Netanyahu said that prevented a clash between Russia and Israel in Syria

The contradictions between the tasks of the Russian Air Force and Israeli military operations during the operation in Syria were so great that they would inevitably lead to a clash of the parties.




About this in an interview with the Russian edition RBC Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said.

According to him, the Israeli Prime Minister’s direct contact with Russian President Vladimir Putin helped to avoid such a development of events.

Netanyahu noted that such coordination was possible only because he and the Russian leader respect each other and can talk on equal terms, calling things by their proper names.

The conversation between the head of the Israeli government and the Russian publication took place on the eve of negotiations between Putin and Netanyahu, at which the heads of the two states will discuss the current situation in the Middle East region and the prospects for further cooperation between Moscow and Tel Aviv in various areas.

Recall that in order to prevent incidents during military operations in Syria, in 2015, the communication mechanism between Russia and Israel began its work.

The main link in this communication, which allows promptly resolving any issues and avoiding misunderstandings, is the line of communication between the Russian air base Khmeimim in Syria and the Israeli command and staff complex Kiriya in Tel Aviv.
Photos used: https://www.thesun.co.uk
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

8 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sergey Latyshev Offline
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 12 September 2019 11: 48
    0
    • 1
    • 1
    What? Shoigu praised coordination with the US in Syria, and Netanyahu too ...
  2. Pishenkov Offline
    Pishenkov (Alexey) 12 September 2019 12: 13
    -1
    • 2
    • 3
    ... well, all the same, at least one of their planes would have to be shot down ... At least to strengthen relations, so to speak ... The Turks won our "Dry", and soon the GDP with Erdogan was almost fraternize, eat ice cream together and meet more often than with their own relatives, probably .... Even with the Ottomans the Ottomans now quarrel and buy our weapons. In how. Well, if you bring down three pieces, then, probably, Netanyahu and Crimea will finally recognize Russia, and maybe Donbass, too, in advance ... but this is if the crews are not allowed to eject ...
    Gloomy? Nothing. Life is like that. Big politics.
    1. Natan bruk Offline
      Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 12 September 2019 17: 41
      -1
      • 0
      • 1
      Here, probably, the thing is that to “shoot down planes” of a high-tech enemy is not for lovers in the desert to drive and confront the formidable ISIS air defense, and no less formidable Igilov aviation. Yes, and you can, in which case, get a response plush. Therefore, it is better to cooperate with such an adversary - it will be better for everyone. And then you can remember 1967 and 1973 - they shot down something, but only the lands themselves were full. How did these campaigns end - recall?
      1. Pishenkov Offline
        Pishenkov (Alexey) 12 September 2019 17: 48
        +1
        • 1
        • 0
        I understand your patriotism again. But here is the fact - your high-tech without outside help and cover costs 3 kopecks. In this case, if you compare, this is a high-tech and very modern pistol against a high-tech and modern one, but a tank ... And the "plop" of the RF Armed Forces, if it can be obtained from anyone, it’s not from you for sure ...
        PS .. and it’s generally strange that it didn’t reach you, but this comment is more of a bitter irony than a call to action that no one will do anyway ... Politics is in the way ...
        1. Natan bruk Offline
          Natan bruk (Natan Bruk) 12 September 2019 19: 01
          +1
          • 1
          • 0
          Do you still recall 1967 and 1973? But it was "great-mighty", and not the modern RF with its cartoons. But then, a lot of Soviet soldiers laid their heads because of the stupidity of the Soviet leadership. It is clear that the categories are incomparable, but small countries survive in their own way. At one time, in 1973, when the defeat of Arab troops, many times superior to the Israeli, was underway, the USSR threatened to land troops, but after a warning, the United States abandoned this undertaking. Therefore, it is not at all shameful to defend oneself from a thug by another thug. In addition, Israel has an answer that can always cool some too hot heads. Well, at least the same minimum of 5 submarines is known with what, constantly cruising, God knows where - the return plop is still guaranteed. Although Russia does not need to attack Israel at all, they agree very well. But with whom did the Russian Federation fight in its recent history? I do not mean the oslolyubov in the desert and not the formidable Georgian army. In fact, the Russian Federation has become a hostage to its own propaganda of victoriousness and any at least some unsuccessful campaign will be regarded as a serious defeat, therefore I am sure that the Kremlin will never attack a regular army that can resist and cause significant losses. And the meaning of existence is not at all to be proud of “Imperialism” and staples, but to provide a decent life for their people. Yes, and with logic you don’t really - it is after all that the Turks shot down Sushka, and not the Russian Efku. Then, according to your logic, the Israelis also had to bring down Sushka - peace and friendships would immediately have flourished in lush color. :)))
          1. Pishenkov Offline
            Pishenkov (Alexey) 12 September 2019 19: 39
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            I already told you everything about this earlier. About 67 and 73, see also above. It’s not you who defeated someone, but you were left alone so as not to provoke a conflict not with you, that’s all. You have the psychology of a first grader who scares everyone with his brother from a vocational school. Be responsible for yourself, but you cannot do this. And in 67 they could not, and in 73, and in 1948, and before that. The Jewish Diaspora of the USA is responsible for you. With all due respect to Israel, I understand that it sounds insulting, but this is a fact. Humble yourself. I won’t discuss this anymore.
            And your submarines can run anywhere and with anything, but you can only scare your neighbors with this. For militarily developed countries, such as the Russian Federation, for example, the means of delivery available to you for all of your “this” do not pose a practical danger. And you should know this if you talk about it. The only theoretically real option is to go up to the coast and blow up your "it" there with the submarine, than cause a tsunami, for example. But it’s only imperceptible for this to approach the coast of the Russian Federation (at least where) your elderly German “Dolphins” also can not.
            So again, with all your patriotism: be realistic, otherwise patriotism becomes ridiculous. hi
          2. gorenina91 Offline
            gorenina91 (Irina) 13 September 2019 08: 54
            +1
            • 1
            • 0
            You didn’t mention July 30, 1970, when ... mmmm ..., to put it mildly ... - Soviet military aces pilots (hardly the Soviet military was inferior in professionalism to the current Russian military pilots ... - rather, vice versa) simply " sat down in a puddle "... - and they themselves died, and great undermined the entire prestige of Soviet military aviation in the" Arab world "(and not only in the Arab) ...
            - It seems that little has changed in Russian military aviation even today ...
            - I’m afraid that today the affairs of the Russian military aviation are in a much more problematic situation than is “customary to talk” about ...
            - What military experience can be gained by a Russian pilot if the enemy refuses to counteract him and he gets used to it ... - Rather, on the contrary, it “corrupts” specialists and they acquire completely different - harmful skills ...
            - Alas, such a "state of affairs" ... could lead to disaster ...
  3. zenion Offline
    zenion (zinovy) 15 September 2019 14: 14
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    But if Netanyahu had not created a Basmachi in Syria, then there would have been nothing at all. In general, he is the same storyteller as that peasant from the cartoon "Last year's snow fell."