The State Department demanded that Russia respect the rights of extremists

US Department of State spokeswoman Morgan Deann Ortagus, born 1982, a certified counterterrorism expert, called on Moscow to respect the rights of supporters of Jehovah's Witnesses, an extremist religious organization banned in Russia. After all, Washington does not care about the Russian Federal Law “On Countering Extremist Activities,” since they are used to using double standards.




Ortegus announced that "the United States is deeply concerned about the decision of the court in Saratov" who imprisoned and isolated six members of the said organization (sect) from society "for their peaceful religious activities." After that, the representative of the State Department and the uncompromising fighter for the rights of extremists demanded that Moscow begin to "respect the right of its citizens to freedom of religion" and "stop falsely accusing it."

We remind you that on September 10, 2019, the US State Department imposed sanctions (restrictions) on two representatives of the investigative authorities of Russia. We are talking about the head of the investigative department, Vladimir Yermolaev and his subordinate, senior investigator Stepan Tkache, whom Washington suspected of "torture, cruel, inhuman, degrading treatment of members of Jehovah's Witnesses in Surgut."

It is necessary to add in April 2017 the Supreme Court of Russia, after studying the evidence, recognized the organization Jehovah's Witnesses as extremist. In August 2017, the Ministry of Justice of Russia added the sect to the list of extremist structures whose activities are prohibited in the country. After that, “inflammation” began in the West on religious grounds.
Photos used: https://apral.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

28 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Jehovah’s are CIA agents, we’ll transplant everyone!
    1. Sapsan136 Offline
      Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 22 September 2019 11: 23
      +6
      • 7
      • 1
      They are criminals, as far as I know. This sect is seen in the squeeze of near-minded citizens of real estate, and people were addicted to drugs ...
      1. bobba94 Offline
        bobba94 (Vladimir) 22 September 2019 22: 00
        -1
        • 1
        • 2
        My friend divorced me like this into two bottles of cognac. I came to a dispute on the selection of apartments by the Jehovahists, well, I argued with him that they were being selected. And a relative of her friend worked in the archive of the regional department of justice, she said that over the past 8 years there have been scammers in conspiracy with district and notaries, banks are being taken away, relatives are being taken away, and witnesses have not been noticed. To be honest, they are much more dangerous. It turns out. that for them the existing power is not power at all, and so, some impostors, they can’t take up arms, they can’t fight ... people who are terrible for the authorities.
        1. Sapsan136 Offline
          Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 22 September 2019 22: 06
          +1
          • 1
          • 0
          This does not mean anything ... I have other information and a living person whom they tried to fool so among friends.
        2. Dan Offline
          Dan (Daniel) 24 September 2019 08: 28
          0
          • 0
          • 0
          Quote: bobba94
          and witnesses are not seen in this

          Well of course. Stupid and psychologically processed "followers" themselves give their apartments and do not complain to the authorities.
  2. Sapsan136 Offline
    Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 22 September 2019 11: 22
    +6
    • 6
    • 0
    And why the United States does not respect those whom they themselves consider extremists, but rot them in prisons without trial, or arrange an accident for them, at the hands of their young men from the CIA ?! Do not give the Russian Federation such advice!
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 22 September 2019 21: 52
      +6
      • 6
      • 0
      There is only one answer: ALL US statements about freedom of speech, economic activity, religion, conscience are FALSE from beginning to end, designed to impose its political and economic activities and aimed at overthrowing the existing system (whatever it is in Russia) and the destruction of the Russian Federation as countries, as an ethnos, as a civilization, as they did with the indigenous population of North America. Because the United States does not have ANY right, including moral, to tell Russia (and any other country in the world) what to do with criminals who break the law.
  3. valeriy7 Offline
    valeriy7 (Valery) 22 September 2019 13: 41
    +6
    • 6
    • 0
    Russia listens, but closes the Yankees "ideological offices." It is necessary to close all these NGOs and, in addition, drive out the German Adenauer Foundation, as the Old Man did in Belarus.
    1. A.Lex Offline
      A.Lex (Secret information) 22 September 2019 21: 54
      +1
      • 1
      • 0
      Valera, and maybe also because of this RB is not in a hurry to create a joint state?
      1. Sapsan136 Offline
        Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 22 September 2019 22: 04
        +4
        • 4
        • 0
        All these Soviet shovels belong to the Russian Federation in the same way ... they need Russia only as a cash cow, and in return they are not ready to give anything, or those crumbs that the Russian Federation can easily manage without ... (the game is not worth the candle) and the potato Sasha is here not an exception ... They are most dear to their independence, and it rests on Russophobia. That’s why they don’t eliminate the red-white Natsiks in the Republic of Belarus ... because Yanukovych flirted with the Bandera people ... They all want to sit as kings, give them free rein - they will make a state from every city, just to sit there as a king.
        1. A.Lex Offline
          A.Lex (Secret information) 1 October 2019 08: 48
          +2
          • 2
          • 0
          I consider myself a Soviet person. Therefore, agreeing with most of your statements, I want to ask you not to offend the Soviet system and not to rush words, such as "soviet". You are not like Savigne (I’ll remember by night), I hope ... Yes, the Soviet government made too many mistakes, the critical limit of which led to the destruction of the USSR, but that does not mean that everything was wrong there? Most were true in state building.
          In addition, if there had been no USSR, most likely, you and I would not have been. Let us treat the history of our country with due respect. For, whatever system we have is one and the same country.
          1. Sapsan136 Offline
            Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 1 October 2019 17: 25
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            I warmly recall the USSR, but I hate the Soviet national minorities, patients with Russophobia ... like Bandera and Basmachi. For reasons you understand ...
            1. A.Lex Offline
              A.Lex (Secret information) 3 October 2019 08: 50
              +1
              • 1
              • 0
              I agree, Peregrine Falcon.
  4. nov_tech.vrn Offline
    nov_tech.vrn (Michael) 22 September 2019 13: 49
    +5
    • 5
    • 0
    The desk is purely state-born, and money flowed in there too, so why shouldn’t they be worried for their own, have they drowned for Basayevites for a long time?
  5. Bitter Offline
    Bitter (Gleb) 22 September 2019 16: 23
    -1
    • 0
    • 1
    US State Department spokesman Morgan Ortegus ...

    Wow, this is Miss Ortagus. It could have been in a dark place to a warm wall ... or something like that. Pretty. But she doesn’t say that, so well - she reads what they give from the editorial office.

    After all, Washington does not care about the Russian Federal Law ....

    No wonder they have their own laws and legislators. There is even the option that they are similar, but the interpretations very often depend on the goals set and diverge in opposite directions.
    1. Alf Offline
      Alf (Vasiliy) 22 September 2019 21: 33
      0
      • 0
      • 0
      Quote: Bitter
      It could have been in a dark place to a warm wall ... or something like that.

      To not see the face.
    2. Nina Offline
      Nina 24 September 2019 12: 40
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      without proper make-up, cosmetics, designer and maybe plastics will not be broadcast in the USA! The only thing she forgot to put on beads was to be exactly like Psaki ("I don’t know anything, I don’t remember anything, I don’t understand anything, I need to go up to the office to look or ask for information, I carry out the State Department’s policy and do only my job, working off my salary. .. ") !!!!!
  6. steelmaker Online
    steelmaker 22 September 2019 16: 27
    +5
    • 5
    • 0
    And so as not to be pointed out and not required, you must first put Ukraine in its place and begin to respect yourself.

    Without respect, life is a trifle - water is empty for an empty stomach.
  7. LeftPers Offline
    LeftPers (Anton) 23 September 2019 09: 13
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    At the pin-dos, the borzometer seems to have malfunctioned; they stick their shabby nose where the dog did not poke anything.
  8. Come on Offline
    Come on 23 September 2019 16: 44
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    a country where it is legal! the church of Satan is functioning! (you can google it) ... it would be worth it just to shut the blew!)
  9. Monster_Fat Offline
    Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 23 September 2019 17: 44
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    And who is an "extremist"? An "extremist" is an overly, exaggerated person, and most importantly, publicly expressing his dissatisfaction, or one who commits actions "exaggerated" necessary in some situation. Well, for example, you came to the store and took away the new price tags, you thought to yourself: Well, not a shit to yourself! "- everything is fine here, you are a simple respectable citizen. But if you loudly begin to express your dissatisfaction with the raised prices, attracting attention the rest of the buyers, then it’s quite possible for you to “solder” “extremism,” especially if others start supporting you or you waving something, push something off a shelf or smash it. “Extremism” is a very “interesting” thing that you can solder , in principle, to any citizen.
    1. Pishenkov Offline
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 23 September 2019 18: 16
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      ... if a citizen “waving his arms and knocks something off a shelf”, not by chance, mind you, but in the process of publicly expressing his indignation in an obviously unlawful way, then he deserves an “article” on his neck ... And if a couple of such it’s also really possible to put in a year or two, not for a couple of days and not community service, namely in the zone ... Then, then, citizens will begin to learn to publicly express their point of view in more civilized ways ... within the framework of law and decency, and without damage to others ...
  10. Pishenkov Offline
    Pishenkov (Alexey) 23 September 2019 18: 08
    +2
    • 2
    • 0
    US deeply concerned about court ruling in Saratov

    - without even touching on the topic of sects, extremism, etc., I really want to take and send these “troubled” citizens far and very rudely ... The softest thing that comes to the language is what kind of dog thing they do before the trial in Saratov? Let them deal with Oklahoma or New Jersey, for example, there probably also have their own problems ...
  11. olbert Offline
    olbert (Albert) 23 September 2019 20: 47
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    Respect the rights of extremists ???
  12. Verkhomnapule Offline
    Verkhomnapule (OLEG) 24 September 2019 10: 18
    +2
    • 2
    • 0
    these sectarian creatures do not need to be planted, but in uranium mines with kyle !!!!!!!
  13. Nina Offline
    Nina 24 September 2019 12: 33
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    Let the US “respect” its bandits and criminals! That’s why they have residents and are forced to sleep with pistols under their pillows, because the state does not protect them! We’ll sort it out ourselves somehow. We have our own laws, which we consider fair
  14. intervention Offline
    intervention (ECUMENISM PROSELITISM) 24 September 2019 13: 16
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    The late Zadornov is right:

    Well stupid!
  15. Gennady Bedokur Offline
    Gennady Bedokur (Gennady) 25 September 2019 18: 26
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    This Miss Ortagus would go to the oval office to take vitamins - she was already clearly waiting for her there.