Why did Lukashenko need Ukrainian missiles

The day before, the first meeting of Presidents Lukashenko and Zelensky took place in Western Ukraine. At the same time, the Belarusian leader threw so many stones into the Russian garden at a time that it is impossible to ignore them. How does Alexander Grigoryevich intend to play the “Ukrainian card” this time?




President Lukashenko’s range of interests in Ukraine turned out to be much wider than one might have expected. With all the desire, it is difficult not to notice their clear anti-Russian orientation.

United Ukraine


As you know, Minsk “hovers” over the conflict between Moscow and Kiev, taking maximum advantage of it. It was the Belarusian capital that became the platform for taking control of the rebel republics of Donbass and preparing for their return to Ukraine. It is quite possible that it was the Belarusian peacekeepers that could become the guarantor of their security for the first time after the implementation of the Minsk agreements.

President Vladimir Zelensky confirmed that Belarus represents a reliable ally for Independent in achieving peace in his country. Alexander Lukashenko put it much cooler:

We are ready to do something together to ensure that Ukraine is united, holistic, powerful, so that even nobody can look askew here.


After the words about “united and integral Ukraine” and “sideways look” from the Belarusian leader, who did not recognize not only the DPR and LPR, but also the Crimea as Russian, his colleague Vladimir Putin clearly had to choke on tea.

Threat from the east


Alexander Grigorievich expressed himself in the spirit that there are some evil forces who want to separate Belarus and Ukraine, and, moreover, it can come not only from the West, but also from the East:

The more dear our states will be, the greater resistance we will feel.


Language issue


It is no secret that Kiev’s fundamental refusal to recognize Russian as the second state language has become one of the main prerequisites for the sad events of 2014. Direct communication in Russian was not prohibited, but the entire official workflow in the state is tied to mov. Moreover, most residents of Ukraine and Belarus use the Russian language. In this context, the statement about the special closeness of the Ukrainian and Belarusian languages ​​strained somewhat:

The languages ​​of both peoples are very close.


In other words, the focus is not on what unites Minsk and Kiev with Moscow, but on the fact that they de facto divide them.

Missiles


Alexander Grigoryevich said that Belarus is interested in creating its own missile program and asks Kiev for help about this:

We are working a lot on the development of the rocket industry in Belarus. We did not have such a production, but you have it. We are very interested in helping you with this.


This is where Sergey Shoigu should choke on tea. President Lukashenko responded to Moscow’s desire to open the Russian Defense Ministry’s air base near Bobruisk.

In general, the Belarusian leader in Zhitomir was annealed not childishly.
Used photos: http://news.21.by
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

32 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Victor N Offline
    Victor N (Victor n) 5 October 2019 13: 34
    +5
    • 8
    • 3
    Even in the reception no longer allowed! This is an ENEMY! And those who are with him.
    1. AICO Offline
      AICO (Vyacheslav) 5 October 2019 14: 00
      +6
      • 9
      • 3
      The same as 10 years ago, and 20 years ago, only more hypocritical, arrogant and less covered - grimaces already distort facial bones - tired portraits are portrayed when you have to grin !!!
  2. Nymp Offline
    Nymp (Boris) 5 October 2019 15: 47
    +5
    • 7
    • 2
    If Russia shuts off oxygen to Belarus, it will suffocate faster than Ukraine. Lukashenko - a full gigolo on Russian software. I wouldn’t have stood on ceremony with Putin, I like Banderlog Ukraine ?! Under the ass with a knee from the Eurasian Union and the CIS! Shuruy to your bandera, do a "miracle rocket"!
  3. steelmaker Offline
    steelmaker 5 October 2019 17: 27
    -4
    • 2
    • 6
    The author "exaggerates."
    1. Putin himself always supports the integrity of states - Serbia, Syria as an example.
    2. The threat, so nothing concrete at all - everyone understands to the extent of their depravity.
    3. Language, and what is the author in Belarus so annoying? In this matter, even Ukraine is not worth comparing.
    4. Missiles, so now only a dumb or dumb person would not want to have them. Conclusion - to discredit the Republic of Belarus, show more serious evidence.
    Yesterday, after a hard shift, we decided to undergo medical treatment at the entrance. They took Belarusian fat, without it the treatment would be incomplete, and now the conversation has started about RB. So, one admitted that he applied for citizenship of the Republic of Belarus in the spring. Just did not work out. They called him to the "organs" and held an educational conversation. I asked him: "WHY?"
    - I was there, I liked it. They immediately offered a job. If you are honest, there is nothing to fear. It shows that people are trying to do everything, not like ours - so that you choke! "And you know, not one hard worker did not dissuade him.
    1. polev66 Offline
      polev66 (Alexander) 5 October 2019 17: 56
      +1
      • 3
      • 2
      You need to be treated with medicines from the pharmacy, and not wine and vodka, you see - and there will be less delirium.
    2. bonifacius Offline
      bonifacius (Alex) 5 October 2019 18: 57
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      Have you tried smoking?
    3. 123 Offline
      123 (123) 5 October 2019 23: 50
      +7
      • 8
      • 1
      Putin himself always supports the integrity of states - Serbia, Syria as an example

      Does Lukashenko support the integrity of Serbia and Syria? If so, what does this mean? In the meantime, in Serbia something like this ...

      https://regnum.ru/news/polit/2656009.html

      And in Syria, he is ready to help in the restoration, that is, to master the contracts. Is he ready to wet the terrorists? Here is such an ally .....

      It is quite possible that it was the Belarusian peacekeepers that could become the guarantor of their security for the first time after the implementation of the Minsk agreements.

      He wants to put them on the border with Russia. winked In 2017, Belarus canceled visas for citizens of the United States, the European Union and others, only 80 countries. Canceled unilaterally. But what about a single space? request He just took it and opened the border without asking us. belay "Come in, dear guests." fellow And you can go anywhere, even to Russia. A week ago, Vice-Speaker of the Polish Parliament Gosevskaya came to Belarus, and she is on the list of people whose stay in the Union State is prohibited or undesirable. stop And after that he was going to control the border with Donbass?

      Language, and what is the author in Belarus so annoying? In this matter, even Ukraine is not worth comparing.

      Not yet worth it. In Ukraine, too, it was not immediately like that.

      Missiles, so now only a dumb or dumb person would not want to have them. Conclusion - to discredit the Republic of Belarus, show more serious evidence.

      Yes, Kim Jong-ying is not stupid, only for some reason he can’t sell rockets and Iran can’t, But Father needs, all kinds of non-proliferation treaties do not apply to him. laughing

      So, one admitted that he applied for citizenship of Belarus in the spring

      Did he just take it and file it? lol A person has the right to apply for citizenship after continuous residence for 7 years (Article 14. Law of the Republic of Belarus "On Citizenship" 136-З of 1.08.2002), but for now a residence permit. Check out the link:

      https://kodeksy-by.com/zakon_rb_o_grazhdanstve/14.htm

      laughing So, fairy tales about

      They called him to the "organs" and had an educational conversation

      and further in the text, you will tell your "steelwork crew". laughing They are not found here. hi
  4. Sapsan136 Offline
    Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 5 October 2019 18: 36
    +4
    • 5
    • 1
    Well, if so, then it’s time for the Russian Federation to completely stop financing the Republic of Belarus and notify Lukashenko that the political asylum in the Russian Federation, following Yanukovych’s example, does not shine for him!
  5. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 5 October 2019 18: 39
    -3
    • 2
    • 5
    Quote: steel maker
    The author "exaggerates."
    1. Putin himself always supports the integrity of states - Serbia, Syria as an example.

    Well, then you have to be consistent and give Crimea.
    1. 123 Offline
      123 (123) 6 October 2019 03: 48
      +6
      • 6
      • 0
      So smoothly from Lukashenko to the Crimea jumped. laughing
      How is it to give Crimea? Have you asked people? We have no serfs request . They exercised their right to self-determination. They said the rest of the day, "goodbye, pretty nenka," crying and voluntarily according to the results of the referendum became part of Russia good. Is Ukraine suing Gazprom, but embarrassed in Crimea? And anyway, maybe it’s better to give you away? sad
      1. Marzhecki Offline
        Marzhecki (Sergei) 7 October 2019 08: 44
        -1
        • 1
        • 2
        It was said that Putin is for the territorial integrity of other states. If so, then it is necessary to return Crimea to Ukraine to restore its integrity.
        If he is not going to return Crimea, then he does not support the territorial integrity of other states, in particular Ukraine.
        I'm talking about the principle of consistency.
        1. 123 Offline
          123 (123) 7 October 2019 09: 43
          0
          • 1
          • 1
          What, excuse me, principles? belay
          Do you want to give people away? am
          Have you forgotten to ask for their opinion? sad

          Quote: Marzhetsky
          It was said that Putin is for the territorial integrity of other states. If so, then it is necessary to return Crimea to Ukraine to restore its integrity.

          But the USSR does not need to be recreated? fellow Well, to be consistent and restore integrity. yes
        2. Bulanov Offline
          Bulanov (Vladimir) 7 October 2019 11: 29
          +1
          • 1
          • 0
          Russia still represents the USSR at the UN. Therefore, in your opinion, it is necessary to maintain territorial integrity and annex separatist territories back to the USSR?
    2. sgrabik Offline
      sgrabik (Sergei) 7 October 2019 09: 04
      +2
      • 3
      • 1
      Crimea has never been Ukrainian. People living in Crimea were always loyal only to Russia and considered themselves Russian, so what kind of return of the Crimea can there be any talk about, are you there, raving, or how ???
  6. Victor N Offline
    Victor N (Victor n) 6 October 2019 11: 32
    +3
    • 4
    • 1
    He speaks of Donbass not with Donetsk and Lugansk, but with Kiev. This is normal?
    Donetsk where it stood, there it stands. They approach, shoot and leave for him - in the diesel fuel kindly provided by Lukashenko. This, apparently, was to be loved more by future Belarusian peacekeepers. But so far, only Stalevar has a certain respect for Lukashenko.
    1. sgrabik Offline
      sgrabik (Sergei) 7 October 2019 09: 09
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      After excessively excessive use of fake vodka, respect can manifest itself and grow to anyone !!!
  7. the RASS Offline
    the RASS (Yaroslav C) 6 October 2019 21: 05
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    The day before, the first meeting of Presidents Lukashenko and Zelensky took place in Western Ukraine.

    Since when did Zhytomyr become Western Ukraine? Hitherto Zhytomyr Zapadenskaya was never.
    1. Marzhecki Offline
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 8 October 2019 14: 55
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Is it in the west of Ukraine?
      1. the RASS Offline
        the RASS (Yaroslav C) 13 October 2019 19: 40
        0
        • 0
        • 0
        Quote: Marzhetsky
        Is it in the west of Ukraine?

        Zhytomyr is located in the center of Ukraine. More precisely, in the north, but the population of Zhytomyr never considered themselves to be "zapadentsami", but, on the contrary, opposed themselves to them.
  8. Sergey Latyshev Offline
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 7 October 2019 10: 40
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    Right. While cheap - you have to take it. And rockets, and everything else.

    Old Man is a patriot. Belarusian oligarchs are not fools.
    1. Victor N Offline
      Victor N (Victor n) 7 October 2019 11: 01
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      However, there are enough fools for the "father". By the way: a patriot is when for a country, for people, and not for himself, his beloved.
      1. Sergey Latyshev Offline
        Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 7 October 2019 13: 21
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        So it is for the country. On a fig to him personally in the rocket garden?
  9. Vkd dvk Offline
    Vkd dvk (Victor) 7 October 2019 11: 24
    -1
    • 1
    • 2
    Quote: steel maker
    Conclusion - to discredit the Republic of Belarus, show more serious evidence.

    The mere statement of this attack in Germany, five years ago, that he "Chokes Russia with a pipe" is worth all the rest of his anti-Russian statements.
    She’s a bastard, and we have to deal with him.
  10. Bulanov Offline
    Bulanov (Vladimir) 7 October 2019 11: 25
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    If these words are true, then I doubt that Lukashenko is Belarusian by nationality. After all, it was the Ukrainian Nazis who burned the Belarusian Khatyn. It turns out that Lukashenko agrees with them? And how much more “Khatyn” in Belarus can burn out from such a “friendship”?
  11. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 7 October 2019 11: 40
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    Quote: Bulanov
    Russia still represents the USSR at the UN. Therefore, in your opinion, it is necessary to maintain territorial integrity and annex separatist territories back to the USSR?

    Do you even understand what I wrote?
  12. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 7 October 2019 11: 41
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    Quote: 123
    What, excuse me, principles? belay
    Do you want to give people away?am
    Have you forgotten to ask for their opinion? sad
    Quote: Marzhetsky
    It was said that Putin is for the territorial integrity of other states. If so, then it is necessary to return Crimea to Ukraine to restore its integrity.

    But the USSR does not need to be recreated? fellow Well, to be consistent and restore integrity. yes

    What kind of porridge in your head? .. where and whom did I offer to give?
    The commentator above wrote that Putin is for territorial integrity. I have denied this false thesis. That's all. Leaving Crimea as part of the Russian Federation, he is AGAINST the territorial integrity of Ukraine. That’s the whole logic.
    1. 123 Offline
      123 (123) 7 October 2019 23: 56
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Putin FOR territorial integrity. I have denied this false thesis.

      Not sure they have disproved. Watch your hands. winked Putin for the territorial integrity of countries. If you think that he should give Crimea, then in order to remain consistent, he needs to restore all these countries, including the USSR, and start exactly from this, so to speak, in chronological order. But he doesn’t do this, he doesn’t restore Serbia’s integrity either (the situation in Syria is somewhat different, but in fact there is a struggle against gangs, the country's integrity is not very restored, the Turks and Americans are not forced out, the Kurds are not touched). And yet, in Syria our troops, and they are there legally, do not comply with this condition in other countries.
      The question is, why does he not? Because he is the president of Russia, and not the "director" of the planet, and this is not his competence. Maintaining the integrity of other countries is not his responsibility; he simply does not have the authority to do so. In Ukraine, put Yanukovych where you got it, return the comrade, let him do it, that was his duty. Putin owes nothing to Ukraine. But Putin preserves the integrity of Russia. With him, the “parade of sovereignty” calmed down, he returned Chechnya and he would not give Crimea to anyone, for this would violate the integrity of the country. yes
      1. Marzhecki Offline
        Marzhecki (Sergei) 8 October 2019 14: 56
        0
        • 0
        • 0
        Sorry, this is not serious boltology.
        1. 123 Offline
          123 (123) 8 October 2019 17: 36
          0
          • 0
          • 0
          Sorry, this is not serious boltology.

          Well, of course. smile
          And yours

          ... since he is for the integrity of the countries, he must return Crimea.

          - this is to refute the thesis. sad 2 simple questions:
          Who does he owe?
          How to return Crimea without violating the territorial integrity of Russia?
  13. Marzhecki Offline
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 7 October 2019 11: 44
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Quote: Bulanov
    Russia still represents the USSR at the UN. Therefore, in your opinion, it is necessary to maintain territorial integrity and annex separatist territories back to the USSR?

    Russia is the successor of the USSR. If it was a question of restoring the USSR and annexing the territories, then in 2014 it was not necessary to push the whole of New Russia, which itself fell to its feet. Nobody is going to restore and attach anything, understand.
    1. 123 Offline
      123 (123) 8 October 2019 00: 13
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Sorry that I kind of got into someone else’s conversation, they wrote not to me. But still....

      Nobody is going to restore and attach anything, understand.

      If even the USSR is not going to restore anyone, then with what fright should Putin restore Ukraine? request
      And in New Russia, there were no legal grounds for the adoption of the Donbass, unlike the Crimea, there autonomy. In accordance with the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, a legitimate parliament decided to secede from Ukraine and after that, on the basis of a referendum, an independent republic was adopted in Russia. And that no one asked Ukraine, so look at the “Kosovo Precedent”, they tried to sue there.

      UN International Court of Justice ruled that Kosovo’s declaration of independence does not contradict international law

      https://news.un.org/ru/story/2010/07/1167021

      So, from a legal point of view, everything has been done flawlessly; Putin does not violate laws.
  14. Galar Offline
    Galar (Timur) 7 October 2019 12: 18
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Lukashenko will politicize with everyone who has in this world gold-milk substance from the main god in our world - the Golden Calf. What's so surprising? And Russia, and Ukria, and the rest of the world are fighting for gold, whoever snaps more is right - this is such a bad law of our corrupt world. Lukashenko preserves the Russian world and the Russian language, for which he is a plus. However, he said that if there is no Russian language, then people will simply lose their mind - this is Pashkevich’s thought. Therefore, no matter how these two Jews look - Lukashenko and Zelensky, but the Russian language is a determining position in moving forward. There will be no Russian language - there will be the Baltic states and the Zhidobandera.