Long line to the Minister: Lavrov’s speech at the UN caused a stir

16
Recently we Reported, as the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Sergey Lavrov, promised a “surprise” to the American “partners” for the visa scandal. And now, it became known that after Lavrov’s speech at the 74th session of the UN General Assembly, a queue of people wishing to communicate was lined up for him. This was written by the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, in her Facebook.



A queue at the UN Headquarters of representatives of international delegations wishing to communicate with the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs after his speech at the General Assembly. I love to watch the "isolation of Russia."

- signed a picture of Zakharov.



The photo from the UN Headquarters really turned out to be “talking”. There are no special explanations required.


It should be noted that during the speech of the head of the Russian foreign ministry, the hall was completely full. The Minister thanked the audience for the interest they showed in Russia's position on international issues. Lavrov noted that Russia will present a draft resolution aimed at strengthening and developing the system of agreements on arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation. He specified that Moscow calls for constructive negotiations on this issue.
  • https://www.afp.com/ и https://www.facebook.com/maria.zakharova.167
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    28 September 2019 21: 01
    One statement of fact and concern. You can’t expect anything else from Lavrov. After our delegation was not issued a visa, I would like more aggressive speeches and aggressive proposals - such as moving the UN to another place. But this is Lavrov -

    Guys, let's live peacefully!
    1. -2
      28 September 2019 22: 12
      And now without imagination, but in reality - how do you imagine today the transfer mechanism of the UN headquarters? wink
      1. 0
        29 September 2019 12: 39
        Elementary, if such tricks by the United States continue further, then the option of moving the UN headquarters is quite real.
        1. 0
          30 September 2019 04: 31
          Of course, the transfer of the UN headquarters is real, but it will take time, money and some effort (political). But the transfer of the next meeting of the UN General Assembly to another country (another city) is quite real, not very expensive and relevant right now. We offer countries and cities. In my opinion, the most acceptable countries are Switzerland (Geneva) or Portugal (Lisbon), from where, by the way, the UN Secretary General is born.
          1. +1
            30 September 2019 22: 30
            I'm talking about reality, not about fantasy. I would like that too, but you have to look at life as it is. Who will support this bootlegging, gentlemen dreamers? There ours at least knock a shoe on the UN rostrum in their proposals and requirements, but none of the other countries will twitch, especially from the remaining 4 countries (the founders of the UN).
            And you, like children in a sandbox, with unrealizable (at the given moment) dreams.
            PS You can still have some fun "pardon". This is about the same kindergarten as in Odnoklassniki - who is against corruption, put a class! wink
        2. -1
          30 September 2019 22: 45
          Quote: sgrabik
          ... then the option of moving the UN headquarters is real.

          What the hell do Americans need it for? And the Americans don’t need it, so no one needs it.
      2. +2
        30 September 2019 10: 13
        ... how do you imagine the transfer mechanism of the UN headquarters today?

        Absolutely normal - in Switzerland, for example, all the infrastructure for this has been around for a long time. Just take and carry everything. Every month the European Parliament went from city to city and nothing ... Does it cost money, yes, but not enough, do they have stupid expenses?
        And if you decide, for example, to transfer to China, then there they’ll just take everything and build it from scratch in an open field, I think for a year it’s about ...
    2. -2
      29 September 2019 15: 49
      Well of course you don’t need one. Need like Bolton. You think world leaders - they don’t understand who is worth what. Just not everyone can speak openly.
    3. -1
      29 September 2019 20: 49
      Quote: steel maker
      One statement of fact and concern. You can’t expect anything else from Lavrov. ..... But this is Lavrov.

      Yes, this is Lavrov. Our Foreign Ministry. A person who really does the country's policy and is responsible for his work. And you are nobody. Probably because you are foolish. Behind the sim and take it easy.
    4. +2
      29 September 2019 21: 10
      I agree ... Another "Chinese" warning ... Only China has already changed, but our "elite" has not ...
  2. -2
    29 September 2019 09: 31
    I will not argue with you, because there is no way to give a lobehnik and put a jaw on the back of your head! I expressed my opinion on the article. Damn, they took the fashion not to discuss the article, but to comment on the article. Not letting the Russian delegation go, they wiped their feet about RUSSIA once again, and Lavrov is again "white and fluffy".
    1. 0
      29 September 2019 18: 44
      Quote: steel maker
      I expressed my opinion on the article.

      And then sank to rudeness.

      Quote: steel maker
      Not letting the Russian delegation ...

      Quote: steel maker
      Lavrov is again "white and fluffy".

      What was required to prove: a standard set of template phrases - the main thing is to choose a "louder" nickname. And the fact that the comment is dissected is the fate of the first commentator, especially if he writes heresy, as in your case. And by a strange coincidence, the more game a person writes, the more then he is offended. laughing
    2. -2
      30 September 2019 22: 47
      Quote: steel maker
      Not letting in the Russian delegation, they again wiped their feet about RUSSIA.

      So they have such an opportunity.
      And now what? Do not sleep and worry at night?
  3. 0
    29 September 2019 12: 01
    The hall was completely full ...

    - it sounds a lot. )
    1. +1
      29 September 2019 12: 32
      And this is to the fact that when representatives of some other countries, for example, Ukraine, speak, the hall is always half empty.
  4. +1
    30 September 2019 09: 43
    As far as I understand, Lavrov is wise enough to give an adequate answer in any situation. Too harsh Russia is not something that it cannot afford, but it is simply not our style. So, for all the "softness", some manage to frighten the whole world with "aggressive Russia". You have to understand that there is actually a war going on, while ideological and economic, and try to enlist allies, and not add oil. In fact, Russia has one strategy: to carry truth and justice, as far as it is possible at all safely, and thereby to defeat the medieval Machiavellian essence of the so-called. "West".
    And to "move the UN", as we understand it, Russia's desire alone is not enough. The UN itself needs a decision, which seems unrealistic to me. Otherwise, we will "transfer" another organization and split the world, depriving the planet of even such a platform for communication.