Long line to the Minister: Lavrov’s speech at the UN caused a stir

Recently we Reported, as the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Sergey Lavrov, promised a “surprise” to the American “partners” for the visa scandal. And now, it became known that after Lavrov’s speech at the 74th session of the UN General Assembly, a queue of people wishing to communicate was lined up for him. This was written by the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, in her Facebook.




A queue at the UN Headquarters of representatives of international delegations wishing to communicate with the Russian Minister of Foreign Affairs after his speech at the General Assembly. I love to watch the "isolation of Russia."

- signed a picture of Zakharov.



The photo from the UN Headquarters really turned out to be “talking”. There are no special explanations required.


It should be noted that during the speech of the head of the Russian foreign ministry, the hall was completely full. The Minister thanked the audience for the interest they showed in Russia's position on international issues. Lavrov noted that Russia will present a draft resolution aimed at strengthening and developing the system of agreements on arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation. He specified that Moscow calls for constructive negotiations on this issue.
Photos used: https://www.afp.com/ and https://www.facebook.com/maria.zakharova.167
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

16 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. steelmaker Offline
    steelmaker 28 September 2019 21: 01
    0
    • 2
    • 2
    One statement of fact and concern. You can’t expect anything else from Lavrov. After our delegation was not issued a visa, I would like more aggressive speeches and aggressive proposals - such as moving the UN to another place. But this is Lavrov -

    Guys, let's live peacefully!
    1. akarfoxhound Offline
      akarfoxhound 28 September 2019 22: 12
      -2
      • 0
      • 2
      And now without imagination, but in reality - how do you imagine today the transfer mechanism of the UN headquarters? wink
      1. sgrabik Offline
        sgrabik (Sergei) 29 September 2019 12: 39
        0
        • 1
        • 1
        Elementary, if such tricks by the United States continue further, then the option of moving the UN headquarters is quite real.
        1. topograf Offline
          topograf (topograf) 30 September 2019 04: 31
          0
          • 1
          • 1
          Of course, the transfer of the UN headquarters is real, but it will take time, money and some effort (political). But the transfer of the next meeting of the UN General Assembly to another country (another city) is quite real, not very expensive and relevant right now. We offer countries and cities. In my opinion, the most acceptable countries are Switzerland (Geneva) or Portugal (Lisbon), from where, by the way, the UN Secretary General is born.
          1. akarfoxhound Offline
            akarfoxhound 30 September 2019 22: 30
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            I'm talking about reality, not about fantasy. I would like that too, but you have to look at life as it is. Who will support this bootlegging, gentlemen dreamers? There ours at least knock a shoe on the UN rostrum in their proposals and requirements, but none of the other countries will twitch, especially from the remaining 4 countries (the founders of the UN).
            And you, like children in a sandbox, with unrealizable (at the given moment) dreams.
            PS You can still have fun "remember." This is about the same kindergarten as in Odnoklassniki - who is against corruption, put a class! wink
        2. Savigne Offline
          Savigne 30 September 2019 22: 45
          -1
          • 0
          • 1
          Quote: sgrabik
          ... then the option of moving the UN headquarters is real.

          What the hell do Americans need it for? And the Americans don’t need it, so no one needs it.
      2. Pishenkov Offline
        Pishenkov (Alexey) 30 September 2019 10: 13
        +2
        • 2
        • 0
        ... how do you imagine the transfer mechanism of the UN headquarters today?

        Absolutely normal - in Switzerland, for example, all the infrastructure for this has been around for a long time. Just take and carry everything. Every month the European Parliament went from city to city and nothing ... Does it cost money, yes, but not enough, do they have stupid expenses?
        And if you decide, for example, to transfer to China, then there they’ll just take everything and build it from scratch in an open field, I think for a year it’s about ...
    2. mister-red Offline
      mister-red 29 September 2019 15: 49
      -2
      • 0
      • 2
      Well of course you don’t need one. Need like Bolton. You think world leaders - they don’t understand who is worth what. Just not everyone can speak openly.
    3. Dan Offline
      Dan (Daniel) 29 September 2019 20: 49
      -1
      • 1
      • 2
      Quote: steel maker
      One statement of fact and concern. You can’t expect anything else from Lavrov. ..... But this is Lavrov.

      Yes, this is Lavrov. Our Foreign Ministry. A person who really does the country's policy and is responsible for his work. And you are nobody. Probably because you are foolish. Behind the sim and take it easy.
    4. MATRICA Offline
      MATRICA (Alex) 29 September 2019 21: 10
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      I agree ... Another "Chinese" warning ... Only China has already changed, but our "elite" - no ...
  2. steelmaker Offline
    steelmaker 29 September 2019 09: 31
    -2
    • 2
    • 4
    I will not discuss with you, because there is no way to give a lobeshnik and put a jaw on the back of the head! I expressed my opinion on the article. Damn, they took the fashion not to discuss the article, but comments on the article. Not letting in the Russian delegation, they again wiped their feet about RUSSIA, and Lavrov is again “white and fluffy”.
    1. Paranoid50 Offline
      Paranoid50 (Alexander) 29 September 2019 18: 44
      0
      • 1
      • 1
      Quote: steel maker
      I expressed my opinion on the article.

      And then sank to rudeness.

      Quote: steel maker
      Not letting the Russian delegation ...

      Quote: steel maker
      Our Lavrov is again "white and fluffy."

      What was required to prove: the standard set of template phrases - the main thing is to choose the nickname “louder”. And the fact that the comment is being prepared is the fate of the first commentator, especially if heresy is written, as in your case. And by a strange coincidence, the more a person writes a big game, the more he is offended later. laughing
    2. Savigne Offline
      Savigne 30 September 2019 22: 47
      -2
      • 0
      • 2
      Quote: steel maker
      Not letting in the Russian delegation, they again wiped their feet about RUSSIA.

      So they have such an opportunity.
      And now what? Do not sleep and worry at night?
  3. nesvobodnaja Offline
    nesvobodnaja (Unfree Press) 29 September 2019 12: 01
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    The hall was completely full ...

    - it sounds a lot. )
    1. sgrabik Offline
      sgrabik (Sergei) 29 September 2019 12: 32
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      And this is to the fact that when representatives of some other countries, for example, Ukraine, speak, the hall is always half empty.
  4. Mich rozhdestvensky (Mich Rozhdestvensky) 30 September 2019 09: 43
    +1
    • 2
    • 1
    I understand that Lavrov is wise enough to answer adequately in any situation. Too harsh Russia is not something that it cannot afford, but it's just not our style. So, with all the “softness”, some people manage to frighten the whole world with “aggressive Russia”. We must understand that there is actually a war, while ideological and economic, and try to enlist allies, and not add oil. Russia actually has one strategy: to bring truth and justice, as far as it is safe possible, and thereby defeat the medieval Machiavellian essence of the so-called "West".
    And to "transfer the UN," as we understand it, Russia's desire alone is not enough. The UN itself needs a decision, which seems unrealistic to me. Otherwise, we will “transfer” another organization and split the world, depriving the planet of even such a platform for communication.