Netanyahu said that prevented a clash between Russia and Israel in Syria

12 September 2019 8

The contradictions between the tasks of the Russian Air Force and Israeli military operations during the operation in Syria were so great that they would inevitably lead to a clash of the parties.

About this in an interview with the Russian edition RBC Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said.

According to him, the Israeli Prime Minister’s direct contact with Russian President Vladimir Putin helped to avoid such a development of events.

Netanyahu noted that such coordination was possible only because he and the Russian leader respect each other and can talk on equal terms, calling things by their proper names.

The conversation between the head of the Israeli government and the Russian publication took place on the eve of negotiations between Putin and Netanyahu, at which the heads of the two states will discuss the current situation in the Middle East region and the prospects for further cooperation between Moscow and Tel Aviv in various areas.

Recall that in order to prevent incidents during military operations in Syria, in 2015, the communication mechanism between Russia and Israel began its work.

The main link in this communication, which allows promptly resolving any issues and avoiding misunderstandings, is the line of communication between the Russian air base Khmeimim in Syria and the Israeli command and staff complex Kiriya in Tel Aviv.

https://www.thesun.co.uk

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Sergey Latyshev

0

12 September 2019 11: 48

What? Shoigu praised coordination with the US in Syria, and Netanyahu too ...
Pishenkov

-1

12 September 2019 12: 13

... well, after all, at least one of their airplanes should have been shot down ... At least to strengthen relations, so to speak ... The Turks overtook our "Drying", and soon the GDP with Erdogan was almost fraternize, eat ice cream together and meet more often than with their own relatives, probably .... Even with America, the Ottomans have now quarreled and are buying our weapons. How. Well, if you shoot down three pieces, then, probably, Netanyahu and Crimea will finally recognize the Russian, and maybe Donbass too in advance ... but if the crews are not allowed to eject ...
Gloomy? Nothing. Life is like that. Big politics.
1. Natan bruk
  
  -1
  
  12 September 2019 17: 41
  
  Here, probably, the thing is that to “shoot down planes” of a high-tech enemy is not for lovers in the desert to drive and confront the formidable ISIS air defense, and no less formidable Igilov aviation. Yes, and you can, in which case, get a response plush. Therefore, it is better to cooperate with such an adversary - it will be better for everyone. And then you can remember 1967 and 1973 - they shot down something, but only the lands themselves were full. How did these campaigns end - recall?
  1. Pishenkov
    
    +1
    
    12 September 2019 17: 48
    
    I understand your patriotism again. But here's the fact - your high-tech without outside help and cover costs 3 kopecks. In this case, if we compare, this is a high-tech and very modern pistol against a high-tech and modern, but a tank ... And the "splash" of the RF Armed Forces, if it can get it from anyone, it is certainly not from you ...
    PS .. and it’s generally strange that it didn’t reach you, but this comment is more of a bitter irony than a call to action that no one will do anyway ... Politics is in the way ...
    1. Natan bruk
      
      +1
      
      12 September 2019 19: 01
      
      Do you still recall 1967 and 1973? But it was the "great-mighty", and not the modern Russian Federation with its cartoons. But then very many Soviet servicemen laid down their heads because of the stupidity of the Soviet leadership. It is clear that the categories are incomparable, but small countries survive in their own way. At one time, in 1973, when the Arab troops were defeated, many times superior to the Israeli ones, the USSR threatened to land a landing, but after a warning from the United States, they abandoned this venture. Therefore, it is not at all shameful to defend against a thug by another thug. Plus, Israel has an answer that can always cool some over-hot heads. Well, at least the same at least 5 submarines are known with what, constantly plying God knows where - the return flop is still guaranteed. Although Russia does not need to attack Israel at all, they agree perfectly. But with whom did the Russian Federation fight in its recent history? I do not mean donkey lovers in the desert and not the formidable Georgian army. In fact, the Russian Federation has become a hostage of its own propaganda of victory, and any even somewhat unsuccessful campaign will be regarded as a heavy defeat, therefore I am sure that the Kremlin will never attack a regular army capable of resisting and inflicting significant losses. And the raison d'être of existence is not at all to be proud of "Imperskoe" and the bonds, but to ensure a decent life for our people. Yes, and your logic is not very good - it was the Turks who shot down Sushka, not the Russians Efka. Then, according to your logic, it was the Israelis who also had to knock down the DRY - peace and friendship would immediately flourish. :)))
      1. Pishenkov
        
        +1
        
        12 September 2019 19: 39
        
        I already told you everything about this earlier. About 67 and 73, see also above. It’s not you who defeated someone, but you were left alone so as not to provoke a conflict not with you, that’s all. You have the psychology of a first grader who scares everyone with his brother from a vocational school. Be responsible for yourself, but you cannot do this. And in 67 they could not, and in 73, and in 1948, and before that. The Jewish Diaspora of the USA is responsible for you. With all due respect to Israel, I understand that it sounds insulting, but this is a fact. Humble yourself. I won’t discuss this anymore.
        And your submarines can ply anywhere and with anything, but you can frighten your neighbors with this, only the maximum. For militarily developed countries, such as the Russian Federation, for example, your means of delivering all your "this" do not pose a practical danger. And you should know this if you are talking about it. The only theoretically realistic option is to go up to the coast and blow up your "it" along with the submarine, than cause a tsunami, for example. But just imperceptibly for this to approach the coast of the Russian Federation (at least where), your elderly German "Dolphins" will also not be able to.
        So again, with all your patriotism: be realistic, otherwise patriotism becomes ridiculous.
      2. gorenina91
        
        +1
        
        13 September 2019 08: 54
        
        You did not mention July 30, 1970, when ... mmmm ..., to put it mildly ... - Soviet military aces pilots (it is unlikely that the Soviet military was inferior in professionalism to the current Russian military pilots ... - rather, on the contrary) simply " got into a puddle "... - and died themselves, and greatly undermined the entire prestige of Soviet military aviation in the" Arab world "(and not only in the Arab world) ...
        - It seems that little has changed in Russian military aviation even today ...
        - I'm afraid that today things in the Russian military aviation are in a much more problematic position than it is "customary to say" about it ...
        - What military experience can a Russian pilot gain if the enemy is inadequately opposed and he gets used to it ... - Rather, on the contrary, it "corrupts" specialists and they acquire completely different - harmful skills ...
        - Alas, this "state of affairs" ... can lead to disaster ...
zenion

0

15 September 2019 14: 14

But if Netanyahu had not created Basmachi in Syria, then there would have been nothing at all. In general, he is the same storyteller as that little man from the cartoon "Last year's snow was falling."