The main candidate to replace Prime Minister Medvedev: who is he?

Russia entered the period political instability. In 2024, the so-called “power transit problem” looms. Western sanctions are constantly growing, so it’s not that simple to let things go on the brakes. Meanwhile, the protest movement from both capitals is moving to the regions, sometimes taking on bizarre forms.




The figures of pagan shamans appearing at the head of regional protests seem very outlandish. It is very significant that unexpectedly for many, the opposition was recently publicly supported by Sergei Chemezov, one of President Putin’s closest associates.

Sergey Chemezov has a very impressive biography. He worked at one time as an engineer, is a doctor of economic sciences, and graduated from the Higher Courses of the General Staff Academy. Through the KGB, he worked in the GDR, where, as reported, he made friends with our current president, Vladimir Putin. Today he heads the state corporation Rostec and is one of the highest functionaries of the United Russia party. It is not surprising that the statement of the head of the country's most important defense concern, which is part of Putin’s inner circle of communications, regarding Moscow protests attracted increased attention:

On the whole, my civic position is this: the presence of a sound opposition is for the benefit of any body, a representative assembly, and, ultimately, the state. There must be some alternative force that prompts something and gives signals in one direction or another.


Chemezov’s words can be interpreted in different ways. Consider the most popular versions.

A signal to the people?


Optimists regarded the statement by the head of the state corporation as the willingness of the authorities to hear the aspirations of their people. All the problems of the country are usually blamed on the liberals in the Medvedev government, which itself does not enjoy the great love of Russians because of a number of ambiguous statements.

In this context, the nomination of the "statesman" Chemezov to replace the "liberal" Medvedev can be done to exhaust a couple of public discontent. The solid background of the head of Rostec gives him certain advances, as well as some time for the authorities themselves, required for "changing horses at the crossing." An old friend Chemezov will be loyal to Putin as the second person in the state no less than the verified Dmitry Anatolyevich.

Signal to the West?


But there are less optimistic views on this issue. The domestic oligarchy, which was attached to the “Kremlin towers”, has already suffered very seriously from Western sanctions, but they don’t see the end and edge. Crimea, which caused a fundamental disagreement with the collective West, is directly associated with the person of President Putin. He cannot play back anything under any circumstances.

However, in 2024, his next powers expire. Various options are called for how he can circumvent the norms of the law on the need for a regular change of power: “castling”, State Council, Union State. Once the “castling” worked, but until 2024 there is still a lot of time, and anything can happen. It is possible that representatives of certain “clans” are not against establishing a dialogue with the pro-Western opposition, demonstrating their constructiveness and willingness to play according to the new rules.

Other explanations are possible. Everyone understands what is happening to the extent of his own understanding.
Photos used: https://defence.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

48 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Bulanov Offline
    Bulanov (Vladimir) 7 October 2019 11: 01
    +4
    • 5
    • 1
    Nobody has ever removed the head of the Union State from the agenda. Until 2024, the law on the Union State is quite possible, especially if some former sister republic jumps in there.
    1. Sergey Latyshev Offline
      Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 7 October 2019 13: 15
      -4
      • 0
      • 4
      Yes, annealed so annealed!
    2. Victor N Offline
      Victor N (Victor n) 7 October 2019 17: 11
      +1
      • 3
      • 2
      From Lukashenko, an ally with the company is like a bullet from a bullet. Therefore, a union state is a fiction; none of this will come of it. The hope is Putin’s introduction into the active politics of new people. I am sure it will happen soon.
      1. Digital error Offline
        Digital error (Eugene) 8 October 2019 17: 50
        0
        • 1
        • 1
        Quote: Victor N
        The hope is Putin’s introduction into the active politics of new people.

        In this case, it is the hope of maintaining the status quo. I hope the hope is impossible. And I’m not just hoping, but I’ll interfere with this (in the elections, of course).
    3. Artie Offline
      Artie (Artyom Korolev) 8 October 2019 12: 59
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Donbass will definitely be in the Union State in 2024, and most likely also South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
    4. Pishenkov Offline
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 8 October 2019 20: 28
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      If she doesn’t drop herself, she must drop in there ... wink And then the Russian Empire began to play in democracy and liberalism. This is not our way. And everything that happened to Russia and is happening on this "path to democracy", this only proves once again.
      1. A.Lex Offline
        A.Lex (Secret information) 11 October 2019 10: 11
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        By RI do you mean Greater Russia? (everything that was part of both the Republic of Ingushetia and the USSR?) If so, then it will not work with psheks (and thank God!), nor will it work with Finns. And the rest ... And what about the Nazis of all stripes in Ukraine? And the Baltic states? And the Georgian idiots who hate Russia too? And in other "fraternal" ... "countries" (why in quotation marks? But because only thanks to Russia they also exist - there are too many territorial claims from neighbors from outside to these "states") too.
        1. Pishenkov Offline
          Pishenkov (Alexey) 11 October 2019 10: 23
          +2
          • 2
          • 0
          By RI, I mean what and who wants to understand it myself. She is even a kind of empire even now. And what, with whom, and how to do it, we always knew this, we just need the determination of a leader for all this, and it does not matter who it is or what it is called — the tsar, the generalissimo or the president. In each of the territories indicated by you, an ordinary population lives, which existed and will continue to exist in any power and any situation. There is always a certain layer in this population, which simply needs to be removed so that the rest does not interfere. And about the need for certain territories for the empire in modern conditions - this is the power that should be decided. wink Peter considered that it was necessary to open a window to Europe - it was cut through, it seemed to Stalin that East Prussia and Western Ukraine would not be in the way - please, Putin realized that in this situation Crimea had to be taken away - and he did it right ... But there were such leaders who were distributing - and the same Ukraine, and Finland, and the Baltic states, and Crimea, and Alaska, and in general the whole country in parts ...
    5. Hassan Abdukhalikov (Hassan Abdukhalikov) 8 October 2019 23: 06
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      It is necessary to restore the Soviet Union, and not this nonsense.
      HOW TO RECREATE THE USSR (Commonwealth of Strategic Allies of Russia).

      1. To begin with, starting in 2019, it is necessary to begin implementing the New Economic Policy of the Russian Federation (NEP of the Russian Federation) to accelerate the growth rate of the Russian economy 2 times or more above the world ones. (Author of the NEP RF Abdukhalikov H. A.).
      2. As Russia’s economy grows faster than the world’s, Russia should unilaterally withdraw from the CIS and thereby liquidate this amorphous organization itself.
      3. When the inflation rate in the Russian Federation reaches 1% per year, denominate the Russian ruble at the rate of 100/1 so that 1 US dollar is equivalent to 60 kopecks.
      4. With countries of the former CIS that are loyal to Russia, it is necessary to sign an agreement on the Strategic Union on the following conditions in which the country Ally of Russia assumes obligations of the following nature:
      - Recognition of Russia as the Superpower No. 1 in the World;
      - Respect Russia and its interests in all cases;
      - Provide on its territory the location of Russian military bases for the protection of airspace and external borders at no cost for a period of up to 49 years (for the duration of the Union Treaty);
      - Open your domestic markets and create a single economic space with Russia.
      Russia, in turn, pledges to its Strategic Ally:
      - Protect and respect the economic, political, cultural and other interests of their Strategic Ally;
      - Open access to preferential credit resources from the GIFF of the Russian Federation (according to the NEP of the Russian Federation) as part of the modernization of the economy of the Strategic Ally of Russia according to the signed Union Agreement (without prejudice to the domestic economy of the Russian Federation, and due to international guarantees for borrowing in international financial markets);
      - Open your domestic markets to the Strategic Ally and create a common economic space with it.
      When signing bilateral Union treaties in accordance with the above conditions, Russia may on December 30, 2022 create the Commonwealth of Strategic Allies of Russia with countries that have signed the above Union Agreements with the Russian Federation.
      The main constituent agreement of this Commonwealth of Strategic Allies of Russia (hereinafter referred to as the USSR) should be the Charter of the USSR.
      The USSR charter must contain the following points:
      1. The Commonwealth of Strategic Allies of Russia (USSR) is a voluntary Union of the Russian Federation with countries that have signed the Strategic Union Treaty with it;
      2. The Chairman of the USSR is the President of the Russian Federation, secretaries are determined by rotation from among the Presidents of countries belonging to the USSR;
      3. The supreme body of the USSR Administration is the Council of Heads of State of the USSR;
      4. The decision adopted at this Council will have legal force only after ratification by the parliaments of the countries participating in the USSR;
      5. The Supreme Court of the USSR, which will operate on the basis of the Union Treaties and the Charter of the USSR, should become the supranational organ of the USSR.
      If this strategy is implemented, the formation of Russia as Super Power No. 1 will be real, and this strategy will really be able to ensure the security of Russia's external borders from the encroachment of other Super Powers.

      Russia must recreate the USSR and the Russian Empire in the form of the Commonwealth of Strategic Allies of Russia, not in order to feed the Union republics, but in order to use their potential for their own development.
      1. A.Lex Offline
        A.Lex (Secret information) 11 October 2019 10: 19
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        Ohohoyushki, Hassan ... come down from heaven to earth. Who will agree from the leadership of the “neighbors” of the Russian Federation with what you listed? Who! Who agrees to transfer at least the smallest piece of their power? After all, they are all khans, bais, counts and princes there ... They (for the most part) will be completely unnecessary under the new order!
        Another point - and where do you get from us, in the Russian Federation, MUCH leading managers to manage this entire economy? After all, they need to be raised and "sharpened" to solve specific - NEW tasks! And for this you need to set a GOAL before Russia, and for setting a GOAL -IDEOLOGY NEEDED !!!! And we have it "under the constitution" (just like in an occupied country) !!!
      2. Pishenkov Offline
        Pishenkov (Alexey) 11 October 2019 10: 26
        0
        • 0
        • 0
        Good plan. I generally like it. good Do you have any specific schemes and principles for its implementation?
        1. Hassan Abdukhalikov (Hassan Abdukhalikov) 12 October 2019 20: 28
          0
          • 0
          • 0
          Give me an email, send it.
  2. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 7 October 2019 11: 39
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    Quote: Bulanov
    Nobody has ever removed the head of the Union State from the agenda. Until 2024, the law on the Union State is quite possible, especially if some former sister republic jumps in there.

    You are super optimistic ...
    1. Bulanov Offline
      Bulanov (Vladimir) 7 October 2019 14: 42
      +2
      • 3
      • 1
      After the destruction of the USSR in 1991, anything can happen. Kievan Rus also broke up into specific principalities, and then reunited with another capital.
      1. Victor N Offline
        Victor N (Victor n) 7 October 2019 17: 15
        +5
        • 5
        • 0
        Do not even think! Russia must always remain strong. The current "Mongols" and "Teutons" are more fierce than the former.
    2. sgrabik Offline
      sgrabik (Sergei) 8 October 2019 16: 36
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      So it’s better to be optimistic and hope for the best, than pessimistic all-outers, which are the liberals.
      1. A.Lex Offline
        A.Lex (Secret information) 11 October 2019 10: 23
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        One must be not one and not the other ... One must be realistic.
        Today, we (in Russia) still do not have such opportunities ... We must first deal with ourselves and evaluate the last 30 years - political, economic and social ... But we are not in a hurry with this! ... for some reason ...
    3. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 11 October 2019 10: 20
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Nobody has ever removed the head of the Union State from the agenda. Until 2024, the law on the Union State is quite possible, especially if some former sister republic jumps in there.

      You are super optimistic ...
      Yes, see what else! laughing laughing laughing It is immediately clear that he does not live in Russia or in greenhouse conditions! lol
  3. steelmaker Offline
    steelmaker 7 October 2019 14: 27
    +2
    • 2
    • 0
    Now I watched NTV with Norkin for about an hour, though not from the beginning. The conversation was about the economy. Delyagin is sitting. They all talked about the economy, but what Delyagin said, I did not wait. So in our government - they “rule” everything, but there are no real pros. Glazyev and then removed to hell with his advice.
  4. yuratanja1950 Offline
    yuratanja1950 (Yuri) 7 October 2019 15: 31
    +3
    • 4
    • 1
    Hmm ... I have nothing against Chemezov, as a manager, ...
    However, in 2024, he will turn 72 years old ...
    What, again, will we play the game in the Politburo-Necropolis?
    If you change Medvedev, so now ... the berry has ripened for a long time, but it doesn’t fall from the bush ...
    1. Artie Offline
      Artie (Artyom Korolev) 8 October 2019 13: 02
      +4
      • 4
      • 0
      Quote: yuratanja1950
      Hmm ... I have nothing against Chemezov, as a manager, ...
      However, in 2024, he will turn 72 years old ...

      Regarding Chemezov, this is not about 2024 and not about the presidency, but premiership. Most likely, in 2021 - 69 years. By the standards of the current lifespan of elites, nutrition and medicine are a penny. In the United States, won, on condoms, the main Democratic candidates are nominated Biden and Sanders, who will be 78-79 years old by the elections)) And the "young" Warren, who is 71. Yes, and Trump is 73 now, sort of. So 69 is still a young man by political standards.
      1. Digital error Offline
        Digital error (Eugene) 8 October 2019 17: 56
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        Quote: Artie
        By the standards of the current lifespan of elites, nutrition and medicine are a penny.

        Do you support raising the retirement age to 75?
        1. Artie Offline
          Artie (Artyom Korolev) 9 October 2019 13: 12
          0
          • 0
          • 0
          For top politicians, yes.
  5. yuriy55 Offline
    yuriy55 (Yuri Vasilievich) 7 October 2019 19: 53
    +3
    • 4
    • 1
    The main candidate to replace Prime Minister Medvedev: who is he?

    Izraitel (Kiriyenko) Sergey Vladilenovich ... belay
    He already has some experience and is less than 60 years old ... wassat
    But in Russia there are people (production workers) who have real achievements? Not from the Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs under the heel of Shokhin, but those who managed could organize? At least the same creator of "Magnet" Sergei Nikolaevich Galitsky?
    What am I saying there ... A bank lending system in Russia is capable of ruining (or buying) any enterprise (an enterprise in terms of activity).
    1. Lusis Offline
      Lusis (lusis) 8 October 2019 11: 53
      +6
      • 6
      • 0
      Kiriyenko’s experience is not some, but a very good experience, how to lead the country to default.
      1. Digital error Offline
        Digital error (Eugene) 8 October 2019 18: 05
        0
        • 1
        • 1
        Quote: lusis
        ... experience how to bring a country to default.

        And yet - how to prepare and roll out the pension "reform" - in AP he is responsible for domestic politics, and also how (and why) to digitize the elections, and also the experience of "placing" former subordinates from Rosatom to governor’s seats and many, many more useful experiences and, sure, businesses. He also has a talented son, who at 22 became chairman of the board of directors of one of the companies. It will be his hope, support and joy, so to speak. For the comment plus. He came to the same conclusion more than a year ago, when he realized that Kiriyenko was not able to "smear" publicly in the pension "reform."
    2. Artie Offline
      Artie (Artyom Korolev) 8 October 2019 13: 04
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Chemezov is an effective manager (without sarcasm). Galitsky would be a chic option, but unfortunately, who will give him.
    3. sgrabik Offline
      sgrabik (Sergei) 8 October 2019 16: 46
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      Kinder - surprise was already the prime minister, though not for long, just when it happened “Black Thursday”, during which the most severe collapse of our ruble took place, he is a great specialist in defaults, and not in the qualitative development of the national economy.
      1. Digital error Offline
        Digital error (Eugene) 8 October 2019 18: 09
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        Quote: sgrabik
        ... he is a great specialist in defaults.

        That is why it is valuable for the current leadership - there are no impossible tasks for it, it undertakes any work. In my opinion, for Yeltsin, he became a public “whipping boy,” no more. He took the blow of popular indignation and went into the shadows. The "family" owed him, it was time to return the favor - as I see it.
  6. Vkd dvk Offline
    Vkd dvk (Victor) 7 October 2019 21: 06
    +1
    • 3
    • 2
    And where did the author see an organized protest led by Chemezov? Do you miss Brezhnev’s approval? Bulk and any scum that organizes clashes on the street - is it better? Or is it better for the sane, cabinet employee to lead the sane opposition?
    1. Digital error Offline
      Digital error (Eugene) 8 October 2019 18: 16
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      Quote: wkd dvk
      ... is it better to head the sane opposition?

      Let me find out - what is “sane opposition”?
      Contractual, I mean, like the Communist Party, or what? In time "merging" protest and not insisting on real changes? Well, this is not an opposition, but a fiction. And the fiction is insane, since it claims to be the title of "opposition", which, in fact, is not.
  7. beeper Offline
    beeper 7 October 2019 22: 30
    +3
    • 4
    • 1
    WORDS are correct (theoretically, with them, and I agree! yes ) Techie S. Chemezov said, but whether he is aware of the degree of “health” of the “opposition” he is referring to - because “on its site” they so “organically sounded” and completely radical calls for targeted tracking down and brutally cracking down on children and law enforcement families .... ??!
    So it was with us on the Kiev "Euromaidan", and also the "wobbly" and unprincipled Ukrainian politicians mercantilely flirted with extremists, hoping for their "health", but they, interpreting these flirtations only as a weakness of the authorities and seeing their complete impunity, evil words quickly turned to vile villainous affairs (wouldn’t this happen in Russia, because the American puppeteers in the Russian “sound opposition” are the same as in the Bandera-Nazi “bloodthirsty unhealthy” ?!) ?!
    And then, at first "applauding the Maidan," dill Victor Yanukovych hurriedly fleeing from the capital and from the country! His "regional" VIP colleagues in Judomazepinism and the dashing razmaydan of Ukraine, instantly renounced their runaway patron and "pragmatically" transferred to the camp of "remnants-myzobulov, whole legislatively issued an anti-people and anti-state pro-American Maidan coup" !!!) self-fall "from the windows of Kiev high-rise buildings and ended up in prison ... after all, to traitors," werewolves "no one has faith!
    1. Lusis Offline
      Lusis (lusis) 8 October 2019 12: 01
      +3
      • 3
      • 0
      Yeah, as the party of regions rapidly “changed its shoes”, I just had a shock. How can one radically change one’s political views in a short time?
      1. beeper Offline
        beeper 8 October 2019 12: 23
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        It was, in fact, a situational alliance of kleptopolitikans of the Southeast! request
        By the way, the “cynical w / bandera” Waltzman-by “Roshen”, Janek’s fellow associate in the “razderiban” razderiban, was one of the founding fathers of this so-called “party” - before he “changed his shoes” to the same situational, thieves' coder of the “orange-faced” Doksin - so you can imagine their common Judomazepin “party ideology”!
  8. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 8 October 2019 07: 27
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Quote: wkd dvk
    And where did the author see an organized protest led by Chemezov?

    There were no such words in the article.
  9. Sergey Latyshev Offline
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 8 October 2019 09: 47
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    IMHO, bullshit all this reasoning. Whoever is appointed will be. As it was before, when there were little-known officials - for president.

    And rather, one of the old ones, Medvedev, for example, will go.
    How much will he be there in 24?
    Get ready to vote for Medvedev!
  10. Artie Offline
    Artie (Artyom Korolev) 8 October 2019 12: 57
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    Medvedev will be replaced in 2021.
  11. Artie Offline
    Artie (Artyom Korolev) 8 October 2019 12: 58
    +2
    • 2
    • 0
    Few things could be worse than Medvedev. Is that Chubais. Therefore, even ambiguous, but relatively effective, Chemezov would be a much better option than DAM.
    1. Digital error Offline
      Digital error (Eugene) 8 October 2019 18: 19
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Quote: Artie
      Few things could be worse than Medvedev.

      Today, tomorrow, not everyone can watch. Rather, not only everyone can watch, not everyone can do it.
  12. Dima Dima_2 Offline
    Dima Dima_2 (Dima Dima) 8 October 2019 14: 07
    +3
    • 3
    • 0
    It’s time to change Medvedev.
    1. sgrabik Offline
      sgrabik (Sergei) 8 October 2019 16: 52
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Yeah, MDA was clearly sitting in the prime minister’s chair.
      1. Digital error Offline
        Digital error (Eugene) 8 October 2019 18: 20
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        Maybe owed for what and fulfills?
        Well, or he knows a lot, and enemies are usually kept closer than friends - so that they are under supervision.
  13. Hassan Abdukhalikov (Hassan Abdukhalikov) 8 October 2019 23: 07
    +3
    • 3
    • 0
    Without the New Economic Policy, the new prime minister will not be any better than the previous one.
  14. Vkd dvk Offline
    Vkd dvk (Victor) 9 October 2019 13: 33
    -1
    • 1
    • 2
    Quote: DigitalError
    Quote: wkd dvk
    ... is it better to head the sane opposition?

    Let me find out - what is “sane opposition”?
    Contractual, I mean, like the Communist Party, or what? In time "merging" protest and not insisting on real changes? Well, this is not an opposition, but a fiction. And the fiction is insane, since it claims to be the title of "opposition", which, in fact, is not.

    This is the one that doesn’t take gangsters to the streets. Seen it. Dushanbe 1990. 12th of February. Barely got out of this democratic will. And not the Communist Party, calling back nowhere. In a regime that managed to ruin a millennial power in just 80 years. The opposition is competent, both in financial, legal, and other plans. Offering not 500-day-old ravings, but a development strategy based not on handouts from the enemy, but on their own. Put forward real and attractive to most ideas. Based on the initiative of everyone, and the strictest control (but not the participation of the state) in business. Around like our neighbor. It has become during the lifetime of one generation from an endangered starving country to the forefront.
  15. Vkd dvk Offline
    Vkd dvk (Victor) 9 October 2019 13: 46
    +2
    • 3
    • 1
    Quote: sgrabik
    Yeah, MDA was clearly sitting in the prime minister’s chair.

    I would say, I stayed at large. How many disgraces can one protect in a country? Okay, the power structures under the President are not accountable to him, but also in the economy of theft, starting from .... to Space. Where is the landing? Where is the confiscation? Where are the executions in the end?
    1. Digital error Offline
      Digital error (Eugene) 9 October 2019 18: 05
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      Quote: wkd dvk
      Where is the landing? Where is the confiscation? Where are the executions in the end?

      What to do is known. The question is, who will do this - his own ideological "admirers" sitting in warm places in fiscal and investigative-punitive bodies? Do you remember about Cherkalin / Zakharchenko? Do not you think that they did not appear there by chance, but as a result of many years of negative selection of personnel and in the absence of proper educational work with young people?
  16. Vkd dvk Offline
    Vkd dvk (Victor) 11 October 2019 20: 59
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    Quote: DigitalError
    Quote: wkd dvk
    Where is the landing? Where is the confiscation? Where are the executions in the end?

    What to do is known. The question is, who will do this - his own ideological "admirers" sitting in warm places in fiscal and investigative-punitive bodies? Do you remember about Cherkalin / Zakharchenko? Do not you think that they did not appear there by chance, but as a result of many years of negative selection of personnel and in the absence of proper educational work with young people?

    A disease called gangrene is treated with multiple blood substitutions in the body. Wash cells with fresh, healthy blood. What is more expensive - the death of the state or the planting of crooks by GENERATIONS, with the confiscation of property not only directly from them, but also from all relatives up to the 7th generation. DENOS Reward. Of course, not for slanderous, but for truthful. Will it hurt everyone? Yes. Will there be errors? Yes. But otherwise there is no gangrene.
    In China, in the early years of their perestroika, swindlers were shot by thousands a year. Now smaller. Two generations of brutal repressions for bribery will pass, and the nation will have an economy free of this infection.
    I do not know whether it is true or not, but Hitler in 40 ordered to overcome free rides in public transport.
    Caught and shot several hundred hares, explaining that they are the enemies of the nation. Ask today's Germans how are they doing with this business now?
  17. Vkd dvk Offline
    Vkd dvk (Victor) 11 October 2019 21: 09
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    The main candidate to replace Prime Minister Medvedev: who is he?
    The answer is clear - Putin V.V. Who will be the President? Medvedev? Not. He has already shown himself on all sides.