The return of "Baikal": the new "Wing-SV" will be tested in 2,

11
The first test flight of the domestic return stage of the Krylo-SV launch vehicle should take place as early as 2021-2022. As part of the mission, a demonstrator with a mass-dimensional model of the unit will be used, through which the controlled descent will be tested at subsonic speeds. This was reported to the agency on the eve. TASS Director of Private Property Andrey Grigoryev.





Recall that the project “reusable” the first stage of the carrier was protected last year. The development of the apparatus "Wing-SV" was carried out by the Design Bureau. V. M. Myasishchev is a further development of the Baikal project.

The return of the stage is planned to be carried out by means of a jet engine, which will be launched after the rocket reaches the specified height and the wing opens. Grigoriev said this in his interview, specifying that when the set mark is reached, Krylo-SV will accelerate to hypersound, and then brake in the Earth’s atmosphere, followed by a smooth landing on the airfield.


As it became known, the Foundation for Advanced Research plans to create several demonstrators of the return stage for testing in 2021-2022. At the moment, a mathematical model of flight has already been developed, terms of reference have been prepared, design solutions have been determined, and optimal engine type and characteristics have been selected.

It is worth noting that the reuse of missile components could significantly reduce the cost of launches. A similar solution has already been implemented in the Falcon 9 carrier from SpaceX, the first step of which lands on a floating platform in the Atlantic Ocean.
  • https://timeshola.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    9 July 2019 18: 16
    A fully feasible option. Buran also sat in an unmanned version.
  2. -1
    10 July 2019 11: 14
    Disney branch in Russia released another cartoon ...
    1. 0
      11 July 2019 10: 19
      In vain the Buran project was inhibited in due time - now the American project looks like it.
      Do you think it will turn out to implement a cartoon in real life?
      1. +1
        11 July 2019 14: 09
        Why won't it work? Buran turned out, but it will be more complicated. And about the fact that Buran in vain slowed down - not a fact. It was very expensive, and the Americans are not going to build new ones either. Along the way, it was a dead end road, albeit an interesting one. If the Union had remained, maybe they would have seen its full-scale manned flight ... But, not destiny. The liberal market people were not interested in the Russian Federation as a space superpower. They themselves made a gas station out of the country, and now they themselves are scolding the current government for this. Apparently because the profit from the "gas station" was taken away from them, and sent, albeit partially, but to such projects ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      11 July 2019 14: 15
      Well, firstly, in Russia cartoons and without Disney were able to draw and are able to draw, and not worse for sure. And secondly, in the West, apparently, everything is from cartoons and goes to pants ... how impressionable, however ... cartoons after all ... Or just real experts, unlike you, know how, on the basis of what and why such "cartoons" are created ...
  3. +1
    16 July 2019 09: 42
    As far as I remember, they recognized it as a dead end branch in due time. The mechanisms of rotation of the wing, landing gear, greatly complicate the design + complication of the system leads to a greater likelihood of failures.
  4. 0
    17 July 2019 10: 25
    The first stage of the Falcon 9 is only occasionally safely brought to the platform. With an amateur’s glance, we can say that the method of returning the first stage of Lake Baikal will be more successful than the method used on Falcon 9. I assume that the return option will consume significantly more fuel than a disposable rocket to deliver a unit of cargo into orbit ... I wonder how much is it worth preparing to restart the returned stage?
    1. +1
      18 July 2019 07: 53
      It will be more exact the opposite: only sometimes it is not splashed.
    2. 0
      28 July 2019 16: 51
      "Only occasionally" - 5 unsuccessful landings occurred at the beginning of the landing system development and over the past 3 years there was only one unsuccessful splashdown, which even did not damage the engines. 37 successful landings, but yes, only "sometimes".
  5. -1
    22 July 2019 22: 43
    The idea is just wonderful, and very promising !!! It’s a pity that they dragged with her - it’s necessary to send manned space not 5, but 25 a year .... And she’s better than with Falcon 9 !!!
    1. 0
      28 July 2019 16: 55
      This method is better for light launch vehicles, and jet landing for heavy and super heavy vehicles - read the deputy. gene. designer RSC Energia Radugin in this regard. A rocket-dynamic landing, like the Falcon, is the only true path of development.