Prime Minister Putin will get full control over the country's parliament

Fans of Vladimir Putin can breathe a sigh of relief. The beloved president will remain at the helm of power for a very, very long time, even after the expiration of the next six-year term. True, to do this, he will again have to rewrite the Constitution. Apparently, the Kremlin finally decided on the formula for transforming Vladimir Vladimirovich into the de facto lifelong ruler of Russia.




And yet the “castling”. Again.

This scenario was predicted by the American agency Bloomberg with reference to some of its sources in the Kremlin, about which we recently told. And it seems to hit the bull's eye.

Recently, the Speaker of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, Vyacheslav Volodin, pleased the Russians with another legislative initiative, according to which the Lower House of Parliament should actively participate in the formation of the cabinet. Volodin's article is creatively called the Living Constitution of Development. He's writing:

We see that the responsibility of the Government and the quality of power as a whole have grown, parliamentary control over decisions has become more effective. Today it is necessary to go this way further.


And where will the country lead this way?

De jure, he turns the Russian Federation from a presidential into a parliamentary-presidential republic. This is done exactly under one person, Vladimir Putin. In 2024, his presidential term expires. Political scientists considered different scenarios of keeping him in power: both through a special structure in the form of the State Council, and for his sake, they were ready to quickly squeeze Belarus into the Union State, and even remove the word “twice” from the Constitution. But all of these options have significant drawbacks.

Therefore, it turned out to be easier to re-enter the same river, with "castling" in places of the president and prime minister. However, this time, everything will be done much more circumspectly.

So that the “locum tenens” inadvertently did not send Putin to resign with his entire government, the president will be deprived of this opportunity. And along with this, and a number of other important powers. The prime minister will become the real ruler of the country, and the president will become a more decorative figure, conditional "head of state." To do this, you will have to make "point changes", as Volodin put it in his article, in the Constitution and the law "On State Duma Elections".

The increasingly less popular party of power, United Russia, will begin to distance itself from Putin. Under the new legislation, no more than a quarter of the deputies will be able to enter the Lower House according to party lists, the rest as single-mandate candidates. Dear people who clearly received the tacit approval of the Presidential Administration and are not directly associated with United Russia will become one-mandate holders. Already in the next Duma elections, the composition of the Parliament can be radically updated, and Putin can gain reliable control over the "place for discussion."

It should be noted that in our country the electoral legislation is very flexible, it changes almost every next election. It turns out that now the "bad liberal government", as before, can not be scolded ...
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.
I have an account? Sign in
  1. Oleg RB Offline Oleg RB
    Oleg RB (Oleg) 19 July 2019 08: 58
    -1
    Yes, there was already such a twin theme here belay
    Seryog, what are you doing?
  2. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 19 July 2019 09: 18
    +1
    Quote: Oleg RB
    Yes there was already such a twin theme here belay
    Seryog, what are you doing?

    Firstly, we have not yet switched to you.
    Secondly, that article was about Bloomberg’s forecasts on this subject. Then many doubted their realism.
    But now this infa has been confirmed by the actions of the State Duma. So this is a reality.
    1. Digital error Offline Digital error
      Digital error (Eugene) 19 July 2019 23: 07
      +4
      Quote: Marzhetsky
      Firstly, we have not yet switched to you.

      With all due respect - you went out into the public space - get ready.
      From personal experience - as soon as a person has written an article (ten articles), he begins to imagine about himself that he is from another test (judging by himself), but this is not so.
      In this regard, I want to wish you well and tolerance, I like your texts, although many are controversial - but discussion is necessary - to search for the truth hi
  3. Igor Pavlovich Offline Igor Pavlovich
    Igor Pavlovich (Igor Pavlovich) 19 July 2019 09: 53
    -4
    Volodin is a plagiarist - Zhirinovsky already proposed to introduce a monarchy in Russia, Khazanov gave the crown - give Putin to the kingdom !!!
    1. Digital error Offline Digital error
      Digital error (Eugene) 19 July 2019 09: 59
      +3

      Quote: Igor Pavlovich
      Give Putin to the kingdom !!!

      I won’t give without a fight, Igor Pavlovich. I will oppose all legal means.
    2. Actellius Offline Actellius
      Actellius 19 July 2019 17: 43
      +6
      As Peter 1 brought in amusing troops, Putin needs to make a funny country, for example, from the Jewish Autonomous Okrug. May there reign. It's time to collect stones.
    3. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 21 July 2019 02: 08
      +1
      I am for the monarchy, but what does Putin have to do with it? He has no rights to this. There is no dynasty, no legitimate heir, not a single monarchical state recognizes it. Namely, the monarchy rests on universal recognition. Remember, there was such an African dictator. He proclaimed himself emperor of Africa, in the end, of course, no one recognized him! And this venture failed completely. Suppose that this was not a dictator - an imposter, but related to one of the royal family in Africa, the situation would be the opposite.
      Putin can become the new Minin or Pozharsky, transferring the reins of power to the tsar from the Romanov dynasty. Ask why Romanov? I answer because Rurikovich cannot be found during the day with fire, they do not have direct descendants who could lay claim to the throne. Godunov’s general is not even discussed. And the choice of a new candidate for the creation of the dynasty is excluded. Why? Read my post above.
  4. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 19 July 2019 10: 05
    +4
    I'm tired of it already.
    1. Digital error Offline Digital error
      Digital error (Eugene) 19 July 2019 23: 13
      -1

      Quote: Oleg Rambover
      I'm tired of it already.

      This is not constructive. I agree with the promise, but do not give him a reason to say that

      The opposition has no positive agenda.
      1. yehour Offline yehour
        yehour (yehour yedemski) 20 July 2019 12: 53
        0
        So this is not the opposition, which is the funniest!))
        It’s just that if you watch the same show year after year on TV, even a good one, let’s not be surprised that sooner or later everyone will get tired of it.
  5. sergeu2 Offline sergeu2
    sergeu2 (sergeu) 19 July 2019 10: 08
    0
    The Pentagon burst in with diarrhea.
  6. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 19 July 2019 10: 13
    0
    So, I can’t wait for a bright future and justice. And great shocks await us all.
    1. Digital error Offline Digital error
      Digital error (Eugene) 19 July 2019 22: 54
      +3

      Quote: steel maker
      So, do not wait for me a bright future and justice

      I don’t like it because I don’t like it, although I share your thought. We can try it on a single voting day. At the same time, I personally intend to be an observer, and if they do not allow it, I will write an article about how it was. The contribution of each grain of sand affects the result - I want you and other readers to believe in it.
      1. yehour Offline yehour
        yehour (yehour yedemski) 20 July 2019 13: 04
        0
        Quote: DigitalError
        I want you and other readers to believe it.

        - But I believe more in the famous writer and just an intelligent person:

        If something depended on the elections, we would not be allowed to participate in them.

        Mark Twain
  7. Victor N Offline Victor N
    Victor N (Victor n) 19 July 2019 10: 43
    -4
    With a great desire, the intrigue can be seen even in the fact of the purchase of matches by the grandmother Marusey. As for lawmaking, this is an endless process. The main thing is that it takes place in the interests of the country, and not of individual groups of citizens.
    If anyone doesn’t like Putin much, then propose the best candidate. And if not.....
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 19 July 2019 11: 36
      +4
      Victor N. Yes Yes Yes. Russians are so stupid and limited people that it is better not to find such mediocrity as GDP in the whole country. Yes, my friend, Russophobe.
      1. Victor N Offline Victor N
        Victor N (Victor n) 20 July 2019 17: 23
        +1
        So look for it! And if you don’t find it, go yourself. Every election, several candidates are nominated - so they must convince voters. But it did not happen.
        The Russian state MY ancestors created. MY! And I have to take care of it and equip it, about which I bake. What about your ancestors?
        1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
          Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 21 July 2019 22: 44
          +1
          Yes Yes Yes. Each election nominates candidates, in consultation with the presidential administration; not agreed - not nominated. Equal access to the media - no, I have not heard. The constitution has two terms - no, I have not heard. And as whom did your ancestors create the Russian state? Was the rent paid or collected? And this is your emphasis on Russianness to the Tatars with the Buryats - is there a place in the Russian state? And out of sheer curiosity, how do you bake?
          Part of my ancestors, I suppose, do not know what they created there, but they lived on the territory of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Russia, Zhemaitsky. Part of the Kuban, they created some kind of state there or quite the contrary, I do not know.
          1. Victor N Offline Victor N
            Victor N (Victor n) 22 July 2019 08: 55
            +1
            In the Russian state there is enough space for all good people, and even the Litvinians will fit.
            Ancestors need to know, understand and honor.
            In the elections in the Donbass, the turnout was always much lower than in the western regions ....... They settled themselves .....
            1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
              Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 22 July 2019 17: 42
              0
              So how did your ancestors create the Russian state? And how do you care about the current state? In what generation do you know your ancestors?
              If you call me Litvin, then one of my grandfather would be a Belarusian, and his wife is Ukrainian. And I thought - Donbass voted for the main culprit of the Maidan - Yanukovych.
    2. Digital error Offline Digital error
      Digital error (Eugene) 19 July 2019 20: 28
      +2

      Quote: Victor N
      The main thing is that it takes place in the interests of the country

      Some rulers tend to equate themselves and the country - this is treated only by free elections, which are not.

      Quote: Victor N
      If anyone really doesn’t like Putin, propose the best candidate

      Yes, even if you. Or am I - not connected with the oligarchs, not bound by obligations, did not sign the pension "maneuver", a native of the deep people (according to Surkov). Pots do not burn the gods.

      Quote: Victor N
      And if not.....

      If not, then we will have many more years of annual "compensation" of Rosneft from the budget of 450 billion.
      There are 150 single-industry towns in the country, I live in one of them. Last year (for the first time in 30 years) ALL roads were repaired for 420 million rubles. Estimate the potential - 450/150 = 3 (billion).
      1. Victor N Offline Victor N
        Victor N (Victor n) 20 July 2019 17: 28
        0
        Eugene, I will not pull. And I support your desire, success. That’s just the way it is: take responsibility on yourself, look for ways to influence the situation to the best of your ability.
  8. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 19 July 2019 11: 06
    +1

    Quote: Victor N
    The main thing is that it takes place in the interests of the country, and not of individual groups of citizens.

    With your mouth yes honey drink smile
  9. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 19 July 2019 11: 06
    0

    Quote: Victor N
    If anyone doesn’t like Putin much, then propose the best candidate.

    And then what will happen to this person? wink
    1. Victor N Offline Victor N
      Victor N (Victor n) 20 July 2019 17: 33
      0

      Afraid of wolves - do not go to the forest.

      It’s scary to sit and keep quiet. But even Grudinin was only lightly dusted - do not scare yourself. Well, it won’t work out - honey with bread.
  10. Come on Offline Come on
    Come on 19 July 2019 13: 00
    -2
    Again the grandmothers are vanging)) "Some sources" - this is the Kremlin plumber Uncle Vasya.
    1. Digital error Offline Digital error
      Digital error (Eugene) 19 July 2019 20: 32
      +1

      Quote: Daladno
      "Some sources" is the Kremlin plumber Uncle Vasya

      In vain you laugh. The most knowledgeable person in the company after the director is a cleaning lady. Because he knows all the entrances and exits, he goes into all the offices, including the director’s office, hears all the conversations and can tell a lot about this to interested parties. I speak as a person who once granted loans to budgetary organizations - the main thing is to talk to the cleaning lady, and there it’s the small business.
  11. Actellius Offline Actellius
    Actellius 19 July 2019 17: 39
    0
    Only revolution will save this country.
    1. Oleg RB Offline Oleg RB
      Oleg RB (Oleg) 19 July 2019 19: 17
      0
      Save - yes.
      But it will be the bloodiest in history.
      Residents of Russian life are not ready for this.
      1. Digital error Offline Digital error
        Digital error (Eugene) 19 July 2019 20: 35
        +2

        Quote: Oleg RB
        Not ready for it life dwellers of Russia

        If the inhabitants of life are those who bring the revolution closer with their legislative innovations, then I agree - they are not ready. But with these innovations, they systematically bring closer to the readiness of those against whom these laws are applied.
  12. Oleg RB Offline Oleg RB
    Oleg RB (Oleg) 19 July 2019 18: 57
    -2
    In general, you can summarize.
    The old man is stupid, you can make a regular referendum.
    Draw in the morning after - from announcers 146% per monarchy. And bingo bully
    1. Digital error Offline Digital error
      Digital error (Eugene) 19 July 2019 20: 37
      +2

      Quote: Oleg RB
      Dumb old man

      This is frightening - complacency and bronzelnost. One such already existed - and the CPSU invented the “ethical code”, and much more. It all ended predictably - the collapse of the stategift(from the word DAR. What now - think for yourself, education, I think, is enough).
    2. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
      Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 19 July 2019 22: 00
      +1
      This year, grandfather will turn 67 years old ... Everything ends, sooner or later ... no one is eternal and nothing lasts forever ... I just don’t understand one thing - What are you happy about? The resignation or death of GDP, physical or political? The Communists today will not come to power in the Russian Federation, Navalny and Yavlinsky will not even ride at all ... And those who can come ... they from people like you, for your national crimes committed by you against the Russian people, will rigidly ask and according to the full program ... In general, I don’t see what you are happy about there ... Or do you seriously think that as long as there is no stability in the Russian Federation, you will be in the Russian Federation Kuban, or will you squeeze something else ?! This is unlikely, and even so, then they will lower 7 skins from you and return everything with interest ... You wouldn’t lose Kiev and Warsaw .... and not dream of Russian lands ...
      1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
        Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 20 July 2019 00: 33
        0

        Quote: Sapsan136
        In general, I don’t see what you rejoice over there ...

        You are happy about something, if they come, we will cross the streets, we will receive pasta with wood chips on the cards, iPhones, foreign cars, foreign trips - all this will prove to be a corrupting influence of the West, you will enjoy a new pair of shoes, no matter what quality, every 5 years.
        1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
          Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 20 July 2019 01: 08
          -1
          And I don’t need your foreign cars, if today in the Kremlin they can’t buy a license for their production in the Russian Federation, as Spain and the USSR did ... Spare parts for them today can be discontinued at any time in the Russian Federation, just like Mistral did not ... At the expense of wood sawdust, I personally lived normally in the USSR and most sawdust didn’t eat, and today we have homeless people, beggars, and children who receive SMSs, they collect as if we live in Somalia, and not in a decent country. .. Computers in the USSR did, and no worse than Western counterparts, such as the IBM-286 ... Electronics - 585 was no worse ... we won’t be left without phones ... Sawdust almost the whole country ate in the 90s, but apparently you didn’t touch anyone like you ... By the way, my deceased grandmother always had icons in her house and no one touched - neither an icon, nor a grandmother ... So do not repeat the tales of lies, such as Solzhenitsyn, about crossing the street ...
          1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
            Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 20 July 2019 01: 43
            +2
            What makes you think that it will be like in the USSR? The USSR had an ideology, the USSR was the second world economy, the USSR developed its own industry and science. The Russian Federation does not have this and is not expected. So, if they come as you want, like Zolotov, there will be Uzbekistan at best, and North Korea at worst. In the 90s, my youth and youth passed, I didn’t eat sawdust, and I don’t remember what anyone would eat.
            1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
              Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 20 July 2019 18: 09
              +1
              The Russian Federation does not have this while in the government of the Russian Federation (Chernomyrdins) are sitting, who are trying for their Ukraine, USA, Kyrgyzstan ... but not for the Russian Federation ... but everything can change and very cool, and I believe it will change ... And I I remember how in the 90s prices rose every day and salaries were not paid for six months, and for me Yeltsin is a fascist ... head of the US occupation administration in the Russian Federation ...
              1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 21 July 2019 00: 29
                +1
                Quote: Sapsan136
                The Russian Federation does not have this while they sit in the government of the Russian Federation (Chernomyrdins)

                You do not know? Chernomyrdin died 10 years ago. Like the USSR 30 years ago. No return possible. The current elites (including our main liberal GDP, who claims that liberalism has outlived itself) have no ideology. And a new generation of elites is not visible even with some idea. I only know that Dugin is trying to build an ideology, but his constructions are not popular among the elite and strongly resemble fascism. And without an idea, we will sell oil for bucks in gay Europe.
                Yeltsin - a consequence, the causes of the collapse of the USSR were laid long before him.
                1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
                  Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 21 July 2019 13: 20
                  +1
                  I am aware that Chernomyrdin died, but people like him, unfortunately, still remain in the government of the Russian Federation, and from them the Russian Federation is one harm, since they try not for the Russian Federation ... To treat as they treat you is not fascism, this is a normal reaction of a normal person ... Personally, I am for the adoption of a citizenship law in the Russian Federation, similar to what is valid in Saudi Arabia, and no one in the world considers this to be fascism ... This is their country in which there is indigenous people, and how to build their relations with foreigners and migrants, each country has the right to decide for itself, including completely forbid the entry into the country of migrants and tourists from certain countries ... In the same Australia they can ban the entry into the country, even on the grounds that you criticized the Australian authorities on social networks without Australian citizenship ... or spoke badly about the state and its population as a whole ... There were precedents ...
                  1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 22 July 2019 20: 08
                    +1

                    Quote: Sapsan136
                    I am aware that Chernomyrdin died, but people like him, unfortunately, still remain in the government of the Russian Federation, and from them the Russian Federation is one harm, since they are trying not for the Russian Federation ..

                    I hope Putin has nothing to do with it, because the king is good, these are bad boyars.

                    I do not quite understand your speech about fascism, if you are talking about Dugin, then it doesn’t matter how anyone relates to whom. And yes, they do not treat Saudi Arabia as fascists. They are treated like medieval obscurantists, where hands are chopped, atheism is a criminal offense, and judged by Sharia. As for me, this is a bad example for Russia.
                    1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
                      Sapsan136 (Sapsan136) 22 July 2019 20: 43
                      +1
                      Speaking about Saudi Arabia, I admired its law on citizenship, not Sharia law ... Russia is a Soviet state and it suits me, but the law on citizenship of Saudi Arabia is a good example for the Russian Federation ... I am convinced that those who hates the Russian Federation and its indigenous population (84% Russians, 11% Tatars ... plus small nations (Chukchi, for example) in the Russian Federation! Foreign patriots do not belong among Russian citizens! Those who accept US citizenship swear to defend the United States with weapons in their hands, including from their historical homeland ... this is also good for er to Russia! Russia should require all these foreign diasporas living in Russia, to swear allegiance to the Russian Federation, or to leave it outside all!
            2. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 21 July 2019 02: 17
              +1
              Maybe the USSR was the second economy in the world. But at the time of the revolution, the Russian Empire was the third economy after the United States and France. Less than half the US GDP. But the USSR lagged behind the United States by more than three times. Draw your own conclusion.
              1. Pound Offline Pound
                Pound (Alexander) 21 July 2019 04: 08
                -1
                The Russian Empire is an illiterate people and Nikolashka ** Bloody **, the tsar is a halfwit.
                1. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 21 July 2019 17: 59
                  +2
                  What is your modest and limited knowledge. What is one European monarchical state in such a position (economic) as we are? More than a hundred years ago, the states in question were not much different from Russia of that period. Including the level of illiteracy. Now these are developed advanced states with a very high standard of living. The monarchical system will allow redirecting financial flows into the country, to certain tasks. After all, before the revolution, Russia did not withdraw profit abroad, but accumulated inside.
  13. bonifacius Offline bonifacius
    bonifacius (Alex) 19 July 2019 23: 32
    -2
    The question of the Head of State, a multinational state with a nuclear status, with a huge territory - this is very serious to solve it through elections. At the present time, the ELECTIONS (in any country, anywhere and anyone) have become fictitious and farce. Examples of darkness. For example, China or the United States. Farce is the current Ukraine. Everywhere politicians and politicians dancing to the tune of money bags. Alas, we are not observing statesmen. Everyone wants to rule the people, nobody wants to serve the people.
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 20 July 2019 00: 27
      +1

      Quote: bonifacius
      The question of the Head of State, a multinational state with a nuclear status, with a huge territory - this is very serious to solve it through elections.

      And what is the alternative to the election?
  14. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 20 July 2019 06: 17
    0

    Quote: DigitalError
    In this regard, I want to wish you well and tolerance, I like your texts, although many are controversial - but discussion is necessary - to search for the truth

    No one refused the discussion. The question is in the form, a gentleman from Belarus and I did not drink to the Brudershaft to poke each other in this very public space.
    I have about XNUMX articles already. But the crown has not yet grown, if you are to this.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. Victor N Offline Victor N
    Victor N (Victor n) 20 July 2019 17: 10
    +1
    Governance needs to be improved CONSTANTLY. For this, amendments should be made to the Constitution. This is normal. Strengthening the role of the State Duma in governing the state with the trust of citizens in it is good. But who sees benefit for themselves in these changes is of little importance. The purpose of the publication is clear - throw dirt at the President. Ugly! Give suggestions - discuss.
  17. Vladimir501 Offline Vladimir501
    Vladimir501 (Vladimir) 20 July 2019 17: 16
    +1
    All the harm of your hatred in its false goal-setting - you just have to drive Putin away - and we’ll immediately heal that someone who is greedy for all sorts of lightning-fast recipes is knocked off by the last brain like

    Russia will live perfectly without Putin. People supposedly grow wiser, start stealing less, work better, and learn to respect themselves and others. The absence of one "petty and deceitful man" will bring many benefits to a huge country ...

    This simplicity is worse than theft: just take out one man - and everything itself, as in a fairy tale, is formed! In '91 we, fascinated by the same, took out of the country, a bad but pivot - but nothing was formed in the end. The country went on the run - which Putin is good, bad, but stopped.
    Tell me, how could you prove your love for the Motherland, otherwise? Well, there with valiant labor, honest tax payment, throwing cigarette butts into ballot boxes, and not by? Law obedience, mutual respect? I understand that this is boring, does not inflame the imagination, does not heat the blood, does not fog the mind. All these years, you didn’t give a damn about the boring and routine construction of your own country, preferring to permanently find out who is more evil, psychopathic, if you will, more prone to destroy what remains of the supposedly damned past. Contempt for everything that the ancestors did, multiplying by zero the heroic history of our country only because it was part of the history, supposedly of the empire - that, perhaps, is all that you have all been able to contribute to the history of Russia's development during this time.
  18. Vkd dvk Offline Vkd dvk
    Vkd dvk (Victor) 21 July 2019 00: 03
    -1

    Quote: Oleg Rambover
    Victor N. Yes Yes Yes. Russians are so stupid and limited people that it is better not to find such mediocrity as GDP in the whole country. Yes, my friend, Russophobe.

    Our mediocrity is a dime a dozen. For example, you. Perhaps more mediocre mediocrity is not found. Do not think to take part in the elections? You will succeed.
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 21 July 2019 00: 40
      0

      Quote: wkd dvk
      Our mediocrity is a dime a dozen.

      You flatter me, compare with the GDP itself, it is especially nice to hear this from such a developed person who has achieved unprecedented success as you. Leaders must participate in the elections, this is clearly not for me.
  19. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 21 July 2019 01: 58
    +1
    Putin has already led the government. Just at that time, the recession in the economy began and still does not stop. What - will we repeat it again?
  20. topograf Offline topograf
    topograf (topograf) 21 July 2019 03: 09
    0
    I read the comments and wept! There are so many “suffering” people (people) in Russia under the new Authority that they are already taking the hell! What potential is this ?! Well, if it (this potential) were sent in the right direction, how much electricity could be generated! Or, say, which one - to dig any channel (to connect the Caspian with the Indian Ocean). Yes, there are no more in Russia such "thinkers - giants" as Velikiy Raikin !!!
    1. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 21 July 2019 17: 47
      +3
      Your thought is generally correct, but turned in the wrong direction. You offer "this potential", that is, the people, to direct in the right direction. In other words, it is only at the expense of the people to solve the problems that arise. It is precisely this formulation of the question that causes much controversy. We are talking about turning the feudal (oligarchic) ​​potential into the right direction for the state and people. Agree, this is not the same thing.
  21. Nikolay Malyugin (Nikolai Malyugin) 21 July 2019 06: 52
    +1
    We have not yet decided on our judgments on the former leaders. We divide them into black and white. And this does not happen. We have not decided on the social system. If we approached capitalism, then we must take all its attributes. And these are taxes, and criminal penalties for conspiracy of persons in trade and services, and the definition of the middle class, and much more. A change of leader cannot be an end in itself. You need to see what adjustments need to be made. Talk less and do more.
    1. Hassan Abdukhalikov (Hassan Abdukhalikov) 21 July 2019 08: 43
      +3
      The modern system of Russia is all a little bit. A little bit of feudalism, capitalism, monarchism and socialism, to a lesser extent for appearance. So call this system Putinism, as Surkov called it.
      1. Citizen Mѣshkov (Sergѣi) 21 July 2019 19: 07
        +2
        Quote: Hassan Abdukhalikov
        The modern system of Russia is all a little bit. A little bit of feudalism, capitalism, monarchism and socialism, to a lesser extent for appearance. So call this system Putinism, as Surkov called it.

        I agree with your statement. And it is no accident that you put feudalism in the first place. According to the constitution, Russia is a social state. This was necessary to put in the first place. But it turned out that social tasks were present only for visibility. And for someone - as a cover.
        In my opinion, the overall arrangement should be:

        Monarchism - as a form of government, capitalism - working on social tasks, and feudalism should be gradually eradicated.
    2. Digital error Offline Digital error
      Digital error (Eugene) 21 July 2019 22: 05
      +2

      Quote: Nikolai Malyugin
      Talk less and do more.

      Well, about this V.V.P. and said - in December 2018:

      (https://tass.ru/ekonomika/5909243)
      - called on young people to go into business not in order to “get money”, but in order to leave behind a significant result. As an example, he cited the construction of the Crimean bridge, which was a business project, but a project needed by the country. He tactfully did not mention the contractors. Can you read between the lines? - There are coms to hammer grandmothers without you, and you, youth, work most importantly. I understand that.
  22. Hassan Abdukhalikov (Hassan Abdukhalikov) 21 July 2019 08: 39
    +1
    But what about demography and the economy?
  23. Vkd dvk Offline Vkd dvk
    Vkd dvk (Victor) 21 July 2019 09: 49
    0

    Quote: Oleg Rambover
    Quote: wkd dvk
    The mediocrity of us is a dime a dozen.

    You flatter me, compare with the GDP itself, it is especially nice to hear this from such a developed person who has achieved unprecedented success, like you. Leaders must participate in the elections, this is clearly not for me.

    Well, from modesty you will not die. You should be proud if you are compared with an extraordinary personality. But mediocrity is all different. You are not good for leadership in a public yard. Critically nibbling out from under the fence is the level of your ordinary.
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Rambover) 22 July 2019 19: 14
      0
      I really appreciate the comments of such a gifted, comprehensively developed personality, the genius of our generation, which has undoubted leadership qualities.
  24. Pooh Offline Pooh
    Pooh 21 July 2019 21: 54
    0
    The meeting continues. I will command the parade.
    1. topograf Offline topograf
      topograf (topograf) 23 July 2019 03: 57
      0
      And who, sir, have you appointed to command the parade? No, fire from such a gag !!! We will use the lot (a broken match) - whoever draws out, he commands the parade! lol soldier