On the web there were photos of crashed in military exercises combat vehicles of the Russian airborne

23 September 2019 15

During the exercises “Center-2019” at the Donguz training ground in the Orenburg region during the airborne landing equipment the parachute systems did not work for two airborne combat vehicles (BMD).

After falling from a height of one and a half kilometers and hitting the ground, both combat vehicles turned into a pile of mangled scrap metal.
Landing technique was carried out without a crew, so the emergency happened without casualties.

Currently, the Ministry of Defense experts are establishing the reasons why the parachute systems failed.

In social networks, photos of the fallen BMD appeared. The photographs show that the cars were damaged, excluding the possibility of their recovery.

Landing of military equipment is one of the most technically complex operations, therefore, similar incidents periodically happen in other armies of the world that have airborne troops.

Recall that earlier on the network there was a video with the failure of four parachute systems when landing armored vehicles "Humvee" in the exercises of the US armed forces.

http://www.strategic-bureau.com

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

beeper

+2

23 September 2019 09: 12

So when the Americans fell four "Humvees", it seems, was specially set up by something offended "parachute" sergeant ?! But together with a group of the American military who cheerfully commented on what was happening, we were very happy about that video report on YouTube - the foe has minus four all-terrain vehicles ...
And here they are guilty of strong winds at a speed of 15 meters per second (with the standard limitation for the dumping of equipment at 8 m / s?), Which prevented the BMD hashes from opening normally? And not at all happy about the sight of Russian cars crashed into the trash ....
It’s good that there were no human casualties ... unless, of course, they tell us the whole truth?
1. Pishenkov
  
  +2
  
  23 September 2019 20: 26
  
  ... all the same, they should have opened up, and in the wind, then later there would have been more problems with landing. But parachute machines are not visible at all. Only one on one. So, apparently, it’s not the wind ...
  1. beeper
    
    0
    
    23 September 2019 20: 48
    
    Parachutes are visible (open and unopened, in the packs from under the wreckage of the BMD hulls peep out-the lower photo-on the right a green bundle "in a white cage" from under the remnants of the fenders can be seen, and on the Web, in many other photos of these broken armored vehicles, there are unopened parachutes and the details of the cargo parachute system are clearly visible!) and the halyards are extended beyond the borders of the photo ...
    1. Pishenkov
      
      +1
      
      23 September 2019 21: 55
      
      Well, I only saw these photos, I won’t guess. But the wind speed itself should definitely not affect the opening of the parachute. They, apparently, did not even get out of the containers ...
      1. beeper
        
        +1
        
        24 September 2019 02: 24
        
        I'm certainly not an expert on parachutes and airborne landing, I only know that laying parachutes and storing them before use is a holy science that does not forgive the slightest negligence and ignorance - all the rules here (as in aviation in general!) Are written in blood, and that damp parachute in the cold can fail ....
        As not alien to aviation and aerodynamics, I know that after the discharge of the cargo, its initial stabilization in the incoming (with the speed of the plane, helicopter plus or minus relative to the direction and speed of the wind at working altitude) air flow is very important.
        Otherwise, there may be problems with the deployment of the parachute system (if the platform with the load tumbles in a too disturbed air flow and at the same time "obscures" the pilot chute or somehow hooks and twists its halyard ?!).
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +2
        
        24 September 2019 10: 13
        
        ... I’m not an expert in landing technology, but I jumped a couple of times and the landing of technology saw. The weather is not the same as freezing a wet parachute, but an exhaust halyard, unless of course it was correctly prepared inside the aircraft, the parachute will be pulled out by anyone and no wind will affect it. It was revealed, it was not revealed, how it was revealed - this is a different question. And there, along the way, they did not even stretch out of the containers, not all at least. So the error or defect, apparently, was still when laying or in the function of the exhaust halyard, maybe in its fastening in an airplane, etc. ...
2. Syoma_67
  
  0
  
  24 September 2019 18: 38
  
  eggs interfere with a bad dancer
sgrabik

+3

23 September 2019 09: 21

The main thing is to draw from the incident all the necessary and timely conclusions, identifying and eliminating the shortcomings that were the cause of this incident.
Sergey Latyshev

0

23 September 2019 09: 51

It happens. But do the Amers calmly take off the landing and do not steam?
1. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
  
  -1
  
  23 September 2019 14: 39
  
  Quote: Sergey Latyshev
  It happens. But do the Amers calmly take off the landing and do not steam?
  
  Well, they don’t take a steam bath, until the moment when all this is done, they will not be hanged at the expense of them.
  1. Sergey Latyshev
    
    0
    
    24 September 2019 09: 06
    
    So do not hang. There’s how they rumble behind the scenes
SERGEY SERGEEVICS

0

23 September 2019 14: 45

The main thing is that all the soldiers are alive and well, and they will write off the equipment and put in a new one, but the writings, they now have a lot to do.
1. Pishenkov
  
  +1
  
  23 September 2019 20: 23
  
  The main thing is that all the soldiers are alive and well.
  
  - let's hope so. Everything else, in principle, is a matter of technology. It happens. Unpleasant of course, but it happens. To this end, exercises are also conducted in order to avoid such things as much as possible in battle. For one, apparently, the parachutes worked partially, while the other did not. Unless, of course, the photo was taken in the original position
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

-1

23 September 2019 18: 51

Guilty to shoot, replace wedges, continue the exercises! Alive!
Anchonsha

+1

24 September 2019 09: 35

A serious setback with equipment during landing is not good for the general army. This suggests crappy specialists in the unit. It is good that the landing was carried out without warriors. Whatever the results, the responsibility should be borne by whoever led. After all, all factors should be taken into account during such operations, and first of all the movement of air masses in the region.