Government prepares “ambitious plan” for new privatization

First Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian government, Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, on the sidelines of the meeting of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank, said that the next stage of privatization would begin in Russia. According to him, the country's government in the near future should begin to develop a "more ambitious" plan (program) of privatization.

Indeed, we relaxed a little because we don’t need money, and the ministries all sit on their even small shares in companies, and everyone wants to manage them

- said Siluanov.

According to Siluanov, the government must once again compile a list of state assets in which the Russian state does not need to remain.

The list of investments that are not decisive is not key for our country, I mean, maybe, oil and gas or the banking sector

- specified Siluanov.

It should be noted that earlier Siluanov said that Russian Railways, Aeroflot, ALROSA and Channel One will not fall into the new privatization plan for 2020-2022. In addition, the Deputy Prime Minister studied the proposals of the Ministry of Economic Development for the specified three-year period and discussed them with interested departments.

According to preliminary data, the state-owned packages of Roshydro, Sovcomflot, Transneft, Rostelecom, Rossetei and OZK (United Grain Company) fall into the draft new privatization program.

We remind you that the previous three-year privatization plan (2017-2019) is coming to an end. It provided for the privatization of 477 JSCs and 298 FSUEs. The plan is implemented by 41% in relation to federal state unitary enterprises and by 59% in relation to joint-stock companies. The plan still in effect stipulates that it is planned to terminate the participation of the Russian state in the authorized capital of joint-stock companies: Novorossiysk Commercial Sea Port, United Grain Company, Prioksky Non-Ferrous Metals Plant and Makhachkala Commercial Sea Port.
  • Used photos:
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Afinogen Offline Afinogen
    Afinogen (Afinogen) 19 October 2019 18: 55
    In simple terms, it sounds like this. Putin is not eternal, especially since his talking room without real deeds begins to annoy the people. Here is his clique and decided - not to disappear to the same good. Here they are stolen the public treasure in their pockets for nothing.
  2. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
    Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 19 October 2019 21: 04
    This government will bring Russia to a revolution and civil war, it has already weary of its stupid actions ... The abolition of Soviet state standards for food, a fiasco with educational and health care reforms, raising the retirement age ... The people in Russia are not patient ...
    1. Digital error Offline Digital error
      Digital error (Eugene) 19 October 2019 22: 55
      Quote: Sapsan136
      Cancellation of Soviet GOSTs on products

      For business, this is ingenious and will end in selling you sawdust at the price of sausage. There will be no other products - everyone needs 500% of the net profit.

      Quote: Sapsan136
      education reform debacle

      The government does not need smart people - firstly, you have to pay a lot, secondly, they create competition for technology partners that is not needed by partners, and thirdly, uncomfortable questions are asked and voted against Putin and United Russia. Paid education is an eternal business.

      Quote: Sapsan136
      and health

      People who have reached the age of 65 need to pay a pension. Unprofitable for business.

      Quote: Sapsan136
      raising retirement age

      See above. IMF partners need money from the NWF.

      Quote: Sapsan136
      non-iron tartar

      Iron. The past single day of voting clearly showed this.

      Quote: Sapsan136
      tired of their stupid actions

      For business - the smartest. They’ll think about tomorrow tomorrow, and snatch today - comprador logic, nothing personal.
      1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
        Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 20 October 2019 08: 20
        Do you believe in the honesty of these votes ?! There are fewer people like you ... What is good for hucksters is bad for the country and people, but hucksters will not defend the country and even this government, where they have a priest in the warmth, they have their homeland, and they need money alive, so THESE will not go to the front by themselves.
        1. Tatyana Offline Tatyana
          Tatyana 21 October 2019 16: 14
          Siluanov with his henchman-promoter Oreshkin is the same "marketer-IMFovets" as Kudrin. They are both "kudrienyats" and the successors of the Kudrin case in the financial block of the RF government of Medvedev. By the way, Nabiullina is also Kudrin's "student" and promoter.
          Kudrin is not just a liberal "mole" of Washington in the pro-American colonial power of the Russian Federation, but in essence an "agent of the US Federal Reserve with his agents" in Russia. Otherwise, they cannot all be appreciated.
    2. jrvp79 Offline jrvp79
      jrvp79 (Yuri) 20 October 2019 07: 05
      Why fiasco?
      The government is fulfilling an order to destroy the people. Everything is like 100 years ago, and this is just the beginning.
      They don’t want to fight with us anymore - they have grown wiser!
      But will we grow wiser and learn to fight back, time will tell.
      In the meantime: sleep, residents of Russia - everything is calm in Baghdad!
      1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
        Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 20 October 2019 08: 39
        Alas, this is so ... Chubais’s statements that the deaths of 20-30 million people as a result of his reforms are nothing, it’s nothing but fascism!
        1. Yevgeny Mikhailov (Vyacheslav Plotnikov) 21 October 2019 14: 26
          "Nazism" ... More correctly - "Nazism", "Fascism" - this is "unity", "solidarity" ... Here it is different. Here we see the struggle between "ordinary nonhumans" and "those who have joined them."
    3. A.Lex Offline A.Lex
      A.Lex (Secret information) 21 October 2019 13: 52
      Peregrine Falcon, I didn’t want to write - I became lazy. ... But if you touched on something Soviet, then let us recall the thing that today is called unprofitability or, in other words, unprofitability. This is what condition the enterprise needs to be brought to become unprofitable? We ask ourselves a question - why did this happen (or is happening)? There are two possible answers:
      1. Incompetence of the top management of the enterprise.
      2. Intentionally bringing the company to bankruptcy.
      In both the first and second cases, there are laws by which management must RESPOND and receive appropriate sentences.
      Now, let's deviate a little and look at this option - the company really became unprofitable due to the termination of the receipt of components or the development of sources of receipt of materials and resources. How was it done in the USSR? But simply - or the company was transported to new sources. The workers were offered to move to another region where there is such an enterprise (in our case, where this enterprise moved), or they were offered to retrain for a new specialty, which was required by the state (but this happened much less often).
      It's very simple - you just need to WORK. Work both for the management of enterprises and for the state. Shaking off the workers from their hands will do the state a disservice - the people, as you rightly said, are increasingly disillusioned with the state and its leadership. And for the state, this death is like ... an example of this is the Russian Empire, and the Bolsheviks cost INCREDIBLE labors and sacrifices to reassemble the country ... and even then not in full force, although mostly ... Now the collapse (91-92 ) happened with much greater consequences ... And what NOW "bolsheviks" will be able to assemble the country ???
  3. oracul Offline oracul
    oracul (leonid) 20 October 2019 07: 25
    Apparently, it was the turn to grab their tidbit from the state pie, those who did not participate in the thieves' privatization of the 90s. Roshydro, Sovcomflot, Transneft, Rostelecom, Rosseti and OZK are working, firstly, not at a loss, secondly, the state has invested too well in them, thirdly, they work to the whole country.
  4. oracul Offline oracul
    oracul (leonid) 20 October 2019 07: 32
    And it smacks of not just the desire to grab money, but also the opportunity for someone to gain access to vital areas of Russia. An example of this is the reconstruction of a military construction company. At one time, military builders liquidated and handed over the construction of malware to businessmen. The result is sad.
  5. Potapov Offline Potapov
    Potapov (Valery) 20 October 2019 08: 56
    It's time again to customize the tanks to the house of the Soviets ...
  6. yuriy55 Offline yuriy55
    yuriy55 (Yuri Vasilievich) 20 October 2019 12: 10
    Government prepares “ambitious plan” for new privatization

    It has already been said here, I would like to summarize:

    Do not hope that once using the weakness of Russia, you will receive dividends forever. Russians always come for their money. And when they come - do not rely on the Jesuit agreements that you have signed, supposedly justifying you. They are not worth the paper on which they are written. Therefore, it is worth playing with the Russians honestly, or not at all.

    These words of Bismarck can be addressed to those who consider themselves in fact Russian (Russian) authorities ...
  7. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 20 October 2019 12: 47
    The state is building, and they are privatizing everything. Siluanov would have better said that in 28 years these privatizers have built - a port, a factory, a factory. Or how many sick children were cured, the poor bought apartments, they gave work. And then he talked about efficiency. The results of privatization - it is 1-1,5% of GDP per year, and so 28 years in a row?
  8. Monster_Fat Offline Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 21 October 2019 12: 19
    I have already written here more than once that it is impossible to expect any kind of "successful management" from the former "blacksmiths of the 90s" and their "siloviki-protectors", as well as their hangers-on, they do not know how to "build", "develop" and " multiply ", they only know how to:" sell "," remove competitors "and" hide "the received." "Development of the economy?" "Effective management? No, this is not for them.
  9. sgrabik Offline sgrabik
    sgrabik (Sergei) 21 October 2019 13: 25
    Only in no case can you sell the assets of defense industry enterprises and strategically important facilities for the country, you need to remember the mistakes of the 90s and draw the right conclusions, no longer stepping on the same rake.
    1. Monster_Fat Offline Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 21 October 2019 13: 52
      The joke here is that the Kremlin simply has nowhere to take money for its Wishlist (even for its maintenance and the maintenance of the expanded oprichnina and bureaucratic support). Earn - no way, and bother with it, you need to strain your brains and make other efforts, it’s easier to sell off everything that remains - for 4 years, maybe that's enough, and there others will disentangle ....