Time to exit: what Russia cost 7 years in the WTO

On the eve, seven years have passed since the day Russia entered the WTO. The transition period has passed for our country to adapt to the conditions of this international trade organization. What was the price of “being like everyone else” for Russia, what kind of “goodies” it received, and is it time for us to leave, following the United States, as Donald Trump constantly talks about?




The WTO was created in the mid-nineties after the collapse of the USSR to unite all countries under the auspices of the United States. This is probably the most obvious globalist project known. The organization is periodically criticized for dancing to the tune of the United States and defending, first of all, the interests of transnational corporations. Roughly, but straightforwardly, the formula for its existence can be described as follows: rich countries become even richer, poor countries remain poor, or even become poorer.

Russia took a long time to enter the WTO. We had before our eyes a negative example of Ukraine, which became a member of the organization in 2008. The Minister economics Independent, Vasily Tsushko, in 2010 described the consequences of this political step:

Our leadership, especially under President Yushchenko, tried to join the WTO in order to annoy Russia. Whether we salted Russia, this is a question, but we ourselves have salted for sure. Because, joining this organization, we signed a duty of 12% on 0 thousand commodity items.


By opening its domestic market to transnational corporations, Kiev has thereby damaged its own producers. It is believed that Moscow took into account the Ukrainian experience and bargained fiercely, defending the interests of Russian industrialists, knocking out a 7-year transition period. But is it really so?

Membership in the organization is possible on individual conditions for different countries, but generally involves a reduction in import duties and the opening of the domestic market for other participants. It is believed that the WTO acts as an arbitrator who impartially parses trade disputes between all parties.

It should be noted that many business representatives were against Russia's entry into the WTO. Domestic industrialists and agricultural producers warned that the market would be inundated with foreign products, which we cannot compete with. In the future, this would inevitably lead to their ruin and the purchase of larger "business sharks". As a matter of fact, it was in this scenario that everything went until the Crimea happened. But more on that later.

The arguments of supporters of WTO accession can be found, for example, by link. There they are quite innocently arguing that it is bad if the shelves are littered not with domestic but with imported products. Say, lazy Russian manufacturers do not want to honestly compete with foreigners, do not invest in equipment and development. About how, in principle, without state support and protectionism, you can compete with transnational corporations with huge budgets and lobbies, and what to do if sanctions are introduced and the shelves are empty, in naive 2012, it was clearly not thought.

Let's see what came of it all.

In general, everything really went according to a negative scenario. Pockets were stuffed with exporters of metals and chemical products, some types of equipment and machinery. But the noose around the neck of representatives of agriculture, manufacturing and light industry began to tighten. WTO standards have banned state support for these industries and lifted barrage duties. There are estimates according to which, over 5 years, due to a reduction in duties, our country has lost 800 billion rubles. However, we will be fair and we will not begin to paint everything exclusively in black colors. For example, despite the reduction in import duties, the government, by introducing a recycling fee for cars, prompted foreign auto concerns to transfer assembly plants to Russia. But this is only a plus for TNK: each assembly line in our country gives work to many related enterprises abroad.

Frankly speaking, having entered the WTO on current conditions, Russia voluntarily embarked on the path of deindustrialization under the supervision of international bureaucrats. In a sense, the Crimea can be “thanked” for a trend change. As a punishment, the Western countries took that carrot that hung before the eyes of the Russian government. State Duma deputy Valery Gartung explains:

When we joined the WTO, we were told that our products would go to world markets without any discrimination. But we saw the opposite situation - sanctions, unilateral restrictions.


Yes, the United States, despite the WTO, closed its market for imported metallurgy products, imposed a ban on the sale of oil and gas equipment to Russia, threatened sanctions on our public debt, investments fell, access to cheap foreign loans was closed. Moreover, the Americans hit point-blank on a few Russian promising projects, for example, on the MS-21 airliner. Moscow had to introduce counter-sanctions and stimulate the development of its own agricultural sector.

Needless to say, the events of the past five years run counter to the “spirit of the WTO”? So if the “carrots” are no longer there, but there is objective harm from the WTO, then why not raise the question of revising the conditions for their membership in this organization, or even completely withdrawing from it?
Photos used: https://en.wtcmoscow.ru/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed oshЫbku Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

12 comments
Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in

  1. Joe Cook Offline
    Joe Cook (Joe Cook) 23 August 2019 11: 41
    +5
    • 6
    • 1
    Right now, apparently, it's time to get out of this uncomfortable WTO. Sanctions imposed against Russia are a good reason.
    1. Alexander Ra Offline
      Alexander Ra (Alexander) 23 August 2019 12: 07
      +3
      • 3
      • 0
      Will our "elite" have the courage?
      1. Victor N Offline
        Victor N (Victor n) 23 August 2019 12: 24
        +3
        • 3
        • 0
        It is not so much the elite as the ordinary consumers who are addicted to imported goods. Any increase in salaries, pensions, benefits, most favorably responded to the growth of imports, and not to the growth of consumption of domestic products. And they say - nothing depends on us, Medvedev is to blame ....
        They still object: they say that our goods are worse. But WE themselves produce them.
        1. Tatyana Offline
          Tatyana 24 August 2019 12: 02
          +2
          • 2
          • 0
          Quote: Victor N
          They still object: they say that our goods are worse. But WE themselves produce them.

          Talk illogically!
          And why would our products be better if, without state subsidies, as is done in the West, we, according to the WTO Rules, are forced to exorbitantly reduce the cost of their costs ?!
          Due to what it is possible to reduce the cost of goods? By reducing the cost of labor (lowering salaries and lowering the qualifications of workers), low-grade cheap raw materials, worn-out and non-renewable equipment, etc., etc.
          From what the heck, when entering the WTO, Russia and any other country on the terms of the WTO, which are not observed by the United States or other sharks of the cap-country, will the product quality increase ?!
        2. Sapsan136 Offline
          Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 24 August 2019 22: 44
          +3
          • 3
          • 0
          Well, it’s time for the government to raise ... from the chair and start production, which is simply dying in the Russian Federation today ... At VASO, locksmiths receive 11000-17000 rubles a month, so what kind of product quality should be expected from poor pensioners working on antique machines? All these Chubais shouted that they were supposedly effective managers, life has shown that this is not so ... grabbers yes ... temporary workers yes ... but not effective managers under whom Russia could develop.
    2. Conn Offline
      Conn (Conn) 24 August 2019 20: 00
      +2
      • 2
      • 0
      The anti-national elite will not allow this! What Russian death, it is profitable!
  2. Syoma_67 Offline
    Syoma_67 (Semyon) 23 August 2019 20: 48
    -2
    • 2
    • 4
    Here we can say only one thing:

    Bad dancer eggs interfere.
  3. YATWIAG. BY Offline
    YATWIAG. BY (Cheslav) 23 August 2019 23: 50
    -3
    • 2
    • 5
    Comparing the Russian economy and the US economy is the same as comparing Lada Kalina and some Dodge Viper ...)))

    In spite of my mother frostbitten ears ...
    1. Conn Offline
      Conn (Conn) 24 August 2019 20: 02
      +1
      • 2
      • 1
      Alas, we did not rob the whole world for 300 years, like America!
  4. Dzafdet Offline
    Dzafdet (Sergei) 24 August 2019 18: 42
    +4
    • 4
    • 0
    And how Medvedev spilled the nightingale! I wonder what kind of rollback he received for joining the WTO?
  5. g1washntwn Offline
    g1washntwn (George Washington) 26 August 2019 09: 45
    +1
    • 1
    • 0
    The WTO was one of many field experiments, thanks to which you begin to understand why they say -

    Do not put your fingers in the socket.

    but foreign investment looked so sweet ... it is because of the latter that this is possible only if the next "iron curtain" is finally shut.
  6. Robert Robertovich 30 August 2019 09: 03
    0
    • 0
    • 0
    You wouldn’t grumble, we have very different climatic conditions, we are initially in different conditions in agriculture.