Trump accused socialism and communism of killing 100 millions of people

When some leaders of the Western world speak, one gets the feeling that they are openly raving or taking the rest of humanity for the mentally retarded. For example, at the 74th session of the UN General Assembly in New York (USA), US President Donald Trump said that the ghost of socialism is one of the most serious challenges for the stronghold of "democracy."




One of the most serious challenges for our country is the ghost of socialism, which destroys society and countries. The events in Venezuela remind us all that socialism and communism are not for the sake of justice, equality, not in order to defeat poverty.

- said Trump.

According to Trump, socialism and communism are needed only for the ruling class to have power. He stressed that the United States will never become a socialist country.

In the last century, socialism and communism killed 100 million people. Unfortunately, we see in Venezuela that the death toll in this country is growing.

Trump added meaningly.

It should be noted that this is not the first time that Trump speaks out in this way in relation to socialism and communism. In 2018, from the rostrum of the UN General Assembly, he called on the whole world (all humanity) to rally in the fight against socialism.

It should be recalled that relatively recently, in historical terms, in the unequal struggle with the “hand of the market”, “human rights”, “freedom of conscience” and “democracy”, about 100 million Indians in the United States fell. Reservations for the indigenous population are still preserved there. At the same time, Britain, expanding its colonial empire, has destroyed more than 200 million people in China, India, Africa and Australia. France did the same in Indochina and Africa, though on a smaller scale. Microscopic Belgium, under the leadership of King Leopold II, has destroyed millions of inhabitants of the Belgian Congo, a huge country in Africa, now known as Zaire, or the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

And after that, Trump has the audacity to say something about socialism. Indeed, under socialism in the twentieth century, it, without a doubt, implies the struggle of the colonies around the world against Great Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands (Holland), Spain and the USA. Yes, yes, the USA also had colonies - the Philippines and Cuba. In addition, socialism and communism fought against fascism and Nazism (born precisely of the West) during the Second World War.

At the same time, Trump's cynicism does not surprise us, because for him and others like him, any increase in social guarantees for workers is “socialism and communism”. However, we hope that from the same rostrum of the UN, one of the leaders of the states will take the liberty and voice the results of colonialism, demanding appropriate compensation. After all, the well-being of modern Western society is built on the ruined millions of lives in the colonies.
Photos used: https://www.kp.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

17 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. gorenina91 Offline
    gorenina91 (Irina) 25 September 2019 10: 47
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    Gives to Trump ... - the socialist himself, but also rolls a barrel on socialism ... -Hahah ...
    1. Vyacheslav E. Offline
      Vyacheslav E. (Vyacheslav Evdokimov) 25 September 2019 11: 16
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      Only socialism will save mankind from the barbaric extermination of all earthly resources for the sake of the profit of the capitalists, this is already obvious. Capitalism is the creation of a society of indefatigable consumers, and now it is necessary to move on to asceticism. Only the necessary, more attention to man, his health, healthy food, healthy ecology.
    2. Savigne Offline
      Savigne 25 September 2019 12: 35
      -4
      • 0
      • 4
      Quote: gorenina91
      Gives to Trump ... - the socialist himself, but also rolls a barrel on socialism ...

      He rolls the barrel not to socialism, but to “Soviet socialism” (probably, to avoid confusion, it is more convenient to call it “communism”). Which has nothing to do with real socialism. This is another Soviet verbiage.
      1. gorenina91 Offline
        gorenina91 (Irina) 26 September 2019 14: 03
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        Since you, too, put pretty cons, then I will answer you ...

        He rolls the barrel not to socialism, but to “Soviet socialism” (probably, to avoid confusion, it is more convenient to call it “communism”). Which has nothing to do with real socialism. This is another Soviet verbiage.

        "Soviet socialism" is no worse than all the rest ... "social-democratic undertakings" ... - And in many respects ... - this is how Marx himself refuted and perplexed ...
        - Actually, in Russia social ... as such, began to lose many of its social principles ...
        - After WWII, there was no need to make all kinds of “peculiar tricks” and attempts to “make friends with families” with cap-and-misses ...
        - War is over; divided the world; they made atomic bombs and ... and ... and ... and went to different angles ... And no debts for the USSR ... - no Lend-Lease returns ... - no "Paris clubs", etc. d ...
        - In the USSR itself, all republics and autonomies are abolished (as having fulfilled their functions), and the task is set to infuse into the USSR new European states that were freed from fascism and defeated ... - the only way ...
        - Work ... - more than enough ... - there is no time for youth to hang out ... - study, work, order, create, create ... - the whole North; all south; the whole East; and most of the West ... - at your service ... - And there is also Cosmos ahead ... ... - a field for endless development ... and prosperity ...
        - The topic is big ...
        1. Savigne Offline
          Savigne 1 October 2019 14: 03
          -2
          • 0
          • 2
          Quote: gorenina91
          "Soviet socialism" is no worse than all the others ..

          And no worse than German National Socialism?

          Quote: gorenina91
          ... even Marx himself.

          And who is Marx?
          The loser who wrote nonsense to nobody (at first)?

          Quote: gorenina91
          ..in Russia social-m ..

          There was no socialism in Russia. He was in the USSR.

          Quote: gorenina91
          ..no Lend-Lease returns ...

          The USSR never paid a single penny for a land lease. Because that one, in terms of money, was FREE.

          Quote: gorenina91
          ..and the task is to infuse into the USSR new European states that were freed from fascism and defeated ... - the only way ...

          Those. annexation of European countries?
          And who would allow the USSR to do this?
          In addition, European countries were not freed from fascism. They were recaptured from the Nazis (not fascists) in the form of booty.

          Quote: gorenina91
          .. study, work, build, create, create ...

          Create, study and create in a kind of slave society called "Soviet socialism"?
          Did you go to school? Why did one OEF in the course of evolution replace another passed?
          The fact of the matter is that the slaveholding OEF in any form is COMPETITIVE. And loses even to the feudal OEF. Not to mention the capitalist OEF.
          You do not know basic things.

    3. Sake Offline
      Sake (Sake) 26 September 2019 13: 12
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      The Germans also had socialism, but only for their nation ...
  2. And in America, Negroes hang! This is terrible!
    1. Sake Offline
      Sake (Sake) 26 September 2019 13: 13
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Yes, and on email. send the chair, the most brutal ...
  3. Savigne Offline
    Savigne 25 September 2019 12: 29
    -4
    • 0
    • 4
    Trump has accused socialism and communism of killing 100 million people.

    Exact numbers are still awaiting their researchers. But one thing is certain, the crimes were colossal. It seems that no Nazis and other medieval inquisitors even lay next to them.

    According to Trump, socialism and communism are needed only for the ruling class to have power.

    In the USSR there was a classless society (although the opposite was stated), so there was no ruling class there. Class society is a higher stage in the development of society, feudal. And in the slave-holding USSR he had an owner (owner). At first it was Dzhugashvili alone, to whom everything belonged: fields, meadows, pigs, people, etc. Then this owner (collectively), after a palace coup during the time of Khrushchev, became members of the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee.

    Unfortunately, we see in Venezuela that the death toll in this country is growing.

    It is not entirely clear what relation Venezuela has to socialism and communism. Doesn’t Trump notice Cuba under his nose? Or is there simply no oil?

    Reservations for the indigenous population are still preserved there.

    The author does not even know what a “reservation” is and why the native population of the USA is holding onto these reservations with their teeth. And it will continue to hold on.

    ... about 100 million Indians in the United States fell.
    Great Britain, expanding its colonial empire, has destroyed more than 200 million people. Microscopic Belgium, under the leadership of King Leopold II, has destroyed millions of inhabitants.

    Shooter translation is a favorite move. "What I stole there, you look at Vasya." However, the Criminal Code does not agree with this approach.

    Indeed, under socialism in the twentieth century, he, without a doubt, means the struggle of the colonies around the world.

    Then the conjecture went.
    In fact, the national liberation struggle has nothing to do with either socialism or communism.

    In addition, socialism and communism fought against fascism and Nazism (born precisely of the West) during the Second World War.

    So what?
    In addition, when they fought, and when and together Poland and Eastern Europe were tanned.
    In addition, the USSR practically did not fight against the Nazis (in the USSR there was only an Italian expeditionary force), only against the Nazis.

    However, we hope that from the same rostrum of the UN, one of the leaders of the states will take the liberty and voice the results of colonialism, demanding appropriate compensation.

    Again will translate the arrows.

    After all, the well-being of modern Western society is built on the ruined millions of lives in the colonies.

    The statement is extremely arrogant. The colonial system does not exist soon for 100 years. And the standard of living of the "colonialists" is growing and growing. At the same time, the standard of living of the "liberated colonies" basically only decreases.
    1. Sake Offline
      Sake (Sake) 26 September 2019 13: 23
      -2
      • 0
      • 2
      Reprimanding white settlers in the USA for killing a lot of buffaloes, they deprived the Indians of their main source of livelihood, which, of course, is true, and this is bad. But fans of Comrade Stalin conducted the same experiment with the Kazakhs in the 30s, when cattle were nationalized among Aboriginal nomads and their lifestyles habitual for centuries - nomadism - were canceled! This crime cost the diaspora more than 4 million lives and 1,2 million Kazakhs were able to go abroad. Only Nazarbayev keeps this subject on the brakes, with the advent of youth there will be a court of the history of communism in the Republic of Kazakhstan and criminals will be named both in Moscow and in Kazakhstan!
      1. Savigne Offline
        Savigne 1 October 2019 14: 05
        -2
        • 0
        • 2
        Quote: Sake
        With the advent of youth, there will be a court of the history of communism in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

        He will be everywhere. With time. As society develops. It's unavoidable.
  4. Port Offline
    Port 25 September 2019 12: 42
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    This is less than the Indians destroyed in the hegemordor, and if you still count the bison, it becomes completely sad.
    1. Savigne Offline
      Savigne 25 September 2019 14: 55
      -3
      • 0
      • 3
      Quote: Port
      This is less than the hegemore of the Indians destroyed.

      Are you indian
      And if not, why are you so worried about them?
  5. Port Offline
    Port 25 September 2019 15: 17
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Quote: Savigne
    Are you indian

    Are you a bison? Wow, one survived ...
  6. Sake Offline
    Sake (Sake) 26 September 2019 13: 09
    -2
    • 0
    • 2
    Over the past 100 years, whirling in a circle, Russia has returned to the tsar, to priests, to the gendarmes (represented by the Russian Guard, only several times more), theft and corruption on an unprecedented scale in history, having lost territory and approx. 80 million people!
    1. Kuzmitsky Offline
      Kuzmitsky (Sergei) 26 September 2019 19: 01
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      In order to return to something, you must first get away from something. Do you reproach Russia for having a tsar, priests and gendarmes? If you decipher, then we are talking about the head of state, the people responsible for the ideology (or mythology) and law enforcement agencies. So all this in Russia has always been, only called differently in different eras. And not only in Russia, but also in any country in the world. If this is not the case, then a complete and unlimited mess sets in. And about the unprecedented theft and corruption ... I saw this world and not that.
    2. Savigne Offline
      Savigne 1 October 2019 14: 24
      -2
      • 0
      • 2
      Quote: Sake
      Over the past 100 years of wandering in a circle, Russia has returned to the Tsar, to the priests, to the gendarmes

      I do not agree.
      At the beginning of the 20th century in Russia there was a fully formed, developed, and even slightly decayed autocracy. Those. feudal society.
      The time of his death (with transformation into a bourgeois society) has not come yet and, apparently, this time would be appropriate somewhere in the middle of the 20th century. But what happened happened.
      So, we state, RI at the beginning of the 20th century. was at the penultimate (but not the last) stages of the feudal OEF.
      Nowadays, the Russian Federation (there is nothing in common between RI and the Russian Federation, but the names are consonant) is in interphase. That is, it rushed from the slave-owning society (such a society in the USSR was called "Soviet socialism") forward, into the feudal one, crushed the resistance of the right scoops (shooting of the armed forces), but then rolled back a little. From the first phase of feudalism back to the interphase. Power has changed.
      In this position, she is now.
      What's next?
      It is impossible to stay in the interphase for a very long time, crash is inevitable sooner or later. The option that power will change again and society will move forward into the feudal OEF (its first phase) is negligible. Society has lost the momentum of moving forward.
      It is much more likely to roll back and restore some truncated variation of Owls. Union in a new, tragicomic form. And not for long. After that, the country will finally crumble into its component parts. The fate of the population is extremely unenviable. The standard of living of modern Ukraine seems to be happiness.
      Perhaps the restoration attempt will be unsuccessful. Then everything will happen faster.
      This is very unpleasant for me, but the most realistic forecast is just that.
      And of course, the penultimate phases of feudal society (RI), this is a much higher level of development of society than the interphase between the slaveholding and feudal OEF (RF).
  7. The comment was deleted.