The expert revealed the winner in the naval clash between Russia and the United States

An increasing number of representatives of the American expert community express concerns about the aggravation of relations (tension) between the United States and Russia in general and the aggravation of the situation (situation) in the Black Sea in particular. For example, naval specialist Lyle Goldstein, after regular exercises by NATO and allied countries near the borders of Russia, wrote in an article for National Interest that the forces of the Alliance, in the event of a "naval battle", would be destroyed on the Black Sea in the "first hours".

The expert noted that Washington deliberately aggravates with Moscow, arranging meaningless Sea Breeze exercises (conducted for many years together with Ukraine) "off the coast of Russia." For example, in 2019, 19 countries took part in them. At the same time, most of these countries do not possess any military power at all, but they go on provoking Russia, hoping for the power of the United States.

In fact, it is not difficult to imagine a war between the United States and Russia, initiated by the accidental flooding of a NATO vessel participating in Sea Breeze exercises over an unexploded mine in such dangerous waters.

- the expert wrote.

Goldstein noted that NATO forces in that region of the planet, with the exception of Turkey, will only be political (symbolic) meaning. That is, they do not represent a military value at all. According to the expert, Washington should be very happy that the Montreux doctrine (1936) is still valid. Since U.S. aircraft carriers would be excellent targets in the Black Sea, it will not be difficult for Russia to destroy any of them using its own forces and means (missile boats, coastal defense complexes, Navy, Navy, submarines and hypersonic weapons). He drew attention to the real lethality of the Russian group for any enemy of Moscow in this region.

After that, Goldstein wondered why then Washington regularly sends its ships there, and even agitates its allies. Why are ships of the US Navy and non-Black Sea countries on the Black Sea needed? The expert emphasized the "limited usefulness" of all this and the pointlessness of the "war for Ukraine." Therefore, Washington needs to revise its strategy and deviate to the development of new types of weapons.
  • Photos used:
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. General Black Offline General Black
    General Black (Gennady) 11 August 2019 13: 03
    There, apparently, they have one Goldstein smart. And so - yes, the naval battle is fleeting.
  2. AICO Offline AICO
    AICO (Vyacheslav) 11 August 2019 16: 18
    So do not forget about this, otherwise it will turn out - Malbrook was going on a camping trip ... and further on in the text !!!
  3. boriz Offline boriz
    boriz (boriz) 11 August 2019 21: 32
    Well, yes, somehow. Only NI is overly optimistic. This is me about "... in the" first hours "." From the moment you receive a command to open fire, everything will be limited to one hour.
  4. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 11 August 2019 21: 55
    National Interest Pushkova often drives garbage.
    On the website normal calculations.

    And in the Black Sea, shot from all sides, it’s generally not worth comparing anyone.
    Single US armored boats demonstrate the flag, and that’s it.