Over a thousand people detained in Moscow during illegal protests

July 28 2019 23

On July 27, 2019, more than 1 thousand people were detained by police officers for committing various offenses in the process of illegal protests in the center of the capital. This was reported by the press service of the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the city of Moscow.

1074 people were detained in an unauthorized rally in the center of the capital for various offenses

- it is told in the message.

Before that, the department reported that about 3500 thousand people took part in the event, which was not authorized by the authorities, of which about 700 were media representatives (journalists and bloggers). At the same time, 295 participants were detained for disturbing public order.

It should be noted that law enforcement officers repeatedly informed the protesters that the event was illegal and warned of responsibility. However, the protesters, having violated the car traffic on the streets of the capital, began to throw pieces of asphalt and other objects at the police, use tear gas against law enforcement officers and try to break the “living chain” that separates the aggressive opposition from other citizens.

The Ministry of Internal Affairs clarifies that a trial will be held in respect of each detainee, after which decisions will be made in accordance with applicable law.

Peaceful protest???? In the USA, what would be the fate of these “peacefully protesting"? pic.twitter.com/PyJSQ2Mckz
- Vladimir Soloviev (@VRSoloviev) July 27, 2019

We remind you that earlier we informed readers about how the opposition blogger Alexei Navalny was detained in Moscow on July 24, 2019. He would be detained for calls to his supporters to go to the rally to support candidates for the Moscow City Duma, who were previously denied registration due to various violations committed by them.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Digital error

-1

28 July 2019 10: 40

At the same time, 295 participants were detained for disturbing public order.

And for what another 700 were detained? For the fact that

A trial will be held in respect of each detainee, after which decisions will be made in accordance with applicable law.

- that is, while there is nothing to show, but there they will "throw"?

They started throwing pieces of asphalt and other objects at the police, using tear gas against law enforcement officers.

They are in vain, one must be above this and not be likened.

In the USA, what would be the fate of these “peacefully protesting"?

We are not in the USA, Vladimir Rudolfovich.
You better tell us about Italy, and not about the United States, so it will be more interesting.

Opposition blogger Alexei Navalny was detained.

For all my complex attitude towards Navalny - the person who gained 27% in the mayoral election in Moscow should have stopped calling a blogger, since it will be more honest. The inability of state propaganda to rebuild under the new realities will destroy her.

Registration was denied due to various violations committed by them.

Violations were on both sides - again for the sake of honesty.
1. Victor N
  
  0
  
  28 July 2019 14: 30
  
  REASON FOR DETENTION - violation of public order in the center of the country There can be no excuse for this! And the punishment must be compulsory and tangible. Everything else is not related to the specific facts of the detention.
  1. Digital error
    
    +2
    
    28 July 2019 15: 33
    
    Quote: Victor N
    Everything else is irrelevant.
    
    Everything has to do - even the expression on the performers' faces (some of them showed a lack of understanding of what was happening and detachment).
    Regarding your tolerance bordering on indifference, I can quote Martin Nimeller:
    
    When the Nazis came for the communists,
    I remained silent - I was not a communist.
    When they planted the Social Democrats,
    I said nothing - I was not a Social Democrat.
    When they came for union members,
    I did not protest - I was not a member of the union.
    When they came for the Jews,
    I was not indignant - I was not a Jew.
    When they came for me, there was no one left who stood up for me.
    
    Problems begin when one of those in power begins to think of himself that he is the embodied state, instead of recognizing the mistakes that have taken place and working on them.
    The downside is not from me - we still have freedom of opinion.
    1. Victor N
      
      +1
      
      30 July 2019 08: 11
      
      Responsible citizens are OBLIGED to protect their state from those who do not comply with the laws! Or do you propose to live "according to concepts"?
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

-2

28 July 2019 10: 47

Whack! Whack! Publicly!
1. Igor Pavlovich
  
  -4
  
  28 July 2019 11: 08
  
  It’s not enough to fight, it’s necessary, like the minions of Spartak, to crucify all those detained on crosses around the Kremlin ... That’s the joy for Putin when he returns ...
  1. Panting
    
    0
    
    28 July 2019 15: 09
    
    So you will be appointed the main spreader from the Kremlin, that is, the Kremlin.
  2. BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
    
    -2
    
    28 July 2019 20: 08
    
    No atrocities - just wipe the birch twig and release to the folder with your mother!
  3. newbornGP
    
    0
    
    28 July 2019 23: 34
    
    Right! And you have to start!
Bakht

+4

28 July 2019 11: 04

In general, what was the problem? I think that if there had been no ban on holding the rally, then several hundred people would have come from strength. Another thing is that the venue should not be in the city center.
I will give Azerbaijan as an example. Opposition rallies are not prohibited. Another thing is that they were allocated for their stadium on the outskirts of the city. A maximum of 100-200 people come to each meeting. They stand, chat and diverge. There are more journalists than protesters.
You can also give Kiev as an example. There, too, the Maidan was declining, until they decided to disperse it by force.
I don’t see a big problem if several hundred people gather with some posters. But not in the city center.
1. Digital error
  
  0
  
  28 July 2019 12: 52
  
  Quote: Bakht
  If there had been no ban on the rally, then several hundred people would have come from strength.
  
  A week ago, 20 thousand came to allow.
  
  Quote: Bakht
  The Maidan was on the decline, until they decided to disperse it by force.
  
  I disagree. It went downhill until the blood of "sacred victims" appeared.
  
  Quote: Bakht
  But not in the city center.
  
  Here I agree - the freedom (including movement) of some ends where the non-freedom of others begins.
  1. Bakht
    
    +2
    
    28 July 2019 15: 46
    
    I disagree. It went downhill until the blood of "sacred victims" appeared.
    
    And what do you disagree with? Until they began to disperse and "sacred victims" did not appear, the Maidan was on the decline. The same is with any rally. Any meeting becomes nothing without violence and sacrifice.
    1. Digital error
      
      0
      
      28 July 2019 15: 48
      
      Quote: Bakht
      Violence and victims ...
      
      Now I agree - initially you mentioned only one of two necessary conditions.
      1. Bakht
        
        +2
        
        28 July 2019 15: 55
        
        Now I do not agree :-)
        
        The event, after which Maidan became truly massive, was a hard dispersal of protesters on the night of November 30.
        
        Digital error
        
        0
        
        28 July 2019 16: 03
        
        Quote: Bakht
        Now I do not agree :-)
        
        It may have become truly massive, but I'm talking about the result - the first murder occurred on January 22, and exactly one month later Yanukovych escaped.
Port

+2

28 July 2019 11: 54

There are such candidates that there’s no one to spit on, saliva are a pity ...
1. Nikolay Malyugin
  
  0
  
  29 July 2019 06: 53
  
  Port wine. After all, would you not vote for them? And I would not vote. So what's the booze?
Port

0

28 July 2019 11: 57

How long on top of this white mucus will the unsinkable Navalny swim, and why does it not sink?
Port

0

28 July 2019 12: 00

Quote: Igor Pavlovich
Crucify all the detainees on ...

Enough of you, hang the tongue.
steelmaker

+2

28 July 2019 12: 22

The problem is that the government impudently does not allow opposition to the elections, and even more so to the authorities. Remember Primorye, where the elections were canceled altogether because the candidate won not from the authorities. While in Moscow, the financing that Navalny has and gaining signatures for registration is several dozen more than it should be, it means that Muscovites do not need such an opposition!
1. Digital error
  
  +4
  
  28 July 2019 15: 42
  
  Quote: steel maker
  Remember Primorye, where ...
  
  If everyone remembered everything, even from the 2012 May Decrees, the outcome of the 2018 elections would have been different. Unfortunately for us - the national memory is short, we have to remind.
newbornGP

-1

28 July 2019 23: 39

This is some kind of kindergarten, not acceleration! It is necessary to use the correct, western, democratic methods. For example, like on Wall Street. Gas, rubber bullets, batons, hoses! Need to learn democracy!
Sergey Latyshev

+2

29 July 2019 10: 44

Wah! We must wait for the authorities to have mercy and allow "legal protests."
There were protests of all Kurginyans, Zhirikov, etc. What's the point? Maybe PR canceled? or Zhirik’s son didn’t go to the granddaughters in the USA?

Is it legal to block Leningradka? Is it legal to organize an all-Russian strike? Is it legal to block the movement of deforestation machinery? Yeah, wait ...