of Kazakhstan, it never had the Caliber in service, and therefore, in principle, it could not launch them.

      - you just did not understand, RBC journalists, apparently, also: this technological breakthrough has occurred. Apparently, it was from Tatarstan that they were still launched from the second or third attempt. laughing Dolbanuli there with a sledgehammer a couple of times, the burrs were cleaned up, stuffed into the mine and ... laughing And not the first time, because the missiles of the “wrong system” were ... The mines were not designed, that’s why they were held up, but still managed ...
      (... just in case: this is a joke ... laughing )
      1. 123 Offline
        123 (123) 22 October 2019 00: 54
        +3
        • 4
        • 1
        Humor appreciated. laughing We are waiting for messages about the launches of the “Caliber” from the “Guardian”.
        1. A.Lex Offline
          A.Lex (Secret information) 22 October 2019 23: 04
          0
          • 0
          • 0
          ... okay, not yet "Topol"! ..
    2. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 22 October 2019 23: 03
      +1
      • 2
      • 1
      RBCovtsev more than once caught in a lie. This ... mmm ... muddy puddle once again spreads the information sucked from a finger. Any citizen who refers to RBC and insists that this is a "source of information" can be safely reckoned with KL (Creakle liberals).
      Now they are offended that they are called that ... They want to be called directly - LIARS?
  2. 123 Offline
    123 (123) 21 October 2019 22: 54
    +2
    • 3
    • 1
    Supplement: I read that two "unnamed sources close to the Ministry of Defense" were told by Vedomosti - the agro-industrial complex Ryazan was unable to launch the second Sineva missile.

    https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/articles/2019/10/20/814167-podvodniki-otstrelyalis.

    Characteristically, RBC sources reported only about Dagestan, and Vedomosti only about Ryazan. Otherwise, the information is almost identical.
    Questions arise recourse :
    1. Have you never divorced all kinds of sources?
    2. Are they so close to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation (if they are real) if they have different information. It seems that they handed information to two different people and began to wait for someone to run to drain. laughing
    Well, and or another option, the editorial offices "ordered" material of a certain orientation, and they themselves thought up the details.
    1. Pishenkov Offline
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 22 October 2019 09: 24
      +3
      • 3
      • 0
      ... they handed information to two different people and began to wait for someone to run to drain.

      - this, by the way, is a very plausible explanation ... wink Maybe they just "clean up" all kinds of "sources" in the Moscow Region, giving out information in this way, and then looking at you, saying what and where it "flows" ...
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. General Black Offline
    General Black (Gennady) 22 October 2019 06: 32
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    Start from the submarine Severodvinsk - 1 Sineva missile.

    "Severodvinsk" of the 885th project, what kind of "Sineva" can it have on it?
    1. 123 Offline
      123 (123) 22 October 2019 10: 44
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Your truth, thanks for clarifying, good you have to be careful. The Caliber was launched from Severodvinsk; the Sineva launch was from Karelia. I typed in a quick manner, did not double-check, in general - did not print it out (Karelia fell out), well, I attributed Sinev, respectively, to Severodvinsk. repeat

  5. Rusa Offline
    Rusa 22 October 2019 12: 10
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    "Informed sources" again launched fakes, which the Russian Defense Ministry has already refuted.
    If someone itches very much, then they would scratch in another place, as V. Chernomyrdin said.
  6. sgrabik Offline
    sgrabik (Sergei) 22 October 2019 12: 13
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Even if we assume that during the launches there really were some kind of malfunctions or deviations from the norm, it is necessary not to suppress these facts, but to work on the errors in order to completely exclude such incidents in the future. Indeed, no one is safe from this and nothing ideal can be in principle, all the more so since such incidents in the NATO military alliance are also more than enough.
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 22 October 2019 23: 10
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      You are wrong - how can you doubt the power and advanced technology of the "fair-faced"? It is only in the "smelly crust" rockets can fall and explode, break tanks and do not fly airplanes!
      But seriously, for me the collapse of Amer’s technology came when TWO shuttles exploded one by one, with astronauts on board! (after which this program was covered). This is already when our technology didn’t let people down!
  7. Valentine Offline
    Valentine (Valentin) 22 October 2019 16: 11
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    How many couch "experts" here who are in Sergey Kuzhugetovich’s circle are enviable, and so it is famously scattered by the names of the ships and missiles, as if they themselves launched them from the place of their constant couch and couch deployment.
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 22 October 2019 23: 12
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      You just don’t get clever - the guys took a serious approach to collecting information, but RBC is a lie again. Do you support RBC?
    2. 123 Offline
      123 (123) 22 October 2019 23: 38
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Envy silently laughing